Jump to content
IGNORED

What do these Diff. say about my game?


kfowler
Note: This thread is 5338 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

I played one of the hardest courses I've ever played in my life yesterday. Faulkwood Shores in Michigan. The rating is 72.8 and slope 137. I played erratic and shot a 92. Ends up the differential for my handicap for this round was a 15.8.

I find that interesting since my two lowest differentials this year have been from the two toughest courses I've played. The one mentioned above and a 91 I shot on 71.8/136 (Diff: 16.0).

Differential wise, it seems I do better on tougher courses compared to easier courses where I generally shoot in the mid to high 80's.

If I were to guess, I think this can be attributed to my issues with my short game. I generally don't have an issue with distance. My average drives are 240-260. Putting and chipping, on the other hand, is where I really struggle.

Does this make sense?

Kevin

-------
In the Bag
Driver: G15 9.0*3 & 5 Wood: BurnerHybrid: Pro Gold 20*; 23*Irons: MP-58 (5-PW)Wedges: Vokey Spin Milled 52*8; 56*14Putter: Newport 2.0 33"Balls: NXT

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Any difference on putts per round. I tend to putt a lot better on difficult courses that do a good job maintaining their greens.

HiBore XLS Tour 9.5*
Adams Fast10 15* 3W
A2OS 3H-7iron 60* LW
8iron Precept Tour Premium cb
9iron and 45* PW 50* GW 56* SW m565 and 455 VfoilPutter Anser Belly Putter Ball in order of preference TPblack e5 V2  AD333

Link to comment
Share on other sites


That may be a part of it. I tend to really struggle on municipal greens where they have "Mickey Mouse" pin placement. You know where the course is fairly seasy so they want to make it more difficult by placing every pin on top of a false edge or ridge.

The nicer courses tend to have larger greens with less gimicky pin placements.

Kevin

-------
In the Bag
Driver: G15 9.0*3 & 5 Wood: BurnerHybrid: Pro Gold 20*; 23*Irons: MP-58 (5-PW)Wedges: Vokey Spin Milled 52*8; 56*14Putter: Newport 2.0 33"Balls: NXT

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • 4 weeks later...
I was just thinking about this myself. Since joining a club where the slope is 134 or 137 depending which tees I play, my handicap has plunged. Started 2009 at 12.1, creeped up to 13.2 in late June. The suddenly I not only started playing better (several rounds in the lows 80s and a 77), but they were all on a slope about 8-10 points higher than I'd been playing. The latest update and I've dropped to 8.3. Playing a ton of golf in August helped me replace a bunch of low 90s with low 80s, which led to the quick drop.

So, are there skeptics out there about the system? I know it measures potential, but I'm not sold that I would be shooting 3-4 shots better on a 122 slope course, although I hope to find out this weekend when I've got a 3-day golf trip planned. Really hoping to close out the season with a couple more rounds in the 70s because I want to play in some state tournaments early next year with a handicap requirement of 7.

What do you guys think of the slope/rating system? Does it overemphasize a good round on a tough course? Or even overemphasize a so-so round on a tough course? Is there an actual numerical value for how many strokes difference between an 80 on a 120 vs. an 80 on a 137?

Driver: Nike Covert Tour | 3W: Callaway X Hot Pro | Irons: Mizuno JPX-800 Pro X100 SS | Wedges: Vokey SM 54-08, Vokey Raw 60-12 | Putter (of the week): Arnold Palmer "The Original" 33"

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I played one of the hardest courses I've ever played in my life yesterday. Faulkwood Shores in Michigan. The rating is 72.8 and slope 137. I played erratic and shot a 92. Ends up the differential for my handicap for this round was a 15.8.

Makes perfect sense. As a 16.4 handicap you shouldn't really concern yourself with your scores vs the course rating. There is a little-known (and usually omitted from scorecards) figure besides the USGA® Course Rating and the Slope Rating®, called the

Bogey Rating . quote from USGA link :
Bogey Rating: The one number every golfer worse than a scratch should check before deciding which tees to play. This rating is the evaluation of the playing difficulty of a course for the bogey golfer. It is based on yardage, effective playing length and other obstacles to the extent that affect the scoring ability of the bogey golfer. To figure out this number, other than from looking at this database, the bogey golfer should take the Slope Rating®, divide it by the set factor (5.381 for men, and 4.24 for women) and add that to the Course Rating. The result is a target score for the bogey golfer, and is a truer yardstick of the challenge that lies ahead for the particular set of tees. Example: 96.3- which predicts the bogey golfer's average of his ten best (out of twenty) scores would be approximately 96.3 from this particular set of tees.

At Faulkwood Shores, from the tees you played, the bogey rating is 98.3. You shot 92 - 3 strokes better than a 'bogey golfer' - thus, your differential is going to be about 3 strokes lower than the bogey golfer's differential.

driver: FT-i tlcg 9.5˚ (Matrix Ozik XCONN Stiff)
4 wood: G10 (ProLaunch Red FW stiff)
3 -PW: :Titleist: 695 mb (Rifle flighted 6.0)
wedges:, 52˚, 56˚, 60˚
putter: Studio Select Newport 1.5

Link to comment
Share on other sites


That may be a part of it. I tend to really struggle on municipal greens where they have "Mickey Mouse" pin placement. You know where the course is fairly seasy so they want to make it more difficult by placing every pin on top of a false edge or ridge.

