Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6317 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I am a high handi capper and have been using a 3 wood to drive with. A friend gave me his old Titleist 983K it is a 9.5 with a regular shaft. I really only hit just a few balls with it. My main thing is just having something that I can hit decent with on my drives. Just dont know if I should stay with my 3 wood or learn to hit the driver and also is the newer technology better on the newer drivers than the 983K is. Thanks for any info.

Titleist 907 D2 Driver
Nike Sasquatch 2 3 wood
Nickent 2 Genex Ironwood
Nickent 4DX 20*
Nickent 3DX 26*Nickent 3DX RC 6-PWCleveland CG11 52* Cleveland CG11 56* Odyssey 992 Putter


Posted
I am a high handi capper and have been using a 3 wood to drive with. A friend gave me his old Titleist 983K it is a 9.5 with a regular shaft. I really only hit just a few balls with it. My main thing is just having something that I can hit decent with on my drives. Just dont know if I should stay with my 3 wood or learn to hit the driver and also is the newer technology better on the newer drivers than the 983K is. Thanks for any info.

Steve, the 983k is an excellent driver.

However , compared to more recent drivers, the head on the 983k is relatively small (365cc vs 460cc). For a high capper, you will probably be better off with a bigger and more forgiving driver. If you want to stick with Titleist and want something that you might be able to pick up fairly cheap, I would recommend the Titleist 905R. It is a full 460cc head and is widely considered to be one of the best drivers Titleist has ever made. If you are going to spend a little money, and are open to other brands, then I would say just go out to stores, ranges, demo days, etc. and just hit whatever you can get your hands on until you find one you like.

Posted
i had a 983 k and it was great. sure its not the newest but plenty good

Tour Burner 9.5 w real Diamana 63 S
906f4 15.5 Proforce V2 S
909H 19 Diamana S
755 4-PW
Vokey 50/56/60Yes! NatalieBushnell Medalist w/ PinseekerI'll play just about any ball


Posted
Steve, the 983k is an excellent driver.

I agree with Harry, although I will make the point that the 983k might be a good transitional driver to work with for a while, especially since it was a gift. A bigger and more forgiving driver is definitely better, but if the OP is used to hitting with a 3 wood, the large head size of the 460cc might be a little off-putting. To each his own.

Twitter - @rubofthegreen | Xbox 360 - zilegati


Posted
I agree with Harry, although I will make the point that the 983k might be a good transitional driver to work with for a while, especially since it was a gift. A bigger and more forgiving driver is definitely better, but if the OP is used to hitting with a 3 wood, the large head size of the 460cc might be a little off-putting. To each his own.

You know what, I completely missed that the 983k was a gift. I misread and thought he was thinking about buying the 983k from his friend.

Steve, swing away with the 983k until you are ready to buy a driver. It's an excellent driver.

Posted
Steve, swing away with the 983k until you are ready to buy a driver. It's an excellent driver.

Totally agree. For free it is a great driver. I actually still have a 983E and I hit it longer and straighter than any of the newer, bigger drivers that are out there today.

I will judge my rounds much more by the quality of my best shots than the acceptability of my worse ones.


Posted
Thanks

Yes it was a gift. I have just gotten comfortable with the 3 wood on the tee so I believe I will try the driver at the driving range.

Thanks

Titleist 907 D2 Driver
Nike Sasquatch 2 3 wood
Nickent 2 Genex Ironwood
Nickent 4DX 20*
Nickent 3DX 26*Nickent 3DX RC 6-PWCleveland CG11 52* Cleveland CG11 56* Odyssey 992 Putter


Posted
Just came in from hitting the 983K I am looking I guess at the positives. I hit about 20 balls. My longest went 30 yards longer than my longest ever with using my 3 wood. Most of my balls went right not a slice just went to the right. There was a couple sliced but tthe majority just went to the right. Lately I have been concentrating slowing my backswing and not overswinging. I also been trying to keep my grip loose. I also been working on keeping my left arm straight and keeping my right elbow inside on my backswing. I tried rolling my wrist on my forward swing and that seemed to help some in keeping the ball straighter. Thanks looks like I have found a driver I just need to perfect my swing.

Titleist 907 D2 Driver
Nike Sasquatch 2 3 wood
Nickent 2 Genex Ironwood
Nickent 4DX 20*
Nickent 3DX 26*Nickent 3DX RC 6-PWCleveland CG11 52* Cleveland CG11 56* Odyssey 992 Putter


Posted
983K is a great driver head. for a beginning golfer you might find the percussion center is small. you don't get the whole face like you would with a Cobra head. It is still a great driver. I would use it at the range for practice and then pull out big headed driver and it will seem like one of those plastic toy clubs for kids and you'll just feel that you cannot miss hit it.

Taylormade Driver HT
Taylormade 3 HT

Mcgregor 7w
Vulcan irons 5-P
Solus 53 61

Vokey 56

Scotty Caneron Flange/ Ping Cushin

Srixon ZStar

71 gold tees

bring cash


Posted
Steve, the 983k is an excellent driver.

