Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

I hate when golf shops mess with their simulator before releasing a new driver...


Note: This thread is 5907 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

As the title says... I hate that. I hit the new R9 SuperTri this past weekend and it was just so obvious that the settings had been doctored to increase distance by an unrealistic margin.

I understand they want to sell clubs, but first I watched people with average technique at best hitting the ball "270-280" which was completely unrealistic. When I stepped up and proceed to mishit my first shot and yet carry it over 330, my doubts were confirmed. When I finished, my last 3 drives carried 345, 350 and 340.

The T-made rep and the Golf Galaxy staff were going on and on about how much further they were hitting that driver than their current ones. Well... of course I had to be empirical about it, so I grabbed my driver from my car and hit shots with that too. When they carried 330-340, I think that put the debate to rest. That said, I was impressed that the SuperTri was 10-15 yards further, even if it was rigged.


Most frustrating part? While I was hitting, the store representatives told me that it's not really an exact science (overstatement??) and that the simulator will make the ball go about 20-30 yards further than in real life, so you have to subtract that distance... 20 minutes later, I walked by someone hitting it 240 and heard the same guy tell him that it's not an exact science, and the ball with actually go 20-30 yards further in real life, so you have to add that to your total.

Penta TP Ball || Nakashima Golf HTEC Tour Driver - w/ Mitsubishi Rayon Bassara 83g || Izett Golf 15* Deep Face 3-Wood - w/ Royal Precision Rifle Steel || MD 18* Hybrid - w/ Aerotech SteelFiber 110g || MP-58 3, 4 Irons... MP-60 5, 6 Irons... MP-32 7-PW - w/ Dynamic Gold || MP-T 53-08...

Posted

That is just sad.
I supposed if we are realistic about how far down the food chain someone traveling for a club maker is, then we should not be surprised if scruples are an issue. I am glad you have the presence of mind to use your old driver too, now if comes to my town I will do the same.

Current Bag
Ogio Synchro cart
'07 Burner Driver, 3 Fairway, and Rescue 5
Early Titelist Cavities
200 56, Spin milled 60 , Rossa  Suzuka


Posted
Sales rep's do what sale's rep's do. SELL!! As long as we understand that it's all good.

Driver.... Nickent DX Evolver V2 65 stiff /07 Burner YS6+ stiff .
4 wood..... Nickent 4DX
Hybrids.....Tour Edge Geomax 22* 25* 28*
Irons.....TM R7 6-P + AW,SW,LW
Putter.....Odyssey White Hot XG 2 BallBag.......Callaway ORG 14 A.L.I.C.E. Ball........Bridgestone e6 / Srixon Soft Feel...


Posted
we have no simulators in my area so i can only get accurate distances when we have the titleist demo day and they bring their trackman along. the rest of the time it's just about guessing the distance you're hitting on the range.
i never liked simulators and you're not the only one to mention these miraculous distance gains.

Posted

I hate in-door simulators...maybe becuase I am 6'4 and they make my swing feel confined or because the target is only 10 feet in front of me...I don't know??? But I have to test clubs at the driving range off the grass to truly know if a club will work for me...just my 2 cents...

TEE - XCG6, 13º, Matrix Ozik HD6.1, stiff
Wilson Staff - Ci11, 3-SW, TX Fligthed, stiff

Odyssey - Metal X #7, 35in

Wilson Staff - FG Tour ball 


Posted
I hate in-door simulators...maybe becuase I am 6'4 and they make my swing feel confined or because the target is only 10 feet in front of me...I don't know??? But I have to test clubs at the driving range off the grass to truly know if a club will work for me...just my 2 cents...

Yeah I can't get a true feel for how the club works unless I'm at the range. The guy at the golf shop today even said I was best to do that with a couple demos before buying. Good honesty, it's appreciated. He also let me take a few swings on the monitor to give me some feedback before I left. Good stuff.

In my stand Bag:

R7 Superquad 10.5* Fujikura REAX 65-S
Hi-Bore XLS 19* Hybrid Dynamic Gold S300
MP-60 4 thru PW Dynamic Gold S300 .588 REG 54* SW Vokey 58* LWSTX Greeny IV putter


Posted
Sounds more like a stimulator than a simulator.

Maybe the had the settings for high altitude desert????
909D Comp 9.5* (house MATRIX OZIK XCON-6)
Burner Superfast 3 & 5 woods (house MATRIX OZIK XCON-4.8)
G15 Hybrid 23* (AWT shaft)
G5 5 iron-PW-46*, UW-50*, SW-54 & LW-58 (AWT shaft)
Studio Select Newport 2 Mid SlantGrips: PING cords & Golf Pride New Decade Multi-Coumpound Bag: C-130...

Posted
I know the EW shop near my house has the sim at a 10mph tail wind. Im there so much, they usually set it where it should be for me...

