• ### Announcements

• #### Introducing TST "Clubs!"08/28/2017

No, we're not getting into the equipment business, but we do have "clubs" here on TST now. Groups. Check them out here:

# hitting to elevated and de-elevated greens

## Recommended Posts

Is there a general guideline / formula as to how much more club to take hitting uphill (like 1 club per 10ft. elevation) and the same for hitting to a green that is significantly lower than the tee, (1 club less per 40ft?)

##### Share on other sites

B-Con    52
The question is all about how fast the ball is dropping. How many feet does it travel forward for every foot that it drops? The ratio continuously changes, but if you find some graphs showing the ideal path of the ball, you can probably get a good idea for it. You're just interested in what the bottom 5 or so yards above the ground of the trajectory is like. Remember that a properly struck iron is going to have climbed in trajectory and finished by dropped much more steeply than it rose. I would guess that a good rule might be to assume that, as the ball drops from a mid-iron shot, is between 2ft down for every 1ft forward (2:1), maybe as low as a 3:2 ratio. So if the green is 10 feet above your starting point and you're approaching with a 7-iron, I can't imagine that you'd lose more than 5 to 8 feet of distance. For more parabolic-type shots, like pitches, you might have a ration closer to 1-to-1 at that point, so if you're 20ft from the pin standing at the base of a green that's 5 feet elevated, you may want to hit a 25-foot pitch shot. Everything works similarly for greens lower than you, but remember that the rate of decent only gets steeper as the ball drops. For a mid-iron, the ratio might be more like 5:2 or 3:1. 10 feet of elevation is probably negligible. And of course, the higher in the trajectory the ball hits the ground, the more it's going to roll out. The more it drops, the less it'll roll out, so roll-out will compensate a little bit for whatever distance you gained or lost in your shot. So, my purely abstract assessment would suggest, as a very general rule, maybe adjust by 1 club for every 15 yards of elevation...?

##### Share on other sites

In my experience 1 club for 50 feet of elevation loss going down, 1 club for 25 feet going up, the first time around. See what happens, and write it down for the next time.

##### Share on other sites

Thanks guys, that's kind of what I was thinking but didn't know if there was a concrete formula for it.

##### Share on other sites

Clambake    222

Trackman has a lot of the data from Tour pros, and in the Jan 2010 newsletter they discuss yardages and landing angles, and this can provide a better method determining what club to use through measured data.

The Tour pro data show that landing angle varies from about 39 degrees for a driver to 52 degrees for a PW (Tour averages).     For most short to mid irons the optimum is around 45 degrees.      At a 45 degree descent angle, you gain or lose 1 yard in distance for each yard in height.      So using this data suggests that you can simply take the elevation difference and add or subtract it from the horizontal distance to get the effective yardage and pick your club accordingly.

This data seems to be close to my experiences as well.    A par 3 on my home course plays downhill on a 165 yard shot to a green about 30 feet below means the hole would play effectively 155 yards    (30 feet=10 yards vertical distance, and with a shorter iron landing at about 45 degrees this means 10 yards effectively shorter).       I take an 8 iron instead of the usual 7 and the distance works out nicely.

For those who haven't read them, there is a lot of interesting factual data in the Trackman newsletters - check them out here: http://trackman.dk/Media/Newsletter.aspx As quoted by one of the pros about Trackman "Never guess what you can measure".

##### Share on other sites

B-Con    52

Trackman has a lot of the data from Tour pros, and in the Jan 2010 newsletter they discuss yardages and landing angles, and this can provide a better method determining what club to use through measured data.

The Tour pro data show that landing angle varies from about 39 degrees for a driver to 52 degrees for a PW (Tour averages).     For most short to mid irons the optimum is around 45 degrees.      At a 45 degree descent angle, you gain or lose 1 yard in distance for each yard in height.      So using this data suggests that you can simply take the elevation difference and add or subtract it from the horizontal distance to get the effective yardage and pick your club accordingly.

This data seems to be close to my experiences as well.    A par 3 on my home course plays downhill on a 165 yard shot to a green about 30 feet below means the hole would play effectively 155 yards    (30 feet=10 yards vertical distance, and with a shorter iron landing at about 45 degrees this means 10 yards effectively shorter).       I take an 8 iron instead of the usual 7 and the distance works out nicely.

