Jump to content
IGNORED

Is false advertising = cheating.


Note: This thread is 5457 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

http://tgontg.blogspot.com/2008/03/w...-bag-2008.html
...seems like up until last year he was usin SQ...last year was the dymo...

In my Titleist 2014 9.5" Staff bag:

Cobra Bio+ 9* Matrix White Tie X  - Taylormade SLDR 15* ATTAS 80X - Titleist 910H 19* ATTAS 100X - Taylormade '13 TP MC 4-PW PX 6.5 - Vokey TVD M 50* DG TI X100 - Vokey SM4 55 / Vokey SM5 60* DG TI S400 - Piretti Potenza II 365g


  • Replies 123
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

his balls (haha no jokes please) are not readily available to us. they are prototypes suited to his needs. they aren't marked with 'one', 'one tour d', etc. but rather his trademark 'Tiger' along the putting aid or the tw logo.

I can confirm that this is indeed true, although the actual makeup of the ball is unknown, they are indeed, Nike One balls marked with "Tiger" and the number "18". They come in a plain white sleeve with no markings on it. Apart from that, I think they're the same as regular Nike One balls. He draws a line on them freehand on the first tee, to gauge his nerves.


I can confirm that this is indeed true, although the actual makeup of the ball is unknown, they are indeed, Nike One balls marked with "Tiger" and the number "18". Apart from that, I think they're the same as regular Nike One balls. He draws a line on them freehand on the first tee, to gauge his nerves.

???? Where do you get this?

And of all the times the cameras have shown Tiger's ball close up, why have I never seen these supposed "Tiger" marks or "18" on them?

TM R11/Titleist 910F 15*/ Nike SQ2 20* & 23*/ Nike CCi 5-PW/ Nike SV 52* & 56*/ SC Newport 2 Studio Style 32.5"
Nike 20XIx/Pro V1x


Only the FWs, the Driver is a Dymo.

Really? Cause I thought maybe he was using a Ping G10 driver w/ a Nike headcover.

( I'm well aware of the clubs he uses)

TM R11/Titleist 910F 15*/ Nike SQ2 20* & 23*/ Nike CCi 5-PW/ Nike SV 52* & 56*/ SC Newport 2 Studio Style 32.5"
Nike 20XIx/Pro V1x


I can confirm that this is indeed true, although the actual makeup of the ball is unknown, they are indeed, Nike One balls marked with "Tiger" and the number "18". They come in a plain white sleeve with no markings on it. Apart from that, I think they're the same as regular Nike One balls. He draws a line on them freehand on the first tee, to gauge his nerves.

I knew I would be starting a lively discussion about Tiger's balls (Ha Ha). Nike does not make the balls Tiger uses. Never have. He has always played Titleist Pro V1s, with the swoosh logo. Wouldn't Nike love to run full page ads with Tiger saying he owes he success to a Nike One ball, but they never have. That's why. This info comes from a USGA official, who noticed during tournaments that the balls Tiger used didn't look like Nikes, so he asked an Acushnet rep about it. So, you could say I got the info 3rd hand, but there it is.

Driver 905S, V2 stiff shaft
3-Wood 906F2 13 degree, V2 stiff
Hybrid 585H 21 degree, Aldila VS Proto
Irons (4-PW) MP-57, Rifle 5.5
SW & LW spin milledPutter TracyBall Pro V-1


I knew I would be starting a lively discussion about Tiger's balls (Ha Ha). Nike does not make the balls Tiger uses. Never have. He has always played Titleist Pro V1s, with the swoosh logo. Wouldn't Nike love to run full page ads with Tiger saying he owes he success to a Nike One ball, but they never have. That's why. This info comes from a USGA official, who noticed during tournaments that the balls Tiger used didn't look like Nikes, so he asked an Acushnet rep about it. So, you could say I got the info 3rd hand, but there it is.

How would an official notice they didn't look like Nike's if the balls have the swoosh logo?

You saying the official didn't think the dimple patterns looked right for a Nike ball or something? If Acushnet knows about what Tiger and Nike are doing w/ his balls, I would think Acushnet would have a problem w/ that. To think Nike takes an Acushnet product, strips the product of the identity marks, and labels it as one of their own is almost impossible to believe. "Hey Titleist, Tiger Woods, the worlds best golfer and the most marketed athlete today, likes and wants to use your balls. We're going to take your balls, take your logos off of them and put ours on them." I really doubt Acushnet would be okay with that. Especially considering ball sales are the biggest money maker for golf companies. Sorry, not buying the story.