G10 (VS Proto 65 X) or 905S (speeder X) / X Tour 3W (VS Proto S) / Adams Idea Tour Proto 18* (VS Proto S) / S59 Tour, Z-Z65 Cushin (D2) / Mizuno MP-T 51-06 , 56-10, / Miz TP Mills #6 ~or~ Cleveland BRZ #5
 
 
85,84,85,84


Posted
The sims are handy at times.

In the rare event my wife traps me at the local mall, I'll scurry over to Dick's and play around with some new sticks in their simulator. I've never felt it was "rigged" but I've always wondered how accurately it depicted side spin.
909D Comp 9.5* (house MATRIX OZIK XCON-6)
Burner Superfast 3 & 5 woods (house MATRIX OZIK XCON-4.8)
G15 Hybrid 23* (AWT shaft)
G5 5 iron-PW-46*, UW-50*, SW-54 & LW-58 (AWT shaft)
Studio Select Newport 2 Mid SlantGrips: PING cords & Golf Pride New Decade Multi-Coumpound Bag: C-130...

Posted
As the title says... I hate that. I hit the new R9 SuperTri this past weekend and it was just so obvious that the settings had been doctored to increase distance by an unrealistic margin.

That story pisses me off honestly. IMHO a consumer watchdog group should be contacted and this story aired through mainstream news.

(Is serious)
Driver: Adams 9032LS 9.5* - 45" - Aldila RIP Alpha 60S
3 Wood: Adams FAST 10 15* - 43" - Aldila Wasabi 70S
2-Iron: Mizuno Fli-Hi 18* - DGS300 
Irons: Mizuno MP-68 3-PW - DGS300
Wedges: Mizuno MPT-11 54* and 60*Putter: PING Redwood Anser Black Nickel 340g, 34"Ball: Titleist ProV1Bag: Mizuno...

Posted
When I go into a place that has a simulator, and I'm really serious about buying a new club, I will always go out and get my club out of the car so that I can gauge the difference in reality.

The one at Pro Golf here is fairly accurate as far as distance, but it seems to accentuate any side spin. I typically hit a small fade, but it turns into a slice on their simulator quite often.

Posted
at least you can brag in the launch monitor that you were averaging more than 330 yards

Haha, true... I did feel a little like Happy Gilmore for a minute...

Penta TP Ball || Nakashima Golf HTEC Tour Driver - w/ Mitsubishi Rayon Bassara 83g || Izett Golf 15* Deep Face 3-Wood - w/ Royal Precision Rifle Steel || MD 18* Hybrid - w/ Aerotech SteelFiber 110g || MP-58 3, 4 Irons... MP-60 5, 6 Irons... MP-32 7-PW - w/ Dynamic Gold || MP-T 53-08...

Posted
Sales rep's do what sale's rep's do. SELL!! As long as we understand that it's all good.

I sell insurance... if I exagerrated the benefits of a product or sold someone a policy on the premise that it provides more coverage than their current one, and it actually didn't, I could/would lose my job, my insurance license, and probably have legal action brought against me. Like I said in the original post, I understand they are trying to move merchandise, but doing it by fabricating false results is sketchy. Point is, I feel like salesmen should at least be honest, regardless of what they're selling.

By the way, I'm not trying to be defensive or be a jerk, just playing devil's advocate to your comment. Just my opinion.
Penta TP Ball || Nakashima Golf HTEC Tour Driver - w/ Mitsubishi Rayon Bassara 83g || Izett Golf 15* Deep Face 3-Wood - w/ Royal Precision Rifle Steel || MD 18* Hybrid - w/ Aerotech SteelFiber 110g || MP-58 3, 4 Irons... MP-60 5, 6 Irons... MP-32 7-PW - w/ Dynamic Gold || MP-T 53-08...

Posted
Selling insurance is a lot different than selling golf clubs. I used to sell for a personal training facility and would promise the women to be in a 2 piece within a few months. There are 2 buying emotions:

Pain: My current driver sucks, I can't hit my current driver, etc

Pleasure: I hit this driver 30 yards farther than my current driver (albeit w/ a rigged simulator)

Most of us are smart enough to not faall for it but as a salesman I SORTA applaud the effort, these are tough times and salesman gotta eat too.

:callaway: BB Alpha 815 DBD 10.5* Rogue Silver 60 :callaway: x2hot 3deep 14.5* (TBD) :tmade: RSI UDI 20* RIP Tour 90 :bridgestone: J40CB 4-PW Steelfiber i95 :vokey: SM4 50* KBS Tour V :vokey: SM5 54* KBS 610 :vokey: SM5 58* KBS HI-REV 2.0 MannKrafted Handmade Custom


Posted
not surprising...i dont think the r9 is all its hyped up to be personally.

