Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5980 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
My question and thread topic is chipping. I am sure many have watched the Secrets of the short game by Phil and have read the short game bible by Dave Pelz. They are polar opposites in way of technique. I have been practicing the "hinge and hold" and can not carry it only a yard or two with this technique. I will use the Pelz way for shorter chips from a good lie and will use the Phil way for longer chips and pitches. I think the angle created is so much better for chipping hinging the wrist and then holding the release but there is too much energy at times.

I have success with both methods and thought it would be an interesting discussion. I have also not read any of the Utley books so I would love to hear about his technique as well.

Brian


Posted
The first thing I ever learned about the short game was to get the ball rolling as fast possible. I have always stuck by that theory and it seems to work for me. I use a chip and run on 75% of my chips. If the shot calls for spin than I will do it but I don't ever just try to land one right by the pin and have it stop.
Driver: i15, 3 wood: G10, Hybrid: Nickent 4dx, Irons: Ping s57, Wedges: Mizuno MPT 52, 56, 60, Putter: XG #9 

Posted
You point out something I found interesting as well: Pelz and Phil's methods are completely opposite from each other. Given that Phil is such a big advocate of Pelz and that Pelz always holds up Phil as his star student, I've thought this rather odd.

Like you, I've found a hybrid seems to be working for me. For chipping, I use more of a putting stroke and address the club similar to how Pelz teaches, but for pitching I've found that Phil's "hinge and hold" works very well.

Posted
Like you, I've found a hybrid seems to be working for me. For chipping, I use more of a putting stroke and address the club similar to how Pelz teaches, but for pitching I've found that Phil's "hinge and hold" works very well.

Same here. For really short chips, I tend to use more of a putting stroke, and for anything longer than 6-7 yards, I "hinge and hold". I've tried the Utley technique for both long and short chips/pitches, but I found it harder to control.

905R 10.5* - Speeder (S) ::: 909F2 15.5* - VooDoo (S) ::: 909H 19* - VooDoo (S) ::: Vokey Spin Milled 52.08, 56.11 & 60.07
MX-25 4-P - Dynamic Gold (S300)
Studio Style Newport 2 - 33/350
Pro V1Tour V2

Posted
I know it's not the conventional wisdom but I like carrying my chips most of the way and getting it to roll out. I usually chip greenside with a open 56* and I pick a spot and watch for the roll out. For some reason, it's just the most comfortable shot for me to visualize. I also can expect the same results all the time as the open clubface makes it check and release to the right a bit. Gives me a little option to sometimes let it fight up against a hill.
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
I love Phil's method. I had lost the spin and consistency in my chips and pitches until I started using his method. Now every shot I hit has spin no matter how far it is. I still use my bump and run chipping if I don't have anything to carry but otherwise it is Phil's way for me.

And he seemed to trash the "clock" method of chipping...

Bryan A
"Your desire to change must be greater than your desire to stay the same"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Ive got Pelz's Short Game Secret manual and it is very useful although some of the material is quite complicated and difficult to put in to practice without lot of practice.

Posted
I believe Phil's is more of a feel approach to the short game, as oppose to Pelz's approach is more mechanical?

If I am correct with that statement above, I'm far more confident/better when I feel the shots around the green. I'm not mechanical in really any approach to my game, but chipping and pitching is probably the best part of my game, and I'm far more of a feel player. I don't really care for statistics and probabilities around the greens. I know which shot is a higher % shot and when trying a flop shot can be really just flat out stupid, but I just play the shot I play and I just feel my way around from inside 100 yards.

Driver Ping G10 10.5*
Hybrids Ping G5 (3) 19* Bridgestone J36 (4) 22*
Irons Mizuno MP-57 5-PW
Wedges Srixon WG-504 52.08 Bridgestone WC Copper 56.13
Putter 33" Scotty Cameron Studio Select #2


Posted
I went to a Dave Pelz 2-day short-game school, about 3yrs ago. It was everything with 100 yards and in.

Learned putting techniques, chipping, sand/flop shots. It really helped trim down strokes around the green.

Driver: Callaway Big Bertha 10.5* 

3WD:  Callaway Big Bertha 15* / X2 Hot H4 Hybrid
Irons:  Callaway Apex 4-PW Project X 5.5 shafts

Wedges: Callaway MackDaddy 2  52/58
Putter: Odyessey Metal X Milled 1


Note: This thread is 5980 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • In driving a car you have all sorts of random or variable parts, though. Different speeds, corners, conditions, size of turns… even different cars and sizes, different traffic and laws (lights, signs, etc.). I don't think I've seen anyone doing "block practice" to practice the same exact turn 100 times, then trying it in the real world.
    • IMHO, block practice is good. Any new motor pattern or a 'move' has to be committed to muscle memory and be reproducable at command without conscious thought as the final goal. I don't see how this is that much different than learning how to drive a car, or let's say how to handle the steering for example. One must do it enough times and then also do it in different situations to commit to all layers of brain - judgment of demand, decision making, judgment of response and finally execution. Unless each layer is familiar of each of their role in the specific motor move, it is not truly learned and you will simply fall back to the original pattern. I think the random practice is simply committing the learned pattern to different scenarios or intervals of time to replicate in the real world (actual rounds). It breeds further familiarity learned from block practice. Steer the car a hundred times to learn the move (block) and then drive the car all over town to make it real world (random) to a level of maturity. I don't see how block and random have to be in conflict with each other.  
    • Yea, I think the first thing is to define block, variable, and random practice with regards to golf.  The easiest one might be in practicing distance control for putting. Block practice would be just hitting 50 putts from 5 feet, then 50 putts from 10 ft then 50 putts from 15 ft. While random practice would having a different distance putt for every putt.  In terms of learning a new motor pattern, like let's say you want to make sure the clubhead goes outside the hands in the backswing. I am not sure how to structure random practice. Maybe block practice is just making the same 100 movements over and over again. I don't get how a random practice is structured for something like learning a new motor pattern for the golf swing.  Like, if a NFL QB needs to work on their throw. They want to get the ball higher above the shoulder. How would random practice be structured? Would they just need someone there to say, yes or no for feedback? That way the QB can go through an assortment of passing drills and throws trying to get the wright throwing motion?  For me, how do you structure the feedback and be time effective. Let's say you want to work on the club path in the backswing. You go out to the course to get some random practice. Do you need to set up the camera at each spot, check after each shot to make it random?  I know that feedback is also a HUGE part of learning. I could say, I went to the golf course and worked on my swing. If I made 40 golf swings on the course, what if none of them were good reps because I couldn't get any feedback? What if I regressed? 
    • I found it odd that both Drs. (Raymond Prior and Greg Rose) in their separate videos gave the same exact math problem (23 x 12), and both made the point of comparing block practice to solving the same exact math problem (23 x 12) over and over again. But I've made the point that when you are learning your multiplication tables… you do a bunch of similar multiplications over and over again. You do 7 x 8, then 9 x 4, then 3 x 5, then 2 x 6, and so on. So, I think when golf instructors talk about block practice, they're really not understanding what it actually is, and they're assuming that someone trying to kinda do the same thing is block practice, but when Dr. Raymond Prior said on my podcast that what I was describing was variable practice… then… well, that changes things. It changes the results of everything you've heard about how "block" practice is bad (or ineffective).
    • Day 121 12-11 Practice session this morning. Slowing the swing down. 3/4 swings, Getting to lead side better, trying to feel more in sync with swing. Hit foam balls. Good session overall. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.