Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5274 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
He is.

The problem with these ideas, is it doesn't take anything close to what is happening inside your body into account. I tell you what, you take men the same age, same weight, same health...feed them the same diet for a 12 week period, have one walk 4 miles a day at 3 mph, and have the other run at 6 mph for 4 miles everyday...we'll see who's in better health after 12 weeks.

In my Callaway stand bag:

9.5 Degree Taylormade Burner Superfast Adilla Voodoo shaft
3 Wood: Cleveland Launcher 15 degree Adilla Voodoo shaft
Irons 3-SW: Callaway X-14 Steelhead

Lob wedge: Cleveland 60 degree

Putter: Ping Anser Karsten


  • Administrator
Posted
I tell you what, you take men the same age, same weight, same health...feed them the same diet for a 12 week period, have one walk 4 miles a day at 3 mph, and have the other run at 6 mph for 4 miles everyday...we'll see who's in better health after 12 weeks.

The point remains that walking is nowhere near as low as 40% as you stated. And your experiment is flawed - and would be even with twins - so it's pointless to discuss it.

I never said walking was "as good as" running, just that 40% is way, way too low.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
The point remains that walking is nowhere near as low as 40% as you stated. And your experiment is flawed - and would be even with twins - so it's pointless to discuss it.

Hey, if you think walking is going to make you lose weight at the same rate as running...knock yourself out. As I'm sure you'll admit, there seems to be contradicting sides to the arguement and several theories- so with that in mind I'm not sure how you can be so sure to say that my estimation "is no where near" accurate.

And if you think the experiment is flawed, I could agrue it's not anymore flawed than posting links from a website promoting walking which only supporting idea is how many METs are burned... The only thing a MET should be used for is calculating METs burned, not comparing running to walking. Like I said, if you're too old to consider running or your doctor does not recommend running for you, or if you're looking for a light excercise, spending time with your spouse, enjoying the scenery, than running is a good use of your time. But as I've said all along, if you're hoping walking is going to improve your physical fitness, you simply won't see the results you're hoping for.

In my Callaway stand bag:

9.5 Degree Taylormade Burner Superfast Adilla Voodoo shaft
3 Wood: Cleveland Launcher 15 degree Adilla Voodoo shaft
Irons 3-SW: Callaway X-14 Steelhead

Lob wedge: Cleveland 60 degree

Putter: Ping Anser Karsten


  • Administrator
Posted
Hey, if you think walking is going to make you lose weight at the same rate as running... knock yourself out.

I never said that it did.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I don't walk for excercise because I am time restrained and enjoy cycling and running more. Walking is more substainable for most people. If you are a typical fat person who is trying to lose wieght, you can't run for an hour at 6 MPH but you most probably could walk for 1.5 hours at 4 MPH.

What really matters IMO is how hard you work. I am a very intense. I did walk in the past at the highest incline at about 4.3 MPH for an hour. I am quite confident I burned a ton of calories in that time. No I choose to go to spinning instead or run at 6 to 6.5.

Brian


Posted
Lefty, that's what I was trying to get at before we had to go and get all technical. Depending on how far I'm running, I usually run somewhere between a 7-8 mpp pace. If I'm walking fast, it's probably going to be around a 4 mph pace. In my humble estimation (better??) I'm at least burning 60% more calories while running.

Heck, I can't even talk when I'm running hard, even walking fast I could probably be downing a cheeseburger and telling you about my last round. After viewing the links, you have to get pretty creative with data and scenarios to claim "running and walking burn the same amount of calories."

Paralysis by analysis, when really it just boils down to plain common sense.

In my Callaway stand bag:

9.5 Degree Taylormade Burner Superfast Adilla Voodoo shaft
3 Wood: Cleveland Launcher 15 degree Adilla Voodoo shaft
Irons 3-SW: Callaway X-14 Steelhead

Lob wedge: Cleveland 60 degree

Putter: Ping Anser Karsten


Posted
Lefty, that's what I was trying to get at before we had to go and get all technical. Depending on how far I'm running, I usually run somewhere between a 7-8 mpp pace. If I'm walking fast, it's probably going to be around a 4 mph pace. In my humble estimation (better??) I'm at least burning 60% more calories while running.

