Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6232 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I hit them at a Golf Galaxy in the simulator. For comparison, I also hit an identical X-20 Tour and couldn't tell a difference between them, although, in all fairness, I only hit the 6 iron in each with about 10-15 shots each.
Driver: SQ DYMO STR8-Fit
4 Wood: SQ DYMO
2H (17*), 4H (23*) & 5H (26*): Fli-Hi CLK
Irons (5-6): MX-900; (7-PW): MP-60
Wedges (51/6*): MP-T Chrome; (56/13): MP-R ChromePutter: White Hot XG 2-Ball CSPreferred Ball: e5+/e7+/B330-RXGPS Unit: NEOPush Cart: 2.0

Posted
that was my plan for this weekend but when I called the Golf Galaxy near me the said the dont have them yet....

Posted
I tried them at Golfsmith and they felt great. I compared them to Ping I10 and the sole is about the same width. (The G10 is much wider.) Felt very solid and the offset wasn't too much for my eye. In my limited time hitting about 10 shots each, they were very close to the I10's that I have my eye on.
Je joue au golf, et j'aime ca.
-------------------------------------
Nike SasQuatch Sumo2
HaLo 2i & 3i
3100 I/H 5-GW588 Gunmetal 53/56/60White Hot XG #2Vector BagProV1x

Posted
Were these on a fitting cart?? I thought they were not supposed to come out until Jan 15th, 2009.
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted
Got mine... after a little hiccup from Callaway team (they sent me the wrong set) Callaway rep walked into the shop 5 mins later said leave it with him, 3 days later had the right set in my hands.

Configured with PX6.0, 3 up and +1 inch.

Never played Callaway before but after all the hype around the x-22 decided time for a change.
Setup for me is a look purer than previous models. Like the thin topline and sit very nicely behind the ball.
Very pure off the face though I find them that they have a bit of a dull sound rather than a 'click' off the face - maybe a Callaway 'feature'?

The main reason I wanted a change was I was looking for more mid range accuracy... and the x-22 do not disappoint in this category! 6 - PW are deadly accurate! Really like the combination of the PX with the x-22 and found the longer irons easy to hit. Feedback on mis-hits is good you'll know where you have missed it on the club face but tend not to get too harshly punished.

I found them easier to draw... harder to fade - but could just be me. Tried a few low punches, draws/hooks around trees, fades, high/low shots with the set and all responded as expected... (did my 'testing' walking around my club with 4 balls in pocket hitting various shots from different angles/lies etc)

Distance - about the same as my old TM's in the longer irons but found the 8-PW about 5 yards longer and the trajectory a lot flatter (PX's!) Plenty of zip from the 8-PW coming into the pins.

The biggest 'win' for me in the x-22's is the accuracy... felt very confident at the end of the day that if I wanted to I could attack (or play safe) with utmost confidence!

...on the tee in 5hrs 34mins 15secs and counting - can't wait!!!
Posted
I hit them in the simulator and they were great not a sgi but not a blade it is a very nice players iron 9 handicap and under they had good forgivness and workability they are a good blend of both.

driver. taylormade tour burner tp ust avixcore tour green 75 x
3 wood 909 f3 13* voodo xnv8
3 hybrid adams idea pro vs proto 95x
irons 3 no 4 5-pw nike cci forged blades
gap wedge nike sv tour blacksand wedge cg14 56* 14flopadopolous vokey spin milled 64 7putter scotty cameron classics newport...


  • 4 months later...
Posted
I finally received mine; project x 5.0, standard, 1' flat. I'm 60 y/o. 6 handicap. They're amazingly accurate and easy to hit, very smooth, very solid. Ball flight is high, they go right where you're looking. MOI is very obvious in performance, technology is amazing for a near blade head. Distance is better than I expected. My miss toward the toe, but they're very foregiving, no noticable loss of distance. I was most impressed by the 3 and 4 irons.... long irons I can hit!!

Posted

if they are better than the X-22's I have then I can't even imagine!

What's In My Bag:
Driver: TaylorMade R11s 9* w/ Fujikura Motore F1
3 Wood: TaylorMade R11s w/ Mitsubishi Fubuki 
Irons: Taylormade R11
Wedges: Titleist SM4 Vokey 52.08, 56.11, 60.04 
Putter: Odyssey Metal-X #9
Ball: Taylormade Penta TP5


Posted
if they are better than the X-22's I have then I can't even imagine!

The main differences between the "regular" and tour versions are:

Tour models have less offset. Tour models have a wider variety of shaft options. Tour models have a much thinner topline. Tour models do not have the bore thru shaft to club connection, so, the heel is more upright. Personally, I can "work" the tour version much better than the non tour. I played Callaway X12's for years, great clubs, the only "issue" was that all they wanted to do was go straight. (at the time, that was a really good thing) Not necessarily "better", just different. The whole X-22 line is/are great sticks.