TM R11/Titleist 910F 15*/ Nike SQ2 20* & 23*/ Nike CCi 5-PW/ Nike SV 52* & 56*/ SC Newport 2 Studio Style 32.5"
Nike 20XIx/Pro V1x


Me either, his balls are too white to be Titleist. No player has ever had s many close ups run in slow motion of balls rolling on greens in history. He could not get away with this for more than an hour.
And besides, if he were going to do that wouldn't he use Callaways?

Current Bag
Ogio Synchro cart
'07 Burner Driver, 3 Fairway, and Rescue 5
Early Titelist Cavities
200 56, Spin milled 60 , Rossa  Suzuka


If Acushnet knows about what Tiger and Nike are doing w/ his balls, I would think Acushnet would have a problem w/ that. To think Nike takes an Acushnet product, strips the product of the identity marks, and labels it as one of their own is almost impossible to believe.

Well, unless they have a specific contract arrangement with him on that issue, there is literally nothing they could do even if they didn't like it. Nike is free to buy any product they want, strip it of its identifying logos, and affix their own. The only exception I can think of would be a product whose very form was distinctive enough to be a trademark---it might be difficult to do this with a uniquely-shaped driver, but even that would only be a potential problem if it were being offered for sale. There's nothing (outside of individual contracts) that requires you to keep a logo on a product, and only the owner of the mark being applied could object to the use of their mark (i.e., Nike could prevent him from applying its mark, but obviously they would be happy to have him use it so that's not an issue here)

However, this doesn't sit well with the stories that Tiger has custom balls manufactured. It would seem unlikely that Titleist would make a custom ball for him and allow this, since in that case there'd probably have to be a contractual relationship on the issue.

In the bag:
FT-iQ 10° driver, FT 21° neutral 3H
T-Zoid Forged 15° 3W, MX-23 4-PW
Harmonized 52° GW, Tom Watson 56° SW, X-Forged Vintage 60° LW
White Hot XG #1 Putter, 33"


Well, unless they have a specific contract arrangement with him on that issue, there is literally nothing they could do even if they didn't like it. Nike is free to buy any product they want, strip it of its identifying logos, and affix their own. The only exception I can think of would be a product whose very form was distinctive enough to be a trademark---it might be difficult to do this with a uniquely-shaped driver, but even that would only be a potential problem if it were being offered for sale. There's nothing (outside of individual contracts) that requires you to keep a logo on a product, and only the owner of the mark being applied could object to the use of their mark (i.e., Nike could prevent him from applying its mark, but obviously they would be happy to have him use it so that's not an issue here)

I see what you're saying, I just don't believe it.

And the customized ball thing was rumored to have been through Nike, not Titleist. I'm pretty sure Nike is just as capable as Titleist to make a custom ball just for Tiger, so why wouldn't it be from Nike? Tiger uses all Nike clubs (sans his putter) and I'm sure the Nike ball is just fine for him to use as well. Like I've said, years ago, yeah, he probably did use a ProV1 ball. He also used to be sponsored partly by Titleist and Nike didn't even have a ball, or one that was good enough for a pro to use.

TM R11/Titleist 910F 15*/ Nike SQ2 20* & 23*/ Nike CCi 5-PW/ Nike SV 52* & 56*/ SC Newport 2 Studio Style 32.5"
Nike 20XIx/Pro V1x


Titleist get lots of money out of this deal

Bingo! To those who doubt, I can't blame you. It really surprised me too. But, if you think about it, everybody wins. Nike gets their swoosh all over the TV screen (remember the 16th at Augusta?), Titleist gets a boatload of cash, and Tiger plays a ball that he is familiar with and is, in many people's opinion, the best golf ball.

Driver 905S, V2 stiff shaft
3-Wood 906F2 13 degree, V2 stiff
Hybrid 585H 21 degree, Aldila VS Proto
Irons (4-PW) MP-57, Rifle 5.5
SW & LW spin milledPutter TracyBall Pro V-1


Bingo! To those who doubt, I can't blame you. It really surprised me too. But, if you think about it, everybody wins. Nike gets their swoosh all over the TV screen (remember the 16th at Augusta?), Titleist gets a boatload of cash, and Tiger plays a ball that he is familiar with and is, in many people's opinion, the best golf ball.

How would Titleist agree to that though? If people think he's using a Nike ball, that's what a lot of people are going to want to buy. Ball sales are the biggest sales for a golf company such as Titleist and Nike. Why would Titleist just be okay w/ that? Just because Nike pays them a lot of money to do it? Well, it would have to be a lot of money, because they're losing out on a lot of money by "allowing" Tiger to play w/ what is perceived a Nike ball.

