Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5514 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I just cannot seem to hit a driver to save my life and I am very consistent with my strong 3 wood (see sig) off the tee...I am avgeraging 250 off the tee with it but when I am swinging well I can put it out there 260 or more. What I was thinking about doing was "Building a 2 Wood" as follows:

1) Use a strong 3 wood head (12 - 13 degree) as I seem to like the head size of a 3 wood better then a driver

2) Put a 44 or 44.5 inch shaft into the strong 3 wood head

What I need to know is that my current 3 wood is 13 deg and the shaft is 43 inch...if I go to a 12 degree head and use a 44 inch shaft how many more yards will I get? Is that worth 10 more yards on the average???

Please I do not need advice on hitting a driver ...I have tried many different drivers/shafts etc...and have worked with a coach...not sure if it a mental thing or that the big heads just don't work for me but I can play this game fairly well (8 handicap) with a 3 wood off the tee...I would just like a few more yards off the tee and wonder if building a "2 Wood" would do that for me...thanks...

TEE - XCG6, 13º, Matrix Ozik HD6.1, stiff
Wilson Staff - Ci11, 3-SW, TX Fligthed, stiff

Odyssey - Metal X #7, 35in

Wilson Staff - FG Tour ball 


Posted
10 yards is miles in golf I would assume. The Superfast 3-wood plays much like what a 2-wood would assumingly play like. My guess is that you will either not see much difference in distance and/or see more left or right misses with the longer shaft/stronger loft club. What about a higher lofted driver?

Posted
Have you already tried your driver with a shaft at the shorter length? They sell drivers in 12 degree lofts, but if you want any shaft but regular or senior it would have to be special order or reshaft it. What you suggest would work, but if you are sensitive to swingweight or lie there could be unintended consequences.

1W Cleveland LauncherComp 10.5, 3W Touredge Exotics 15 deg.,FY Wilson 19.5 degree
4 and 5H, 6I-GW Callaway Razr, SW, LW Cleveland Cg-14, Putter Taylor Made Suzuka, Ball, Srixon XV Yellow


Posted
You could also get a Titleist 910 D3 in 10.5º and use the SureFit hosel to add 1.5º of loft (position A-4).
Bam, you get a 12º, 420cc driver.

Posted

Who even makes a 12° fairway club head? I know TEE doesn't. If you switch to another brand, that alone will lose you yards.

« Keith »


Posted
Have you already tried your driver with a shaft at the shorter length? They sell drivers in 12 degree lofts, but if you want any shaft but regular or senior it would have to be special order or reshaft it. What you suggest would work, but if you are sensitive to swingweight or lie there could be unintended consequences.

I have as during my testing to find a driver I tried 44.5 inch drivers and it did not seem to help...I actually think it is the large head that does not work for me???

You could also get a Titleist 910 D3 in 10.5º and use the SureFit hosel to add 1.5º of loft (position A-4). Bam, you get a 12º, 420cc driver.

I thought about this as I tested a 909 & 910, D3 & D2 10.5 and as I said above I think it is the large head that does not work for me???

Who even makes a 12° fairway club head? I know TEE doesn't. If you switch to another brand, that alone will lose you yards.

Ha! Ha! too funny BUT with the new Titleist Surefit I was looking at the new 910Fd...it is 13.5 and you can decrease the loft .75 so in essence it would be a 12.75...and then order it at 44inch...getting closer to what I am thinking about...does anyone remeber the Callaway X Hot 3 wood...it was desgined to be hit off the tee and was 44 inches long...but it was 15 degree...that is kind of my thought here but with lower loft???

TEE - XCG6, 13º, Matrix Ozik HD6.1, stiff
Wilson Staff - Ci11, 3-SW, TX Fligthed, stiff

Odyssey - Metal X #7, 35in

Wilson Staff - FG Tour ball 


Posted
I just cannot seem to hit a driver to save my life and I am very consistent with my strong 3 wood (see sig) off the tee...I usually avg 230 off the tee with it but when I am swinging well I can put it out there 250 or more. What I was thinking about doing was

While a bit off subject, I can't help but to suggest an alternative. All my clubs come from Callaway Preowned. "Like new" on that site is brand new. I had a driver I loved, a 360 cc Big Bertha, perhaps 4-5 year old model now. It can be bought "like new" for $90. I wonder if a smaller sized driver head would be of benefit to you. Another option would be a Steelhead driver. Fantastic clubs and I had one of these prior to the Big Bertha. Food for thought at any rate. Big bertha 360 cc $90 http://www.callawaygolfpreowned.com/...efault,pd.html Steelhead III 225cc $70 http://www.callawaygolfpreowned.com/...efault,pd.html -Dan

Posted
Bang makes a 11* fairway head with a maraging steel face at 192cc, and a #2 fairway with a beta-ti face, those could be options. Bang also makes a 401cc driver head that comes in 12* or 14*. SMT has their Nemesis driver head at 405cc in 12* or 14*. There's some other ideas.

Posted

Today I learned that Titleist are now making a fairway wood specifically designed to be hit off the tee. Might suit?

http://www.titleist.com/golf-clubs/fairways/910Fd.aspx

FF to 2:24.

Stretch.

"In the process of trial and error, our failed attempts are meant to destroy arrogance and provoke humility." -- Master Jin Kwon

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Today I learned that Titleist are now making a fairway wood specifically designed to be hit off the tee. Might suit?

YES! The 910Fd is definitely in my radar...

Attachment 2584 I cannot wait to see one in person...if you go the wesbite it also says they will make them up to 2 inches long (45 inches) but I am thinking 44 inches...I really hope I like these as I am kind of a Titleist guy. However, after Acushnet's announcment today I am hoping there will be a Titleist...

TEE - XCG6, 13º, Matrix Ozik HD6.1, stiff
Wilson Staff - Ci11, 3-SW, TX Fligthed, stiff

Odyssey - Metal X #7, 35in

Wilson Staff - FG Tour ball 


Note: This thread is 5514 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.