Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5934 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I'm looking at getting a new Driver. Currently I hit the R7 Driver and I have loved it since the day I got it. I do have money burning a hole in my pocket and the Driver is the next thing on my list to replace. So the question is should I buy the 09 Burner or Should I Get a high end exotic shaft put in my existing Driver.

Thanks

Driver - Taylormade R9
3 Wood - Titlelist 909F2 15.5 degrees

2H - Nickent

4H - Taylormade
Irons - Mizuno MP-63 5-PW
Wedges - Titlelist 52 and 60 and Cleveland CG-15 56
Putter - Scotty Cameron Stainless Steel NewportBall - Pro V or V1


Posted
I'm looking at getting a new Driver. Currently I hit the R7 Driver and I have loved it since the day I got it. I do have money burning a hole in my pocket and the Driver is the next thing on my list to replace. So the question is should I buy the 09 Burner or Should I Get a high end exotic shaft put in my existing Driver.

I would say to go get fit on a launch monitor- I have been continually surprised hot much this helps and often fits me into something I was not even considering. Technology has improved over your R7 but not by much and a new shaft may be a nice new upgrade. I just tested the new Ping i 15 with the Proforce AXIVCore Tour Red 69 shaft and compared to my 09 burner with aftermarket UST V2 my spin rates came down about 400 rpms and I gained about 10 yards on the launch monitor. Of course now I'm shopping for the i 15:)

In the bag-

Driver- Ping Anser 9.5  Diamana Ahina
3 Wood-RBZ tour 15
Hybrid-RBZ tour 4 Irons-  Ping I20s 4-GW with soft stepped X100sWedges 58 and 54 SM4s with soft stepped X100s Putter- Ping TR Senita


Posted
Getting on a launch monitor is definitely a good idea. I strongly disagree with the 400 rpm having anything to do with a 10 yard gain tho'. Because if that were true then I should have picked up (let me do the math here... 4 naught naught naught minus twenty eight naught naught equals twelve naught naught then divide by 4 naught naught equals three times 10 yards per 400 rpm spin equals 30 yards I should have picked up by changing shafts alone?
No. If you want to gain distance the first thing to do is match your equipment to a faster swing.
Golf is a game of physics. In physics everything matters, to a degree. In this case 400 rpm didn't matter THAT much.

Not to insult you sir, I just know this to be true.

KZG Gemini 9* Aldila Proto By You
Leyland COPlasma 3wd
Golfsmith Q4 19*
Louisville HyLofter 24*
Wishon 770CFEs w/Nippons
Alpha P2 wedges
Louisville EWP putter


Posted
now if the launch agle would have went up along with the spin rate decreasing add in probably 1.5-2 mph extra clubhead speed and there you have your 10 yards
If you always do what you've always done....You'll always be where you are right now..
Driver: C830.2 HOF Taiwan Proto
3 wood: Versus VS 1 Proforce V2
7 wood: DCT Fujikura Motore F1
3-pw: Nakashima NX-1 Project X 6.5 53*: ...

Posted
Getting on a launch monitor is definitely a good idea. I strongly disagree with the 400 rpm having anything to do with a 10 yard gain tho'. Because if that were true then I should have picked up (let me do the math here... 4 naught naught naught minus twenty eight naught naught equals twelve naught naught then divide by 4 naught naught equals three times 10 yards per 400 rpm spin equals 30 yards I should have picked up by changing shafts alone?

I never said that the reduction in spin rate was giving me all the 10 yards. I just said the spin rate came down and I gained 10 yards. There is a lot more going on in the shaft and new head that is giving me the extra yards. The swing speeds were actually averaging 1 mph lower with the ping. Go figure. No insult taken:)

In the bag-

Driver- Ping Anser 9.5  Diamana Ahina
3 Wood-RBZ tour 15
Hybrid-RBZ tour 4 Irons-  Ping I20s 4-GW with soft stepped X100sWedges 58 and 54 SM4s with soft stepped X100s Putter- Ping TR Senita


Posted
Most of the graphite wood shafts in US is 65+ grams.

Have you try to fit with sub 60g ? It might give you faster swing andmore distance.


Clubs make for Asian are typically lighter , the wood shafts are ranging from 40g to 50 g.
What I Play:
913D3 9.5°Diamana Kai'li 70 Stiff  "C3" | 910F 15°, Diamana Kai'li 80 Stiff "D2" | 910H 19°,  Diamana Kai'li for Titleist 85 Hybrid Stiff | Titleist 714 AP2 4 to P Aerotech Steelfiber i110 S | SM4 Vokey 50.12, 54.14 & SM5 60.11K| 34" Edel Umpqua + 40g Counter Weight
 

Posted
Another option for you could be to buy the driver you want on e-bay (depending on make and model, I have seen some NEW for about half the retail value). Then, take your brand-new driver to your local golf fitter and have whatever stock shaft is in it replaced with the appropriate shaft. This has the pototential to save you quite a bite of money and you can satisfy all your driver needs!

In my Grom stand bag:

V2 Rapture 9* with Mitsubishi Rayon Diamana Blue stiff shaft
Launcher 15* 3 wood with Proforce V2 stiff shaft
18.5* 3DX 3+ Hybrid with Adila NV Hybrid 75 stiff shaft MX 200 3-PW with True Temper XP S300 stiff shaftsVokey Spin Milled 52.08Vokey Spin Milled 58.12 CX2 34 in


Note: This thread is 5934 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I work with a lot of golfers who want more shaft lean at impact, who currently have AoAs that range from +2° to -2°, and who love to see the handle lower and more "in front of their trail thigh" from face-on at P6. And a lot of these golfers try to solve the issue by working on the downswing. They do something to drag the handle forward. Or they just leave their right thigh farther back so the same handle location "looks" farther forward. Or they move the ball back in their stance. Or they push themselves down into the ground to get the handle lower and increase (decrease?) their AoA (to be more negative). The real fix is often to get wider in the backswing. To do LESS in the backswing. To hinge less, fold the trail arm less, abduct the trail arm less. I had a case of this over the weekend. Before, the player had 110° of trail elbow bend, "lifted" his trail humerus only a few degrees, etc. The club traveled quite a bit around him, and he tended to "pick" the ball from the fairways. In the "after" swings below (which are mild exaggerations — this golfer does not need to end up at < 70° of elbow bend. These were slower backswings with "hit it as hard as you normally would" intent downswings), you can see that he bent his elbow about 70° instead of 110° and lifted his right arm an extra ~15° or more. You can't see how much less this moved his hands across his chest (right arm abduction), but it was also decreased. His hands stayed more "in front of" his right shoulder rather than traveling "beside" them so much. The two swings look like this: The change at P6, without talking about the downswing one little bit (outside of him telling me that he tends to pick the ball), is remarkable: Without 110° of elbow bend to get out (which he gets to 80°, a loss of 30°), the golfer actually loses slightly less elbow bend (70 - 50 = 20), but delivers 30° less elbow bend, lowering the handle and letting the elbow get "in front of" the rib cage… because it never got "behind" or "beside" the rib cage. If you look at this video showing the before/afters of P6, you'll note the handle location (both vertically and horizontally) and the shoulders (the ball is in the same place in these frames). This golfer's path was largely unaffected (still pretty straight into the ball, < 3° path and often < 1.5°), but his AoA jumped to -5° ± 2°. I've always said, and in talking with other instructors they agree and feel similarly, that we spend a lot of time working on the backswing. This is another example of why.
    • We had a member of our senior club who developed a mental block on pulling the trigger. I played with him to see what the membership was talking about. I timed him a few times when he would get over the ball. 45 seconds. He knew he had a mental block and would chide himself, “Just hit it!” Once on the green he was okay and chipping was a bit better. It was painful to watch him struggle. Our “bandaid” was to put him in the last tournament  tee time with two understanding players. We should have suggested to him to take a break from our tournaments. I agree with the idea that when a player realizes they have a problem, the answer is to go fix it and not return until they are able to play at an acceptable pace.
    • Day 56 (4 May 26) - Worked on some ball-then-ground drills - going from P3 thru impact - with a slowed tempo, working to keep all parts in sync.   
    • Wordle 1,780 3/6 🟩⬜🟨🟨🟨 ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,780 4/6 🟨⬜⬜⬜🟨 ⬜🟨🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟨🟩🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.