I agree with Harry, the 983K has a small sweet spot compared to other drivers that you can purchase for about $150 - $200

Titleist 910 D2 9.5 Driver
Titleist 910 F15 & 21 degree fairway wood
Titleist 910 hybrid 24 degree
Mizuno Mp33 5 - PW
52/1056/1160/5

"Yonex ADX Blade putter, odyssey two ball blade putter, both  33"

ProV-1


Posted
I borrowed our club pro's to test drive one week. I liked it and could put it out there about 280 on my good swings, so I would say the technology is good. But I agree with the other guys, it is fairly small. However, compared to the three wood you have been using, I think it would only be an improvement from what you have been hitting...

Callaway FT-9 Tour 9.5* with Prolaunch Blue S| Adams InSight XTD A3 15* FW | Adams IDEA a3 hybrid irons | Callaway 52* X-Tour Forged wedge | Titleist Bob Vokey SM56* | PING Day putter

Favorite Ball: Srixon Z Star X

Home Course: Majestic Pines GCage: 16


Posted
... A friend gave me his old Titleist 983K it is a 9.5 with a regular shaft. ...

The 983K is still my choice and those specs. sound reasonable. I feel the 983K is more responsive than either of my 905's or any of the other big headed drivers I've tried. That's probably just another way of saying the sweet spot is smaller, as several other posters have already replied.

In one of your posts you mention that some of the initial balls went out to the right. My only comment is if the shaft is a Grafalloy Blue, even in a regular flex, it will take a reasonable swing speed (90 mph minimum?) to make it work. The Blue regular flex is similar to a lot of other stiff shafts (the popular ProForce V2 stiff for example).

Mike


Titleist 905T 10.5°, 5W Golfsmith SuperSteel 17°, 4W MacGregor Tourney laminate 21°, 3-P MacGregor Colokrom M85 reissue, Snake Eyes 54° and 58° wedge, Odyssey Dual Force 330 blade

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
The shaft is a Titleist 4560.

Titleist 907 D2 Driver
Nike Sasquatch 2 3 wood
Nickent 2 Genex Ironwood
Nickent 4DX 20*
Nickent 3DX 26*Nickent 3DX RC 6-PWCleveland CG11 52* Cleveland CG11 56* Odyssey 992 Putter


Posted
The shaft is a Titleist 4560.

I don't know the specs on that shaft but have hit it, my guess is you should be all set.

Mike


Titleist 905T 10.5°, 5W Golfsmith SuperSteel 17°, 4W MacGregor Tourney laminate 21°, 3-P MacGregor Colokrom M85 reissue, Snake Eyes 54° and 58° wedge, Odyssey Dual Force 330 blade

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
where on the web stores can i get a new one? all i see on ebay are used ones.

ISLAND PAR

In my Mizuno Bag:
TBD, MacGregor 4W(16*), 3H(20*),4H(23*), 5H(26*) Mizuno MX-900 6-PWAdams Watson 2010 Wedges (GW, SW, LW),Ping Wolverine Putter "But I thought you meant these golfers from our club when you said you needed SANDBAGGERS to help with the flood...


Posted
i doubt anyone has new ones anymore, and why would you buy a brand new one, when for the same price you can get something with newer tech that is better. i just bought a d1 and put my 905r up for sale, it is amazingly forgiving.

Tour Burner 9.5 w real Diamana 63 S
906f4 15.5 Proforce V2 S
909H 19 Diamana S
755 4-PW
Vokey 50/56/60Yes! NatalieBushnell Medalist w/ PinseekerI'll play just about any ball


Posted
hi erikpmort,

i'm having problems hitting big headed drivers (i know, weird and should go to a pro etc., etc.,) but am hitting my 3 wood very consistently like steve617. I tried a friend's 983K and was a lot more in the fairway than my 460 cc driver. This smaller headed driver helped me stay in the fairway and give me additional distance over my 3 wood.

But i guess you're right its not worth getting a new 983K for a price similar to the newer ones. Will probably check out 2nd hand ones. Thanks!

ISLAND PAR

In my Mizuno Bag:
TBD, MacGregor 4W(16*), 3H(20*),4H(23*), 5H(26*) Mizuno MX-900 6-PWAdams Watson 2010 Wedges (GW, SW, LW),Ping Wolverine Putter "But I thought you meant these golfers from our club when you said you needed SANDBAGGERS to help with the flood...


Posted
Yesterday I played 18 holes and used the 983K on all holes except the par 3's and I have to say even though I sliced the ball a couple of times bad. I hit the ball much more consistant with the 983K than I did with the 3 wood.

Titleist 907 D2 Driver
Nike Sasquatch 2 3 wood
Nickent 2 Genex Ironwood
Nickent 4DX 20*
Nickent 3DX 26*Nickent 3DX RC 6-PWCleveland CG11 52* Cleveland CG11 56* Odyssey 992 Putter


Note: This thread is 6317 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.