Posted
Playing the X 22's for me has been like night and day from my old clubs. Not many of my friends are lefty's so I have not been able to try a wide variety of clubs, but my 22's are by far the best I have played.
Driver: R9 460
3 Wood: Big Bertha Diablo 3D
Hybrid: Rapture 24
Irons: X-22's 4-AW
Wedges: X Forged 58/10Putter: Black Series Tour Design #2 (Righty)Balls: Pro V1x Penta TP

Posted
Yeah, I couldn't believe the difference the clubs could make until I got my X-22's. I hit every shot straight and perfect ...makes me look like a good golfer for once haha

What's In My Bag:
Driver: TaylorMade R11s 9* w/ Fujikura Motore F1
3 Wood: TaylorMade R11s w/ Mitsubishi Fubuki 
Irons: Taylormade R11
Wedges: Titleist SM4 Vokey 52.08, 56.11, 60.04 
Putter: Odyssey Metal-X #9
Ball: Taylormade Penta TP5


Posted
I tried the X-22s and found them pretty good. However, I also enjoyed the X-20s. Given the difference in price (and that the X-20s were on offer), I opted for the latter.

In my bag:

D: Burner 2009 10.5˚
3W: Burner 2009 15˚
5W: Burner 2008 18˚R: Rescue Burner 25˚I: X-20 (4-SW)W: CG12 52˚P: Black #2


Posted
I got em in flighted PX 5.0 and love them. When you hit them flush, they are indeed worthy clubs! A bad mishit will let you know you screwed up though. I like the setup and little offset... Yeah, perhaps there are - no there definitely are - easier clubs out there to hit, but being comfortable at address looking down at the ball/club, I think adds to your confidence, and for me these clubs do inspire.

WTIB:
Callaway FT-9 Tour 9.5° Scads of shafts - now: Kai'li 63 stiff
Tour Edge Exotics 3 & 5 FW
Callaway X-22 Tour irons
Bobby Jones 3 & 4 hybridsRife Abaco/Odyessy Black Series i9 puttersWith a few more hangin' around


Note: This thread is 6232 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • So, Brendan Sorsby, Texas Tech transfer QB, was found guilty of sports betting by the NCAA. He admitted to it. He placed thousands of bets over multiple years while at Indiana and Cincinnati. This included betting on his own teams.  The NCAA rules ban athletes from betting on any sport (college or pro).  A retired visiting judge from Tarrant County, Texas has put an injunction on the NCAA ruling. He is a visiting judge because the first judge was a graduate and big fan of Texas Tech, and he recused himself. The judged ruled the following... "Under Curry's order, Sorsby is permitted to play for Texas Tech's 2026 season on the condition that he continues his treatment for a gambling and anxiety disorder and serves a two-game suspension (missing games against Abilene Christian and Oregon State)."  Don't get me wrong, I don't particularly care for the NCAA. That still doesn't mean that a college can choose when or where to say, "Yea we agree to these rules for all our sports, well except in this case." Here is a breakdown from S&W. The Hidden Weapon in Sorsby’s Injunction: How a Lubbock County Court Order Quietly Neutralized the NCAA’s Most Powerful Enforcement Tool - Law Offices of Snell & Wilmer By Ryan J. Regula On June 8, 2026, Lubbock County District Court Judge Ken Curry issued a temporary injunction in Brendan Sorsby v. National Collegiate Athletic Association, Cause No. DC-2026-CV-0791 (99th Judicial District... The main judgement made sense. Sorsby, I am going to have all this harm done to me if I don't get to play. The Judge, I agree. The penalty for gambling is too harsh, so here are all these things you must do, and I will grant this injunction against the NCAA. Basically, an analogy would be when a person goes into court for a DUI and they agree to all these other things to not end up in jail.  What sucks for the NCAA is the NCAA has appealed to Texas’ Seventh Court of Appeals, based in Amarillo. All four justices that preside over the court are graduates of Texas Tech University School of Law. It would be hilarious if all four of them had to recuse themselves 🤣. For those who like to read legal rulings...  
    • The chatter in my brain is when the distance is between clubs since I am pretty weak at shortened backswings, etc. I try to simply decide if being long or short is the better outcome and choose my club based on that and simply not even try for the “real” distance.  For me a full normal swing is what I strive for.
    • I saw this comment made in a golf article... "Most golfers stand over a 4- or 5-iron still negotiating with themselves. They think about how hard to swing, whether they have the right club, if they have the aim correct and more. It’s a lot to deal with and long irons punish the “half-in” golf swing." I am not sure the "most golfers" is correct regarding the bolded part. I can understand if there is a bunker, water, and/or OB that a lot of golfers would be fixated on that. I am not sure that leads to ending up more times there. Pending your level in golf, the variance is so large in outcomes, it could be just with in the expected outcomes. I can understand if have a big lake on the right side of the hole being one of the most terrifying shots for right-handed amateur golfers.  I am not sure many golfers are standing over the ball talking to themselves, "Ok, maybe I should step back and pull the 4-iron. Am I lined up right? Oh, the wind came up, should I swing harder? What am I going to have for dinner tonight, maybe steak. (Joking, somewhat 😛)" A question is that how much chatter do you get while standing over the ball. Are you questioning the everything about your golf shot?   
    • Wordle 1,816 5/6 🟨🟨⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ ⬜🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,816 3/6 ⬜⬜🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨🟩⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.