Jump to content
IGNORED

gap wedge vs sand wedge


Note: This thread is 6471 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Gap wedge and sand wedges are two different things. Once upon a time a PW was around 48-degrees and a lot of guys used a 56-degree sand wedge. Because iron lofts have been juiced to produce more distance a need arose for filling the loft gap between the PW and SW. The "Gap-Wedge" was born.

A gap-wedge doesn't replace your sand wedge, it fills the gap between pitching-wedge and sand-wedge that would be too great because the gap has widened between pitching-wedge and sand-wedges in recent years. Your new pitching-wedge is probably in the neighborhood of 46-degrees and your gap-wedge is probably around 50-degrees so adding a sand-wedge or two would be a sensible solution. You'll want a SW for sand-play (imagine that!), for chipping over bunkers or hazards, or when you need your ball to stop on a dime when you don't have much green to work with.

You can see what sand wedges I play (54-degrees and 58-degrees). You may want to go with similarly lofted sand-wedges or just pick up on 56-degree sand wedge and become a master of one.

I hope that clears things up for you. Happy hunting.

Jeff

10.5° Callaway FT-iZ Tour

18°, 20°, 23° Adams Idea Pro Prototype Hybrid

4-9 Titleist 690.CB
48° Titleist Vokey Tour Nickel
54°, 58° Titleist Vokey Tour Oil Can

Scotty Cameron NP2, 33"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

i have ordered new irons and it comes 4-gw with 2 wedges pw and gw and i was wondering what are the advantages or disadvantages to having a gap wedge over a sand wedge

Most people carry both; usually more. I carried a 45 degree pitching wedge, a 51 degree gap wedge, a 56 degree sand wedge and a 60 degree lob wedge. The advantages to me were the more wedges I carried, the more options for shot selection based on lie. I'm currently carrying a 47 degree pitching wedge, and the 53 & 60 degree wedges that share sand duties as well as being gap and lob wedges; I did this to make room for a fairway wood.

Being a 15 handicap, I'm prone to missing the green fairly frequently. I would not play well with only a pitching wedge and one other.
In My Bag:

Taylormade: Superquad 9.5 Aldila VS Proto 'By You' 70-S
Sonartec: SS-07 14.0 Aldila NV 85-S
Cleveland: Halo, 3i UST Irod 83-SPing: i-10 4-UW AWT-STitleist: Vokey Design Spin Milled 54.10 & 60.08Slighter: Handstamped Tacoma, 350G in Black Satin w/Sound Slot
Link to comment
Share on other sites


One additional factor. The reason I carry four wedges and usually only a 1,4.7wds is not just yardage gaps it is what type of shots you usually face. I hit my driver almost as straight as my fairway woods. Since I am not very long any holes short enough for non driver, under 360, four wood is plenty. I can't reach par 5s in two. The occasioal long par 3 or 4 the 4 wood is easier to hit higher, which gives me a better chance to control the distance. This puts extra pressure on my short game which is simplified since I basically have a wedge with which I can hit any distance and trajectory I want. Theoretically anyway, I still manage to find ways to screw up. I think you will notice that the low handicappers are usually talking about the type of shot they want to hit not just length and direction. Wedges are a big part of trying to get where they are I believe.

1W Cleveland LauncherComp 10.5, 3W Touredge Exotics 15 deg.,FY Wilson 19.5 degree
4 and 5H, 6I-GW Callaway Razr, SW, LW Cleveland Cg-14, Putter Taylor Made Suzuka, Ball, Srixon XV Yellow

Link to comment
Share on other sites


My PW is 47 deg and I have a SW at 56. I like having the 51 deg. GW in between. Without it I would be faced with trying to take 10-12 yards off my PW too often.

The GW has less bounce than the SW, but if the lie and sand conditions allow for it, I'll use the GW for longer greenside bunker shots. It also comes in handy for chips where the PW may run out too much and the SW has more loft than I want.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


I have a 47/48 degree PW, and a 56degree sand wedge. I've been looking at getting a 52 or 51 degree wedge to bridge a distance gap. The reasoning came at me head on this past week, when I was left with a shot to the green that if i had hit my PW good i would have cleared the green, and I wasn't too sure about my sandwedge distance so I hit the 56degree, and left myself about 15 feet from the hole. (Luckily i cleared the pond, and didn't quite get to the sandtrap). Since that experience I realized I'm in that situation a lot where I find i need to layoff the PW or come up short with the SW, so getting something in between would be really helpful.

On the other hand i guess i can just teach myself how to layoff my PW to do those distances and not bother with more equipment.

I'm terrible, but i have fun.

In the Bag:
Taylormade r580XD 10.5° Reg flex
3 + 5 wood - Dunlop graphite shaft parts from a set3-pw - Dunlop set that looks sorta like ping I3's (i'm sorely in need of an upgrade.)LW/SW/GW - Adams black 52, 56, 60 degree wedges.Putter - Ping Karsten Anser 34"Bac...

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I only carry a 52* gap wedge and 60* lob wedge. I played a traditional 56* SW for many many years; however, it seems like I always coming up short on my pitch and run shots, and running too far on my lob shots.

