Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5458 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I took the time to get these images lined up to the pixel.  What's most impressive is how well he returns his hands to the address position.  Almost eerie if you just stare at his hands the whole time...

hogan.gif

[ Equipment ]
R11 9° (Lowered to 8.5°) UST Proforce VTS 7x tipped 1" | 906F2 15° and 18° | 585H 21° | Mizuno MP-67 +1 length TT DG X100 | Vokey 52° Oil Can, Cleveland CG10 2-dot 56° and 60° | TM Rossa Corza Ghost 35.5" | Srixon Z Star XV | Size 14 Footjoy Green Joys | Tour Striker Pro 5, 7, 56 | Swingwing


Posted

Click on the image to pop.

[ Equipment ]
R11 9° (Lowered to 8.5°) UST Proforce VTS 7x tipped 1" | 906F2 15° and 18° | 585H 21° | Mizuno MP-67 +1 length TT DG X100 | Vokey 52° Oil Can, Cleveland CG10 2-dot 56° and 60° | TM Rossa Corza Ghost 35.5" | Srixon Z Star XV | Size 14 Footjoy Green Joys | Tour Striker Pro 5, 7, 56 | Swingwing


Posted

Words cannot describe...........

 - Joel

TM M3 10.5 | TM M3 17 | Adams A12 3-4 hybrid | Mizuno JPX 919 Tour 5-PW

Vokey 50/54/60 | Odyssey Stroke Lab 7s | Bridgestone Tour B XS

Home Courses - Willow Run & Bakker Crossing

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

Originally Posted by Harmonious

Even more evidence of why he was such a great ball striker.  Thanks for doing this.


Please elaborate on this.

I don't think your club needs to be on the same plane at impact as it is at address, and good to great golfers throughout history have brought the handle in higher (never lower) than the shaft plane at setup. Nicklaus springs to mind - he brought the club in pretty high. And Hogan too, depending on a few things. I have plenty of video of Hogan with his impact shaft plane between shaft and elbow plane.

If you think about it, and the sole goal was to return the shaft to the same plane at setup as it was at address, you could just uncock your wrists more at setup. The cocking and uncocking of the wrists is power accumulator #2 in The Golfing Machine terms, and so it's relative... Let's say the ideal impact shaft plane for a player at a certain height with a 6-iron is 38 degrees from vertical. Well, so what if the player cocks his wrists more at setup and has it sitting at 45 degrees from vertical. He could return the club at 38 degrees every time but it won't match his impact plane.

Plus, I could make the case that you should return the hands higher through impact and thus that the impact shaft plane should be above the setup shaft plane because of clubhead droop. If your irons don't sit slightly toe-up at setup, the toe probably digs a little more than it should through impact. Hogan might have liked that, though, because toe droop helps send the ball right. Plus Hogan probably didn't have much shaft droop anyway, as he had really stiff, really heavy shafts.

I will say this: I think a lot of average golfers return the hands WAY too high. They get steep, they try like heck to send the path to the right (raising the handle helps with this, feeling like you're lowering the handle keeps the handle swinging to the left)...

But, generally speaking, I don't think "return the impact shaft plane to the setup shaft plane" is anything more than a measure of the uncocking of the left wrist, and so long as the impact shaft plane isn't too high, or your clubs aren't built improperly, players shouldn't worry about this too much .

impact_shaft_plane_1.jpg

impact_shaft_plane_2.jpg

P.S. Ben Hogan swung left with the best of 'em. As you might likely guess, swinging left and lowering the handle would be a bad thing for most average golfers, who already swing too far to the left (out to in) and slice the ball.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted


Originally Posted by iacas

P.S. Ben Hogan swung left with the best of 'em. As you might likely guess, swinging left and lowering the handle would be a bad thing  for most average golfers, who already swing too far to the left (out to in) and slice the ball.

After I read your reply to the quote, I thought of this Video


Posted


Originally Posted by Harmonious

Even more evidence of why he was such a great ball striker.  Thanks for doing this.


This Teacher is more qualified then me so I will let him explain it.To get point of, one of the reasons a great ball striker hogan is jump to 1:14 to the vid


Posted

I think that regardless of the general desirability of returning to the address position, the ability to do so is impressive and an indicator of the ability to have a repeatable swing.  If it's preferable to return precisely to a position a few inches offset from address (which I'm sure other pros can do), that's fine, but it doesn't make as visually impressive an animation.  :-)

In the bag:
FT-iQ 10° driver, FT 21° neutral 3H
T-Zoid Forged 15° 3W, MX-23 4-PW
Harmonized 52° GW, Tom Watson 56° SW, X-Forged Vintage 60° LW
White Hot XG #1 Putter, 33"


Posted

I agree with Erik that one shouldn't worry too much about matching up the two.  Golfers should have both a very consistent setup at address and a very consistent motion throughout the swing creating a consistent impact position as a byproduct.  Whether the impact position is the same in certain ways as the address position seems secondary in my view compared to the address position and motion being independently consistent.  Now, for me, it's easier if I set up to the ball with my shoulders open.  The reason is that my shoulders are pretty open at impact and if I set up square with the same amount of reach, I'd hit it on the toe every time simply because my left shoulder's distance to the ball has changed.

I don't know whether Hogan intended to return his hands at impact to the exact address position, but I haven't seen another golfer (maybe Nick Price) who does it as well.  It certainly makes it easy to check if your clubs have the right lie

[ Equipment ]
R11 9° (Lowered to 8.5°) UST Proforce VTS 7x tipped 1" | 906F2 15° and 18° | 585H 21° | Mizuno MP-67 +1 length TT DG X100 | Vokey 52° Oil Can, Cleveland CG10 2-dot 56° and 60° | TM Rossa Corza Ghost 35.5" | Srixon Z Star XV | Size 14 Footjoy Green Joys | Tour Striker Pro 5, 7, 56 | Swingwing


Note: This thread is 5458 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.