For those who haven't read them, there is a lot of interesting factual data in the Trackman newsletters - check them out here: http://trackman.dk/Media/Newsletter.aspx As quoted by one of the pros about Trackman "Never guess what you can measure".

##### Share on other sites

"Hitting to elevated and de-elevated greens"

I play 75% of my golf in Colorado and became very interested in why & how elevation change (of the shot) effects the "Flight path" or carry of the golf ball, over the past year I have come up with some interesting conclusions that might be helpful.

• Elevation change does not discriminate between a 1 handicap or a 20 handicap.
• Most golfers neglect to take elevation change into account or they just guess.
• There are 3 to 6 approach shots typically (per round) that require "distance adjustment" due to elevation change on the majority of courses.
• Golf course architects use design elements to fool your "eye", making it virtually impossible to determine true elevation change.
• There are countless methods and formulas available but without knowing the change in elevation - they won't be very helpful.

knowing how many yards to add for an uphill shot or how many to subtract for a downhill shot and play that "adjusted" distance you will take the guess work out of the shot.

"Trackman" and other flight monitors provide very helpful diagrams to understand launch angle, maximum height and landing angles to see what the ball flight looks like.

Bushnell Tour v2 slope    http://www.bushnellgolf.com/laser/tourv2_se.cfm  works great from my own experience, Nikon and leupold also have rangefinders with slope, but they range in price from \$350 to \$600.  Recently I found a site:   http://www.slope-tec.com   that has a product that calculates the yardage adjustment for uphill and downhill shots for you, and they have an APP that does the same thing. I tried the APP during the last 3 rounds and it does seem to provide pretty accurate adjustment for uphill and downhill shots.

I know these devices are not legal for USGA sanctioned play but, they are a good way to start getting a better understanding of determining yardage adjustment rather than just adding or subtracting a club.

In conclusion: "it's all between your ears" and having an actual yardage to add or subtract has taken a lot of the guess work out for me.

Hope this helps.

##### Share on other sites

"Hitting to elevated and de-elevated greens"

This is an updated link for Slopetecgolf .

Sorry for the error.

##### Share on other sites

Pretzel    397

Has this guy posted about anything besides that website he provides links to? I can understand someone liking a product, but this seems slightly fishy to me...

## Create an account

Register a new account

• ### Topics Being Discussed Right Now on The Sand Trap

• #### Is golf more mental or physical? 1 2

By Runnin, in Golf Talk

• 18 replies
• 177 views
• #### Post Your GAME Golf Rounds 1 2 3 4 49

By mvmac, in Golf Talk

• 869 replies
• 53,813 views
• #### Joining A "No Match" league

By iceman777, in Golf Talk

• 7 replies
• 238 views
• #### Justin Thomas' list of goals for this year

By nevets88, in Tour Talk

• 0 replies
• 2 views
• #### Should the Tour Championship Winner Win the FedExCup?

By jamo, in Tour Talk

• 13 replies
• 116 views

• Want to join this community?

We'd love to have you!

• ## 2017 TST Partners

• ### Posts

• Because you’re defining “ugly” in terms that don’t apply to ballstriking. Jim Furyk has an ugly swing to some. But the ball doesn’t see the “ugly” stuff you do.
• http://www.gamegolf.com/player/klineka/round/1856588 Driving was excellent, gained .87 strokes off the tee.  Had multiple doubles but still managed to score a 79. 67% GIR helped with that.  Greens were super slow and length of the grass on the greens was ridiculously long. Took me a long time to get used to that.  Had my first eagle of the year on hole #15, Driver 280ish, 3 wood 230 ish pin high about 30 feet left of flag, sunk the left to right breaking putt for the eagle.
• Competition is fun! Golf is a game, games are competitive in nature. It's not necessary to play for a bunch of money or anything like that, but I think you may have trouble finding too many people that don't want to play for anything. I literally cannot remember the last round I played where something wasn't on the line.
• Should we all be lucky enough to cross off most of our own.
• Top 6 in season long points would determine who gets into the final day playoff so season long results still matter....but the past gets thrown out on the final day (same as in any other sports' playoff final) and it's winner take all. Would make for way better TV IMO.

• ### Today's Birthdays

1. Dresilved
(52 years old)
2. kpetrina
(25 years old)
3. Luana
(39 years old)