Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5669 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Hi Guys
I have been playing random balls most of my career, right now I'm playing Nike NDX Heats. I was wondering how much playing ProV1's would help with spin. I see that most good/great players use them. I shoot in the 80s usually. My ball from 50-120 (wedges) will bounce a couple times and check, but not come back. I am hitting Vokeys.

John

Posted
Balls come in in three basic categories as far as spin goes:
Distance (usually says Distance), mid-spin (TopFlite Gamer), and high-spin (PROV1).

Golf Digest had a Total Golf lesson series a few years ago (about $15 a year, one packet per month). One segment looked at six short-game situations, and which type of shot you should play depending upon the type of ball (amount of spin) you use.

I would suggest that if you jump around to different types of mid-spin balls, you would notice it less than if you switched from a distance to a high-spin.

Clubhead speed also matters. If two players hit a Gamer squarely with a 7 iron, the one with the higher clubhead speed would generate the most backspin.

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Having just switched from Maxfli Revolution ROCKS to Gamers, I can tell you the spin difference is amazing, and sometimes a detriment. I cannot imagine trying to play a Pro V right now... Too much side spin means many balls OB!

In the bag
Driver: Tour Burner 10.5*
Fairway: Launcher 2009 17*
Irons: X-18r 4-SW
Gap Wedge: CG15 52*Wedge: X Tour 60*Putter: Crimson 550Ball: E5


Posted
it doesn't matter as much as the person hitting the ball...

In my Nike Sport Cart Bag:
Driver: Burner SUPERFAST TP 10.5*
3 Wood Burner SUPERFAST
5 Wood SQ Dymo
Irons(4-GW) SZ Vokey Oil Can 56* 64* TP WedgePutter Oz Mallet 6Ball: ProV1x


Posted
It only matters if the player can make use of it.
But i had the situation where i shot E7s on the front 9 and Prov1 392s on the back 9
I foud the provs check a lot better and its easier to throw those dart flop shots right at the pin

My Clubs:
Ping I3 + blade 3-pw
9.5 09 Burner with prolaunch red
Nickent 4dx driver
Taylormade Z tp 52, 56, 60
YES Carolyne putter


Posted
I think what matters more is playing with 1 type of ball. Premium balls may or may not work for everyone.

If your wallet is tight but want to play with premium balls, try AAAA quality from lostgolfballs. I pay roughly $1 per ball before shipping.

My Clubs
Driver - Nike SUMO 13* R flex
Wood - Cobra 5 wood 18* R flex
3-PW hybrids/irons - Mizuno MX-950 R flex
Wedge - Mizuno MX-950 51* Wedge - Cleveland CG14 56* 14*Putter - RifeBall - Taylormade TP LDP RED


Posted
The ball makes a difference but you have to be able to execute the shot. It's actually funny this came up today because I played with a 15 handicap today and he was telling me about how he switched from a z-star to a bridgestone for more spin. He is a decent golfer but his iron shots from 125 and out did the same thing every time he hit the green bounce and roll out a little. I'm betting it would have been the same hitting any decent ball but once he got inside 125 he had a hard time. He'd hit some that would check, some rolled out and a one backed up. My point he didn't have a clue what his ball would do once inside 125 and when he was chipping. I'd say worry less about the ball and more about how to hit the shots.
Driver: i15, 3 wood: G10, Hybrid: Nickent 4dx, Irons: Ping s57, Wedges: Mizuno MPT 52, 56, 60, Putter: XG #9 

Posted
I usually just play with what I find at my CC, which happens to be alot of proV's Callaways, or Nikes. So I wouldnt really ever buy balls. I just use what I find.

Live, Breath, Golf.
My Home
FT-3 8.5* Driver
X22's
2i Hybrid 3i Hybrid 55* Wedge 60* Wedge PutterWhen Tiger puts spin on the ball, the ball does not hit the green and then spin back, the ball hits the green and the world spins forward.


Posted
I'd say worry less about the ball and more about how to hit the shots.

I agree with you, but I feel like my ball almost always wants to come back from 120 and in, and instead it typically checks. I guess I'm hitting down decently. I am wondering if a prov1 will put me over the top in terms of bite/roll back.

