Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5804 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Update: I went with a set of Mizuno MX-25 irons. Hopefully it dries up a little here in southern Illinois so I can play a round soon! Thanks for all the advice!

I think you made a good choice, considering your criteria. I recently switched from Callaway X-20's to mx-25's. The X-20's definitely hit the ball farther, but I just couldn't get over the clunky, round look of the X-20's, especially in the short irons (which for some reason are clunkier than the long irons in the set). The X-20 PW looks like a shovel, which makes it difficult to use for pitching and chipping.

Driver: Callaway Diablo Edge 10*
Woods: Mizuno F-60 (15*, 18*); Hybrids: Callaway FT-iZ 21*, Callaway X 24*
Irons: Mizuno MX 25 (5I - GW)
Wedges: Mizuno MP T Chrome (56/10), MP T-10 Black Satin (60/8)
Putter: Odyssey White Hot Tour #9

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted
Because I have a very similar question I'll it here rather than start a new thread. I'm a high handicapper, but I think that being a low-high or a high-mid handicapper isn't unrealistic after some solid practice this summer so I want clubs with that goal in mind. (I only started keeping track of my handicap as of the last few games, which weren't exactly my best, and my biggest weakness is woods, not irons.)

I'm considering new irons, and the MX-23, MX-25, and R7 have topped my list so far. The problem, though, is that I can't find any MX-23s or MX-25s to demo hit. No one around here has any, not even the places specializing in used clubs. If I could find demo clubs I'd hit them and let that speak for itself, but I can't so I'm asking here.

From what I've read, it seems that the MX-25s are a bit more forgiving than the MX-23s (more noticeably in the longer irons). If that's true, I'd thought that maybe the MX-23s would be better for me because they'd be a bit over my skill level and help train me to hit better. Can anyone verify that the MX-25s are more forgiving / have a larger sweet spot? If so, my main question is: Might MX-23s be overly ambitious or would they not be any less practical than the MX-25s? It seems not, from my reading, but I'd like to get all the info I can before buying anything.

"Golf is an entire game built around making something that is naturally easy - putting a ball into a hole - as difficult as possible." - Scott Adams

Mid-priced ball reviews: Top Flight Gamer v2 | Bridgestone e5 ('10) | Titleist NXT Tour ('10) | Taylormade Burner TP LDP | Taylormade TP Black | Taylormade Burner Tour | Srixon Q-Star ('12)


Posted
Because I have a very similar question I'll it here rather than start a new thread. I'm a high handicapper, but I think that being a low-high or a high-mid handicapper isn't unrealistic after some solid practice this summer so I want clubs with that goal in mind. (I only started keeping track of my handicap as of the last few games, which weren't exactly my best, and my biggest weakness is woods, not irons.)

I have mx-25's and a demo mx-23 6-iron, and I don't notice any difference in terms of forgiveness (although I have read that the 25's are more forgiving). You should be able to find some demo 6-irons on ebay. IMO, the 25's have a lot nicer finish than the 23's. Maybe just see which set you get the best deal on.

Driver: Callaway Diablo Edge 10*
Woods: Mizuno F-60 (15*, 18*); Hybrids: Callaway FT-iZ 21*, Callaway X 24*
Irons: Mizuno MX 25 (5I - GW)
Wedges: Mizuno MP T Chrome (56/10), MP T-10 Black Satin (60/8)
Putter: Odyssey White Hot Tour #9

Posted
Callaway X-18-20-22

These are all great consideration. You may like Mizuno MP52 (prgressive offset, meaning less offset for higher irons)

I used Callaway X-20 tour and like it better than x-20 as tour version has less offset. You need to spend enough time to test them to find one that works best for you. Let us know which one you'll end up with.

Driver: Big Bertha 460, (9° Steel) | Wood: X Fairway 3W (15° Steel) | Hybrid: X 3H (21° Steel) |
Irons: 4-PW, MP-52 (TT DG S300) | Wedges: X-Forged Chrome 52°/13, 56°/15, 60°/10 (TT DG S300) |
Putter: Ping Karsten Anser


Posted
I just went through the same process, and I'm at the same level. I wanted something that would allow me to get better, but make me focus a bit more on what I was doing, so that when I don't do what I'm supposed to, I have to pay for it. I had TM R9's and liked them, but they still didn't give me that feedback I was looking for. I went and demo'd clubs for 2 hours at a time, 2 days in a row and hit everything they had in the store multiple times before I made my decision. I hit everything from X-20 and X-22 Tours, Mizuno MX irons, TM R9 Tours, Burners, about everything Nike made, and everything Cleveland makes.

I ended up choosing a set of Cleveland CG Red Tour Specs. I thought they were a little over my head, although I hit them well on the simulator. What they do make me do is concentrate on my shots, and since I had them fitted and have taken a lesson since I bought them to straighten me back out, I love them.

Posted
I have mx-25's and a demo mx-23 6-iron, and I don't notice any difference in terms of forgiveness (although I have read that the 25's are more forgiving). You should be able to find some demo 6-irons on ebay. IMO, the 25's have a lot nicer finish than the 23's. Maybe just see which set you get the best deal on.

I'd hate to spend $100 to buy and ship two different demo clubs just to decide on which set set to get, but I did think of that. In the mean time, I'm going to keep looking around the local area to see if anyone out here has them. I think the MX-25s look better too, but that's really only a tie-breaker in my for me.

