Jump to content
Subscribe to the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6905 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
  Xt1ncT said:
gas_can

Graphite Designs International's YS series are consistently tops in terms of overall wood counts.

These guys could play anything, yet most of them play shafts in the $60-$100 range.

  • Replies 74
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Steel shafts will probably be out of irons as they are in drivers at some point in the not too distant future. As more tour players use them, the bias will fade away. The modern graphite like the MFS 115s are exceptional products unlike the old graphite shafts of a few years ago. Cost is still the big factor to broader market growth. MFS 115s are about $70+ a shaft, which is okay for one driver but stings for a full set of irons.

  • Moderator
Posted
I've hit graphite shafted irons, and they were OK ... a little difficult to adjust to the weight difference. It's definitely a different feel, but I can see why some people like them.

For me, I like the extra weight / lower cost of steel in general over graphite. I haven't seen enough of a benefit yet to spend $50 a club in order to upgrade to a premium graphite iron shaft. I emphasize "yet." I think shaft preference will change like everything else. It might be graphite or it might be a new metal composite. Eventually, we'll laugh that we ever played steel shafted clubs.

And if Tiger puts graphite in his irons next year, there will be a serious backlog at all the service shops!

Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend.
Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read.
--Groucho Marx

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I just recently installed the Grafalloy Blue (not prolaunch) in my Titleist 670 forged blades and won't go back to steel. Just a 1/2* higher in torque then the DG's I was using. Use to have the Aldila NV multi and they were great shafts too. I am 48 and have hip and elbow problems and now am able to play 36 a day and not hurt anymore. Don't knock graphite until you try a top quality shaft, you just may surprise yourself.

Mike

Titleist 915 D-2 9,5*

Titleist 915F 15*

Titleist 915H 18*

Mizuno MP-4 3-PW

Mizuno MP 54* & 60*

Yes Pippi Putter


Posted
well I really like the feel of steel, the feedback and the weight of irons with steel shafts.. I installed some Aldila NV multi and then had the chance to hit a few balls with them, they were great nice just not what "I" like.. when back neck knee problems start bothering me trust me I will make the change to enjoy the game longer..

Driver: Taylor Made R7 425 9.5° TP Stiff
Fairway: Taylor Made V-Steel #3 w/Fujikura Rombax Stiff
Irons: Taylor Made rac LT 4-PW shaft; Rifle Flighted 6.0
Wedges: Tayor Made rac 52° 56° 60°Utility: Taylor Made Rescue TP #3 (Aldila NV Hybid 85g Stiff)Putter: Scotty...


Posted
Too bad that all these advances in technology won't help half of the male golfing population because they can't check their ego's at the door.

Posted
Steel is still better than graphite in irons and will probably always be true.
Why?
Cause even if you put the most expansive and best performing graphite in irons you still won't get better distance in irons and you don't need to, it's not the purpose of the irons. Unless you are a senior, lady, or kid, graphite might benefit.

You can get better distance with graphite in drivers and woods. Moreover it's unnecessary as irons should not hit as far as woods since that's their purpose.

So distance is not an issue, and steel has lower torque and better control than graphite anyways.

Posted
Graphite will someday replace steel and here's why I think that is.

With advancements in nano technology, soon we will be able to cutomize graphite shafts in a way that can't be done with steel. Not only will overall flex be much more precise ...and varied, but flex point will be able to be fine tuned based on ball flight requirements. High, mid, low and all flex points in between. Stiffer for accuracy clubs and flexible in just the right way to launch the ball for more distance... much like a pole vaulter is launched.

We do it now with weight ports and drivers. Soon shafts will be able to be chosen to fit our games precisely. It's gonna be fun, as long as you understand your own game.

Rick
http://www.golf-club-revue.com

"Golf either brings out your ego...or your heart."


Posted
  RickRevue said:
Graphite will someday replace steel and here's why I think that is.

Yea someday...

It will be a long way trust me and we don't really need it. Again, unless you a senior, lady, or kid. Aldila VS shafts has nanotube tech in it. Retail for about $175 per shaft vs thier NV shaft which is still $99 without nanotube. I don't see any reason for it to cost cheaper to make nanotube shafts in the near future unless they figure a way to manufacture it faster and or cheaper somehow which is unlikely. Just imagine putting $175 shaft in everyone of your irons though rofl... Like I said, a long way and I do just fine with my Ping Eye 2 with 15+ yr old ZZ lite TT shafts on them... 4 iron around 220 yds is pretty good I think, do I need graphite, I don't think so.

