Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5877 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

0  

  1. 1. Long V Short

    • Long Courses are best
      6
    • Short Courses are best
      5
    • I don't care.
      7


Recommended Posts

Posted
Which do you prefer to play?
A long course that's main wepon is it's length.
OR
A short course that while not long it uses narrow fairways with thick rough and well protected greens.

I ask this because recently I played a short course near me called Rathbane. It's 5476 metres (6000 yards).
And I played a long beatiful course called Dromoland which is 6200 metres (6,800 yards).
My usual course limerick county is 5800 metres (6300 yards

I enjoyed both courses.
But I couldn't decide which I preferred.

What about you?

My Clubs
Driver - LV4 10* R flex
Wood - sam snead persimmon 2 wood (for windy days)
Hybrid burner tour launch 20* stiff flex.
Irons - Tour Mode 3i,4i stiffIrons - FP's 5-PW R-flexWedge - spin milled 54.14Wedge - spin milled 60.07Putter - Victoria Lowest round 2010: 79 (par 70)Latest rounds at...


Posted
So many more factors that determine my enjoyment of a course than just length.

A good golf course design can be short and challenging without resorting to narrow fairways and thick rough. Look at Kingston Heath, site of the 2009 Australian Masters. Short by PGA Tour standards, and wide open. They didn't exactly tear it apart.

I voted "don't care."

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
I prefer short golf courses as they need to get by on something other than length. Most often that happens to be "interest". Ever played an enjoyable and interesting 7,600 yd golf course?
The 10th at the Belfry, the 13th or 9th at Harbourtown, the 10th at Riviera, the 3rd and 12th at Augusta - give me 13 or 14 of those type holes and I am a happy camper.
Andrew Rice
www.andrewricegolf.com
www.itsallaboutimpact.com

Posted
I prefer short golf courses as they need to get by on something other than length. Most often that happens to be "interest". Ever played an enjoyable and interesting 7,600 yd golf course?

Indeed.Shorter courses seem to have more character in my opinion.

A great shot is when you go for it and pull it off. A smart shot is when you don't have the guts to try it. ~ Phil Mickelson.

 

Posted
I am somewhere in the middle...

I prefer long courses if they maintain some character and are not all about length. If the long course is wide open then it is too easy because I can rip driver all the time and not worry about accuracy. A long and narrow course is a true test because the short/accurate hitters are more even with the bombers since they won't make the same mistakes off the tee, but lose a couple shots to the long hitters in distance.

My home course is pretty short (only 6600 from the tips), but has tough greens and several tricky shots that make it challenging in its own way. The shorter courses have more risk/reward type shots that are fun as well (i.e., going for a par 5 in two, trying to drive a par 4, etc.)

"I'm not going left or right of those trees, okay. I'm going over those trees...with a little draw." ~ Tin Cup


Posted
I said "long", but I like courses that are pretty medium-length (to me at least). I'd like a course with a par 4 average of 390 yards. A par 3 average of 170 yards. And a par 5 average of 520 yards. Altogether that equals 6660 yards. That'd the perfect yardage for me. A little more than that would be pushing it.

Posted
I like the tactical approach (short course)..but when my driver is on I like a longer course.

so both!

Cleveland Launcher Driver
Taylormade r7 3 wood
Odyssey White Steel
Mizuno MP-32 3-PW
Cleveland wedges


Posted
Usually the best courses that i have played have been the long ones, but i love the quirky short course more than anything. It is also fun to play course from the front tees.

In my bag:

Driver: Titleist TSi3 | 15º 3-Wood: Ping G410 | 17º 2-Hybrid: Ping G410 | 19º 3-Iron: TaylorMade GAPR Lo |4-PW Irons: Nike VR Pro Combo | 54º SW, 60º LW: Titleist Vokey SM8 | Putter: Odyssey Toulon Las Vegas H7

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 5877 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 22 - 2026-01-11 More mirror work. Back outdoors tomorrow.
    • Day 11, 1/11/26.  Today was putting, along about 6' of carpet, with coins on the ground to keep me cognizant of what I'm doing.  I think this is the at-home drill from LSW. (Ugh, missed two of the last four days -- 1/10 and 1/8)
    • Day 9: 2026.01.11 Hit some balls at the range, concentrating on weight distribution at address, got some on film.
    • Day 468 - 2026-01-11 Loooooong day. Did some work in the patio door (as a mirror) when I got home.
    • I caught a video on this driver; the face tech seems crazy. Looking at the heat map for ball speed, hitting it basically anywhere on the face only loses a few percent ball speed. The surprising and counter intuitive part to me was that for flat faced clubs, ball speed loss is directly proportional to distance loss. For clubs with bulge and roll this is apparently not true. The surprising part of that story being that the max distance potential looks to be a tiny pee sized area for this driver, and I feel in general for drivers. The counter intuitive part being (the myth?) that blade irons have a pee sized sweet spot and missing that tiny spot causes dramatic losses. And that modern drivers, maybe 2017 on, have massive sweet spots and are ultra forgiving. Where in reality, if this heat map data is valid and reliable, it might be a bit of the opposite. This insane tech driver appears to have a pea sized "sweet spot" while Mizuno Pro 241 irons are 28% more forgiving compared to the average of all clubs measured. Not compared to other players irons, compared to all clubs from all categories, players to SGI! The Pro 241 being essentially just a solid chunk of metal with no "tech" at all. Which for me devolves into a whole mess of what is forgiveness really? And in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.