Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6376 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

0  

2 members have voted

  1. 1. back foot at address

    • back foot slightly closed to target, 11 o' clock
      2
    • back foot perpendicular to targert , 12 o' clock
      33
    • back foot slightly open away from target; 1 o' clock or a little less
      35
    • back foot open away from target; more than 1' o clock
      4


Recommended Posts

Posted
I think the positioning of the back foot is a feel thing. To me having it at 12:00 feels a bit restrictive. Out toward 1:00 (between 12-1) gives me an athletic stance to make the pass. I don't think there is a right or wrong answer, and I don't think I have a distance problem...

Driver: Cobra S2 9.5 Fubuki 73 Stiff | Wood: Titleist 909H 17 Aldila Voodoo Stiff | Irons: Titleist ZB 3-5, ZM 6-PW DG S300 | Wedges: Titleist Vokey SMTC 50.08, 54.11, 60.04 DG S200 | Putter: Scotty Cameron Fastback 1.5 33" | Ball: Titleist Pro V1x


Posted
what is the purpose of letting the foot angle out from 12 o clock? how does it help the swing at all?

Greg Norman said he flared his back foot at address because he and Butch Harmon determined that it would help cut down on the lateral lower body drive that he had done to excess (where his back foot would slide toward the front foot, he would end up in a reverse C posture, and he would block shots to the right).

Nick Price said the following on page 90 of his The Swing book: "I point my left foot toward the target slightly and the right away from it. I advocate this position because it creates more balance in the swing. Although it has been fashionable in the past to keep the right foot at 90 degrees to the target line, I think that this is more restricting than helpful for many golfers. Unless you are extremely supple it is harder to make a full turn because your right foot placed in such a way will effectively block the turn. You can still build up the necessary torque or resistance in your right side by having the foot turned to the right 10 degrees." Price goes on later in the page to say: "And here's the benefit of turning the right foot out: It allows for an increase in swing width, as it makes it easier to take the club back a greater distance, to stretch back father. It is also easier to create a bigger shoulder turn this way, as long as your lower half remains stable ." Price continues: "Pointing the right foot out will not compromise lower body stability. I originally felt it might, but practice proved otherwise." "But I never would have gone ahead with this had it reduced control of lower-body stability. It did nothing of the kind." Nick Faldo writes on page 21 of his book Golf - The Winning Formula : "If you have the right foot too straight in front or even turned in a little, which was my old fault, it restricts the hip and body turn in the backswing." he goes on later in the page to say: "If you turn the right foot out excessively it is difficult to get the foot vertical, the sole of the shoe out behind you, by the end of the swing."

In my bag:

Driver: Burner TP 8.5*
Fairway metals/woods: Burner TP 13* Tour Spoon, and Burner TP 17.5*
Irons: RAC MB TP Wedges: RAC TPPutter: Spider Ball: (varies ) (Most of the time): TP Red or HX Tour/56---------------------------------------------------


Posted
I appreciate you showing proof about this Avid Golfer. I learn golf by this philosophy: Not only do you have to tell a player what they should be doing, but you must tell them why they should do it and how it helps. You covered those nicely with the quotes.

That said, I still think a square right foot is fundamentally correct, and a turned right foot is merely an adjustment. To quote Hogan's book: "The truly fortunate golfer is the player who needs to make the smallest number of adjustments."

Posted
That said, I still think a square right foot is fundamentally correct, and a turned right foot is merely an adjustment. To quote Hogan's book: "The truly fortunate golfer is the player who needs to make the smallest number of adjustments."

I don't view the foot flare as a

fundamental in the golf swing. Like I mentioned in post 3 of the thread there are tour pros who have advocated and used both square and flared feet successfully over long periods of time, so its my view that it is of little consequence which a player uses. Like previously noted if a player has a specific fault that they are trying to guard against or compensate for then one may function better than the other.

In my bag:

Driver: Burner TP 8.5*
Fairway metals/woods: Burner TP 13* Tour Spoon, and Burner TP 17.5*
Irons: RAC MB TP Wedges: RAC TPPutter: Spider Ball: (varies ) (Most of the time): TP Red or HX Tour/56---------------------------------------------------


  • 3 weeks later...
Posted
I open both front foot and back foot at address, not much, just enough to allow me more coil on the backswing and then more turn on the follow through. Especially as we all get older, the easier it is for us to turn, the longer we can maintain our power and more than likely, ease some of our little aches and pains after a round.

Driver: TaylorMade r7 460 / 11.5 degrees
Irons: Titleist 822 OS (4, 5, 6)  Titleist 962 (7, 8, 9, P, G)
Putter: Tear Drop
Ball: Precept Laddie
Wedges: Golfsmith Snake Eyes 56 degrees / 60 degrees

18 Hole Low:  67   /  9 Hole Low:  31


Posted
I used to do the squre foot thing but i found it put an uncomfortable amount of pressure on the inside of both knees, and caused me to snap at the ball from the top with my upperbody instead of swinging with everything intact. I opened up slightly and it has been much more comfortable for me.
THE WEAPONS CACHE..

Titleist 909 D2 9.5 Degree Driver| Titleist 906f4 13.5 degree 3-Wood | Titleist 909 17 & 21 degree hybrid | Titleist AP2 irons
Titleist Vokey Wedges - 52 & 58 | Scotty Cameron Studio Select Newport 2 Putter | ProV1 Ball

Posted
I've ultimately migrated into a slightly flared right foot as well; it seemed to add a tiny bit more pop and I do think it allows me to lengthen the swing a little bit. Additionally, the poster who mentioned the additional strain on the inside of his knees from the 90º right foot position had the same problem I did. The flared foot does feel more athletic.

Still, this is a matter of comfort and taste, not a question of fundamental superiority.
In the bag 8/12/09:
R9 w/ 63g S Fubuki | 909F2 13.5º | 909H 19º | MP-67 w/ Project X 5.5, 3-PW | Spin Milled 52â¢04, 56â¢08, 60â¢04 | BC1, 35" | Tour One | uPro

Hcp: 5.9
Trend: 5.2

Note: This thread is 6376 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
    • Hi Jack.  Welcome to The Sand Trap forum.   We're glad you've joined.   There is plenty of information here.   Enjoy!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.