• Announcements

    • iacas

      GAME GOLF Ryder Cup Contest   09/22/2016

      Join our GAME GOLF Ryder Cup Challenge to win an autographed GAME GOLF, a Pebble Steel watch, and many more great prizes!
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
wolverine_man

Bridgestone B330-RXS

13 posts in this topic

Been using Pro-V1x and TP Black religiously but decided to try out the B330-RXS this past weekend. First ball I could really feel compress dramatically on the face of my driver. I mean, it felt like those slow-mo videos of a golf ball exploding off the face of a tee shot hit by a pro. I couldn't really tell if I was getting more distance on my drives or not, possibly. Seemed pretty good around the greens but almost just a tad too soft off the putter face. Thought I might have been losing a couple yards with my irons vs the Pro-V1x, as the RXS seemed to perhaps go a tad higher but I am not sure.

Anyone have any comment or experiences on this ball, the "S" version of the RX?
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

I haven't played the RX but I play the B330-S and can tell you it is a great ball. I don't feel like I lose any distance off the tee and I can get tons of spin with these. I'm not sure if these are available in your area but Bridgestone sells a demo sleeve with one of each of their premium balls, it's your best chance to find out which one you like the most.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I got a free sleeve of the RX and I did not like them in anyway. I'm sure it is the right ball for some people but it played shorter, didn't spin much, and felt awful off the putter for me.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I played the RX last year and bought a box of RXS recently to try them out. The RXS do spin more than the RX, which is nice when chipping over a bunker to the green. But the combination of low compression and very soft cover make the RXS feel a lot less "lively" than the ProV1. If this bothers you and wish to remedy the situation with another Bridgestone Ball, try a sleeve of the new B330-S. The 330-S is now a 4 piece ball and it really jumps off the clubface. Don't worry too much about the swing speed recommendation, just try a sleeve and see what you think.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys. I actually tried out the RXS because I got a free two-ball sleeve of them from golf galaxy using their online ball fitter promotion. The recommendation I originally got was for the B330-S but I fudged my responses because I wanted to try the RXS, which is a lower compression. I will have to look for that demo sleeve of balls from Bridgestone. I may try the TP Red as well, as I have only used the black.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My no. 1 ball of choice would be the Pro V1, but I've tried both the RX and the RXS, and would seriously consider them if they weren't so 'mushy' of the putter face. I haven't tried the B330-S yet, and have heard that they have similar playing characteristics to the Pro V1, but I'm confused about the swing speed.......is this your driver swing speed or iron swing speed?!? Your swing speed drops considerably the further down the set you go. I find it odd how you can be fitted for a ball based on your swing speed that will only be hit at that speed for say 14 shots per round?!? Surely they need to give a guide to swing speed/compression ratios for iron play, as this is the most important and most common part of the game!??
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

....is this your driver swing speed or iron swing speed?!? Your swing speed drops considerably the further down the set you go. I find it odd how you can be fitted for a ball based on your swing speed that will only be hit at that speed for say 14 shots per round?!? Surely they need to give a guide to swing speed/compression ratios for iron play, as this is the most important and most common part of the game!??

There is a well defined linear relationship between driver swing speed and other clubs (reference "Physics of Golf" is one of many sources), so picking one club for this metric is an easy and consistent way of assessing which ball core technology is best suited for your swing.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I appreciate that there is a linear relationship throughout the whole set, but surely the compression of the ball will differ with each club? I know for sure that I cannot compress a golf ball as much with a short iron than I can with my driver, but I would hit a short iron nearly every hole?!? By fitting a ball to you driver speed of say 110mph, that ball is optimised for that speed/compression, and the ball would feel too hard when being hit with an iron, but spot on for the driver (the B330) and the opposite would happen if using a B300-RX/RXS, too soft of the driver and spot on for the irons. I think the B330-S would probably be the middle ground between the two. Unfortunately, something has got to give but it's down to the individual to choose which part of their game they feel can be sacrificed.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The swing speed companies use for recommendations is based on your driver.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I went to a Bridgestone fitting recently but got rained out, so all my info is based on talking to the rep.  The last time I had my driver swing speed checked it was right at 105, which is on the bubble for the Bridgestone balls, so he said I could comfortably play with any of them.  In the last 2 weeks I have tried the RX, RXS, and 330S (only one more to go for the whole set!)  Here are my results so far:

RXS - this is the best feeling ball on the greens, and I hit it about the same distance as most other balls I've played

RX - this is the longest ball I've ever played, even longer for me than the Pro V1X, but I didn't like the feel on short shots or putting.

B330S - for a soft "feel" ball I was immediately impressed by how it responds off the driver:  This ball has very good distance, for me it was in between the RXS and RX.  I also thought it felt good around the greens, but did not putt quite as nicely as the RXS.

On all of these balls I could play an entire round and never saw a blemish on the ball, I think the durability is outstanding.  Overall, I've settled on the 330S as a nice combination of distance and feel, but the jury is still out until I try the regular B330.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Played two rounds with the B330 this weekend.  About the same distance as the B330S but without the extra spin I get on the B330S and RXS I kept more poor drives in play.  This ball also felt good on the greens and short shots.  I played 27 holes with one ball and only took it out of play after hitting a cart path and a tree that left a bunch of sticky sap residue on it.

So, to sum up my Bridgestone "testing":

B330RXS - definitely the best feel ball on and around the greens, and the shortest distance for me.

B330RX - unquestionably the longest of the lot for me, but I did not like the feel on and around the greens.

B330S - Great feel off the driver and fairly soft on the greens.

B330 - Also great feel off the driver and much straighter off the tee.  Good feel on the greens.