Superlight Stand Bag
909D2 9.5° Diamana S
909F2 15.5° Diamana S
909F2 18.5° Diamana S
AP2 Project X 5.5 3-PW Vokey Spin Milled 52° 56° 60° Studio Select Newport 2 Pro V1Home Course - http://www.huronoaks.com (Home of Mike Weir)


Posted
I just had the same experience as the OP, but at Golf Galaxy. After a few warm ups (carry of about 270) I picked up the 9032LS and the first one carried 309. Then 314, then 311. It was insane. My SS was only around 107, which I think makes it impossible to carry it that far. Since it was dead in there, the rep had me hop over to the version you pay to use, and said on five swings I was anywhere from 105-114. That seems like an insane range, right?

Driver: Nike Covert Tour | 3W: Callaway X Hot Pro | Irons: Mizuno JPX-800 Pro X100 SS | Wedges: Vokey SM 54-08, Vokey Raw 60-12 | Putter (of the week): Arnold Palmer "The Original" 33"


Posted
not surprising...i dont think the r9 is all its hyped up to be personally.

Have you hit one my dad had a shot of mine he hit it around 300 yards consistently normally with a PING G2 he drives it 260 That is on the course not in a simulator


Note: This thread is 5907 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I would think of it in terms of time. The time it takes to get the arm angle into a good position to deliver the club with proper shaft lean. Another component is rotation, but that is also a matter of timing. It relates to how the body stalls to give the golfer time to hit the ball. If you have to get 80+ degrees out of that right elbow in one third of a second versus 50 degrees in the same time then you have to steal time from somewhere. It is usually body rotation. That does not help with shaft lean.  I agree in that amateurs tend to make the swing more complicated than pro golfers. 
    • I haven't been able to practice like I wanted and won't for the next week.  1. The weather sucks in Ohio this year. I have been mostly inside hitting foam balls. Just kind of my basic stuff.  2. I woke up last Saturday with a left side rib muscle on fire. If I turned or leaned a certain way it would spasm that almost buckled my knees. I have been taking a break to let that settle. I don't want to get a long term injury. I think I pinched a nerve or just aggravated a muscles.   3. I am going on a mini-vacation to Florida (screw you Ohio weather) with a friend, and rolling that into a work conference I have next week. I will be with out my clubs for a week.  I will be back next in two Fridays to hit the ground running with some warmer temps and better weather in Ohio, hopefully. I would really like to get more out on the course and the range.     
    • Day 580 - 2026-05-04 Played eight holes. Sometimes golf kicks you in the nuts. 😉 
    • I work with a lot of golfers who want more shaft lean at impact, who currently have AoAs that range from +2° to -2°, and who love to see the handle lower and more "in front of their trail thigh" from face-on at P6. And a lot of these golfers try to solve the issue by working on the downswing. They do something to drag the handle forward. Or they just leave their right thigh farther back so the same handle location "looks" farther forward. Or they move the ball back in their stance. Or they push themselves down into the ground to get the handle lower and increase (decrease?) their AoA (to be more negative). The real fix is often to get wider in the backswing. To do LESS in the backswing. To hinge less, fold the trail arm less, abduct the trail arm less. I had a case of this over the weekend. Before, the player had 110° of trail elbow bend, "lifted" his trail humerus only a few degrees, etc. The club traveled quite a bit around him, and he tended to "pick" the ball from the fairways. In the "after" swings below (which are mild exaggerations — this golfer does not need to end up at < 70° of elbow bend. These were slower backswings with "hit it as hard as you normally would" intent downswings), you can see that he bent his elbow about 70° instead of 110° and lifted his right arm an extra ~15° or more. You can't see how much less this moved his hands across his chest (right arm abduction), but it was also decreased. His hands stayed more "in front of" his right shoulder rather than traveling "beside" them so much. The two swings look like this: The change at P6, without talking about the downswing one little bit (outside of him telling me that he tends to pick the ball), is remarkable: Without 110° of elbow bend to get out (which he gets to 80°, a loss of 30°), the golfer actually loses slightly less elbow bend (70 - 50 = 20), but delivers 30° less elbow bend, lowering the handle and letting the elbow get "in front of" the rib cage… because it never got "behind" or "beside" the rib cage. If you look at this video showing the before/afters of P6, you'll note the handle location (both vertically and horizontally) and the shoulders (the ball is in the same place in these frames). This golfer's path was largely unaffected (still pretty straight into the ball, < 3° path and often < 1.5°), but his AoA jumped to -5° ± 2°. I've always said, and in talking with other instructors they agree and feel similarly, that we spend a lot of time working on the backswing. This is another example of why.
    • We had a member of our senior club who developed a mental block on pulling the trigger. I played with him to see what the membership was talking about. I timed him a few times when he would get over the ball. 45 seconds. He knew he had a mental block and would chide himself, “Just hit it!” Once on the green he was okay and chipping was a bit better. It was painful to watch him struggle. Our “bandaid” was to put him in the last tournament  tee time with two understanding players. We should have suggested to him to take a break from our tournaments. I agree with the idea that when a player realizes they have a problem, the answer is to go fix it and not return until they are able to play at an acceptable pace.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.