Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5479 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just made the leap...ordered 909D2 to replace my 905R.....anyone here do the same, and if so..did it work out??

Thanks in advance

Superlight Stand Bag
909D2 9.5° Diamana S
909F2 15.5° Diamana S
909F2 18.5° Diamana S
AP2 Project X 5.5 3-PW Vokey Spin Milled 52° 56° 60° Studio Select Newport 2 Pro V1Home Course - http://www.huronoaks.com (Home of Mike Weir)


Posted
Im jumped to the 909D3 from the 905R and im happy. You wont be dissapointed in the 909D2. (provided you get those crappy stock shafts switched out...)
THE WEAPONS CACHE..

Titleist 909 D2 9.5 Degree Driver| Titleist 906f4 13.5 degree 3-Wood | Titleist 909 17 & 21 degree hybrid | Titleist AP2 irons
Titleist Vokey Wedges - 52 & 58 | Scotty Cameron Studio Select Newport 2 Putter | ProV1 Ball

Posted
i dont know..those stock diamana shafts are nice

Superlight Stand Bag
909D2 9.5° Diamana S
909F2 15.5° Diamana S
909F2 18.5° Diamana S
AP2 Project X 5.5 3-PW Vokey Spin Milled 52° 56° 60° Studio Select Newport 2 Pro V1Home Course - http://www.huronoaks.com (Home of Mike Weir)


Posted
they are good.
i have the sytock stiff shaft, partly because of the reason that i ordered from pakistan, (no custom options) and partly because i have never been fitted. =S the diamana works pretty well. only problem is that the ball doesnt go as high as i want it to go, normally 25-28 m in the air. but idstance wise it is pretty sweet when u catch it in the center, my ball flies at a low trajectory landing at the 280 mark and rolling for further 20 -30 yards. Caution: this club is not for those looking for a forgiving club and distance, thats the ping line for u.

07 Burner regular flex. (my dads-doing wonders with it) :D
supersteel burner steel shaft strong 3 wood
R7 draw 5 wood
Rapture 4-pw uw. Red dot. <3
56 deg sw60 deg Cg14 white steel two ball putter penta golf shoes. =D


Posted
I demoed the D2 this week along with the Nike VR str8 fit and Ping G15. I'm going to demo and get custom fit next week but I think I will go for the D2, it felt great. The Ping was ok and the VR was probably a couple of yards longer than the D2 but I can't really afford the VR with it being so new to the market. I really liked the setup and feel of the D2 and the
fact it comes at 45" as standard where as most other manufacturers are getting on for 46" shafts. I demoed the Voodoo shaft and the ball flight looked pretty good to me, I will see what the figures on the monitor say next week.
adams.gif Speedline fast 10 9.5˚
adams.gif Speedline fast 10 15˚
adams.gif A7 17˚
adams.gif Idea Pro 3-PW
mizuno.gif MP T-11 52˚, MP T-10 58˚  cameron.gif Red X  titleist.gif NXT

Posted
i dont have any problems getting the ball up with the stock diamana....seems to get good ball flight...i actually thought it flew a little high for me.

anyway my d2 should be in next week...debating on trading my 905r in or holding on to it just in case.

Superlight Stand Bag
909D2 9.5° Diamana S
909F2 15.5° Diamana S
909F2 18.5° Diamana S
AP2 Project X 5.5 3-PW Vokey Spin Milled 52° 56° 60° Studio Select Newport 2 Pro V1Home Course - http://www.huronoaks.com (Home of Mike Weir)


Posted
i dont have any problems getting the ball up with the stock diamana....seems to get good ball flight...i actually thought it flew a little high for me.

Spend the little extra (200 bucks or so) and get a real shaft, you'll never use a stock shaft again

I'm using a 909Dcomp with Aldila Voodoo svs6 shaft cut down to 44 inches, the SW is D2 (pretty light) grip Golf pride BCT lable down, I have so much more control now over that stock shaft that I can really cut loose with it and still nail the sweet spot for a few extra yards

Posted
I agree with titleist_prov1x stock shafts are really good shafts made cheaper... I would definitely suggest going with anything in the D line, Personally the D2 spins to much for me so if I were to have one I would have the Comp but look into getting one of the more exotic shafts
Boom Stick: 907 D2 w/accuflex The juice
3 wood: 909F2 w/Fujikura Motore F1 55
Hybrid: 909H 19* w/Fujikura Motore F1 80HB
Irons: 2010 AP2 (3-PW) w/Dynamic Gold S300
Wedges: Spinmilled 54*, 60*Putter: 2002 Studio Design 1.5Balls: Pro V1Range Finder: Pro 1600Proud Member of Piranhas Golf Team Ecole de...

  • Administrator
Posted
I agree with titleist_prov1x stock shafts are really good shafts made cheaper... I would definitely suggest going with anything in the D line, Personally the D2 spins to much for me so if I were to have one I would have the Comp but look into getting one of the more exotic shafts

That's not always true. For example, the Aldila Voodoo is the same exact shaft as the one that sold for $300 when it was introduced (with the exception of having a few tenths of a degree more torque to improve feel). Aldila wouldn't put their name or "Voodoo" on a shaft that wasn't right, and the shafts that sell for $300 still often only cost $10 or $20 to make - they sell for $300 because they can.

