• Announcements

    • iacas

      Visit FlagstickRule.com   03/13/2017

      Visit the site flagstickrule.com to read about and sign a petition for the USGA/R&A regarding the one terrible rule in the proposed "modernized" rules for 2019.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
c. lassiter

What are the benefits of a fairway wood over a hybrid?

12 posts in this topic

I've been alternating a 3 wood and a 15 degree hybrid, and would say that the hybrid is more consistent and more versatile (for me), and the distance difference isn't much.

My son, who is a good junior player, is deadly with a 24 degree hybrid and inconsistent (at best) with his 4 wood.

So, is the fairway wood becoming obsolete? Or is our experience different than most people?
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

I've been alternating a 3 wood and a 15 degree hybrid, and would say that the hybrid is more consistent and more versatile (for me), and the distance difference isn't much.

You can't really compare his 24* hybrid to a 17* 4 wood.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been alternating a 3 wood and a 15 degree hybrid, and would say that the hybrid is more consistent and more versatile (for me), and the distance difference isn't much.

I wouldn't say fairway woods are becoming obsolete, I think hybrids and fairway woods suit certain swings better then others. Years ago there was really no option, only fairway woods.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would suggest that the selection of a fairway wood vs a hybrid varies widely for different people. I tend to be more comfortable with a fairway wood in my hand then a hybrid. My playing partner is the opposite. We all know how much of a mental game golf is, so when you feel comfortable over a shot your likelyhood of success greatly increases.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All things being equal, the fairway wood would probably be longer because they usually have longer shafts. Essentially, a hybrid is a fairway wood on an iron shaft as far as my understanding goes. You'll be more accurate with a hybrid because of this, but again the distance usually isn't as strong when comparing degrees to degrees.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes. Hybrids are more accurate and playable than a fairway wood, IMO. You can use them for chipping, punch shots, and out of rough. Something i find harder to do with fairway woods. I carry i 3wood but i rarley hit it off the turf unless i got plenty of room to miss. The downside to them is that if you replace them with one of your long irons, you loose the spin control that an iron provides. But i find that an easy trade off in favor of playabillity.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Damn PV_Louie is a +10 handicap!

Also, the ball flight I would imagine is different from your fairway and hybrid. Hybrids seem to get up in the air more compared to a fairway metal. I've been looking for a very cheap deal on a 14-16* hybrid but no luck as of yet.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, fairway woods tend to fit people with sweeping swings better than people who have steep swings. People with steep swings tend to like hybrids better as they more closely resemble an iron.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For me personally I use fairway woods. I tried several types and brands of hybrids but didn't get the results that others have. I have a buddy that is just deadly with his hybrids. Like many have already said, it comes down to what your comfortable with. I find my 906F4's to be quite versatile off the tee and forgiving from the fairway. So like any other piece of equipment it boils down to individual taste.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I use both, and i don't really find a difference in them, but i feel that the fairway woods go further, but not as accurate.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it's a classic case of personal preference but my experience has been (speaking in the case of 2H vs. 5W; both about 18 degrees) that the fairway wood tends to fly a little higher. If I'm playing a 200yd shot to a green where I need to fly it all the way and land softly the wood is my only chance. If I want a low, boring shot with run the hybrid is the ticket.

Also, to me it seems like hybrids are still a lot like long irons in that my misses are relatively severe. The hybrids are a lot easier to hit (than the irons) but I never get the same sense of control that I do w/a fairway wood.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I tend to swing more freely with a fairway wood as it's slightly lighter and believe it or not, although I've been hitting the gym lately, I still find it lighter to hold. Please bear in mind that I'm only 15, but it's less heavy so a lot easier to hit for me. And the heads look much nicer IMO.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    Leupold Golf
    Snell Golf
    Talamore Golf Resort
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • Yep! I have both a FJ jacket and pants in rainwear that I bought years ago. I don't use them very often so they've lasted a long time. But, they're heavy and hot! They were made before GoreTex and other waterproof, breathable fabrics. My advice? Get the absolute best you can afford! They will last you a long time, they will keep you comfortable, they will be light, and they won't impede your swing very much.
    • Thanks for all the responses. I think this boils down to the context of the situation. I had two of the foursome busting chops about hitting out of order on previous holes. Then the first time it was mildly inconvenient for them to wait, the holed out just as i hit the green. Mind you.  This wasnt an "adventure" hole.. I hit the green on stroke 5 because of a flub shot that went about 10 ft. And an errant approach that left me about 10 yards short of the green. In any other case I agree that its perfectly fine to hit when ready, but not if you complain about hitting out of order. I guess to paint the picture, one whipped a club on the 3rd hole due to sculling a shout out of the bunker.. on another hole had one of them walking towards green right in front of my approach.. he nicely moved about 3 yards to the right as i asked him to move. As karma would have it, i hit the shot straight at him and nearly hit him.. these were friends of mine.. so a lesson learned to play golf with different friends..
    • Picked one up and checked it out in a store the other day. First thing I noticed about it was how heavy it was. Reminded me of when I went out for the HS golf team, and the coach had a Driver with a solid steel head on it. He advised us that we were NOT to hit drives with it! It was for warm up only. Being as heavy as it is, I think the main benefit to it might be that it slows your transition from backswing to downswing. There's a whole lot of guys who could use that!
    • OK, this kind of clears things up for me. I thought you might have been trying to take close ups of clubheads impacting golf balls. In that case you'd need something numbering in the several thousands of fps! If all you need is to look at swings I'd say anything the budget allows should suffice. Consider the 960fps system mentioned. If a golf swing takes about I second, at a playback rate of 30fps, that gives you a swing video of 32 seconds in length. Plenty long enough to see the golfer's bodily motions. Considering how small the clubhead will appear when videoing the entire golfer, I don't know that fps is the main consideration. It could be pixel count and the quality of the lenses. This reminds me of my "audiophile" days when cassette tapes were all the rage. I had a BIC deck that could record at 7 1/2 ips (inches per second), and an Audiovox car player that could play back at that speed. The sound quality was amazing! You were putting the same amount of info into twice as much space! There was so much more room!
    • Wondered how and where achievements came from. I've broken par,  ( handicap is +3) 2 eagles on par 5's so far this year Hole in one 2 years ago on vacation in Arizona at Karsten ASU course.  My first one.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Just trying
      Just trying
      (33 years old)
    2. Peter_b
      Peter_b
      (45 years old)
    3. SACgolf
      SACgolf
      (51 years old)
    4. Weluvgolf
      Weluvgolf
      (53 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon