Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 7082 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
i have ordered new irons and it comes 4-gw with 2 wedges pw and gw and i was wondering what are the advantages or disadvantages to having a gap wedge over a sand wedge

Posted

Gap wedge and sand wedges are two different things. Once upon a time a PW was around 48-degrees and a lot of guys used a 56-degree sand wedge. Because iron lofts have been juiced to produce more distance a need arose for filling the loft gap between the PW and SW. The "Gap-Wedge" was born.

A gap-wedge doesn't replace your sand wedge, it fills the gap between pitching-wedge and sand-wedge that would be too great because the gap has widened between pitching-wedge and sand-wedges in recent years. Your new pitching-wedge is probably in the neighborhood of 46-degrees and your gap-wedge is probably around 50-degrees so adding a sand-wedge or two would be a sensible solution. You'll want a SW for sand-play (imagine that!), for chipping over bunkers or hazards, or when you need your ball to stop on a dime when you don't have much green to work with.

You can see what sand wedges I play (54-degrees and 58-degrees). You may want to go with similarly lofted sand-wedges or just pick up on 56-degree sand wedge and become a master of one.

I hope that clears things up for you. Happy hunting.

Jeff

10.5° Callaway FT-iZ Tour

18°, 20°, 23° Adams Idea Pro Prototype Hybrid

4-9 Titleist 690.CB
48° Titleist Vokey Tour Nickel
54°, 58° Titleist Vokey Tour Oil Can

Scotty Cameron NP2, 33"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
i have ordered new irons and it comes 4-gw with 2 wedges pw and gw and i was wondering what are the advantages or disadvantages to having a gap wedge over a sand wedge

Most people carry both; usually more. I carried a 45 degree pitching wedge, a 51 degree gap wedge, a 56 degree sand wedge and a 60 degree lob wedge. The advantages to me were the more wedges I carried, the more options for shot selection based on lie. I'm currently carrying a 47 degree pitching wedge, and the 53 & 60 degree wedges that share sand duties as well as being gap and lob wedges; I did this to make room for a fairway wood.

Being a 15 handicap, I'm prone to missing the green fairly frequently. I would not play well with only a pitching wedge and one other.
In My Bag:

Taylormade: Superquad 9.5 Aldila VS Proto 'By You' 70-S
Sonartec: SS-07 14.0 Aldila NV 85-S
Cleveland: Halo, 3i UST Irod 83-SPing: i-10 4-UW AWT-STitleist: Vokey Design Spin Milled 54.10 & 60.08Slighter: Handstamped Tacoma, 350G in Black Satin w/Sound Slot

Posted

One additional factor. The reason I carry four wedges and usually only a 1,4.7wds is not just yardage gaps it is what type of shots you usually face. I hit my driver almost as straight as my fairway woods. Since I am not very long any holes short enough for non driver, under 360, four wood is plenty. I can't reach par 5s in two. The occasioal long par 3 or 4 the 4 wood is easier to hit higher, which gives me a better chance to control the distance. This puts extra pressure on my short game which is simplified since I basically have a wedge with which I can hit any distance and trajectory I want. Theoretically anyway, I still manage to find ways to screw up. I think you will notice that the low handicappers are usually talking about the type of shot they want to hit not just length and direction. Wedges are a big part of trying to get where they are I believe.

1W Cleveland LauncherComp 10.5, 3W Touredge Exotics 15 deg.,FY Wilson 19.5 degree
4 and 5H, 6I-GW Callaway Razr, SW, LW Cleveland Cg-14, Putter Taylor Made Suzuka, Ball, Srixon XV Yellow


Posted
My PW is 47 deg and I have a SW at 56. I like having the 51 deg. GW in between. Without it I would be faced with trying to take 10-12 yards off my PW too often.

The GW has less bounce than the SW, but if the lie and sand conditions allow for it, I'll use the GW for longer greenside bunker shots. It also comes in handy for chips where the PW may run out too much and the SW has more loft than I want.

Posted
I have a 47/48 degree PW, and a 56degree sand wedge. I've been looking at getting a 52 or 51 degree wedge to bridge a distance gap. The reasoning came at me head on this past week, when I was left with a shot to the green that if i had hit my PW good i would have cleared the green, and I wasn't too sure about my sandwedge distance so I hit the 56degree, and left myself about 15 feet from the hole. (Luckily i cleared the pond, and didn't quite get to the sandtrap). Since that experience I realized I'm in that situation a lot where I find i need to layoff the PW or come up short with the SW, so getting something in between would be really helpful.

On the other hand i guess i can just teach myself how to layoff my PW to do those distances and not bother with more equipment.

I'm terrible, but i have fun.

In the Bag:
Taylormade r580XD 10.5° Reg flex
3 + 5 wood - Dunlop graphite shaft parts from a set3-pw - Dunlop set that looks sorta like ping I3's (i'm sorely in need of an upgrade.)LW/SW/GW - Adams black 52, 56, 60 degree wedges.Putter - Ping Karsten Anser 34"Bac...


Posted
I only carry a 52* gap wedge and 60* lob wedge. I played a traditional 56* SW for many many years; however, it seems like I always coming up short on my pitch and run shots, and running too far on my lob shots.

I play the 52* from 120-50 yards as long as I have 10+ feet to run it on the green. For any shot where I need to stop it, I use the lob wedge.

The bag is lighter too (daily walker!)

Driver: FT-5 Tour 8.5* neutral
3 wood: TEE CB1 15*
Irons (3-PW): Nike forged blades
SW: Sonartec T35 proto 54*
LW: Sonartec T35 proto 58*Putter: Yes! Tracey


Posted
I would keep the gap wedge and buy a sand wedge. A pitching wedge is usually around 48* and a GW is around 51* or 52*. I like carrying those wedges along with a LW and reg W. If I had to give up one, it probably would be the GW. That would leave about a 8* difference between my remaining 3 wedges. I think keeping an equal difference between your wedges is helpful. However, I really like having 4 wedges.
Note: This thread is 7082 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.