Like I said, I just don't believe it. I can't believe a ball from Tiger's stash hasn't been proven to be a Titleist ball by now, if that's really what he's using. Tiger has given balls away, he's lost balls, and someone w/ access to the practice range can probably snag a ball off of Tiger if they really wanted to. I just can't believe it hasn't been proven by someone that he really uses a ProV1 w/ Nike logos.

TM R11/Titleist 910F 15*/ Nike SQ2 20* & 23*/ Nike CCi 5-PW/ Nike SV 52* & 56*/ SC Newport 2 Studio Style 32.5"
Nike 20XIx/Pro V1x


  • Moderator
Bingo! To those who doubt, I can't blame you. It really surprised me too. But, if you think about it, everybody wins. Nike gets their swoosh all over the TV screen (remember the 16th at Augusta?), Titleist gets a boatload of cash, and Tiger plays a ball that he is familiar with and is, in many people's opinion, the best golf ball.

If that's the case, now

Tiger & Phil owe (the OP) a lot of money for the deception of it all.. It's cheating ! LOL!

Driver: :callaway: Rogue ST  /  Woods: :tmade: Stealth 5W / Hybrid: :tmade: Stealth 25* / Irons: :ping: i500’s /  Wedges: :edel: 54*, 58*; Putter: :scotty_cameron: Futura 5  Ball: image.png Vero X1

 

 -Jonny

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I knew I would be starting a lively discussion about Tiger's balls (Ha Ha). Nike does not make the balls Tiger uses. Never have. He has always played Titleist Pro V1s, with the swoosh logo. Wouldn't Nike love to run full page ads with Tiger saying he owes he success to a Nike One ball, but they never have. That's why. This info comes from a USGA official, who noticed during tournaments that the balls Tiger used didn't look like Nikes, so he asked an Acushnet rep about it. So, you could say I got the info 3rd hand, but there it is.

Yeah, and my friend's brother's uncle's cousin died when he drank soda and ate pop rocks... Sorry, not buyin it. It's a golf ball, and Tiger would still be the best on earth if he used a white rock.


The NASCAR analogy earlier was pretty spot on.

I think it is funny, I saw where Kim Kardashian (Pitches for Carls JR) was spotted this weekend late at night in an In and Out drive though in Las Vegas with her boyfriend (Reggie Bush). They got a photo or two of her. Guess where their next stop was?......Carls for a salad! Paparazzi in tow. LOL

In my SasQuatch carry bag.
909D2 9.5* (Aldila Voodo Shaft)
FT 3W 15* (Fujikura E370 Shaft Stiff Flex)
FT Hybrid 21* Nuetral (Fujikura Fit On M Hybrid Stiff Flex)
FT Hybrid 24* Nuetral (Fujikura Fit On M Hybrid Stiff Flex)Irons: X22 Tour 5 thru PW (True Temper Dynamic Gold S300) 2* upright (also...


...... there is literally nothing they could do even if they didn't like it. Nike is free to buy any product they want, strip it of its identifying logos, and affix their own. The only exception I can think of would be a product whose very form was distinctive enough to be a trademark---it might be difficult to do this with a uniquely-shaped driver, but even that would only be a potential problem if it were being offered for sale. There's nothing (outside of individual contracts) that requires you to keep a logo on a product, and only the owner of the mark being applied could object to the use of their mark (i.e., Nike could prevent him from applying its mark, but obviously they would be happy to have him use it so that's not an issue here)

I think you have parts of the copyright law here right, but not completely. Putting a Nike logo on a Titleist ball

in commerial use (which this clearly is) without Titleist's permission would be a violation of copyright and patent law. The Titleist ball has patents for exterally visiible aspects (such as the dimple sizes and shapes) as well as the internal parts of the ball, and for another manufacturer to rebrand and use it commercially is clearly illegal under the law, subject to civil and potentially criminal penalties. There is no way that Nike would be unaware of such law (they are extremely conscious of intellectual property law and vigorously defend their own brand in the courts) and they are accutely aware of the potential damages if they did indeed proceed with such a violation. The basic monetary damages would be significant, but knowingly violate patent law is subject to treble damages in the courts. An alternative is that Nike licenses the ball from Titleist. But what would Titleists motivation be for this? Yes, they'd get money for it, but wouldn't they get a lot more if it was the Titleist logo seen in all the closeups? The golf companies are fiercly defensive of their respective designs and patents, and they basically live or die based on brand perception. Brand management in industries such as golf, soft drinks, etc. is probably THE most important element within the company. The differences between the actual golf hardware, whether it is clubs or balls, is actuallly trivial or very minor as far as the general buying public is concerned, so the companies carefully build and nurture their brand perception to achieve competitive market share. Think about it for a minute - the Nike golf brand would be devastated it became public knowledge (I mean REAL knowledge, not the speculation or heresay taking place here) that the golf balls with the swoosh were not really Nike. And if it were true, it would be too easy to verify as others have pointed out. Cut open a lost ball by Tiger or one he gives away, and the truth is revealed instantly. Sorry, but I just cannot accept that this practice is actually taking place - there is way too much money at risk here and this is not a secret that can be hidden easily.

