Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 7550 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I've had one for a while but I'm not sure how much I like it. I've marked lines on my balls since I first found the 'Line em up' little plastic line template. With the Check-Go I spin the ball and make a light line to use as a guide then I use the Line em up device to make my mark. What I've found is that it's hard to get the line centered on the equator with the Check-Go. If you mark just a fraction higher or lower than the equator you've got an off-center line to try to line up. However, there must be something to it because after marking a ball you can put it back in the Check-Go and it'll line right back up the same way (most of the time...some balls are probably not as far off balance).
IMO, there are worse ways to spend $25-30. If it helps a couple putts per round roll in it's worth it, and if it doesn't then you've got an expensive line maker.

Chris
What's in the bag?
Taylormade R7 Superquad
TaylorMade Burner 3W & 5W
Hogan Edge Hybrid 21*
Mizuno MX20 4-PWCleveland 588 GW & CG10 SWOdyssey 2-Ball Center ShaftTitleist NXT Tour

Posted
[QUOTE=If you mark just a fraction higher or lower than the equator you've got an off-center line to try to line up. Chris[/QUOTE]

I do exactly the same as you Chris and also find the the line is sometimes a little off. The thing I do is to put the "line em up" over it and look at the opposite side of the ball to the line em up, this along with what you can see through the slit shows if the line is to one side of the equator or not then you know where to draw the line - using the check-go line as a guide.

Does that make sense?

Anyway Dave Pelz reckons you should do this and give yourself everychance of making the putt...

Cheers

Posted
Yeah, that's where I got the idea from (David Pelz) and was wondering if this device made a difference.

********

Sign the slow play promise and petition


Posted
Well it does what it says on the tin and that is find the c of g of the ball. So if you subscribe to DP's views (which I do) then I think this is a good bit of kit. When I hit a put and it rolls true with the line on it and it misses the hole I know it was a bad read/pace and nothing else.

I think that it's worth the few pounds/dollars it costs.

Posted
Well I sold these at the golf shop for 2 years. We messed with it over and over and I have never seen it work. I do not think it will make a differnce either way. Its like the Sabona's If you think they are going to help with the pain they do.

Posted
I was wondering if anyone has used the "Check-GO sweet spot finder" (

Yes, I was a doubter.

By accident I found a Maxfli noodle that was "balanced" The complete line around the ball was a dead give away... I hit it a good 15 maybe 20 yards longer. I had already owned the Check-Go but did not find it useful? Surprisingly when I used it on new Noodle balls it did make a difference! Balanced noodles are hotter than unbalanced Noodles ? I have tried it on other brands but without the same success. My guess is it adds about 5%, thus 10 yds per 200 yds reg drive. The longer the ball the more you see a difference. Roll does seem truer on putts as well. I have actually had straight putts stop with the line straight at the hole! Really freaks out the opposition!

Driver :T Edge CB-1 or Cally Mini Driver 14* or GBB 11*
Tour Edge CB2 15* 3 wood (Best Club Ever!)

Callaway XR 5Wood (New BCE!)

Hybrids: Nike SQ 23*  Tour Edge 28*

Irons: TMade RAC  7-PW   T Flight 56 SWedge
Putter: Odyssey 2 Ball Blade, SStroke flatside to hole


Posted
I have one. I don't like it because it doesn't allow you to make a nice smooth line because of the high speed and the dimples. I have found that just putting a dot at the top (ie, side of the sweet spot) is a little less of an eyesore than a fat messed up line. Plus the dot usually makes a weird little astrological looking kind of mark.
R7 Quad 9.5*
Cleveland Launcher 13*
Cleveland Launcher 15*
Ben Hogan C455 21*
MP-33 PW-4 iron MP Series 56* & 60*Corza MonzaProV1

Note: This thread is 7550 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Oh man. As you can see above, Manavian mocked me for not realizing they were getting the 130° from BOTH shoulders. Apparently, though, Manavian is also wrong, as Andy said I was lying when I cited what Manavian had written: The next thing Andy says that's both accurate and clearly stated will be the first. I replied to that post with something like: Tell Manavian who said "only counting the abduction/adduction of one shoulder rather than 2." One of the issues with “bad” information is that y’all can’t even get on the same page. You've not shown that Bryson has 130° range of motion in either shoulder separately P1 to P7. I’ve shown the numbers. You’ve name-called and just said “nuh uh” repeatedly. Did you see the AMG IG video? Of course you have. Wrapping your head around the distance the shoulder travels yet, Andy? Andy later commented to explain how he got his range of motion number (apologies to whoever @iacac and @icaca are on Instagram, who are going to be wondering just what in the hell they've gotten themselves into). Oh boy. Adding the numbers in one direction and then adding them again going back is not a "range" of motion. If I can bend my knees 140°, I don't claim to have 280° range of motion because I have two knees nor because I can also extend my knees 140° after bending them. Bryson (with a driver, again — I used his iron swing) abducts about 65° (and bends his elbow a ton) with the driver. Then he adducts 50… and then another 15°… to end up right back where he started. This is exactly the equivalent of saying that I bend my knees 140° and then straighten them, creating a range of 280°. It's so silly I don't even have much of a response. It falls down completely on its own. It doesn't need even a nudge.
    • Can't remember who but some wise guy said "Arms up, body around"..😉. Anywho, been working on pinning my lead arm less and less to my chest in the BS. Decent progress with the arms, need a lot of work and trust for the 'body around' part. 
    • Wordle 1,823 6/6 ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟩 ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜🟩⬜🟩 🟩⬜🟩⬜🟩 🟩⬜🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,823 5/6 ⬜⬜🟩⬜🟩 ⬜⬜🟩⬜🟩 ⬜⬜🟩⬜🟩 ⬜⬜🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,823 4/6* ⬛🟨⬛⬛🟩 ⬛⬛🟩⬛🟩 ⬛⬛🟩⬛🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.