Jump to content
IGNORED

Rules question


Ignorant
Note: This thread is 4934 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

didnt tiger do that once? he couldnt stop the club completely so he pulled up on it and it passed over/to the side of the ball?

That's Tiger... I said I've never known anyone

personally . John Daly stopped his swing once like Tiger does... and he tore a muscle in his ribs and had to withdraw from the tournament.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

im sure i heard of somebody hitting the ball but got to re-tee without penalty because they said that they was trying to stop

Cobra S2 Driver
Nike SQ 3 Wood
Nike Sumo SQ 3 Hybrid
Callaway X-16 Irons 3-PW
Nike Victory Red 56 and 60 WedgesScotty Cameron Newport 1.5 Putter

Link to comment
Share on other sites


im sure i heard of somebody hitting the ball but got to re-tee without penalty because they said that they was trying to stop

One hears a lot of things on the course but half of it is sheer BS. The rest is mostly lies and misunderstandings....

Trying to stop one's swing and yet moving the ball is no excuse, it is still a stroke that counts. See Dec 14/1: 14/1.5 Intent to Strike Ball Ceases During Downswing; Club Not Stopped But Path of Clubhead Altered to Avoid Striking Ball Q. A player begins his downswing with the intention of striking the ball but decides during the downswing not to strike the ball. The player is unable to stop the club before it reaches the ball, but he is able to swing intentionally over the top of the ball. Is the player deemed to have made a stroke? A. No. The player is considered to have checked his downswing voluntarily by altering the path of his downswing and missing the ball even though the swing carried the clubhead beyond the ball. If the player had not successfully checked his downswing (i.e., he had struck the ball), he is considered to have made a stroke. Any doubt regarding the player's intent must be resolved against the player.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator
Yeah, that rings a bell. It was an LPGA player, one of the more well known ones...

Paula Creamer I think. I don't know that she actually hit the ball though. Was a few years ago.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Paula Creamer I think. I don't know that she actually hit the ball though. Was a few years ago.

Yeah it was. There was a Golf Digest article about it too. I believe the story was that she swung the club and basically as she was starting her downswing the ball fell off the tee and she tried to stop mid-downswing but still made contact with the ball. I believe she was allowed to re-tee.

In fact, I found a thread about it: http://thesandtrap.com/forum/threads...tee+shot+rules (Ignore my post in that thread, it's dead wrong. )

In my bag:

Driver: Titleist TSi3 | 15º 3-Wood: Ping G410 | 17º 2-Hybrid: Ping G410 | 19º 3-Iron: TaylorMade GAPR Lo |4-PW Irons: Nike VR Pro Combo | 54º SW, 60º LW: Titleist Vokey SM8 | Putter: Odyssey Toulon Las Vegas H7

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I just reread that thread - to recap, Paula did hit the ball, but the official allowed her to retee since her intent was to miss the ball. So either the stroke does *not* count and you can retee without penalty, or the official ruled incorrectly for Paula. Which of those is the case, I wonder?

Bill

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • 1 month later...
This question came up in a competition (did not happen as described here).

This question was submitted to R&A; for an opinion and the answer was 2-fold:

- 2 strokes to get the ball close to hole - 1 penalty for causing the ball to move (18-2b) - 1 stroke (missing the ball) - 2 penalties for playing a moving ball (14-5) - ball is to be replaced OR is holed out with an additional penalty (R18) Personally I am slightly surprised by this opinion but there is a certain locig in it. If the original scenario was different and the ball had not fallen into the hole then the player would always have an option to continue his play without replacing the ball (provided a serious breach has not occurred) with one additional penalty. According to R&A; the fact that the ball actually fell into the hole is irrelevant when applying Rule 18.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 4934 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...