Note: This thread is 5457 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Having had the opportunity to live and work in a few different countries, I've encountered some golf traditions, whether they are well-established customs or unique experiences at local courses. While not all of these are widely practiced, they highlight the diversity and creativity in the golfing world. 1. Japan - The O-Bon Golf Festival In Japan, during the O-Bon (lantern) Festival, I've seen golf courses hosting night golf events with glowing balls and lantern-lit fairways. It's a serene and beautiful way to combine golf with culture.  2. Scotland - The Guising Golfers In Scotland, around Halloween, I've come across golfers participating in "guising," where they dress up in costumes and play a round of golf. It adds a festive twist and a lot of fun to the game. 3. South Korea - The New Year's Honbae In South Korea, golfers play a round of golf on New Year's Day, followed by a celebratory meal and drinks (9th hole and after the game). It's a time for camaraderie and positive intentions for the year ahead. Besides new year's, on higher end courses, they often break on the 9th hole for some light food and drinks like fancy ramen and makgeolli rice wine (ordered in advance). 4. Australia - The Outback Golf Challenge (I have not experienced this one myself) In Australia, there is apparently an Outback Golf Challenge, where golfers navigate rough terrain and face unconventional obstacles. It's considered a true test of skill and adaptability (but hasn't produced many PGA golfers 😉 ). 5. Finland - The Midnight Sun Golf Tournament (I have not experienced this one myself) In Finland, the Midnight Sun Golf Tournament is where golfers play late into the evening under the perpetual twilight of the summer months. The endless daylight makes it a truly unique event. While these traditions may not be universally established, they represent the variety of golfing experiences around the world. I'm curious if any of you have encountered or participated in unique or local golf traditions, whether internationally or closer to home.
    • It's from "Every Shot Has a Purpose" which was co-written by one of Annika's coaches. Decent read about reducing uncertainty and committing to the golf shot.
    • Ah, I didn't realize this was about standing over the ball versus time to play the shot. Definitely two different things there. Yea I would imagine being static over the ball/taking a long time over the ball does make things worse in the long run, hence all the waggles guys will do before pulling the trigger.
    • I'm not sure who said it first but I've seen it a lot. There's this "think box" vs "play box" theory. I've also seen it with a planning vs doing line on the ground. The idea is basically you stand away from the ball (a couple feet) and do your "think box". This is where you do your planning, your swing cues, your practice swings (if you believe in practice swings.) All of that is done in the "Think Box". Then you step into your "play box" address the ball and hit it. Sometimes it's done with a imaginary line on the ground. You do all of the think box stuff behind the line. Then once you cross the line you step up and hit it.  Here's Annika Sorenstam demonstrating the "Think box" and "Play box": So, Annika's time over the ball is really short. Because she did all of that other stuff not over the ball, but in her "Think box".  There are lots of variations on this theme. But I think you get the idea. 
    • I speak for myself. If I inventory my swing thoughts, swing tempo, optimum muscle tension and rehearse a swing before I take my address, then I pull the trigger reasonably quickly with usually acceptable results. Like a proper program download before deploying it. If I don't bother to by forgetting or just not caring, I am inclined to look for my cues while hovering over the ball after taking the address, while tension builds up and then I fire with a half ass program that is still buffering. I guess that's no better than rolling a dice. In other words, a good pre-shot routine does wonders. I am not advising folks to take 13 practice swings while the flowers wilt waiting for something to happen, but one or maybe two are reasonable and good for you. I am certain hitting half ass shitty shots and making double bogey takes longer than making a par.  My desire this year is to just that as I have not developed a habit taking a practice swing and as a result have tendency to freeze over the ball after address, that is counter productive for both time and result. I think that is what @saevel25 is talking about in the OP.      
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...