• Announcements

    • iacas

      Visit FlagstickRule.com   03/13/2017

      Visit the site flagstickrule.com to read about and sign a petition for the USGA/R&A regarding the one terrible rule in the proposed "modernized" rules for 2019.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
GolfingNewbie

Vokey vs nike sv wedges

22 posts in this topic

Hi

I was thinking about getting some new wedges, a 52 a 56 and maybe replace my 60 aswell. I am currently torn between getting a vokey or nike SV wedges if anyone has any opinions or experience hitting both it would be much appreciated.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Vokeys are the most played wedges for a reason, go with the vokeys nothing else comes close, maybe the CG line, i have them at the moment but im going for the vokeys next time.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

go for the vokeys. the nike wedges don't have a good feel. they have a weird swing weight and kinda feel cheap when you hit em. just my opinion of em when i tried them out.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cool thanks for the advice
My only concern about the vokeys were that they were gonna hack up my balls

anyway play the new VR wedges yet?
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have one of each and actually appreciate them both. I love the spin off the Vokeys and the shape of the Nikes. Only reason I don't switch to all Vokeys is that the SV shape in the 60* is just perfect. It gives me greater confidence when I just need to pinch that ball.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cool thanks for the advice

Yes, for a time they will. This is even more true if you play a soft cover ball. My advice is to dial in your distances at a driving range with your new Vokeys over a few hundred balls per wedge. This will take a little edge off of the grooves and punish the range's balls (instead of yours). After about 1-6 months, depending on your frequency of play, those groove marks on the ball go away. At that point you will have a consistent spin and a wedge you will love. That is just my experience though. Others experiences will certainly varry.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would look at the SV wedges when you get them new they have a differnent feel on them, but once you get used to them the ball control is excellent. I find alot of people dont like to go for the nike gear as they feel it is a poorer quality, plus you are already using the cci irons and these wedges fit in with those irons perfectly. If they are good enough for Tiger I am sure most people should like them...
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I play the SV tour wedges, my brother plays Vokeys. I find it hard to choose which is best, there really isn't much between them.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The vokeys have a great shape and are well balanced. I am very comfortable with them. But if you're good enough you can get up and down with 10 dollar walmart wedges so i guess its all personal preference.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

wow the spin milled wedges are awesome i have the 52, 56, and 60 and i love them!!! if you want spin then get the titleist spin milled volkeys!!!!
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

id check out the cleveland cg14's as well. they are outstanding clubs as well. im getting those in the spring.

whether or not a specific wedge is better than another comes down to personal preferance. all the clubs on the market are really good and can perfrom really well. its up to the player to decide which wedge they like best.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cool thanks for the advice

Just stay away from the spin milled and go for the 200 series then. Ive noticed the 200 series doesnt chew up balls as nearly as much as the SM do. My 58 is the spin milled model, but i never take a full swing with that club so its not too bad. Something to consider. My 54 is 200 series because i often take full aggressive swings with that club. Plus the milled groves will add alot of backspin on the ball, which might leave you short on your distances with a full swing.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Got all three of my Vokey wedges new middle of last summer and I love them (previously played PING MBs). Played V1x and V1 and found, in my experience, the worries about "shredding" balls to be overstated. Sorry I can't speak to the Nike wedges, and I assume you will try both and see what you like best, but I can't think of anything about the design or feel of the Vokeys that I can be negative about.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You'll find that the Nike and Vokey are very similar. I owned Spin Mills before my SV's. Feel wise, they're both cast (not forged) and pretty soft. They both have a pretty square face, which I like. The SM's have a bit sharper grooves that shred balls. The SV's grooves aren't as aggresive, but don't spin as much on half shots.

If you can generate your own spin and play out of the fairway more, I'd go Nike. If you're in the rough around the green a lot, I'd go with the Spin Mills. The sharper grooves put more spin on the ball with a lot of grass in front of it.

