Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6353 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Hey right now I am considering the mizuno mp 60 for my new set of irons. Do you have any thoughts or comments about them? Are they forgiving?

Yeah. A am a consistent ball striker but I want a set of irons that I can get away with the miss hits. Thanks for your input.

In my Bag-

Driver: 909 d3 Matrix Ozik XCON 6 stiff
3 wood: 906 f4 Graphite Design YS-6+
Irons: r7 tp Dynamic Gold S300Wedges: vokey spin milled Putter: tei3 newport 2


Posted
Can't go wrong with Mizunos.
What I Play:

Driver: Sasquatch SUMO² 9.5º Stiff
Hybrid: HiBore 16º (3W replacement)
Irons: Staff Ci6 3-PW StiffWedges: Vokey Spin Milled 54.10 60.04Putter: Newport Studio Style 35"Ball: Pro V1xAge: 15

Posted
heres the deal, you should get the fli-hi irons in the 3, 4 irons, and then get the MP 60s in the 6-Pw. These irons are sweet, up until about a week ago, ive hated mizunos. I had one bad experience on the range with them and i never gave them a second thought, till the pro at my course got the MP 60's and let me hit them. these are crazy irons, i would love to get them, but i bought i10s this year already. They look awesome, they play awesome, and they are one of the more forgiving players irons. Demo them, if you cant hit em, go with the 57s

909D3 9.5° w/ Matrix Ozik Xcon 7 Lime Green Exotics cb2 15 Aldila DVS S-85 Slingshot 17° UST Irod S-110g G10 21° TFC S-129g i10 S300 Green Dot 4-PW Vokey Spin Milled Black Nickel 56° and 60° Made for the Tour AOP Newport PP

Age 16

Home CoursesRoyal Hawk...


Posted
With your 5.3 index i think you would like them. I had them for 2 years and when i was swinging well they were terrific. Issue for me, was that when i was not swinging well, they were difficult. I grew up with offset eye 2's so without as much offset, this might have been an issue also. I have a good friend (approx. 7 hcp) who just got them this year and he is loving them also.

I have since moved back to Cleveland CG golds - more forgiving for the bad days, and just as good for the good days.

Miz makes a great product - and hold their value well, if you get them and decide they are not right for you. Good Luck.

Cobra L5V - Just waiting for the ZL to have a lower price
Cobra F Speed 2006 3 wood - very underrated 3 wood
Adams Pro Idea 3H and 4H

Taylormade Burner XD 4-AW
Cleveland 48*, 52*, and 60*

Odyssey F7 2 Ball


Posted
with a 5.3 index I'd have to say you're a pretty damn good ball striker. you'll love em. they're as forgiving as a 1/2 cb can be. mis hits tend to lose 10 - 15 yards and be a little right. but when you're stroking it well, it's rewarding. i got mine when i was a 20 hc last year...and i've seen, felt, and heard nothing but improvements in my game. shoot, i'd say you'll fall in love with them the minute you pure a shot.
DJ Yoshi
Official DJ: Rutgers Football
Boost Mobile Tour
In My Bag
HiBoreXL 9.5 White Board D63 Stiff Exotics CB2 5 Wood, Exotics CB3 3 Wood MP-60 5.5 Flighted Shafts 54 & Cleveland CG-10 60 Newport 2

Posted
I am about to get them as a 21 hdcp, I don't see why you wouldn't like them.

I am very consistent with my irons, and routinely practice with a set of 1970's Spalding blades. I love the risk / reward of the blades, only if I could get dial my driving I would be in the mid teens regarding hdcp.


Anyway, I am getting them with DG R300

Blade Stand Bag
905R 11.5 R flex
Tight Lies 3 Wood
Ci7 Irons 4-GW R Flex
Vokey SM Wedges 54 / 58Classic Putter #1 34"ProV1 or U-Tri Tour or E5+


Posted
if you want to get away with the mishits then the MP's really aren't for you ..

I so wanted to get a set of blades when I got my new set earlier this year .. I am a very consistent ball striker hitting between 10 - 13 greens a round.

For some reason the mizzy's just weren't my cup of tea, the mis hits I really felt.

I tried about 10 sets of irons over 3 days before choosing the tour burners. These are great on mishits .. my misses are generally a few grooves down on the club and about a half a ball in on the heel. These irons only lost about 5 - 10 yards of distance on those mishits and still flew straight.

When I played 5 times a week through college I played titleist tour model blades .. after college, I got tommy armour 845's .. played those until I got the taylors.

it's a matter of just hitting as many as you can at the range, seeing what the ball flight does on your usual mishits and seeing what club performs the best .. that's what mine came down too.

Sean

What's in the bag:
Driver: TaylorMade R11S 9 degree.  Set to upright 8 degree.  Aldila RIP Alpha 60s X flex shaft.

3 wood: TaylorMade 13 degree RocketBallz (coming shortly).. X Flex Matrix X Conn.

Hybrids: 2iron / 4iron Taylor Burner Rescue.

Irons: 5 - PW 2008 Model Year Titleist AP2

Wedges: 49*, 54* 60* Cleveland 588 Rusties.

Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi Long.

Balls: Titleist Pro VX

Bag: Titleist Black / Red Staff


  • Moderator
Posted
Since you're a 5.3 and "want to get away from the mishits," I'm guessing that you're playing blades. In which case the MP-60s will give you appreciably more forgiveness than you're used to. They won't eliminate mishits, but they'll smooth out those strikes that are a little off.

Definitely wait until September to buy, however, or at least use the pending release of the new MP-52s and 62s (due out then) in your negotiations. The price of the MP-60s should drop (if they haven't already). The MP-52s will be more forgiving than the 60s, and the 62s seem placed as a replacement for the 60s. Personally, I'm thinking of getting a combo set of the 52s and 62s. The specs are reasonably close in the 7-8 iron of each.

Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend.
Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read.
--Groucho Marx

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Well, now I play cavity backs not blades and every once in a while on the range I put impact tape on the iron and I am amazed on how forgiving they are with almost no distance loss. I really just want a forged, more workable club that still performs on the heel and toe hits.

I have heard so much talk about mizuno irons and how amazing they feel when they are struck well. I can't yet afford the mp 52 or mp 62 when they come out but the mizuno mp 60 falls in between my $250- $400 price range.

In my Bag-

Driver: 909 d3 Matrix Ozik XCON 6 stiff
3 wood: 906 f4 Graphite Design YS-6+
Irons: r7 tp Dynamic Gold S300Wedges: vokey spin milled Putter: tei3 newport 2


Note: This thread is 6353 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.