I play the 52* from 120-50 yards as long as I have 10+ feet to run it on the green. For any shot where I need to stop it, I use the lob wedge.

The bag is lighter too (daily walker!)

Driver: FT-5 Tour 8.5* neutral
3 wood: TEE CB1 15*
Irons (3-PW): Nike forged blades
SW: Sonartec T35 proto 54*
LW: Sonartec T35 proto 58*Putter: Yes! Tracey

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I would keep the gap wedge and buy a sand wedge. A pitching wedge is usually around 48* and a GW is around 51* or 52*. I like carrying those wedges along with a LW and reg W. If I had to give up one, it probably would be the GW. That would leave about a 8* difference between my remaining 3 wedges. I think keeping an equal difference between your wedges is helpful. However, I really like having 4 wedges.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Note: This thread is 6471 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Best and Greatest are synonyms IMO. Yep. Longevity is a stupid way to determine something like this. If someone took 30 years to amass a certain record, and someone else accomplished the same thing or more in ten years, the second player is better. Golf wasn't nearly as athletic, as taxing, or as well paid, when Jack played. Careers were longer. It's becoming more explosive, with shorter careers. Guys hit more balls now, train harder now, etc. Dude, 14/10 vs. 5/4 is not remotely the same as 18/72 vs. 15/82. It requires context. Jack was playing against club pros. I agree - Tiger blows Jack's record out of the water when you adjust for field strength. 😉  We agree again: Tiger might have won 30 majors. 🤣 Ha ha ha ha ha ha. No, dude. No, it's not "wrong" and the fields were significantly shallower and weaker when Jack played. Pretend Jack amassed his record against ten-year-olds. How impressive would that be? There's context. Jack amassed his record against significantly weaker/shallower competition. This has all been discussed a hundred times. As it would be if he played against ten-year-olds. Compare Tiger's SG in the PGA Championships against only the club pros and let me know how that shakes out. Strokes gained is against the competition at the time. Competition. Jack strongly disagrees with you, and you're casually leaving off the 2000s, too. No, they weren't. Once in a great while they popped up, but no, they weren't. Given all of the conversation that's been had in this topic, this ranks as one of the dumbest posts ever in this topic. If it was made in the first ten pages, cool. But, no. You made it on page 390-something. Try this on for size: every one of Tiger's 82 PGA Tour wins faced stronger/deeper fields than any of Jack's major victories. I also don't really care about top-tens in majors. 15 x > 18 y, where x and y are the respective strength/depth of field. It may be coherent, but so is someone saying 2 + 2 = 7 or someone trying to explain chemtrails. You can understand what they're trying to say, but it can still be a bad, lousy argument. This implies that I do. I do not. I've made the mathematical argument throughout. You're literally counting things with little to no regard for the freaking competition. Guess what: NHL scoring went down when goalies got more pads and learned to take away more parts of the net by learning to go butterfly, etc. The competition changed, and so scoring records aren't the same now as when Wayne Gretzky played most of his hockey. Because the competition is different now. Neither is someone trying to say that 2 + 2 = 7 or that the earth is flat. I can comprehend what they're saying, but they're still a wacko. Dude.
    • Majors are the primary yardstick that most people use.  No one cares about winning some 30 person tour championship or some defunct tournament with 50 people. Those are exhibitions. I use other sports to show that I have a coherent thought process because this debate seems fraught with emotion because of the names. Jack and Tiger are just nouns to me. I have no emotional attachment to either one. The thought process would be no different in evaluating Jeongeun Kim5 or Jeongeun Kim6.   It is not hard to comprehend.  I even gave you a helpful example of Clemson football so that you would understand.  If you can't understand that, life is going to be too much for you.   Charlie Munger Quote: “Without numerical fluency, in the part of life most of us inhibit, you are like a one-legged man in an ass-kicking conte...” “Without numerical fluency, in the part of life most of us inhibit, you are like a one-legged man in an ass-kicking contest.” — Charlie Munger quotes from QuoteFancy.com  
    • And that gap between Tiger’s total wins against Jack’s is massive. And aside from your obsession with majors, Tiger’s accomplishments are massive compared to Jack’s. And stop using other sports as an example. This is golf. Have you not looked at the lists of Tiger vs Jack accomplishments and records? It’s comical to look at both of them and derive that Jack is the GOAT. You acknowledge the weak fields Jack played in then turn around and state how amazing his major records are. That makes no sense at all.
    • I didn't disregard it at all. I acknowledged and I am very well aware that the British Open often didn't have the best players (which was still true in the 90s but to a lesser extent), the PGA Championship had a lot of club pros and golf in general was a much less viable profession so the fields were more top heavy. Clemson plays college football in the ACC. The ACC is a much weaker conference than the SEC and Big Ten.  Clemson often had great teams that were discounted because people used the same thinking as you.  Just because the SEC is tougher doesn't imply that every team ore even the top teams are better.  This conversation would be more relevant if Jack only had a slightly better major record. The gap between Jack and Tiger in majors records is massive.  Tiger's 50th place finishes and DNPs aren't magically becoming 2nds in the 60s and 70s.
    • Wordle 1,057 4/6 ⬜🟨🟨⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 ⬜🟩🟨🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...