Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast!
IGNORED

Two Members Gone

iacas

By iacas
in Announcements & Tech Support

 Share
Note: This thread is 6341 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Administrator
iacas Hall of Fame Member

iacas

Posted
  • Administrator
Posted
Two members have recently been banned to differing degrees.

rogerhuang was banned for sending derogatory PMs to me regarding my wife, a business I'd sold several years ago, and all sorts of off-the-wall things. He did so unprompted and after several days of inactivity, so I have no idea what prompted it. This came within a few weeks of several somewhat racist threads for which many other users gave rogerhuang negative reputation.

joshtpa was banned for lying. He modified something I said to him and then "quoted" me to another member. I'll put up with a lot of stuff in private messages from people, but outright lying is never one of 'em.

Another member was also sent a PM about reputation abuse. To be clear, reputation should not be used for the reasons "thanks for the +rep" or "you need some +rep." Reputation - both good and bad - should be used for exceptional posts, again either good or bad. Reputation should not be used to suck up, "just because," or as thanks for someone else giving you positive reputation. Reputation, ideally, should also be anonymous - both good and bad; for bad because it inhibits "retaliation" and for good because it inhibits abuse of the "thanks" type I mentioned previously.

On a personal note, you know what, I sometimes totally suck. We all do. However, if you have a problem with me or any other member, private messages TO THAT PERSON are always the way to go. Never is such a discussion better in public and never is it better to talk about someone "behind their back." A long-standing belief of mine is that I'll be the first guy to tell a friend when he screws up, and I expect the same from him. I'm brutally honest, but I can handle the same. If you have an issue, send a PM.

Erik J. Barzeski — ⛳ I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • Author, Lowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

Mr Eagle Dedicated Member

Mr Eagle

Posted
Posted
People who lie cheat and send dodgy PMs have no place on a golf forum let alone a golf course. Well done captian and good riddence to bad blood

In The Bag
Mizuno MX 560 Driver
Taylor made 3 wood
Mizuno HIFLI 21*
Mizuno MX 25's 4-pwMizuno MX series wedges 50, 56*/11 & 60*Bettinardi C02 putter4 bottles of pilsner,2 packs cigars


  • Administrator
iacas Hall of Fame Member

iacas

Posted
  • Author
  • Administrator
Posted
People who lie cheat and send dodgy PMs have no place on a golf forum let alone a golf course. Well done captian and good riddence to bad blood

If anyone has any questions, PM me about it. I forgot to close this one, but will do so now.

Erik J. Barzeski — ⛳ I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • Author, Lowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

Note: This thread is 6341 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up

  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).

  • Posts

    • xrayvizhen
      Differential vs Course Handicap

      By xrayvizhen · Posted

      I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • 5amZ
      "5 Minutes Daily" Practice Challenge

      By 5amZ · Posted

      Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • WillieT
      "5 Minutes Daily" Practice Challenge

      By WillieT · Posted

      Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • mdl
      Differential vs Course Handicap

      By mdl · Posted

      Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
    • dennyjones
      New From the UK

      By dennyjones · Posted

      Hi Jack.  Welcome to The Sand Trap forum.   We're glad you've joined.   There is plenty of information here.   Enjoy!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

  I accept