Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6108 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I'm going to make a purchase soon and my pro told me project x 5.5 are best bet for me. but considering i'm on a budget i wanted to know what your opinions were on shafts like the s300 high launch and sensicore shafts? my normal shot is a mid launch trap draw but i can work the ball pretty well. i hit it a long way also. 85 +/- 2 mph swing with a 5 iron.

Posted
I'm going to make a purchase soon and my pro told me project x 5.5 are best bet for me. but considering i'm on a budget i wanted to know what your opinions were on shafts like the s300 high launch and sensicore shafts? my normal shot is a mid launch trap draw but i can work the ball pretty well. i hit it a long way also. 85 +/- 2 mph swing with a 5 iron.

whats a long way? I think 85 is about average for a 5 iron if not a touch below it. last time somebody measured me it was 83 for a 6 iron which put me right between a regular and a stiff.

Why did the pro select that shaft? Was it based on actual measurements, a fitting, or just a guy feeling? How much do you trust the pro? also remember in the grand scheme of things, the price difference between the 5.5's and s300 with sensicore is probably only about $100 for the set.

In my bag:

some golf clubs

a few golf balls

a bag of tee's some already broken the rest soon to be

a snickers wrapper (if you have seen me play, you would know you are not going anywhere for a while)

and an empty bottle of water


Posted
I'm going to make a purchase soon and my pro told me project x 5.5 are best bet for me. but considering i'm on a budget i wanted to know what your opinions were on shafts like the s300 high launch and sensicore shafts? my normal shot is a mid launch trap draw but i can work the ball pretty well. i hit it a long way also. 85 +/- 2 mph swing with a 5 iron.

My swing speed is a touch below yours and I have the 5.5's... Are you looking for a higher ball flight or more of a mid launch? The swing characteristics of the two shafts are very similar but results are very different in my opinion.

As for the poster above... 85ss on a 5 iron isnt "a touch below average" at all... and most definately it wouldnt but you in between a regular and a stiff.

13 Wedges
1 Putter


Posted
My pro and I thought the X Flighted 5.5s would be right for me and they turned out way too stiff for me and my 6 iron distance is right at 172, which is in their charts as a 5.5. Got analyzed and switched to the Nippons, which I love, and they are an R flex and a little lighter. Really like them. Lots of variables in selecting shafts. I can still play the stiff True Tempers in my old Pings, but the 5.5s seemed and played stiffer than "stiff" in my hands.

909D3 (Voodoo, stiff)
King Cobra Comp 5w (YS 5.1 Stiff)
AP1 4,5; AP2 6-P; Vokey 252 08, SM56 14, SM60 08 (Nippon N.S. Pro 950GH Regular)
Newport 2 Mid Slant


Posted
As for the poster above... 85ss on a 5 iron isnt "a touch below average" at all... and most definately it wouldnt but you in between a regular and a stiff.

That really depends on who is doing the fitting. Some people will think differently. I swing stiff shafts and my swing speed is in the low 90's, high 80's(was high 80's when i got it measured but I've been tweaking my swing and swinging a bit faster). They work fine for me. I normally carry my 7 about 160.

In my Extreme Sport Stand Bag
Driver: 4DX D-Spec Driver 10.5* Stiff UST SR3
3W: F-60 15* Regular Fujikura E150 Fit-On
Hybrids: 4DX Ironwoods 20* 23* Regular UST SR3
Irons: 4DX CB 5-PW Stiff True Temper ST-90Wedges: Vokey 50* 56*Putter: SabertoothBall: DT Roll


Posted
I use 5.5s. I fly a six iron 180, and I have a smooth transition and moderate tempo. I've used the s300s, never with the sensicore. I love the Project X 5.5 shafts. I think they're a little stiffer than the s300.

driver: FT-i tlcg 9.5˚ (Matrix Ozik XCONN Stiff)
4 wood: G10 (ProLaunch Red FW stiff)
3 -PW: :Titleist: 695 mb (Rifle flighted 6.0)
wedges:, 52˚, 56˚, 60˚
putter: Studio Select Newport 1.5


Posted
I've played both, id say the 5.5's are a bit stiffer aswell. Prefer the traditional feel and flight of the s300's though.

: 905R 9.5*
904f 15*
Baffler DWS 20*
eye 2
spin milled 54*, Vokey 58* White Hot XG #9 Pro V1x


Posted
I'm going to make a purchase soon and my pro told me project x 5.5 are best bet for me. but considering i'm on a budget i wanted to know what your opinions were on shafts like the s300 high launch and sensicore shafts? my normal shot is a mid launch trap draw but i can work the ball pretty well. i hit it a long way also. 85 +/- 2 mph swing with a 5 iron.

Both are good shafts, little different feels between the 2, but still both are good. With that said I like PX shafts a lot. What I've found with DG's is there spine is anywhere from subtle to very marked, so if you spine the DG's they will be sweet. They do put more spin on the ball than PX's or KBS shafts, but I don't think its a real big deal.

