Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 861 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi all,

I have a Forerunner 935. I bought it 5 or so years ago and the battery is starting to go and I just think there's enough advancement that it's worth getting a new watch. When I got the Forerunner it was between that and I think the S60. The forerunner basically did everything that the S60 did except for a few specific golf things. So far as I could tell those were all things that would be turned off when you put it in tournament mode anyway and the forerunner had other non-golf stuff that was better.

What I'm trying to find out now is if the same thing is true. The S70 has some better golf specific things it does, but I think many of them (like the virtual caddie and pinpointer functions) are not legal for tournament play, which is all I really care about anyway. Is there much that the S70 does that the other two don't do that would be usable in tournaments? The Epix looks like it does a lot of what the S70 does, but it is a couple of hundred dollars more expensive. There's also the Forerunner 965, which is cheaper than the S70, but so far as I can tell doesn't have the specific targeting that you can get on the S70. 

I want to get the best of all worlds - something that's going to be suitable to wear all the time, has the golf features that I want and will keep decent track of workouts and general health, while not costing an arm and a leg. Does anyone have one of these and can share thoughts? There are plenty of youtube reviews around, but they don't seem to cover the tournament allowed features, which is most important to me.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

A couple of years back a friend was selling his Garmin watch and I trialed it for a couple of rounds to see whether I wanted it.  I found a minimal difference between that and using my Apple watch along with free golf apps on my iPhone.  I doubt watches are much better than the golf apps currently available.  Just check out this option before buying another watch.

What's in the bag

  • Taylor Made r5 dual Draw 9.5* (stiff)
  • Cobra Baffler 4H (stiff)
  • Taylor Made RAC OS 6-9,P,S (regular)
  • Golden Bear LD5.0 60* (regular)
  • Aidia Z-009 Putter
  • Inesis Tour 900 golf ball
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I had a Garmin S62. It was a really nice piece of hardware to use on course, in fact I would say it was the best golf watch I have ever used. I did not like the Garmin Golf app or the way the stat tracking worked compared to my previous ShotScope. I've since switched back to ShotScope simply for the statistics/shot tracking. If I wasn't interested in statistics and shot tracking, I'd still have the S62.

I know for the S62 I could turn off the features that are not legal in tournaments. I didn't particularly care for these features anyways, so I left them turned off all the time.

Garmin also put some thought into the design so it was nice as an everyday watch as well, but I switched to an Apple watch for that.

-Peter

  • :titleist: TSR2
  • :callaway: Paradym, 4W
  • :pxg: GEN4 0317X, Hybrid
  • :srixon: ZX 3-iron, ZX5 4-AW
  • :cleveland:  RTX Zipcore 54 & 58
  • L.A.B. Golf Directed Force 2.1
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I know it is old and antiquated but I still use my Garmin S40.
Tells me how far to the trap and green.
Dont need much more than that!

In my Grom:

Driver-Taylormade 10.5 Woods- Taylomade 3 wood, taylormade 4 Hybrid
Irons- Callaway Big Berthas 5i - GW Wedges- Titles Volkey  Putter- Odyssey protype #9
Ball- Bridgestone E6
All grips Golf Pride

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
4 minutes ago, Elmer said:

I know it is old and antiquated but I still use my Garmin S40.
Tells me how far to the trap and green.
Dont need much more than that!

Needs vs wants my man. 

Thanks all - re the apple watch, I like not having to charge my watch for a couple of weeks vs every day.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 861 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Wordle 1,854 4/6 ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 ⬜🟨⬜⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟨⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Day 27 (17 July 26) - Normally an 18 hole day, but due to commitments abbreviated the round to 9 holes (played the back nine at home course).  Had a solid session where even the worst miss (tee shot off 18) was fully playable.  Shot a solid 39 (6pars, 3bogies) - not dbls, no three putts - just boring golf.  
    • Overall, well said. People have to be very careful in trying to describe very complex problem in simple terms. In this case, it is a clear fundamental misunderstanding of Newton's 1st and 3rd laws.  To clarify more on the misinterpretation of Newton's 1st law. The exact interpretation of Newton's 1st Law....  "Every body continues in its state of rest, or of uniform motion in a straight line, unless it is compelled to change that state by forces impressed upon it" yea, a body will stay motionless unless a force acts upon it. An object will stay on its path of motion unless a force acts upon it.  I get it, complex physics problems are difficult. There is a lot of simplification done in most physics class when it is taught. A classic problem uses a frictionless surface. Projectile motion excludes drag and wind direction. Collisions are usually elastic. The golf swing is not a simple physics problem.  Yea, I think they got caught up the data on the graphs and are not truly understanding cause and effect.  If the golfer isn't first pushing into the ground, then the ground isn't going to push back.  The internal forces of the body create the motion, not the external forces from the ground. The ground isn't like what Psy uses to start his concert. 🤣 You probably need to be connected to the ground and have those GRF to help the body produce the motion you want. Your body has to move in the right way to produce the GRF which helps you move the body in the way you want. Body motion precedes the GRF.
    • I moved a few posts that were here to here:
    • I think that's mostly about lowering the CG. 🙂
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.