Stock shafts are less expensive because they're bought in bulk and because the shaft company gets a bit of advertising, so even if they sell them just a tiny bit above cost to the head manufacturer (Titleist, etc.) they're still getting a good deal out of it. But they're not going to risk damaging their brand by putting a crap shaft in with their name and the shaft product name on it. They might tweak the shaft a bit - as Aldila did for the Voodoo in the Titleist drivers - to better suit the club they're going into, but those aren't quality tweaks - just performance ones.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
im sticking with my diamana shaft...i love em in my 909 fairways...909d2 will be in middle of this week...will report back

also, 909dcomp is the high flight model....if you cant get the ball up in the air buy that lol..otherwise 90% of golfers will be going d2

Superlight Stand Bag
909D2 9.5° Diamana S
909F2 15.5° Diamana S
909F2 18.5° Diamana S
AP2 Project X 5.5 3-PW Vokey Spin Milled 52° 56° 60° Studio Select Newport 2 Pro V1Home Course - http://www.huronoaks.com (Home of Mike Weir)


Posted
That's not always true. For example, the Aldila Voodoo is the same exact shaft as the one that sold for $300 when it was introduced (with the exception of having a few tenths of a degree more torque to improve feel). Aldila wouldn't put their name or "Voodoo" on a shaft that wasn't right, and the shafts that sell for $300 still often only cost $10 or $20 to make - they sell for $300 because they can.

Matrix Ozik XCON-5 =

Aldila Voodoo =

Posted
i havent hit the D2 but i did hit the D3 w a stock voodoo
man that is a SUPER low combo
my regular launch angle is high (over 12 degrees) and with this combo i was in the 9's!!!!
was too low for me......i like to stay in the 11-13 range if at all possible
"My swing is homemade - but I have perfect flaws!" - Me

Posted
I had my driver fitting today and went with the 909 D2 10.5 stiff Diamana. It was more forgiving than I expected, certainly more than my R9. I tried the d3/voodoo combo and it gave a very low flight. The diamana gave a good launch angle and spin rate and was more consistent than the voodoo, plus it had a nicer feel. The voodoo felt ok but a little harsh on off centre hits. Looking forward to taking it out on the course.
adams.gif Speedline fast 10 9.5˚
adams.gif Speedline fast 10 15˚
adams.gif A7 17˚
adams.gif Idea Pro 3-PW
mizuno.gif MP T-11 52˚, MP T-10 58˚  cameron.gif Red X  titleist.gif NXT

  • 8 months later...
Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by iacas View Post
I agree with titleist_prov1x stock shafts are really good shafts made cheaper... I would definitely suggest going with anything in the D line, Personally the D2 spins to much for me so if I were to have one I would have the Comp but look into getting one of the more exotic shafts

That's not always true. For example, the Aldila Voodoo is the same exact shaft as the one that sold for $300 when it was introduced (with the exception of having a few tenths of a degree more torque to improve feel). Aldila wouldn't put their name or "Voodoo" on a shaft that wasn't right, and the shafts that sell for $300 still often only cost $10 or $20 to make - they sell for $300 because they can.

Stock shafts are less expensive because they're bought in bulk and because the shaft company gets a bit of advertising, so even if they sell them just a tiny bit above cost to the head manufacturer (Titleist, etc.) they're still getting a good deal out of it. But they're not going to risk damaging their brand by putting a crap shaft in with their name and the shaft product name on it. They might tweak the shaft a bit - as Aldila did for the Voodoo in the Titleist drivers - to better suit the club they're going into, but those aren't quality tweaks - just performance ones.

hey Eric,

very interesting post you left here. It seems to me that about 5 or 6 years ago a lot of drivers off the rack did not have shafts that were as good compared to an aftermarket shaft. It seems that this has changed now and companies are putting better shafts in there products - especially the TP models. I just purchased a Titliest 909 D2 driver. the shaft i was fitted best for was the Diamana Blueboard stiff. This came as on option with the Titliest driver. the driver works wonderful for me and the shaft feels great. I have no reason to believe it isn't a good product. Your post seems to confirm this - so in your opinion, is it safe to believe that the Diamana Blueboard shaft in my driver is just as good as an aftermarket Diamana Blueboard?

In my bag:
Titleist 910D2 w/Diamana Kaali'Stiff
Titleist 910F w/ Diamana Kaali' Stiff
Titleist 910F Hybrid 19 degree w/ Diamana Kaali' Stiff

Titleist AP1 Irons - TT S300
Titleist Vokey SM 50, 54 & 58 - Titleist Scott Cameron Newport


  • Administrator
Posted

Originally Posted by Sandwedge74

hey Eric,

very interesting post you left here. It seems to me that about 5 or 6 years ago a lot of drivers off the rack did not have shafts that were as good compared to an aftermarket shaft. It seems that this has changed now and companies are putting better shafts in there products - especially the TP models. I just purchased a Titliest 909 D2 driver. the shaft i was fitted best for was the Diamana Blueboard stiff. This came as on option with the Titliest driver. the driver works wonderful for me and the shaft feels great. I have no reason to believe it isn't a good product. Your post seems to confirm this - so in your opinion, is it safe to believe that the Diamana Blueboard shaft in my driver is just as good as an aftermarket Diamana Blueboard?


"Just as good"? I have two answers:

  1. It may even be better since they're built specifically for the heads the company (Titleist, TaylorMade, etc.) are producing. Oftentimes they'll have a slightly different torque or something but those changes are made so the shaft better fits the head...
  2. If you're not a better fit for it, then no.

But in general, quality-wise, they're awfully close. Close enough that I've never seen the need to assume that the stock shaft is garbage. Again, companies aren't going to put their names (and their product names) on crap products.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Yea, never understood the negativity towards stock shafts. I have the Diamana's in my 909H's and my 909 3 wood and the X-Con6 in my 9.5 DComp. I certianly would recommend getting fitted but I bought these when I hit them on the range. For me, it's "hit ball, see ball go" and if I like the distance and flight I consider that a matched shaft to my swing.


  • Administrator
Posted

Originally Posted by 1par2win

Yea, never understood the negativity towards stock shafts.


Never underestimate a club ho's propensity, need, or desire to rationalize the purchase of a $400 shaft...

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 5479 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.