Posted
  oct411 said:
Yea someday...

I don't want to assume that you have or have not read this whole thread but we've already dispelled the only reason you need graphite is because of age and needing distance

  oct411 said:
Like I said, a long way and I do just fine with my Ping Eye 2 with 15+ yr old ZZ lite TT shafts on them... 4 iron around 220 yds is pretty good I think, do I need graphite, I don't think so.

It's not how far its how many

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
  oct411 said:
Yea someday...

I thought you said irons aren't for distance but yet you hit your 4 iron 220???

Also, talking about torque, have you checked out the specs lately in graphite iron shafts? .2 (yes,point 2 degrees differance then Dynamic Gold) is not noticable to 99.999% of golfers. Not to argue but my Grafalloy blue (not pro launch) has 1/2* lower torque then your ZZ Lite shafts. Graphite is not just made for ladies or seniors anymore, they are for everyone. Please let John Daly and Rich Beem know that they are too old to play on tour cause they use graphite. Edit: Just double checked and TT Dynamic Gold steel is 1.7* torque and Aldila NV tour 130 iron shafts are 1.5* Pretty impresive for graphite to be lower then steel without nano tube technology!

Titleist 915 D-2 9,5*

Titleist 915F 15*

Titleist 915H 18*

Mizuno MP-4 3-PW

Mizuno MP 54* & 60*

Yes Pippi Putter


Posted
  670forged said:
I thought you said irons aren't for distance but yet you hit your 4 iron 220???

lol...

I have no idead what the hell you are talking about... I SAID whether or not you use steel shaft or graphite shaft on your irons doesn't matter much in distance. (i.e. even if some new bad ass techno advance graphite shaft was developed for irons you wouldn't want more distance on your irons because each iron is used for a specific distance and steel shafts serves its intented purpose just fine, not like a driver or wood that's used to gain more distance which is perfect for graphite shaft, that's why graphite shafts company started poping up in the 1990's and Pros started to use them in driver and woods.) FYI only recently in 2003 did Tiger Woods switch from steel to graphite shaft on his driver and alot of PGA Pros still play TT or Rifles steel shaft on their woods. The comment I made about using my old set of Ping Eye 2 is to say that the old TT Stiff ZZ-lite steel shafts that are 15+ yrs old are still doing it's intent job just fine, now why would I go with graphite shaft on my irons when clearly there isn't a need for it? In regards to torque and control, the original TT Stiff ZZ-lite steel shafts on my Ping Eye 2s irons are Weight: 115.0g Torque: 1.9, they only hit slightly higher than TT DGS S300. READ: http://community.pinggolf.com/commun...owledge_id=431 And your Grafalloy blue shaft probably on your driver has: 2.8 torque and a weight of only 63g CHECK: http://www.titleist.com/golfclubs/dr...hash=1#pagebot If John Daly and Rich Beem plays graphite shafts on their irons that's great for them, but I have no problems using 15+ yr old steel shaft on my irons, it serves its purpose just fine. It's a matter of choice and I don't see in the near future that graphite shafts are going to replace steel shafts on irons, more over steel shafts are cheaper for everyone and us common folks that pays for their golf clubs. Cheers!

Posted
I wasn't talking about my driver or fairway wood shafts, I was talking about the Grafalloy blue's my irons and wedges. Anyway, enjoy your steel and i'll enjoy my graphite. To each his/her own.

Titleist 915 D-2 9,5*

Titleist 915F 15*

Titleist 915H 18*

Mizuno MP-4 3-PW

Mizuno MP 54* & 60*

Yes Pippi Putter


Posted
  670forged said:
I wasn't talking about my driver or fairway wood shafts, I was talking about the Grafalloy blue's my irons and wedges. Anyway, enjoy your steel and i'll enjoy my graphite. To each his/her own.

Agreed, but I still don't know what the hell you are talking about... ROFL!!!