You aren't the typical person. Most people can get a good workout walking and can't run for more than 5 minutes at a time. I find higher intensity workouts more enjoyable so I choose to do things that gets my body working so hard I can't think. As I get in better and better shape (i've lost 60 pounds and decreased my fat by 10+% while getting stronger in every excercise I do) you have to push yourself harder to get the workouts you once did with less challenging workouts. My point was that for most, you can lose alot of weight and feel better by walking hard for a good amount of time. You don't have to jog to call it working out. To push myself past the point I'm at I am not going to do it with just walking. Sure I love walking with my wife, son, playing golf, around downtown during lunch but it isn't a challenge anymore. To push myself to were I want to be I have to be 100% dedicated to my diet and work my A*s off in the gym lifting, running, whatever. One of the downfalls of being in better shape is it takes more to get the same workout.

Brian


Posted
You aren't the typical person. Most people can get a good workout walking and can't run for more than 5 minutes at a time. I find higher intensity workouts more enjoyable so I choose to do things that gets my body working so hard I can't think. As I get in better and better shape (i've lost 60 pounds and decreased my fat by 10+% while getting stronger in every excercise I do) you have to push yourself harder to get the workouts you once did with less challenging workouts. My point was that for most, you can lose alot of weight and feel better by walking hard for a good amount of time. You don't have to jog to call it working out. To push myself past the point I'm at I am not going to do it with just walking. Sure I love walking with my wife, son, playing golf, around downtown during lunch but it isn't a challenge anymore. To push myself to were I want to be I have to be 100% dedicated to my diet and work my A*s off in the gym lifting, running, whatever. One of the downfalls of being in better shape is it takes more to get the same workout.

First off, nice job on the weight loss, that's quite an accomplishment. I agree with you 100%, that's why I made sure I said walking is better suited for some, and also suggested that people who are really trying to get fit could try walking a 1/4 mile, running a 1/4 mile etc... Actually, I have a buddy who was really overweight, he's gotten into running and he runs for three telephone pole lenghts, walks 5, runs 3 etc...

The fact of the matter is, if you say, 50 lbs. overweight. Maintaining the the same diet and walking as your only form of exercise is not going to get you fit- if that's your goal. But, like I said, getting out and walking is good for you. It's really all about what your goals are.

In my Callaway stand bag:

9.5 Degree Taylormade Burner Superfast Adilla Voodoo shaft
3 Wood: Cleveland Launcher 15 degree Adilla Voodoo shaft
Irons 3-SW: Callaway X-14 Steelhead

Lob wedge: Cleveland 60 degree

Putter: Ping Anser Karsten


Posted
You can't lose any weight with just exercise IMO. The most important part of changing yourself is changing what you put in your body. My nutritionist/enormous body builder guy has stessed the importance of that. He said he would rather me miss a workout than a meal.

Brian


Posted
You can't lose any weight with just exercise IMO. The most important part of changing yourself is changing what you put in your body. My nutritionist/enormous body builder guy has stessed the importance of that. He said he would rather me miss a workout than a meal.

Yup, I agree 100%. Diet is the #1 thing, combining that with exercise is important, but you can run as far as you want, if you're eating super-sized MickyD's meals you're not going to notice any change. It's all about burning more calories than you consume.

In my Callaway stand bag:

9.5 Degree Taylormade Burner Superfast Adilla Voodoo shaft
3 Wood: Cleveland Launcher 15 degree Adilla Voodoo shaft
Irons 3-SW: Callaway X-14 Steelhead

Lob wedge: Cleveland 60 degree

Putter: Ping Anser Karsten


  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
I walked 6 miles today, with a ruck, It was a great workout considering I have not done it in quite a while.

  • 1 month later...
Posted
I walk both on and off the course. I lose a fair amount of desire for golf if my group wants to play cart golf. Cart golf is an amusement ride, walking the course is playing golf. Carts should be limited to folks who have a medical reason to avoid walking. My desire to walk has led me to a group called The Walking Golfers Society.

Posted
I heard some golf courses only have one golf cart for the players to use, so they encourage walking while you play.

