Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Jack vs. Tiger: Who's the Greatest Golfer?


Greatest Golfer (GOAT)  

222 members have voted

  1. 1. Tiger or Jack: Who's the greatest golfer?

    • Tiger Woods is the man
      1627
    • Jack Nicklaus is my favorite
      820


Recommended Posts

Posted
I do think Tiger is a great golfer but have never been on his "band wagon" Wish Jack was back!

Posted
There is pros and cons both ways. The players are better now, but the equipment is better also (despite new groove rule), but the technology is so much greater that the legends of the game have to be so complimented for the way they played at a high level. Tiger will get past his personal slip-up he has had recently and probably pass the Golden Bear and go down as the greatest golfer ever....

Posted
When The Golf Channel recently had the opportunity to interview Jack, all they could ask was what Jack thought about Tiger and his bad actions. Why ask those questions? Why not ask about the glory and the good? Why not ask about Tiger on the golf course? Jack was great! He politely avoided the bad stuff and focused on the game of golf, the difference in players, and the excellence of the athlete.

Posted
its hard to say jack is better than tiger.. more of a class act for sure... but tiger is a better player

Tour Burner 9.0 Reax Stiff
X-Speed 3+ Aldila DVS Stiff
S57 Blades... Rifle 6.0 Flighted
CG12 Black Wedges 52, 56, 60
Craze-E Orig ProV1x UPro


Posted
T i g e r .
.: SQ Tour Carry | SQ MachSpeed 9.5˚ Driver | SQ MachSpeed Irons | To Be Continued...

Posted
Hard to say. I'm not sure Tiger has and Arnie

Cobra ZL 10.5

Cobra Baffle 16 hybrid
Titleist 735CM
Callaway Xtour 54.
Callaway Xtour 58

Ping Crazy-E

Pro V1


Posted
Never saw jack play much as im only 25 but he certainly used the worser technology to gain his feats. But I believe Tiger is one of the greatest athletes of all time, not just golfers

Posted
I'm fortunate to have seen both Tiger & Jack in their prime, in Jack's case from my bird's-eye perch atop the 13th leaderboard as a marshal at the 1980 PGA at Oak Hill. Both great players, but electricity Jack created at Oak Hill (shot 66-69 on weekend to win by 7), and the epic '86 Masters... well, that's for Tiger to out-do too, as well as Jack's 18 majors. Tiger just may, but my memories of "JACK IS BACK" thundering through Oak Hill back in '80 will never be trumped.

Posted
Tiger still has a way to go to be considered the best, but I think there's no doubt he surpasses Jack. If he hadn't had that break, he'd have come out and won the Masters last week too.

Ben


Posted
Well, I'm old enough to have seen them both play. I was just a youngster of about 10 when my neighbor got me started, so I watched Jack, Arnold, and all the gang.
(Yeah, I also watched Richard Petty)
I think today's players have taken it to a higher level. They take fitness and nutrition seriously and have huge technical advantages. So, I think Tiger wins.
But I guess that's comparing apples to oranges, because Tiger has those advantages that Jack did not.

Burner 2.0 Graphite 4-AW
09 Burner 10.5*
08 #3 Burner 15*
09 Burner 3H
09 Burner 4H
TM-110 putter

Vokey 56.11
Titleist NXT 


Posted
i never watched jack play since im only 19 but from what i grew up watching, tiger is the man. tiger also has a lotttt of years in his career left to surpass jack's record so when its all said and done i think tiger will be the best in the future

Posted
The question shouldn't come down to just Jack or Tiger. It does because we have become fixated on winning the four modern majors. That leaves out dominant golfers who played before that test became the standard, and before some of those tournaments even existed.

A strong case could be made for Bobby Jones. You can look at his record, but this comment from his contemporary Francis Ouimet is telling. I read him saying something like this: “In the late 20s I was still playing creditable golf, and Bobby Jones would give me two holes a side and still beat me. You have no idea how good he was!”

Now there’s more to Jack and Tiger than just their record in the majors, but there’s more to golfers from earlier eras, too.

Posted
Had you asked me this question 12 months ago it would have been an obvious answer in my opinion; however, that's no longer the case. Tiger's impact on golf is still epic and hard to overlook.

Posted
My vote goes to Tiger. In my opinion he has harder competition and he kills them by a bigger margin. He basically has 20 years left to get Jack's record, so I think it's safe to say barring death.... he'll easily eclipse every record in golf.

Anddddddd, that pretty much sums it all up.

In my bag:
Driver: Launcher Comp 9deg
Fairway Woods: Launcher Steel 15deg & 19deg
Irons: MX-23 (3-PW)
Wedge: Vokey Nickel 54deg Wedge: 60deg Putter: White Hot #2 Center Shaft Ball: Pro V1x


Posted
I think both Tiger and Jack are similar in many ways. Both men dominate their competition when playing there best, both seem to rise to the occasion in majors, both hit the ball longer than most of there peers and neither have a weakness in there game. I don't think you can say one or the other is better as they are from different eras. Maybe we will have to wait until Tiger gets to the end of his career and compare his acomplishments to Jack's.