Overall, both the B330 and the B330S feel great off the driver and have comparable distance.  The B330S is a little softer for putting, but I found the B330 straighter off the tee.  In fact, the straight got me into trouble a few times when I played for my typical draw/hook and the ball didn't turn over as much as expected.  I think for now I'm going to play the B330, but I could see switching back to the B330S if my game was feeling a bit more controlled.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bridgestone b330 series are my favorite balls to play. Almost the same feel as a titleist but for a reasonable price

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm so wishy-washy: I kept vacillating on which ball I should play, so I got on the Bridgestone ball selection guide website .  Every scenario I put in said I should play the B330RX, so I went to Dick's and bought a box - now I'm committed to them, at least for a while (just can't tell my wife there are still 3 dozen Maxfli Tour's in my locker!)  And I putted very well with them last night, which was my original issue with the RX.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • I like it. Especially compared to nearly all past US Ryder Cup kits. Actually before I dish out too much praise, do they have a huge Stars and Stripes flag emblazoned on the back?
    • I would say it depends on what club you're talking about. For drivers I would say that the best performing drivers of all time have been made within the last five years. Aerodynamics, material science, and the proliferation of launch monitors and data driven design have resulted in improvements across the board in distance and forgiveness as of late. I know that I personally saw a decent improvement on my G10 when I switched to a G30, in that I gained between 10 and 15 yards without sacrificing accuracy. This is on the high end of what aerodynamics can provide though, simply because higher swing speeds receive a greater benefit from decreased drag. Depending on the individual you may not see much difference so long as the driver itself was made within the last ten years or so. For irons I would be inclined to say that the main difference in the irons of yesteryear and the irons of today is forgiveness. The irons made today are much easier to hit than previous irons, simply because they aren't as drastically punishing on mis-hits as the old blades. The PING Eye2 irons seemed to be the first "widespread" GI iron that sparked the trend towards irons that were easier for the layman to hit. That being said, I found my s55 irons (their "blade" from several years ago) to be more forgiving than the Eye2's. Based on that and observations from other clubs I have hit I would say the average golfer would be best suited by irons made within the last 10 to 15 years that are in good condition with sharp grooves. If you play muscleback irons though, there's pretty much zero difference between modern "true" musclebacks and those of yore, though the current muscle-cavity irons (like the iBlade and MP-15) will likely be at least a bit easier to hit than the older blades while maintaining a similar style.  Wedges are the only thing that I would argue the "latest and greatest" provides a tangible benefit for. The reasoning for this is entirely different however, in that it's based solely off the condition of the grooves in older wedges. As wedges grow old, and get used, the grooves wear to the point that there becomes a noticeable performance difference - especially when playing out of the rough. For this reason alone do I say that the average golfer (assuming they golf at least once a week during the golfing season) is best suited by wedges no older than two or three years old.  Putters are the odd man out here. I don't think it matters in the slightest when your putter was manufactured, so long as you keep a reasonable grip on it so that it doesn't slip out of your hands. I personally am a fan of the newer milled putters for the feel they provide, but it doesn't mean I couldn't probably putt nearly as well with an original Anser putter in the same style. I think the average golfer is best suited by whatever putter style and features allow them to consistently roll the ball along their target line, with no age requirement. In summary, considering the advancement of technology, I would feel comfortable putting these "maximum age caps" on equipment for the average weekend golfer to get the most out of his/her game: Drivers: ~10 years old or newer Irons: ~15 years old or newer Wedges: ~3 years old or newer Putter: Whatever works best for you That being said, you may still enjoy the game with any kind of equipment out there. I just think that equipment that follows these guidelines will let the average weekend golfer get about as much as they can out of their game without necessarily breaking the bank. Like @iacas said, you may find incremental improvements by purchasing the R1 over an old G5 but the question then becomes whether or not this improvement is worth the price difference. This question can only be answered by the person buying the club. It can't be denied, however, that a driver from the 1960's will be severely outclassed by the G5 and the R1, making either of them a much better choice than the 1960's driver. Interestingly enough, I have had the desire to go the opposite way for a while now. I bought the s55's my last go around, and I'm thinking that my next set of irons will be a more "traditional" muscleback iron (since the s55 is mostly a CB), along the likes of the MP-4 irons by Mizuno. I hit the ball consistently enough that I don't care about the lack of forgiveness, and I believe that the wonderful look and feel of those irons, along with the little bit of extra vertical control (can thin it slightly to make punch shots even easier) would offset whatever I lose in forgiveness. I know that I would most certainly never go to an iron like the AP2, the G, or the M2. The chunky look of the club (along with the offset) gets into my head nowadays and makes me feel uncomfortable standing over the ball in a manner similar to how I used to be intimidated by the look of blades at address. I would gain forgiveness, but at the price of distance and trajectory control - an unacceptable trade for me considering I value distance and trajectory control much more highly than forgiveness.
    • My newest clubs are pretty old. Maybe 2006? I don't really remember. The other day, just for the heck of it,  I played using my old Bazooka Iron Woods. (2i-LW) Shot my normal score. Those Ironwoods are probably 15-16 years old. I don't think at this stage of my life, that a new set would make that much difference. 
    • My irons are from 1978, driver and woods from 2004 (same G5 as you)....at my current playing level, I don't feel like my clubs are holding my scores back. I will be updating my wedges to something designed this century in the near future but I'll probably regrip and keep playing my grandfather's old Eye irons a couple more years. There's something to be said about being familiar with your equipment too. The control you talk about with your driver comes from hitting a lot of balls with it and getting to know how it responds to different things. That's tough to give up considering that it could take weeks to develop that relationship with a new driver...at least that helps me cure the new toy bug and keep the wallet closed. :)
    • Hah, I was thinking the same thing when I saw that pic go up on the landing page.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. mahariji_slice
      mahariji_slice
      (35 years old)
  • Blog Entries