I'd be interested in the Nike Victory Reds, as they're forged. I'd also suggest the Mizuno T wedge. They're forged with grooves in between the SM and SV's. There are guys that say forged wedges don't make a difference, but I feel they're a bit crisper.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I went out and tried them both last saturday and.... I could not decide!
the Vokey feels lighter and "easier" in your hands, while the Nike (with its heavier s400 shaft) feels more solid; if you shoot a lot of balls in a row at the driving range your arms may fall off (mine would); but they both provide plenty of spin and control. In a full shot I could go longer with the VR (both for the 56° and 60° that I tried). Short flop shots came maybe easier with the Vokey, although with the VR and a bit of patience you may be able to accomplish more control and shaping.
So I brought back home a happy feeling for the Vokey and respect and wonder (of what they could do) for the VR.
In other words, I could not decide.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a vokey wedge and love it. It has a great feel and control for me. but go with what feels best in your hands with a few swings. From what i've heard the Nike vr is pretty similar. I like the nike too and am considering getting a 52. Go with what feels best though


Driver: Taylormade Burner
Fairway Woods: Taylormade V-Steel 3, Nike SQ2 5
Irons: Taylormade burner 09
Wedge: Titliest Vokey
Putter: Ping G5i anser
Ball: Nike One Black
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I picked up a vokey 56 and 60 today and they're great. Perfect angle choices and my 60 picks up RIGHT where the 56 leaves off. My 56 has a little less distance than the ancient Spalding 56 I was using before, but that is quite all right. I wasn't sure if I had enough distance between my SW and PW to warrant a GW. There is an awkward little space in there, but the clubs still overlap a little. Now I can justify a GW and don't have to pay a terrible amount of attention to either hitting a SW hard or hitting a PW weak. I'll pick up a 52 soon and be able to just swing awaaay :)
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    Leupold Golf
    Snell Golf
    Talamore Golf Resort
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • There are several statements that I disagree with which I feel are important to discuss: All golf balls do not go about the same distance.  A low compression, 2-piece Surlyn covered model will launch higher and with less spin than a 5-piece, high compression urethane covered model which will result in a noticeable difference in distance off the tee.  Dean even stated in another answer "The soft golf ball market has taken off due to the lower spinning balls means players can be longer in distance." Regarding balls for different swing speeds and compression:  3) Bridgestone (and I think Callaway) has come out with tour caliber balls for players who swing under 105mph. Is it possible to design a tour caliber ball for a specific segment of swing speed or is this just mostly a marketing thing?  DEAN: The whole swing speed story to me is one of the most over-rated stories in golf. Companies force or teach golfers to play low compression balls so their low swing speed can compress the ball. The problem with this is that low compression balls have the lowest spin in all shots, so they are pushing players to play a ball with no performance at all… and when you need that spin around the green, it's not there…            I almost don't know where to start on this one.  The concept of designing golf balls based on swing speeds doesn't teach or force players to use a low compression ball...it's about using a ball that has the appropriate compression for your swing speed.  Some players will have better results with a higher compression ball, others will have better results with a lower compression.  Keep in mind, there is a difference between "lower compression" and "low compression".  Most of the urethane tour balls have a compression rating somewhere between the mid 70s to mid 90s.  Tour models like the Chrome Soft, B330-RX and B330-RXS are in the mid 60s, which is lower.  Balls like the Supersoft and e6 are in the upper 30s and 40s, which is considered low.  Dean's statement that "low compression balls have the lowest spin on all shots" is somewhere between a little misleading and flat-out wrong.  It's true that a lower compression ball will spin less (and launch higher) than a firmer ball on full shots.  But on short game shots around the green, the ball is not compressed.  On pitch shots, chip shots, and greenside bunker shots for example,    the only part of the ball that is being activated is the cover. Notice on this chart that the lowest compression ball is very close to the highest spinning, and the lowest spinning ball has almost the same compression rating!  The point is, compression has little to no affect on short game shots...the cover is the main factor.  All 4 of these models have a urethane cover, but the two that provide the most spin have softer covers.  