What kind of feedback do you get from the MX-25s? If you hit it an inch from the center, can you tell that you mis-hit? How strong can you feel it? What if you hit a half-inch from the center? Sorry to pick on you, but any info would be helpful.

"Golf is an entire game built around making something that is naturally easy - putting a ball into a hole - as difficult as possible." - Scott Adams

Mid-priced ball reviews: Top Flight Gamer v2 | Bridgestone e5 ('10) | Titleist NXT Tour ('10) | Taylormade Burner TP LDP | Taylormade TP Black | Taylormade Burner Tour | Srixon Q-Star ('12)


Posted
You can certainly tell when you mishit the MX-25s. I have found them to be forgiving enough, though I did replace the 4 iron with a hybrid. I'm not exactly a great golfer either.

Tour Edge Exotics XCG-V 10.5*
Tour Edge Exotics XCG-6 15*
Tour Edge Exotics XCG-6 #4

Callaway Razr X Tour 5-AW
Nike VR Pro Forged Brushed Oxide 54-58
Yes! C-Groove Sally-12M Mid Counterbalance


Posted
I'd hate to spend $100 to buy and ship two different demo clubs just to decide on which set set to get, but I did think of that. In the mean time, I'm going to keep looking around the local area to see if anyone out here has them. I think the MX-25s look better too, but that's really only a tie-breaker in my for me.

I don't think I could answer your last question with any set of clubs, but I do think the 25's have great feedback. I know when I hit them on the sweet spot. I'm not sure if this makes much a difference, but the 25's are have slightly softer forgings (1025 versus 1020 in the 23's).

Driver: Callaway Diablo Edge 10*
Woods: Mizuno F-60 (15*, 18*); Hybrids: Callaway FT-iZ 21*, Callaway X 24*
Irons: Mizuno MX 25 (5I - GW)
Wedges: Mizuno MP T Chrome (56/10), MP T-10 Black Satin (60/8)
Putter: Odyssey White Hot Tour #9

Note: This thread is 5804 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 470 - 2026-01-13 Got some work in while some players were using the sim, so I had to stick around. 🙂 Good thing too, since… I hadn't yet practiced today until about 6:45 tonight. 😛 
    • That's not quite the same thing as what some people messaged me today.
    • Day 152 1-12 More reps bowing wrists in downswing. Still pausing at the top. Making sure to get to lead side and getting the ball to go left. Slow progress is better than no progress.  
    • Yea, if I were to make a post arguing against the heat map concept, citing some recent robot testing would be my first point. The heat map concept is what I find interesting, more on that below. The robot testing I have looked at, including the one you linked, do discreet point testing then provide that discrete data in various forms. Which as you said is old as the hills, if you know of any other heat map concept type testing, I would be interested in links to that though! No, and I did say in my first post "if this heat map data is valid and reliable" meaning I have my reservations as well. Heck beyond reservations. I have some fairly strong suspicions there are flaws. But all I have are hunches and guesses, if anyone has data to share, I would be interested to see it.  My background is I quit golfing about 9 years ago and have been toying with the idea of returning. So far that has been limited to a dozen range sessions in late Summer through Fall when the range closed. Then primarily hitting foam balls indoors using a swing speed monitor as feedback. Between the range closing and the snow flying I did buy an R10 and hit a few balls into a backyard net. The heat map concept is a graphical representation of efficiency (smash factor) loss mapped onto the face of the club. As I understand it to make the representation agnostic to swing speed or other golfer specific swing characteristics. It is more a graphical tool not a data tool. The areas are labeled numerically in discrete 1% increments while the raw data is changing at ~0.0017%/mm and these changes are represented as subtle changes in color across those discrete areas. The only data we care about in terms of the heat map is the 1.3 to 1.24 SF loss and where was the strike location on the face - 16mm heal and 5mm low. From the video the SF loss is 4.6% looking up 16mm heal and 5mm low on the heat map it is on the edge of where the map changes from 3% loss to 4%. For that data point in the video, 16mm heal, 5mm low, 71.3 mph swing speed (reference was 71.4 mph), the distance loss was 7.2% or 9 yards, 125 reference distance down to 116. However, distance loss is not part of a heat map discussion. Distance loss will be specific to the golfers swing characteristics not the club. What I was trying to convey was that I do not have enough information to determine good or bad. Are the two systems referencing strike location the same? How accurate are the two systems in measuring even if they are referencing from the same location? What variation might have been introduced by the club delivery on the shot I picked vs the reference set of shots? However, based on the data I do have and making some assumptions and guesses the results seem ok, within reason, a good place to start from and possibly refine. I do not see what is wrong with 70mph 7 iron, although that is one of my other areas of questioning. The title of the video has slow swing speed in all caps, and it seems like the videos I watch define 7i slow, medium, and fast as 70, 80, and 90. The whole question of mid iron swing speed and the implications for a players game and equipment choices is of interest to me as (according to my swing speed meter) over my ~decade break I lost 30mph swing speed on mine.
    • Maxfli, Maltby, Golfworks, all under the Dicks/Golf Galaxy umbrella... it's all a bit confounding. Looking at the pictures, they all look very, very similar in their design. I suspect they're the same club, manufactured in the same factory in China, just with different badging.  The whacky pricing structure has soured me, so I'll just cool my heels a bit. The new Mizuno's will be available to test very soon. I'm in no rush.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.