Titleist 910 D2 9.5 Driver
Titleist 910 F15 & 21 degree fairway wood
Titleist 910 hybrid 24 degree
Mizuno Mp33 5 - PW
52/1056/1160/5

"Yonex ADX Blade putter, odyssey two ball blade putter, both  33"

ProV-1


Posted
Just to kinda give everyone a basic idea, running is a aerobic exercise, and walking is more along the lines of strength training.

In one hour:
You'll burn more calories running, but the calories being burned would be derived from sugars and carbohydrates.
You'll burn more fat walking because your body doesn't use as many carbohydrates for fuel, it has enough time to metabolize fat.

Walking and running are two different forms of exercise, which is something that is confused a lot. They both have their benefits. The biggest thing with walking is form. Form will dictate how efficiently calories are burned.

A person's weight also comes into play. A heavier individual will burn more calories walking than a lighter individual because he/she has more weight to carry around. I would recommend a heavier individual to walk rather than run for countless health related issues and risks.

  • 4 months later...
Posted
I like to run, but walking is nice.. I walk 30 minutes everday, from my car to my office, i am to cheap to spend for parking closer ;b, FREE PARKING...

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

I just bought a Samsung Epic 4g and downloaded a new app for fitness and it has a pediometer and calculates calories burned from walking, so my next round I will try to remember to turn it on and see how many calories are burned simply by the walking.

Titleist 910 D2 9.5 Driver
Titleist 910 F15 & 21 degree fairway wood
Titleist 910 hybrid 24 degree
Mizuno Mp33 5 - PW
52/1056/1160/5

"Yonex ADX Blade putter, odyssey two ball blade putter, both  33"

ProV-1


Posted

Actually if you look at calories burned over all ranges of weights, if you walk at 3 mph and run at 6 mph, your burning 140% more calories running. I have a nice excel sheet that can calulate daily calories burned for different exercises or activities, ranging from the weight of 170 lbs to 260 lbs, its in calories per minute..

Which means, to burn the same calories for running, lets say you run for 10 minutes, you need to walk for 24 minutes.

Calories = activity * duration, if you equal the two equations one for walking one for running, its about a 14 minutes for every 10 minutes, or 1.4 minutes for every minute walk to run.

Now, there is such a thing as interval training were you run at high speed, take it down to to a brisk walk then amp it up to a run again, constantly fluctuating your pulse rate, so you do like 1 minute run, 30 second walk. It supposedly makes your body burn extra calories afterwards, so theres that to take into account depending on the exercise.

If you want a general idea as to how many calories you burn while walking, take your weight and divide it by 33, then multiply it by the number of minutes. Thats at 3 mph.

If you want 3.3 mph, which is a good pace for a 6 foot guy, divide by 31.. This is for weight in lbs

