Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6333 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
What are the expected performance differences with putters that are the same in every respect except shaft position.

I'm seeing more putters offered now with center shaft positions.

What does this offer?
909D Comp 9.5* (house MATRIX OZIK XCON-6)
Burner Superfast 3 & 5 woods (house MATRIX OZIK XCON-4.8)
G15 Hybrid 23* (AWT shaft)
G5 5 iron-PW-46*, UW-50*, SW-54 & LW-58 (AWT shaft)
Studio Select Newport 2 Mid SlantGrips: PING cords & Golf Pride New Decade Multi-Coumpound Bag: C-130...

Posted
I think it mostly has to do with visual preference... although maybe a severely toed putt would twist the putter head less?

I choose my putter in the center shafted version because it fit my eye a tad better.
My Clubs: Callaway FT-i Tour LCG 9.5° w/ Matrix Ozik Xcon 6 stiff; Sonartec GS Tour 14° w/ Graphite Design Red Ice 70 stiff; Adams Idea Pro 2h(18°) & 3h(20°) w/ Aldila VS Proto 80 stiff; Adams Idea Pro Forged 4-PW w/ TT Black Gold stiff; Cleveland CG12 DSG RTG 52°-10° & 58°-10°; Odyssey...

Posted

I just picked up a center shaft putter. I think they may be better for pendulum swings. I also think that it was easier to "feel" even a slight twist which shoud help me correct mistakes.

On the flip side, it could just be the latest fad..

Drivers:
FT-i Draw 9* W/Grafalloy Red
Sumo2 5900 9.5* W/Grafalloy Red

Irons: A3OS 3-PW Graphite/Steel regularWedges: A3OS GW, SW, LWPutter: Rossa Monza SpiderLittle round white thing:

Posted
What are the expected performance differences with putters that are the same in every respect except shaft position.

There is no difference in performance. It is the preference for different folks - in my case, a pendulum stroke.

STR8 Dymo 10.5
Dymo 3W
Mid Rescue 3
MP-33 4-PW
Eidolon 52* GW LW, SW Titleist Bullseye Putter


Posted
although maybe a severely toed putt would twist the putter head less?

Also, the same with hitting it on the heel. That was my reaoning for trying it out, although my putter is not quite in the center, it was the closest I found at the time I was looking. I feel that I keep the putter head square even on off center hits. I have not putted as well with any other putter I have ever had. It's not like I make a ton of one-putts, but my longer putts I'm leaving in a better position to make the second.

Then again, it could all be in my head and have nothing to do with the position of the shaft on the putter head. That's OK too, as long as it helps me putt better.
My Equipment:
Northwestern 3-, 5-, 7- and 9-wood;
Goldwin AVDP Irons (5-10 plus PW);
U.S. Golf 60 degree wedge;
See-More Putter; Bushnell Yardage Pro 1000 Rangefinder;Golflogix GPS.

Posted
I don't know but i haven't had much success with center shafted putters. They don't really fit my stroke. This may be random but how do you put the thing with your clubs on the bottom.

Taylormade R7 460
Lynx Parallax 15 Degree
Nickent 3DX Ironwood 18 degree
Callaway X-18's
Titleist Vokey Spin Milled 56 degreeOdyssey Black Series No. 1


Posted
The center shaft putters are likely face balanced and for the straight back and straight through aka "Pelz" putters. There may be toe weighted putters with a center shaft though I don't know for certain and that would seem to be kind contradictory to the "Utley" approach. Face balanced putters can have the shaft offset though. You have to balance them on your finger to find out though if the specs don't tell you otherwise

Posted
I've had similar experiences with the swing type. My 8 year old white hot center-shafted works much better with my pendulum swing than the more traditional ping blade I picked up a couple months ago.

In the Vector:

Driver - Hibore XL 9.5
Woods - exotics cb2 15* 906f4 18.5*
Hybrid - clk 20Irons - MP-33 (4-P)Wedges - oil can vokey's 52.08, SM56.10, SM60.08Putters - Studio Laguna 2.5Ball - Touri


Posted
I use an Odyssey centre shafted putter b/c I have a square pendulum swing. It's definitely not for everyone and I actually find it to be more sensitive to the line you're aiming for - be off a little and the end result is that you're much further off than a heel based putter but hit it square and the result is great (at least for me).

Posted
I have been looking at center shafted putters because I have a straight back straight through putting stroke.

The new Scotty coming out is a center shafted putter... but its going to have to knock my socks off to get me to switch from my spider.

13 Wedges
1 Putter


Posted
Thanks for the education.

It does make better sense now.

I read further in Utley's book last night and the matter was explained a bit.


I can see where these models would be great for a SBST stroke. Good to know.
909D Comp 9.5* (house MATRIX OZIK XCON-6)
Burner Superfast 3 & 5 woods (house MATRIX OZIK XCON-4.8)
G15 Hybrid 23* (AWT shaft)
G5 5 iron-PW-46*, UW-50*, SW-54 & LW-58 (AWT shaft)
Studio Select Newport 2 Mid SlantGrips: PING cords & Golf Pride New Decade Multi-Coumpound Bag: C-130...

Posted
Our Center Shafted putter was made for ease of alignment. Although a face balanced putter is great for the SBST stroke, if you look at most of the premier SBST putters (Mickelson, Loren Roberts) they use heel shafted putters with lots of toe hang.
Mike

Note: This thread is 6333 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I caught a video on this driver; the face tech seems crazy. Looking at the heat map for ball speed, hitting it basically anywhere on the face only loses a few percent ball speed. The surprising and counter intuitive part to me was that for flat faced clubs, ball speed loss is directly proportional to distance loss. For clubs with bulge and roll this is apparently not true. The surprising part of that story being that the max distance potential looks to be a tiny pee sized area for this driver, and I feel in general for drivers. The counter intuitive part being (the myth?) that blade irons have a pee sized sweet spot and missing that tiny spot causes dramatic losses. And that modern drivers, maybe 2017 on, have massive sweet spots and are ultra forgiving. Where in reality, if this heat map data is valid and reliable, it might be a bit of the opposite. This insane tech driver appears to have a pea sized "sweet spot" while Mizuno Pro 241 irons are 28% more forgiving compared to the average of all clubs measured. Not compared to other players irons, compared to all clubs from all categories, players to SGI! The Pro 241 being essentially just a solid chunk of metal with no "tech" at all. Which for me devolves into a whole mess of what is forgiveness really? And in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?  
    • Wordle 1,667 3/6 🟨🟨⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,667 3/6 ⬜⬜🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,667 5/6* ⬛⬛🟧⬛⬛ ⬛⬛🟧⬛⬛ ⬛⬛🟧⬛⬛ 🟧🟧🟧⬛⬛ 🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧
    • Wordle 1,667 3/6 ⬜🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜⬜🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Now we’re getting all science-y.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.