Goto Garfalloy's website and look under iron shafts, there are only: http://www.grafalloy.com/grafalloy/products.asp Prologic 3.8 - 3.0 torque ProLaunch 3.3 torque ProLite 3.3 torque No Blue. I'll stick to my steel shaft and you to your w/e Garfalloy blue crap

Posted
No sh1t dumbass, they're not available to the public is why you don't see them on there website. Your're the f--cking loco.

Titleist 915 D-2 9,5*

Titleist 915F 15*

Titleist 915H 18*

Mizuno MP-4 3-PW

Mizuno MP 54* & 60*

Yes Pippi Putter


Posted
  670forged said:
No sh1t dumbass, they're not available to the public is why you don't see them on there website. Your're the f--cking loco.

ROFL!!!

You must be very special to have those aren't you? How far are you hitting with those in your irons? And if you perfer those on your irons what is so great about them as compare to steel shaft like DGS or Rifles? I have no doubt everyone on this forum would love to know the answers. So let us know

Posted
  oct411 said:
ROFL!!!

1-Yes I am special!

2-does it really matter? 3-I like them better! 4-Figure it out for yourself

Titleist 915 D-2 9,5*

Titleist 915F 15*

Titleist 915H 18*

Mizuno MP-4 3-PW

Mizuno MP 54* & 60*

Yes Pippi Putter


Posted
  670forged said:
1-Yes I am special!

Sorry, didn't know you are 48 and have elbow and wrist problems, if I were you I probably get the some thing too...

Just glad I'm still young playing and enjoying this game. Yea I explained earlier that golfers that are healthy and in the age of 18-45 should be using steel shafts in irons, they are cheaper, works just fine and most stock shafts on brand name irons are steel, unless you go to the local Wal-Mart and buy a set that's $199 or less they often have cheap graphite shaft for the whole set ROFL!!! And if you can't swing a golf club more than likely you will break one of these at the hosel within a few outings to the range... I have seen tons of people do that before. Nice graphite shaft ehh? As for the more expensive graphite iron shafts, I don't doubt they work good or as good as DGS or Rifles. As they say, you get what you paid for and that's alot of $$$ for iron shafts. The disadvantage here is cost, again most of us aren't pros that gets sh1t for free and steel is just as good as graphite so why bother? Cheers

Note: This thread is 6905 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    TourStriker
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • bought a used epic driver 3 years ago treated me well i am 72 bought with senior shaft a friend of bought a brand new  ping 440 claims he hits straighter and added 10 to 15 yards on his drive i know drivers are the most frequent club bought is a new driver that much better
    • It's true that it is not always clear where to draw the line of "significant". But I would argue that saving half a stroke or more is definitely more than significant. According to the common meaning of "significant", which is all we have because the word is not defined elsewhere in the rules.  This is irrespective of the two stroke penalty for playing from a wrong place. That penalty is only for when there was no significant advantage.  And it is possible to tell to some certainty whether a stroke or half a stroke was saved by such tools as strokes-gained, experience of officials, etc. Applying the conditions listed in the definition of serious breach.  In the example in which a player gave themselves free relief from a boundary object, if relief was necessary, then that wrong place gave a significant advantage.  Though apparently there is some sort of verbal tradition that tournament officials have a higher standard of what they consider "significant". Much higher than one stroke. And they like to take into account that the player already received a two-stroke penalty, though that is not in the rules for determining what is a "significant advantage".  
    • Until I can find some positive things to post about my swing I think it’s about time to… 
    • How would you change the rule to make it more "fair", and still be consistently interpreted and enforced?  It may not be perfect, but as a referee I can watch a player and look at the ground surface and make a ruling.  How can it be changed to address different players and their individual height, weight, and shoe size?
    • A bit old.. but this rule is kind of unfair ...  Lets say that you have Emiliano Grillo and Darren Clark playing together on a PGA event and on one hole both hit the ball to the middle of the fairway only 1 inch apart. When they arrive to the ball Darren take his stand and water comes out from the ground and remains there so he procceds take a free drop on a dry area and hit his shot.  Afterwards Grillo takes his stance in the same spot as Clark, but because he is a lot ligther, no water araise from the ground. According to the rules he is not allowed a free drop from the same spot darren had a free drop seconds before. I would love to see this happenning live on TV. Can an argument be made by grillo? could and official use the "spirit of the rule" to let him have a free drop?     
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...