John

Posted
It matters, but only to a certain degree, obviously. If you're a 30 handicap you probably won't play any better with a ProV1 as opposed to a Top Flite D2. But if your a 2 handicap it can mean a lot as far as controlling spin on wedge shots and you may see a bit different result with driver distance.

Driver Ping G10 10.5*
Hybrids Ping G5 (3) 19* Bridgestone J36 (4) 22*
Irons Mizuno MP-57 5-PW
Wedges Srixon WG-504 52.08 Bridgestone WC Copper 56.13
Putter 33" Scotty Cameron Studio Select #2


Posted
I doubt even scratch golfers would really worry too much. I get ProV1s used for dirt cheap, so really, they're my best option. The only thing I really care about in a ball is that it gives me the right distance off my irons. I tried some EV Extra Spin balls, and they were 10 yards too long. The execution of a shot is more important than the ball anyway. So long as it spins somewhat decently, doesn't wear out too quickly, and flies around the right distance, it's a good ball.

I will play pretty much any ball that performs within reason. I use the HX-Hot, Tour B330, even Laddies and DT SoLos. I'm not good enough to really be picky about my ball.

Posted
It matters, but only to a certain degree. If you're a 30 handicap you probably won't play any better with a ProV1 as opposed to a Top Flite D2. But if your a 2 handicap it can mean a lot as far as controlling spin on wedge shots.

Your assuming that in order to be a 2 handicap you must be able to spin short irons... and that higher handicappers can't ??????????????


Posted
Your assuming that in order to be a 2 handicap you must be able to spin short irons... and that higher handicappers can't ??????????????

Anyone can spin a ball but the the real skill is spinning the ball on command from tight lies and when it is actually needed.

Irons X-22 Tour irons 3-PW
Driver Superfast TP
Fairway Wood Burner 3W
wedge 50 degree
wedge GS-15 56 DegreeWedge 62 degreePutter ZebraBall TP LDP Red B330 tour


Posted
I play D2's and they check for me around the greens. I don't have to account for much roll out. I tried the Gamers and the D2's spun more for me around the greens. Which is great because they're cheaper and come in boxes of 15. I find it's helpful to play the same ball for consistency in the short game.

Posted
I used to play in a scramble with a friend and his father. My friends dad was around 70 years old, he didn't have the distance he used to but he's was an OUTSTANDING golfer. I've never seen him shoot higher than a 74 and that's only because the par 5's are just too long for him otherwise he'd probably be a +2. My God could that man putt! I got into a discussion with him one time about balls and he just laughed at me. He said it mattered but no where near as much as the manufacturers would like you to believe.

So anyway he hits a shot into the green to about 15 feet. Then he says "watch this".....he pulls a ball out of his bag that looks like it sat in the woods for about 12 years and when through a couple of forest fires. He drops it on the fairway and hits it stiff to about 3 feet.

I'm sure the type of ball matters somewhat but maybe no where near as much as we think. What's far more important is playing a ball that makes you feel like it fits you well.

On another note, aren't we overrating spin into the green? If you hit a distance ball that goes 20 yards farther that's 2 less clubs you're hitting into the green. If you're hitting an eight iron into the green from 140 that's a ton more loft than a six iron from 160. Where spin matters to me is on those delicate half wedges or chips where I want the ball to react predictably.

Driver: VRS 9.5 degrees

Fairway Wood: 13 degrees
Hybrid: A3 19 degrees

Irons: i20's  Yellow dot

Wedges: Vokey's 52, 56 & 60

Putter: 2 ball

Ball: Penta; ProV


Posted
So anyway he hits a shot into the green to about 15 feet. Then he says "watch this".....he pulls a ball out of his bag that looks like it sat in the woods for about 12 years and when through a couple of forest fires. He drops it on the fairway and hits it stiff to about 3 feet.

That's because he knows who hits the ball. The ball is a passive object, the golfer is not. That's where so many people get hung up. The ball is inanimate. It doesn't do anything. It relies on you to hit it. From there on out, it's preference. Tiger is still Tiger, and even if you gave him Walmart clubs and cheap, bargain bin balls, he's still going to be the best

golfer in the world. Equipment is really more about comfort, feel, and aesthetics.