Taylormade R7 460
Taylormade Firesole 3 wood
Cobra Baffler 2 hybrid
Cobra S2 forged 4-pw
Taylomade Rac 52,56,60Oydesee Dual Rossie IIOgio KingpinClic Gear 3.0


Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • They weren't necessarily short - I don't remember the exact specifics of all of it, but some of them were missing a little left or right or both. Day 1 they were landing on the edge and kicking on, where day 2 they were just missing and kicking down into the bunkers and did it a lot. I think all told I actually went into bunkers on 8 holes. Some of them were not good shots. Like a few examples, on 8, the pin was in the back. I hit it solidly, but pulled it and it went long, over the bunker into long grass. I had the ball in sandy earth with long grass around it and about a foot below my feet. That next shot I tried to do what I could but it went into the bunker in front of me. Into a footprint. That one I dug out of the footprint, but still in the bunker. Got that one out of the bunker, but into the fringe grass in front of me. Chipped that one on a bit hard and two putts later made a 7. Another was on 14. The flag was on the little finger of green front left. I tried to play a little past it and a little right. Shoved it maybe 10 yards right of where I wanted to and the carry over the bunker gets longer the further right you go and that one hit the grass between the green and the bunker and came back down into the sand, left it in there and didn't get up and down on the next one. I think carrywise it carried about as far as I was planning on it doing so. Another was on 6, leaked my drive a little right into the fairway bunker. Hit a nearly good shot from there that went a little left and a little short and kicked into the bunker front left. That was a strike thing and just a hard shot. Did similar on 18. Drive in the right bunker, slightly heavy second that hit the bank between green and bunker again and kicked back into the sand. I think the tiredness manifested more as not squaring the face up so well and less as slowing down.
    • Depends on how short you were coming up on these shots. A bit more wind? Also, maybe you were swinging at 2-3 mph slower the next day.  I think the biggest thing is not adjusting. Like making assuming your stock shot is not enough and taking 1 club up. Not sure what type of adjustments you were making in your decision making. 
    • No one should measure a joint mobility away from that joint. If you go to physical therapy, they are not measuring your knee mobility based on your midline. It is based at the joint. Shoulder mobility should be measured in reference to the shoulder joint. 
    • He's using a driver swing, while I used the iron swing. Bryson goes from about 65° B to 15° B, hence the 50°. If you bend your right elbow, you're going to pull your hands across your chest some. Conversely, if you abduct your right arm and hold onto a grip with your left arm, you can see how extending the right elbow as we do in the golf swing during the downswing will "pull" the right shoulder/humerus forward (adducting it, as going from 65° to 15° of abduction is). Even people who pull their right shoulder WAY too far around them eventually get it "back in front" when their right arm/elbow extends. So, such a motion shows up as shoulder adduction even though the movement that causes it is just widening the trail elbow. The left hand on the grip almost "pulls" the hands forward as the left arm can't stretch much (there's some shoulder protraction, but that's almost maxed out at P4). Oh, I downloaded it and watched it (and commented there) before he blocked me. It's what led to him posting the comment in the "update" above. 😄  Single shoulder range of 75°, and that's going out well into the follow-through. 50° Max range up to impact. Manavian's video is bad. He keeps saying "midline" which is just a horrible way to look at it. He also kept saying that the club was moving that amount — also wrong. Adding left and right together is really freaking dumb. Another golf instructor said "That's like saying the player has 100 degrees of knee bend (adding left knee bend to right knee bend) 🤦‍♂️" (similar to what the biomechanist said about squatting). Also, see my post above about elbow bend. That's why Plummer’s alignment stick demo is so intellectually dishonest. A golfer can't get anywhere near that position on the left with his left hand on the alignment stick (quoted below).  
    • That makes no sense at all.  so, I watched that Instagram. Here is a summary...  Bryson.... Address: Trail Shoulder 0 degrees adduction. P4: Trail Shoulder 65-deg abduction. Impact: Right shoulder 15-deg abduction. P9: 10 degrees adduction. Rory... Address: Trail Shoulder 16 degrees adduction. P4: Trail Shoulder 26 degrees abduction. Impact: Right shoulder 0 degrees abduction.  P9: 18 degrees of adduction.  DJ... Address: Trail Shoulder 4 degrees adduction. P4: Trail Shoulder 42 degrees abduction. Impact: Right shoulder 2 degrees abduction.  P9: 15 degrees of adduction.  Their point is that arm doesn't stay on the trail side. That the arms have to get across the chest from P4 to P9. I mean they do. What matters is the rate of which it happens relative to the position of the swing. The trail shoulder at P9 is not abducted a lot. The range of that total abduction movement is like 40 to 70 degrees. Bryson might be an outlier. Rory might be an outlier as well.  A couple of points.  1. None of them had any adduction at impact. So, this tells me the trail arms stays on the trail side of the body at impact. Is it moving towards lead shoulder, yes. It doesn't happen till post impact. The right side of the body is moving towards the target, so the arms don't have to as much as people think.  2. Trail shoulder adduction from Impact to P9 is 18 to 25 degrees.  3. P9 adduction of the trail shoulder is only about 2 to 12 degrees more adducted than at address. The arms/hands stay in front of the chest a long-time post impact. If Rory, from his address position just rotated his body towards the target and raised up his arms so he is at P9. He basically didn't have to move his trail arm further across his chest than where he started at address. Visualize that for a bit. I bet for people who tend to stall and drag their arms across their body to hit the ball, that would emphasize how much the arms stay in front of the body and how much you have to turn.             
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.