For spining, its very easy and easy to build a spine finder for under 10 bux. Its on the internet under shaft spining. In short 1) 1 1/4" PVC T, 2) (I'm not sure about this one) 3 7/8" internal ball bearing thingies, 1 for each end of the t piece.

Posted
My swing speed is a touch below yours and I have the 5.5's... Are you looking for a higher ball flight or more of a mid launch? The swing characteristics of the two shafts are very similar but results are very different in my opinion.

the fitter was working with Mizuno irons, and we were trying to decide if I needed regular or stiff, my swing speed on a six iron was between 81 and 86, which he said put me right between regular and stiff (dynalite gold on MX200's)

I guess it was incorrect to say that its below average, I am used to reading everything on the internet where everybody drives the ball 280+. my apologies.

In my bag:

some golf clubs

a few golf balls

a bag of tee's some already broken the rest soon to be

a snickers wrapper (if you have seen me play, you would know you are not going anywhere for a while)

and an empty bottle of water


Posted
yeah i hit a 6 iron 175 but i can also go after one and hit it 180. i did have a real fitting that showed my average swing speeds which came out to be in the low to mid 80's and my ball flight is a tad on the low side. would you guys say that project x shafts are a higher launch shaft? i've narrowed it down to getting s300 HL or these project x shafts.

Posted
I have the Project X 5.5 (non-flighted) and found the ball flight to be a bit high (probably should have gone with the s300). I believe they're considered a mid launching shaft and I think they play a hair stiffer than the s300. good luck!

EDIT: actually according to golfsmith/custom fitting they're considered a low launching shaft...?

What I Play!

x86 Stand Bag
Driver: 907D2 10.5* w/EPIC-S
Irons: 735.CM irons 4-PW PX 5.5FW Wood: 909F2 15.5* Aldila Voodoo SHybrid: 909.H 21* Diamana Blue Board SWedges: Vokey 250.08 (oil can), Spin Milled 54.11 & 60.07 (Black Ni)Studio Select 2.5Ball: Pro-V1x/Bridgestone B330s (or anything I...


Posted
I guess it was incorrect to say that its below average, I am used to reading everything on the internet where everybody drives the ball 280+.

And that's into a headwind!

"You can foment revolution or you can cure your slice - life is too short for both" David Owen

WITB*: 2010 winter edition

Driver: AyrtimeFW/hybrid: Distance Master Pro Steel 5w, 7w, 27* hybridIrons: Powerplay 5000 hybrids (6i-SW)Wedge: SMT Durometer 55 degPutter: Z/I Omega mallet*as soon...


Posted
can anyone tell me what flighted means?

Here's their site.

driver: FT-i tlcg 9.5˚ (Matrix Ozik XCONN Stiff)
4 wood: G10 (ProLaunch Red FW stiff)
3 -PW: :Titleist: 695 mb (Rifle flighted 6.0)
wedges:, 52˚, 56˚, 60˚
putter: Studio Select Newport 1.5


Posted
hmm i guess the website is telling me flighted means low irons go higher and short irons go lower so all your trajectories stay close to the same.

Posted

PX shafts - yuck! Played the 5.5s for a bit but although they performed pretty good, I couldn't get used to the feel; felt too harsh for me. Gone back to S300s .

Home Course: Wollaton Park GC, Nottingham, U.K.

Ping G400, 9°, Alta CB 55S | Ping G400, 14°, Alta CB 65S | Adams Pro Dhy 18°, 21°, 24°, KBS Hybrid S | Ping S55 5-PW, TT DGS300 | Vokey 252-08, DGS200 | Vokey 256-10 (bent to 58°), DGS200 | Ping Sigma G Anser, 34" | Vice Pro Plus

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 6108 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 9: 2026.01.11 Hit some balls at the range, concentrating on weight distribution at address, got some on film.
    • Day 468 - 2026-01-11 Loooooong day. Did some work in the patio door (as a mirror) when I got home.
    • I caught a video on this driver; the face tech seems crazy. Looking at the heat map for ball speed, hitting it basically anywhere on the face only loses a few percent ball speed. The surprising and counter intuitive part to me was that for flat faced clubs, ball speed loss is directly proportional to distance loss. For clubs with bulge and roll this is apparently not true. The surprising part of that story being that the max distance potential looks to be a tiny pee sized area for this driver, and I feel in general for drivers. The counter intuitive part being (the myth?) that blade irons have a pee sized sweet spot and missing that tiny spot causes dramatic losses. And that modern drivers, maybe 2017 on, have massive sweet spots and are ultra forgiving. Where in reality, if this heat map data is valid and reliable, it might be a bit of the opposite. This insane tech driver appears to have a pea sized "sweet spot" while Mizuno Pro 241 irons are 28% more forgiving compared to the average of all clubs measured. Not compared to other players irons, compared to all clubs from all categories, players to SGI! The Pro 241 being essentially just a solid chunk of metal with no "tech" at all. Which for me devolves into a whole mess of what is forgiveness really? And in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?  
    • Wordle 1,667 3/6 🟨🟨⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,667 3/6 ⬜⬜🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.