To put this in context, the chart below was a test Golf Digest did in 2015 which shows the performance on a partial wedge shot (I think it was 40 yds) with most of the balls on the market at the time The different colors represented the price point.  These results don't match the first chart I posted exactly which can happen when player testing (this one shows the B330 has higher spin than the RXS). Is there a difference between the lower spinning "red dots" and the highest spinning?  Sure.  There should be though.  Golf balls are designed to have different types of performance for different types of players.  The B330-RX has the lowest spin among the red dot models, but that doesn't mean it's lacking in performance...it spins exactly how the ball designers intended it to, because not everyone wants/needs maximum spin.  Notice the e7...this is a high compression ball very comparable to the B330, but has very different spin characteristics. So again, higher compression doesn't mean higher spin around the green and lower compression doesn't necessarily mean low spin.  About the only thing that I could agree with Dean's comment on would be that all the ultra-low compression balls are Surlyn covered models designed for distance, so it's true that these balls have low spin on all shots and will not offer the same level of performance around the greens, but again, that has more to do with the cover than the compression.  The fact is, there are lower compression balls that perform at the highest level. The B330-RXS is the same type of ball as the Pro V1 in many respects, and performs just as well as, or even better for many players, so I'm surprised by his comments that fitting for swing speed is over-rated and lower compression balls have no performance.  That's like saying getting fit for the correct shaft flex is over-rated, and softer flex shafts don't perform as well as stiffer shafts!  Does anyone consider the Dynamic Gold S-300 to be a lower performing shaft than the Dynamic Gold X-100?  No, of course not. They are designed to do the same thing, but because some players don't swing as fast as others the softer flex will give them better results, just like the B330-RXS is the equal to the B330-S, but will fit players who don't swing as hard better. I'm also not on-board with the opinion that fitting with a driver is a "mistake" and when testing to choose a ball based on 100 yds and in.  I'm not saying that short game performance isn't important, but wow...to claim that testing with a driver is a mistake is ridiculous.  I'll make a simple point on this...anyone can hit good wedge shots with a Pro V1 or B330 or Z-Star.  Fast swingers, slower swingers, high handicappers, low handicappers...it doesn't matter, they can all get good results on wedge shots.  Does that mean that's the ball they should play, and it will work equally as well for the other aspects too?  No.  A wedge can mask any issues in performance because of the loft and backspin, but the driver exaggerates issues.  The same players who hit respectable wedge shots with various tour balls might struggle to keep shots in play or lose potential distance. And before anyone tries to use the old "the driver is used 14 times a round, but half of the shots are inside of 100 yds" argument...save it.  If you play a high spin ball and you're struggling to hit the fairway with your tee shots, that ball will not help you save shots around the green.  Too much spin for players who can't control it is worse than a lower spinning model. Sorry Dean...not trying to blast you or anything, just putting in my two cents.  Ok, maybe more like four cents!
    • So......Is this your point @Jack Watson?
    • https://thesandtrap.com/b/clubs/titleist_716_ap1_review My review for the site is above. I've been using them since writing this review. Excellent clubs. One watch out is with short game shots with the PW and GW. They will go a bit farther than a corresponding chip or pitch with the equivalent wedge. The ball feels like it jumps off the face with good contact. So be careful with that.
    • Thanks for all the comments. I realize change is always hard but single length, lie and weight make so much sense to me. I am going to build a set of Value Golf clubs and see what happens. As improve I may go back to normal but who knows.  I think it will be better for learning the overall game. Which in my opinion and observance needs a lot of help. In my other hobbies that required learned skills it was easy to find groups to help you with the skills and drills to improve them. Businesses that the hobby supported held seminars and workshops covering all aspects. Trying to find help, other than paid lessons, is impossible, at least in my area. 
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Golfgirl10543
      Golfgirl10543
      (43 years old)
    2. jkettman
      jkettman
      (28 years old)
    3. old man1953
      old man1953
      (64 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon