• Announcements

    • iacas

      Visit FlagstickRule.com   03/13/2017

      Visit the site flagstickrule.com to read about and sign a petition for the USGA/R&A regarding the one terrible rule in the proposed "modernized" rules for 2019.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
jjb333

DG X100 vs DG S300

15 posts in this topic

I'm in the hunt for a new set of irons on ebay. The particular set I'm interested in have DG X100 shafts when I was planning on getting DG S300 shafts. I'm a bit concerned that the DG X100 shafts will be too stiff for me. I have a pretty quick tempo swing, and my carry distances are as follows for a full swing. I wish I knew my swing speed but unfortunately I don't.

PW-145
9-155
8-165
7-180
6-190
5-200
4-210
3-215

Essentially my question is if you can play DG S300s, can you play DG X100s?
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

PW-145
9-155
8-165
7-180
6-190
5-200
4-210
3-215

If those are your stock carry distances , you could probably handle X100's without much of an issue ... Go find some at a local range and demo them to be sure before pulling the trigger ... -- K.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm in the hunt for a new set of irons on ebay. The particular set I'm interested in have DG X100 shafts when I was planning on getting DG S300 shafts. I'm a bit concerned that the DG X100 shafts will be too stiff for me. I have a pretty quick tempo swing, and my carry distances are as follows for a full swing. I wish I knew my swing speed but unfortunately I don't.

I am assuming those figures are in yards? You can play the X-100 with your distance. I have very similar distance as yours but playing S300. Just a personal choice.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Are the X100s going to be a lower ball flight? I already have a low ball flight with the S300s so I'm worried my flight will be even lower.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was in the same boat, pretty close to your distances, played S300 for a very long time, and rather than go with full on X100, i did the x100 SL, which means they are a good deal lighter than the X100, so if your worried about them being too much, these may be a good option. I had a problem because the normal X100's sapped distance because they were so heavy, but with the SL, i get the smooth feeling, but the same carry and spin as my S300.

Hope this helps!

Brian

Also, i too have never hit the ball very high, but i did not notice a huge difference in height, maybe a 2 or 3 yards, but nothing that affected my distances..
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Remember that there are other options out there when it comes to shafts as well . For me , the Apollo Hump shafts in S flex were the correct fit . For many others , the Rifle shaft works well , somewhat due to the more precise frequency matching system that allows you to find shafts that may flex somewhere between the S300 and the X100 . Don't feel as if there are only two choices for you on the market .

I often found X100 a bit harsh for me from a vibration standpoint ( although I'm sure the Sensicore model might be smoother ) . I found that both a Rifle 6.5 and the Apollo Hump dampened more vibration and gave me a better feel thru impact . Good luck ... -- K.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I hit the X-100 shaft and have very few problems with it, and your distances are about 10-15 yards longer than mine. I tested both when searching for new clubs last year. My problem with the S-300 was that when I wanted to hit a ball hard, the shot would always drift to the left. It got to the point where I couldn't hit a full 8-iron anymore. I would have to choke down on a 7 to get the distance. Now I can hit full shots if I need to with out any problem.

I get the same ball flight and height with both shafts. The 100 is supposed to be lower, but for me it isn't. I have always hit the ball high though. Guys I play with marvel about how I can hit a wedge 150 yards over a tree, when in reality, it was a 8-iron. The big benefit for me is that I am able to hit the ball low when I need to, and it is much easier to do so with the 100.

Someone mentioned that the 100 is heavier and that is why distances go down. I don't think that is correct. They are the same weight. My experience (and personal opinion) was that since they don't flex as much, you don't get that little extra whip of the shaft which for me is probably what added the distance. I initially lost about 5-6 yards per club. The more I play with them, I am figuring out ways to get the distance back.

I have much better control with the 100 also. My old set I would sometimes wonder where the ball would go if I swung a certain way. Not anymore. Now I know if I am drastically off target it is a swing flaw rather than a shaft issue.

Of course the best thing to do would be to find a demo club with the X-100 and hit it as much as you can and see how it works for you. I prefer the 100 over the 300 but that doesn't mean everyone will. You would probably be okay, but you should really test it out first. The other option would be just to get them and if you don't like them, sell them, or just get them reshafted.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I know this thread is old but what the heck... I was testing out the new Mizuno Mp h4 5 and 4 irons today with dgs300 shafts. I play mp 53s with dgs300s and love them (except the 5 and 4 irons don't fly high enough for me because my ball flight is naturally lower, hence trying the h4s:). I loved the mp h4s and was getting the exact numbers I was after and could really work the ball on command with them. I asked the fitter if he thought I should go with an X100 soft stepped and his reply was "why?" I had to think of a good reason to go with anything other than the s300s and the best I could come up with was that playing x100s would be good for my ego, but other than that I didn't need anything more than the s300s. His advice was to use a shaft that made controlling the ball flight the easiest and considering that the s300 gives me complete control that's what I'm going with. Just something to consider next time you're getting new irons.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A stiffer shaft will get you a lower ball flight.

Altho i'm on the same distance, i personally will never go with x100 shafts.