Posted
That's because he knows who hits the ball. The ball is a passive object, the golfer is not. That's where so many people get hung up. The ball is inanimate. It doesn't do anything. It relies on you to hit it. From there on out, it's preference. Tiger is still Tiger, and even if you gave him Walmart clubs and cheap, bargain bin balls, he's still going to be the best

Yep-makes me think of those "What if Tiger had to play [my, these] clubs, etc?" threads. He'd shoot about the same.


Posted
Your assuming that in order to be a 2 handicap you must be able to spin short irons... and that higher handicappers can't ??????????????

my point was that a 30 handicap probably isn't hitting the ball all that solid enough for the ball to actually have an impact on his score/round, and they sure worry about investing the money spent on higher priced balls into lessons, training aids, etc.

Driver Ping G10 10.5*
Hybrids Ping G5 (3) 19* Bridgestone J36 (4) 22*
Irons Mizuno MP-57 5-PW
Wedges Srixon WG-504 52.08 Bridgestone WC Copper 56.13
Putter 33" Scotty Cameron Studio Select #2


Note: This thread is 5669 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 470 - 2026-01-13 Got some work in while some players were using the sim, so I had to stick around. 🙂 Good thing too, since… I hadn't yet practiced today until about 6:45 tonight. 😛 
    • That's not quite the same thing as what some people messaged me today.
    • Day 152 1-12 More reps bowing wrists in downswing. Still pausing at the top. Making sure to get to lead side and getting the ball to go left. Slow progress is better than no progress.  
    • Yea, if I were to make a post arguing against the heat map concept, citing some recent robot testing would be my first point. The heat map concept is what I find interesting, more on that below. The robot testing I have looked at, including the one you linked, do discreet point testing then provide that discrete data in various forms. Which as you said is old as the hills, if you know of any other heat map concept type testing, I would be interested in links to that though! No, and I did say in my first post "if this heat map data is valid and reliable" meaning I have my reservations as well. Heck beyond reservations. I have some fairly strong suspicions there are flaws. But all I have are hunches and guesses, if anyone has data to share, I would be interested to see it.  My background is I quit golfing about 9 years ago and have been toying with the idea of returning. So far that has been limited to a dozen range sessions in late Summer through Fall when the range closed. Then primarily hitting foam balls indoors using a swing speed monitor as feedback. Between the range closing and the snow flying I did buy an R10 and hit a few balls into a backyard net. The heat map concept is a graphical representation of efficiency (smash factor) loss mapped onto the face of the club. As I understand it to make the representation agnostic to swing speed or other golfer specific swing characteristics. It is more a graphical tool not a data tool. The areas are labeled numerically in discrete 1% increments while the raw data is changing at ~0.0017%/mm and these changes are represented as subtle changes in color across those discrete areas. The only data we care about in terms of the heat map is the 1.3 to 1.24 SF loss and where was the strike location on the face - 16mm heal and 5mm low. From the video the SF loss is 4.6% looking up 16mm heal and 5mm low on the heat map it is on the edge of where the map changes from 3% loss to 4%. For that data point in the video, 16mm heal, 5mm low, 71.3 mph swing speed (reference was 71.4 mph), the distance loss was 7.2% or 9 yards, 125 reference distance down to 116. However, distance loss is not part of a heat map discussion. Distance loss will be specific to the golfers swing characteristics not the club. What I was trying to convey was that I do not have enough information to determine good or bad. Are the two systems referencing strike location the same? How accurate are the two systems in measuring even if they are referencing from the same location? What variation might have been introduced by the club delivery on the shot I picked vs the reference set of shots? However, based on the data I do have and making some assumptions and guesses the results seem ok, within reason, a good place to start from and possibly refine. I do not see what is wrong with 70mph 7 iron, although that is one of my other areas of questioning. The title of the video has slow swing speed in all caps, and it seems like the videos I watch define 7i slow, medium, and fast as 70, 80, and 90. The whole question of mid iron swing speed and the implications for a players game and equipment choices is of interest to me as (according to my swing speed meter) over my ~decade break I lost 30mph swing speed on mine.
    • Maxfli, Maltby, Golfworks, all under the Dicks/Golf Galaxy umbrella... it's all a bit confounding. Looking at the pictures, they all look very, very similar in their design. I suspect they're the same club, manufactured in the same factory in China, just with different badging.  The whacky pricing structure has soured me, so I'll just cool my heels a bit. The new Mizuno's will be available to test very soon. I'm in no rush.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.