this is a pet peeve of mine we have this course here, that plays to a 69.4 (nine hole course) only like 6300 yds, but last week will be my last time ever golfing there its cheap, $20 for nine and usually in decent shape i went out last week and they had pins in literally IMPOSSIBLE locations like in the middle of a tier on a downslope, tucked in a hole on the back of the green there was not one pin that was more than 18 inches from the fringe it was ridiculous...never came accross this IN MY LIFE it was impossible to make a putt i shot a 43 on nine and walked in and asked for a refund for the 2nd nine they said i could have a raincheck, but i refused and told them i will never golf there again
"My swing is homemade - but I have perfect flaws!" - Me
Link to comment
Share on other sites


this is a pet peeve of mine

I played a pretty nice muni last year with great greens. Only problem was, on quite a few holes the pin placements were just as you described. If you don't hole your putt, it comes back to you. Really hard to enjoy yourself when you have to hole-out a lot of 10+ foot putts. Can't chip close either.

-Rich

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I play Faulkwood Shores usually twice a week or so. I understand what you mean by tough haha.
My putting always seems to be off at that course for some reason.
Practice your short game and I am sure your scores will drop.

In my Xtreme Sport bag
'09 Burner 9.5*
F50 15* 3 Wood
Burner 18* 5 Wood
MX-19 4-GW SV Tour 54.12 & 58.08 White Hot 2-Ball SRT

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Hm, Isn't there a rule about pins having to be 5 feet from the fringe or something like that? A pro in florida told me about that, anyone?

No rule about pin placement.

Read this thread about pin placement.

driver: FT-i tlcg 9.5˚ (Matrix Ozik XCONN Stiff)
4 wood: G10 (ProLaunch Red FW stiff)
3 -PW: :Titleist: 695 mb (Rifle flighted 6.0)
wedges:, 52˚, 56˚, 60˚
putter: Studio Select Newport 1.5

Link to comment
Share on other sites


You know this got me thinking and I was looking at TPC Sawgrass, Stadium...talk about a hard course lmao. From the tips its rating is a 76.8 with a 155 slope. that would be a lonnnngg day for me ha ha.

Kyle Paulhus

If you really want to get better, check out Evolvr

:callaway: Rogue ST 10.5* | :callaway: Epic Sub Zero 15* | :tmade: P790 3 Driving Iron |:titleist: 716 AP2 |  :edel: Wedges 50/54/68 | :edel: Deschutes 36"

Career Low Round: 67 (18 holes), 32 (9 holes)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Since this thread popped back up, I thought I'd give an update. I truly believe now that my better scores on harder courses is based on the fact that I generally keep the ball in play. I'm fairly accurate with my driver. On easier courses, driving accuracy doesn't seem to be as much a premium, hence the higher handicap scores.

I have a buddy who I play with that hits the ball a ton but is very erratic. I can never beat him on courses that have adjoining fairways. If we play a course that really punishes you for being wild, I typically beat him by several strokes.

Kevin

-------
In the Bag
Driver: G15 9.0*3 & 5 Wood: BurnerHybrid: Pro Gold 20*; 23*Irons: MP-58 (5-PW)Wedges: Vokey Spin Milled 52*8; 56*14Putter: Newport 2.0 33"Balls: NXT

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Since this thread popped back up, I thought I'd give an update. I truly believe now that my better scores on harder courses is based on the fact that I generally keep the ball in play. I'm fairly accurate with my driver. On easier courses, driving accuracy doesn't seem to be as much a premium, hence the higher handicap scores.

Funny to hear your explanation. It makes perfect sense. On the other hand, I think the reason I play better on tighter driving courses is that I tend to pay more attention off the tee and play with more strategy -- hitting 5W, 3I, or will focus more on exactly where I have to hit my driver. When I know that I can spray it 50 yards left or right, I end up playing bombs away and simply trying to overpower the course.

Driver: Nike Covert Tour | 3W: Callaway X Hot Pro | Irons: Mizuno JPX-800 Pro X100 SS | Wedges: Vokey SM 54-08, Vokey Raw 60-12 | Putter (of the week): Arnold Palmer "The Original" 33"

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 5338 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • Day 120 - Played 18; much better than yesterday. Miss right now is off the heel of the club, so I need to sort that out. 
    • Today we played Pease Golf Course in Portsmouth, NH. Course was in great shape but my game didn't show up. I will say I pitched and chipped fairly well but almost everything else was very hit or miss. Cost myself a lot hitting an in play drive with pulling my approach shots maybe 85% of the time. Finally figured out I had been swaying most of the round. Only took me until 13 to figure it out. Used what felt like a much more centered turn and the ballstriking improved. 18 tomorrow using a 2 man scramble format. Just looking to contribute. Been a blast though. 
    • Day 22: Hit balls with 7-iron using mevo+ to track dispersion. Was out for a long time after work; 86 balls but the first 50+ were 50% swings focusing on top of backswing feel and then just hitting the ball as a psychic reward. Finished with 20 balls close to full speed. Pretty happy with dispersion and also no horrendous misses. I’m chunking my priority piece out into two separate feels, first and more important is the position/balance at top of backswing which is what I was working on. Once I have that engrained I’ll move to transition part. 
    • FWIW I never really had issues with the previous generation of Snells. But… I'm not sure I played them a ton, either.
    • I know Dean Snell designed the original Pro V along with a couple of other brands tour balls.  How exactly does the Snell ball have problems.  Did he change something in the design or is a manufacturing error since he cannot afford the unlimited R&D budgets of the big manufacturers to iron out flaws
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...