Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

How Deep in the Ground Is the Cup Supposed to Sit?


Recommended Posts

Posted

I came to think of this a couple of days ago when playing at my local 6 hole course, which usually have holes that are hard to putt on.
I played another course a couple of days before that again and noticed how huge the hole looked like. The diameter is probably the same, but on the 6 hole course, the cup sits 5cm down into the ground, with nothing but earth and grass above it. This makes the hole not only look, but be smaller. The green is making the hole smaller by closing down over the cup.

On the PGA Tour I see a white line all around it all the way up to the grass level. This makes the hole a whole lot easier to putt on, especially short ones you just want to slam into the back of the cup.

Are there any guidelines or how-to's on how to put a cup in the ground? The hole is supposed to be moved two times a week, but that's not always the case.
Compared to the picture below, the cup is much further down into the ground.



Edit: I found these while searching around. Perhaps something to consider.

Ogio Grom | Callaway X Hot Pro | Callaway X-Utility 3i | Mizuno MX-700 23º | Titleist Vokey SM 52.08, 58.12 | Mizuno MX-700 15º | Titleist 910 D2 9,5º | Scotty Cameron Newport 2 | Titleist Pro V1x and Taylormade Penta | Leupold GX-1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I can't give you a measurement of how deep the hole should be. I think the bottom of the cup sits 6" below ground level.

When I worked on the maintenance staff of my home course years ago, I would set the pins. There's a tool that's used that has a flange on it. You can only dig it into the ground but so far to create the new hole.

The tool pulls a plug of earth out and you put it back in the old cup hole's place... leveling and top dressing with sand and soil as necessary to get the surface level.

I've never seen those cup inserts you posted pictures of. I know for certain tournaments, I would paint the exposed dirt above the cup. I think it's only for additional visibility, though.

I would say the biggest problem at your course is that the pins are only moved twice a week. That's not often enough because you get what you've seen... grass growing over the edges, the edges caving in from lots of play, not to mention all the spike marks in that area. In the winter time, we'd change the pins 3 times during the week and both days of the weekend; In the summer time, it was daily.

..................
No brand loyalty at all!

Driver: Speedline 10.5*
Fairway woods: 905F 15* and Big Bertha 19*Hybrid: DWS 3HIrons: 2008 FP 4-GWWedge: Carnoustie 56*Putter: Zing Anser 2i


Posted
The answer is found in Section II of the rules.......

Hole

The "hole" must be 41/4 inches (108 mm) in diameter and at least 4 inches (101.6 mm) deep. If a lining is used, it must be sunk at least 1 inch (25.4 mm) below the putting green surface, unless the nature of the soil makes it impracticable to do so; its outer diameter must not exceed 41/4 inches (108 mm).

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
What is "lining"? The ring thing I posted a picture of above? If so, must all parts of the cup, plastic or metal, be sunk at least 1 inch below the surface, as stated in the rules? So all the cups I see with a white area all the way up to the top is simply painted to get a better visual?

The holes should definately be changed more often, but it's a small course in a small area, currently having no head greenkeeper and using foreign workers to cut the grass and move holes around. They don't play themselves and the holes are usually not moved around enough. The greens also have very high grass, nothing compared to the larger courses in the area, so the grass grow over the cup. When they cut the greens and people walk around the hole, the ground is also pushed together and making the hole smaller.

Ogio Grom | Callaway X Hot Pro | Callaway X-Utility 3i | Mizuno MX-700 23º | Titleist Vokey SM 52.08, 58.12 | Mizuno MX-700 15º | Titleist 910 D2 9,5º | Scotty Cameron Newport 2 | Titleist Pro V1x and Taylormade Penta | Leupold GX-1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
So all the cups I see with a white area all the way up to the top is simply painted to get a better visual?

That would be correct. There is a little attachment that is put on a special spray paint can (that is one way I have seen, there may be others), it is placed over the new hole, put the spray can over the small opening, and push down. The attachment helps spread the paint to the area above the cup so it can be better seen from a distance and on TV.

I will judge my rounds much more by the quality of my best shots than the acceptability of my worse ones.


Posted
That would be correct. There is a little attachment that is put on a special spray paint can (that is one way I have seen, there may be others), it is placed over the new hole, put the spray can over the small opening, and push down. The attachment helps spread the paint to the area above the cup so it can be better seen from a distance and on TV.

http://www.holeinwhite.com/

Rob Tyska

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
What is "lining"? The ring thing I posted a picture of above? If so, must all parts of the cup, plastic or metal, be sunk at least 1 inch below the surface, as stated in the rules? So all the cups I see with a white area all the way up to the top is simply painted to get a better visual?

The lining is the tall metal or plastic cup itself that is sunk into the ground to hold the flagstick. It also keeps the hole the correct diameter and prevents it from caving in. If the top edge of the cup is not kept the correct distance below ground level, balls can rebound off the edge and come back out if a putt is hit dead center. The band of turf/dirt around the top of a properly-cut cup acts like a deadening cushion.

The pro tours paint the dirt around the top edge mostly so that the cup is easier to see on television. Lots of the greenskeepers actually use a small brush to do so.
  • Informative 1

"There are three kinds of men. The one that learns by reading. The few who learn by observation. The rest of them have to pee on the electric fence for themselves." - Will Rogers 1897-1935


  • 10 years later...
Posted (edited)
59 minutes ago, Golfrules said:

Can the cup be set to low and is it legal if say it is 6 inches deep 

There is no specific maximum depth in the rules.  
 

Setting it too deep does cause some real, practical problems with edge erosion and ball removal though, so superintendents take care to ensure that doesn’t happen, and the tool used to dig the hole itself is designed to limit the depth.

Edited by David in FL

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Well this a Blast from the Past thread. 🙂
@David in Fla  - With courses which are Bermuda Greens, do they use a plastic retainer at the surface height to help retain the Bermuda from creeping over the edge of a cup?

I only asked because I do not play very often in these regions with Bermuda.
I recall playing in Bama and had a shot rain down on the pin. When we got to the green and looked at the edge of the hole,
the ball mark made a large divot on the edge, but there was a plastic liner around the edge which prevented damage to the hole.
It also bounced my ball about 10 ft. into the air and probably robbed me of an ACE !!!  🤬

Johnny Rocket - Let's Rock and Roll and play some golf !!!

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 4 years later...
Posted

Great info.  Played my local course here in Virginia Beach, (Heron Ridge) had a very short putt, hit it dead center and was shocked to see the ball rebound out of the hole.  I could hear it hit the plastic cup liner.  This cup was sunk around 1/4" from the surface, maximum of 1/2".  Tried the same putt on numerous other holes where the cup was sunk deeper with no problem.  Guess the greens keeper got lazy on this hole.


Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.