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 5274 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 1: 2025.12.26 Worked on LH position on grip, trying to keep fingers closer to perpendicular to the club. Feels awkward but change is meant to.
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • When you've been teaching golf as long as I have, you're going to find that you can teach some things better than you previously had, and you're probably going to find some things that you taught incorrectly. I don't see that as a bad thing — what would be worse is refusing to adapt and grow given new information. I've always said that my goal with my instruction isn't to be right, but it's to get things right. To that end, I'm about five years late in issuing a public proclamation on something… When I first got my GEARS system, I immediately looked at the golf swings of the dozens and dozens of Tour players for which I suddenly had full 3D data. I created a huge spreadsheet showing how their bodies moved, how the club moved, at various points in the swing. I mapped knee and elbow angles, hand speeds, shoulder turns and pelvis turns… etc. I re-considered what I thought I knew about the golf swing as performed by the best players. One of those things dated back to the earliest days: that you extend (I never taught "straighten" and would avoid using that word unless in the context of saying "don't fully straighten") the trail knee/leg in the backswing. I was mislead by 2D photos from less-than-ideal camera angles — the trail leg rotates a bit during the backswing, and so when observing trail knee flex should also use a camera that moves to stay perpendicular to the plane of the ankle/knee/hip joint. We have at least two topics here on this (here and here; both of which I'll be updating after publishing this) where @mvmac and I advise golfers to extend the trail knee. Learning that this was not right is one of the reasons I'm glad to have a 3D system, as most golfers generally preserve the trail knee flex throughout the backswing. Data Here's a video showing an iron and a driver of someone who has won the career slam: Here's what the graph of his right knee flex looks like. The solid lines I've positioned at the top of the backswing (GEARS aligns both swings at impact, the dashed line). Address is to the right, of course, and the graph shows knee flex from the two swings above. The data (17.56° and 23.20°) shows where this player is in both swings (orange being the yellow iron swing, pink the blue driver swing). You can see that this golfer extends his trail knee 2-3°… before bending it even more than that through the late backswing and early downswing. Months ago I created a quick Instagram video showing the trail knee flex in the backswing of several players (see the top for the larger number): Erik J. Barzeski (@iacas) • Instagram reel GEARS shares expert advice on golf swing technique, focusing on the critical backswing phase. Tour winners and major champions reveal the key to a precise and powerful swing, highlighting the importance of... Here are a few more graphs. Two LIV players and major champions: Two PGA Tour winners: Two women's #1 ranked players: Two more PGA Tour winners (one a major champ): Two former #1s, the left one being a woman, the right a man, with a driver: Two more PGA Tour players: You'll notice a trend: they almost all maintain roughly the same flex throughout their backswing and downswing. The Issues with Extending the Trail Knee You can play good golf extending (again, not "straightening") the trail knee. Some Tour players do. But, as with many things, if 95 out of 100 Tour players do it, you're most likely better off doing similarly to what they do. So, what are the issues with extending the trail knee in the backswing? To list a few: Pelvic Depth and Rotation Quality Suffers When the trail knee extends, the trail leg often acts like an axle on the backswing, with the pelvis rotating around the leg and the trail hip joint. This prevents the trail side from gaining depth, as is needed to keep the pelvis center from thrusting toward the ball. Most of the "early extension" (thrust) that I see occurs during the backswing. Encourages Early Extension (Thrust) Patterns When you've thrust and turned around the trail hip joint in the backswing, you often thrust a bit more in the downswing as the direction your pelvis is oriented is forward and "out" (to the right for a righty). Your trail leg can abduct to push you forward, but "forward" when your pelvis is turned like that is in the "thrust" direction. Additionally, the trail knee "breaking" again at the start of the downswing often jumps the trail hip out toward the ball a bit too much or too quickly. While the trail hip does move in that direction, if it's too fast or too much, it can prevent the lead side hip from getting "back" at the right rate, or at a rate commensurate with the trail hip to keep the pelvis center from thrusting. Disrupts the Pressure Shift/Transition When the trail leg extends too much, it often can't "push" forward normally. The forward push begins much earlier than forward motion begins — pushing forward begins as early as about P1.5 to P2 in the swings of most good golfers. It can push forward by abducting, again, but that's a weaker movement that shoves the pelvis forward (toward the target) and turns it more than it generally should (see the next point). Limits Internal Rotation of the Trail Hip Internal rotation of the trail hip is a sort of "limiter" on the backswing. I have seen many golfers on GEARS whose trail knee extends, whose pelvis shifts forward (toward the target), and who turn over 50°, 60°, and rarely but not never, over 70° in the backswing. If you turn 60° in the backswing, it's going to be almost impossible to get "open enough" in the downswing to arrive at a good impact position. Swaying/Lateral Motion Occasionally a golfer who extends the trail knee too much will shift back too far, but more often the issue is that the golfer will shift forward too early in the backswing (sometimes even immediately to begin the backswing), leaving them "stuck forward" to begin the downswing. They'll push forward, stop, and have to restart around P4, disrupting the smooth sequence often seen in the game's best players. Other Bits… Reduces ground reaction force potential, compromises spine inclination and posture, makes transition sequencing harder, increases stress on the trail knee and lower back… In short… It's not athletic. We don't do many athletic things with "straight" or very extended legs (unless it's the end of the action, like a jump or a big push off like a step in a running motion).
    • Day 135 12-25 Wide backswing to wide downswing drill. Recorder and used mirror. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.