I use KBS tour stiff shafts

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The way I see it from a manufacturer standpoint the dg x-100 sl are basically s-300 guaranteed at a lighter weight. The dg sl s-300 would play on average more like a reg flex and I know from experience playing them in the 990's for 7 years. Shafts vary from batch to batch that's why they have tour issue being more expensive and are the best of the batch in terms of consistency. your safest bet is to get dg x-100 sl at .25 over and get your clubs bent 1 deg flat. This will result in a higher ball flight and more spin but still have a tighter dispersion than s-300 at 130 grams and the x-100 sl is around 110. The plus .25 will soften the shaft a quarter of a flex giving you that higher ball flight. If however this isn't a route you want then go even further and flight your own irons. Go .25 over from 6 iron to 3 iron and standard from 7 to pw bending accordingly to adapt for lie angle. The main problem you have with Sl is shaft diameter and tip stiffness somehow or another the interior wall of the shaft is going to be weaker and thinner than the tour issue s-400 and that's why the pros play it because it straighter from a more solid piece of material but much heavier at 134 grams.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The way I see it from a manufacturer standpoint the dg x-100 sl are basically s-300 guaranteed at a lighter weight. The dg sl s-300 would play on average more like a reg flex and I know from experience playing them in the 990's for 7 years. Shafts vary from batch to batch that's why they have tour issue being more expensive and are the best of the batch in terms of consistency. your safest bet is to get dg x-100 sl at .25 over and get your clubs bent 1 deg flat. This will result in a higher ball flight and more spin but still have a tighter dispersion than s-300 at 130 grams and the x-100 sl is around 110. The plus .25 will soften the shaft a quarter of a flex giving you that higher ball flight. If however this isn't a route you want then go even further and flight your own irons. Go .25 over from 6 iron to 3 iron and standard from 7 to pw bending accordingly to adapt for lie angle. The main problem you have with Sl is shaft diameter and tip stiffness somehow or another the interior wall of the shaft is going to be weaker and thinner than the tour issue s-400 and that's why the pros play it because it straighter from a more solid piece of material but much heavier at 134 grams.

Holy crap on a cracker. With responses like these, it's little wonder that there is so much confusion about shafts in general. I've never heard such a load of BS in all my 30+ years of building clubs. Unless of course you were being sarcastic - which is unlikely if you're from the US.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Holy crap on a cracker. With responses like these, it's little wonder that there is so much confusion about shafts in general. I've never heard such a load of BS in all my 30+ years of building clubs. Unless of course you were being sarcastic - which is unlikely if you're from the US.

I think you would find many Americans to be very sarcastic, especially if they are from the Northeast.  Not sure about this guy though.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I think you would find many Americans to be very sarcastic, especially if they are from the Northeast.  Not sure about this guy though.

Are you being sarcastic? :-$

On topic, there is not too much difference in a wood, but in an iron. DG-S300 shafts make you work really hard compared to the other shafts I've used. Even needed a lesson just to be able to swing them.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Wait, guys, I'm American. Can you talk slower?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Wait, guys, I'm American. Can you talk slower?

It's easier to cut and copy each word and read them back one at a time. In. the. same. order.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    Leupold Golf
    Snell Golf
    Talamore Golf Resort
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • There still seems to be a bit of a disconnect between his explanation of the situation and the shot that he actually played......just doesn't add up that he hit pretty much a perfectly paced shot with the "belief" that that ball was  sitting way down and maybe even slightly plugged.....just doesn't look to me that he was trying to gouge out a shot that is sitting way down........as Erik said on the first page, there is a huge difference between a ball sitting all the way down and one that is sitting up even a 1/4" 
    • So? I'll take what may be the minority view here… but so what? You said the kid was young, so I'm picturing, I don't know, a 7-year-old kid. At this point, the father's main "goals" should really just be "let the kid whack a few balls, see if he has some fun." What you see as "a few fundamentals" might overwhelm the kid. After all, look at the list you just posted and what sorts of corrections you'd have to make to fix all of those things… When I introduced @NatalieB to golf (granted, she was barely three), I cared about roughly three things: That she stood on the left side of the golf ball (righty clubs) That she put her left hand above her right hand That she had fun whacking golf balls "somewhere in the right general direction" That's it. Every "fundamental" that came after that was a result of her expressing a desire to get better. The last thing I'd have thought to do was to give her a list of a bunch of "fundamentals." That sounds like the opposite of fun. The most important thing a parent can do to help their kids develop a passion for golf is to make sure they have fun around golf (on the golf course, at the range, etc.), particularly early on.
    • Thanks for all the advice. Its definitely more a case of wondering if my distance is likely to increase rather than worrying about it.  At the moment I just want to keep working on a reliable and repeatable swing that gives me a straight shot.  Once I've got that I can think about other things. The point about not fully trusting the swing yet is not something I had thought about before, but I think there may be something in that - repetition and practice is the answer to that I guess. Those distances are already in yards I'm afraid :)
    • Kiawah Island is even worse, I'm sure… it's about a 30-minute drive under regular circumstances onto the island and out to the course, let alone during the PGA Championship.
    • I would like to add that you made sure to convert the meters into yards (add an extra 10% or so to the numbers), right?  Otherwise, those are respectable numbers for someone only started their golf journey. FWIW, as a 58 year old who started playing golf in their mid-40s, I don't have a lot of distance (driver 210-240y, 7i 130-140y and PW 95-105y), but I do enjoy the game very much, did take lessons and improved my swing considerably after I did.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. bigtosh90
      bigtosh90
      (27 years old)
    2. dopplegvnger
      dopplegvnger
      (25 years old)
    3. Frank62
      Frank62
      (55 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon