Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5385 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Can someone explain with maybe pictures exactly what he means by this?  Is this cocking the wrist (hinging it) at the top of the back swing forming a relatively cupped left wrist instead of flat?  How does this help fight a hook vs a flat left wrist at the top?  I noticed my left wrist is pretty flat at the top of my backswing and this could be a big help to my problems striking the ball.  I'm looking for a little more clarity on this secret move though.

Thanks

Driver: adams.gif Speedline 9032LS RIP Shaft (Stiff)

3 Wood: adams.gif Oviation 3Wood

Hybrids: taylormade.gif Rescue 18* 3H - 22* 4H

Irons: callaway.gif X-24 Hot Irons 5-PW

Wedges: cleveland.gif CG15 52, 56

 

Putter: odyssey.gif PT 82

Ball:  e6


Posted

I don't have pics, but I use it.

Basically, if you are looking down at your left hand on the grip, rotate it to the right, so you can see more of the back of your left hand.


Posted

I'm paraphrasing from memory, but in five lessons he states at just prior to impact the wrist should supinate rather pronate so that the palm is facing more up than down to maximize swing power at impact.

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I was under the impression that the 'anti-hook' move was the one described on page 101:

Quote:

Every good golfer has his left wrist in this supinating position at impact. Every poor golfer does the exact reverse.

Five Lessons: Left Wrist Supination

The reason this is an anti-hook move is simple:

A hook is caused by having an in-to-out swing path combined with a club face that is square to the target. This generates a mass of left-ward spin on the ball. By increasing the angle of the club face or opening it, we generate less leftward spin which in turn shapes the shot as a draw rather than hook.

By supinating the left wrist, the club face is opened more at impact; an anti-hook move.

SWING DNA
Speed [77] Tempo [5] ToeDown [5] KickAngle [6] Release [5] Mizuno JPX EZ 10.5° - Fujikura Orochi Black Eye (with Harrison ShotMaker) Mizuno JPX EZ 3W/3H - Fujikura Orochi Black Eye Mizuno JPX 850 Forged 4i-PW - True Temper XP 115 S300 Mizuno MP R-12 50.06/54.09/58.10 - Dynamic Gold Wedge Flex Mizuno MP A305 [:-P]


Posted



Originally Posted by bkoguy07

Can someone explain with maybe pictures exactly what he means by this?  Is this cocking the wrist (hinging it) at the top of the back swing forming a relatively cupped left wrist instead of flat?  How does this help fight a hook vs a flat left wrist at the top?  I noticed my left wrist is pretty flat at the top of my backswing and this could be a big help to my problems striking the ball.  I'm looking for a little more clarity on this secret move though.

Thanks


There is nothing secret about it.  You should experiment with the amount of rotation in your backswing, to see what works for you.  This is also affected by your grip.  A strong grip restricts rotation, while a weak grip allows for more rotation.

Hogan found that a full rotation (cupped lead wrist at the top) kept him from closing the clubface through impact.  However, it is just the opposite for me.  It keeps me from leaving the clubface open, and I have found this to be true with some other players.  That's why I say experiment .


  • Administrator
Posted

Originally Posted by MiniBlueDragon

The reason this is an anti-hook move is simple:

A hook is caused by having an in-to-out swing path combined with a club face that is square to the target. This generates a mass of left-ward spin on the ball. By increasing the angle of the club face or opening it, we generate less leftward spin which in turn shapes the shot as a draw rather than hook.

By supinating the left wrist, the club face is opened more at impact; an anti-hook move.


Completely the opposite. The supination is turning the palm upwards, which points the clubface more to the left (for a righty).

http://www.davidlnelson.md/anatomy12.htm (demonstrated with the right hand - make the same move while holding a golf club with only your left hand and you'll see that it turns the face DOWN and left).

Here's the full image. Palm faces upward. Clubface rolls a bit. Overdone, low-pull-hook city.

Hogan-left-wrist-action.jpg

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted


Originally Posted by MiniBlueDragon

By supinating the left wrist, the club face is opened more at impact; an anti-hook move.


Incorrect. Hogan is incorrectly using the term "supination" here. This is much of where his so-called "secret" comes from, I think. What he's actually referring to here is palmar flexion -- the bending back of the left wrist through the downswing and hitting area. It is defined as "the decreasing of the angle between the palm and the forearm."

The correct definition of supination in the forearm is "when the palm faces anteriorly, or faces up (when the arms are unbent and at the sides)." So supination here for Hogan means both supination and palmar flexion. The supination occurs when the lead arm rotates. But he forgot to add the palmar flexion part.

Palmar flexion (what he's actually referring to) shuts the face of the clubhead -- it doesn't open it -- it allows the hands to be ahead at impact. Its one of the moves that contributes to creating draw or hook spin. It increases ball compression...I could go on and on here over the good things it does for you.

Example 1: Dustin Johnson at the top of his backswing with extreme palmar flexion. His clubface is dead shut.

Picture 1.png

Picture Two here is an example of a golfer doing the opposite -- dorsiflexion of the lead wrist -- or "cupping" in golf terms -- is defined by modern medicine as "when the angle between the back (dorsum) of hand and the forearm is reduced." This opens the club face. Its extremely useful if you're hitting an explosion shot of some kind.

Picture 2.png

The clubface here is wide open. If these wrist angles are maintained through impact, the golfer will be flipping at the ball with a severely open face. This produces a push or push fade with minimal compression.

This mistake is just another example why Hogan's book is an out-dated teaching tool for many.

IMO

Constantine

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Damn Erik beat me to the punch. I could have edited my post better. I wasn't clear enough in some sentences. If you hit a hook you probably have too much bowing of the wrist already. If you hit a weak push or push slice though with no distance it will help though.

Constantine

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Ah see my interpretation of supination from Five Lessons was the bending of the hand toward the forearm which seems to open the face more in a stationary impact position pose. That to me turns a hook into a draw. My bad! :( Thanks for clarifying though. The "weak push" comment may be handy for me personally. :)

SWING DNA
Speed [77] Tempo [5] ToeDown [5] KickAngle [6] Release [5] Mizuno JPX EZ 10.5° - Fujikura Orochi Black Eye (with Harrison ShotMaker) Mizuno JPX EZ 3W/3H - Fujikura Orochi Black Eye Mizuno JPX 850 Forged 4i-PW - True Temper XP 115 S300 Mizuno MP R-12 50.06/54.09/58.10 - Dynamic Gold Wedge Flex Mizuno MP A305 [:-P]


Posted


Originally Posted by JetFan1983

What he's actually referring to here is palmar flexion -- the bending back of the left wrist through the downswing and hitting area.



This is one of those unclear parts, my bad. This is what Dustin Johnson does (probably why his driver face is custom built to be a few degrees open). Palmar flexion specifically just refers to a way the wrist can bend.

Constantine

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted


Originally Posted by JetFan1983

Incorrect. Hogan is incorrectly using the term "supination" here. This is much of where his so-called "secret" comes from, I think. What he's actually referring to here is palmar flexion -- the bending back of the left wrist through the downswing and hitting area. It is defined as "the decreasing of the angle between the palm and the forearm."

The correct definition of supination in the forearm is "when the palm faces anteriorly, or faces up (when the arms are unbent and at the sides)." So supination here for Hogan means both supination and palmar flexion. The supination occurs when the lead arm rotates. But he forgot to add the palmar flexion part.

Palmar flexion (what he's actually referring to) shuts the face of the clubhead -- it doesn't open it -- it allows the hands to be ahead at impact. Its one of the moves that contributes to creating draw or hook spin. It increases ball compression...I could go on and on here over the good things it does for you.

Example 1: Dustin Johnson at the top of his backswing with extreme palmar flexion. His clubface is dead shut.

Picture Two here is an example of a golfer doing the opposite -- dorsiflexion of the lead wrist -- or "cupping" in golf terms -- is defined by modern medicine as "when the angle between the back (dorsum) of hand and the forearm is reduced." This opens the club face. Its extremely useful if you're hitting an explosion shot of some kind.

The clubface here is wide open. If these wrist angles are maintained through impact, the golfer will be flipping at the ball with a severely open face. This produces a push or push fade with minimal compression.

This mistake is just another example why Hogan's book is an out-dated teaching tool for many.

IMO

OK I'm officially confused.

Palmar Flexion is when your wrist bends forward, decreasing the angle between palm and forearm.

Dorsiflexion is the opposite; it's your hand bending backward, decreasing the angle between the back of your hand and forearm.

Standing at address and applying Palmar Flexion to the left wrist pushes the club head backward toward the rear foot (hands end up more ahead of the club head), increases the right wrist flying wedge angle and opens the face.

Standing at address and applying Dorsiflexion to the left wrist pushes the club head forward toward the front foot (hands end up further back from the clubhead), decreases the right wrist flying wedge and closes the face. It resembles the "scooping" a lot of amateurs do when they start out.

That's the complete opposite to your description above.

SWING DNA
Speed [77] Tempo [5] ToeDown [5] KickAngle [6] Release [5] Mizuno JPX EZ 10.5° - Fujikura Orochi Black Eye (with Harrison ShotMaker) Mizuno JPX EZ 3W/3H - Fujikura Orochi Black Eye Mizuno JPX 850 Forged 4i-PW - True Temper XP 115 S300 Mizuno MP R-12 50.06/54.09/58.10 - Dynamic Gold Wedge Flex Mizuno MP A305 [:-P]


Posted


Originally Posted by MiniBlueDragon

Standing at address and applying Palmar Flexion to the left wrist pushes the club head backward toward the rear foot (hands end up more ahead of the club head), increases the right wrist flying wedge angle and opens the face.


Hands ahead good, increased flying wedge yes, but the face should be delofting. Do it so the face delofts.

Constantine

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted


Originally Posted by JetFan1983

Hands ahead good, increased flying wedge yes, but the face should be delofting. Do it so the face delofts.


Ah right so I was actually slightly rotating my forearm there even though it looked like a straight bend. It looked like a perfectly straight bend from my own view looking down at address but when done holding the club in just the left hand, vertically (thumbs-up) it's clear as day that it closes majorly.

I think I may have to add a little Palmar Flexion to my swing to fight this baby push I've been playing with.

Many thanks indeed!

SWING DNA
Speed [77] Tempo [5] ToeDown [5] KickAngle [6] Release [5] Mizuno JPX EZ 10.5° - Fujikura Orochi Black Eye (with Harrison ShotMaker) Mizuno JPX EZ 3W/3H - Fujikura Orochi Black Eye Mizuno JPX 850 Forged 4i-PW - True Temper XP 115 S300 Mizuno MP R-12 50.06/54.09/58.10 - Dynamic Gold Wedge Flex Mizuno MP A305 [:-P]


Posted

Well I hope it works out for you . Hopefully you need more of this in your swing. If you already fight a hook, feeling more palmar flexion is bad.

You could do some of this drill -- adding the exaggerated palmar flexion to it throughout the backswing and downswing. You know you are doing it right if you're hitting very well compressed baby draws that feel great off the clubface. If you're hooking it you are overdoing it (but at least you're doing it). If you are slicing, pushing, or push slicing, you are probably not palmar flexing enough, and/or your hands aren't inward enough.

In the end, the ideal here is perfect baby draws.

Good luck. Keep in mind, I'm but a humble Sandtrap member such as yourself -- and not an instructor . Hopefully, this is something you need in your swing. It might not be who knows. I tried viewing your swing but it was hard to in the thread you started. You need to post better clips (better angles, etc.) Correctly filmed swing threads always will have a higher reply rate.

Constantine

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

Originally Posted by MiniBlueDragon

Standing at address and applying Palmar Flexion to the left wrist pushes the club head backward toward the rear foot (hands end up more ahead of the club head), increases the right wrist flying wedge angle and opens the face.

You figured out that you were rotating your forearm a little when doing this, so that's good.

Ulnar deviation and palmar flexion both will effectively raise the handle, pushing the path farther to the right while maintaining a clubface that's relatively more closed to the path than before.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I tried cupping my wrist last year when having snap hook issues.  I didn't read too much into it, just made sure it was cupped at the top.  It felt a lot easier to get a lot of clubhead speed, and I hit amazing iron shots.  I shot my first round under par doing this, but a week later my game went down the tube, and I went back to my natural swing.


Posted

Cool.  Another Hogan's secret thread.  I've got a secret too.  It was the last thing that I worked on that made be a better ballstriker.  That was the 'final' missing piece to improvement....by definition because I don't know what to work on next.  Get good enough, and it will be a long time before you find something new to improve on.  Become world class and you may actually convince yourself that you've discovered the secret to golf.

The cupping issue is really a simple one and I'm not sure why people are so confused about it:  your wrists hinge more with a cup.  Why do you want more hinge?  More power.  That's why the long-drive guys use strong grips.  They can hinge the club more and that grip keeps the clubface square.  If you want to cup with a weak grip, that's fine too, but you need to flatten it somehow by impact.  Maybe better said, "It needs to flatten by impact".  Hogan did this naturally in two ways, combining the power of the hinge with the accuracy of a clubface that's not manipulated.  One, he had soft wrists so that the Hogan hands through impact image was automatic.  That is, he released late, so with the club pointing up in the air, the cup wants to flatten out since the arms are being driven forward with the club back.  Two, he ever-so-slightly let the club sneak behind him for extra leverage on the backswing.  Then, on the transition, he pulled his right elbow into his side a little to get it back in front of him.  When you tuck your right elbow in at the TOB, the left wrist wants to flatten just a little.  The former much more extreme than the latter, but they both worked to flatten the left wrist.

Also, not sure if this was mentioned, but turning the hands down (left hand palm-up) like in the Hogan photo at impact causes the ball to go low and left if the clubface wasn't open at address.  You can just hold a club and do this to prove it to yourself.  Hogan's was open 5 degrees or so, so he could get away with this move.

[ Equipment ]
R11 9° (Lowered to 8.5°) UST Proforce VTS 7x tipped 1" | 906F2 15° and 18° | 585H 21° | Mizuno MP-67 +1 length TT DG X100 | Vokey 52° Oil Can, Cleveland CG10 2-dot 56° and 60° | TM Rossa Corza Ghost 35.5" | Srixon Z Star XV | Size 14 Footjoy Green Joys | Tour Striker Pro 5, 7, 56 | Swingwing


Note: This thread is 5385 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • This is one of the cleanest, least emotional ways to separate the Nicklaus–Tiger debate, because international participation is a direct proxy for field depth. Not vibes. Not nostalgia. Talent supply. Below is a tight, historically grounded explanation of how field strength changed — with special emphasis on how many non-U.S. players were actually in PGA TOUR fields, and what that means competitively for Jack Nicklaus vs Tiger Woods. 1. Why international share = field strength (conceptually) The PGA TOUR doesn’t draft players. It selects talent from a global labor market. So: more international players in the field from more countries who earned access through competitive tours → means a deeper, harder field, even if total field size stays the same. International share isn’t cosmetic — it’s how globalization enters the win-probability math. 2. Nicklaus era (roughly mid-1960s to early-1980s) International presence in PGA TOUR fields ~2–5% of players in a typical PGA TOUR field Often 5–8 non-U.S. players in a 140-player event Many weeks: fewer than five Who those internationals were Gary Player occasional Europeans (Seve later, Woosnam briefly) a handful of Australians or South Africans Crucially: They were elite imports, not a broad middle class. What that means for field strength The top of the field was excellent The middle and bottom were shallow After ~10–12 legitimate contenders, win equity dropped sharply This is why Nicklaus: contended constantly piled up runner-ups remained relevant for decades The field simply didn’t replenish elite threats fast enough. 3. Transition era (late-1980s to early-1990s) This is the inflection point. Structural changes Official World Golf Ranking (post-1986) European Tour becomes a true pipeline Easier travel, better incentives to cross over International share ~8–12% of PGA TOUR fields Now 15–20 non-U.S. players per event Importantly: not just stars, but solid Tour-caliber pros This is when field strength begins to compound. 4. Tiger Woods era (late-1990s through early-2010s peak) International presence explodes ~25–35% of PGA TOUR fields Often 40–55 international players in a 156-man field Representing Europe, Australia, South Africa, Asia, Latin America This is not just more flags — it’s more win equity. Why this matters competitively The median player is better The gap between #1 and #40 shrinks Every round is contested by professionals who already won elsewhere This is what people mean by “deep fields.” 5. Side-by-side comparison (simplified but accurate) Era Intl % of.    Field Intl Players       Event Competitive Meaning Nicklaus prime ~2–5% ~5–8 Elite top, thin middle Early transition ~8–12% ~15–20 Talent thickens Tiger prime ~25–35% ~40–55 Deep, global, relentless This is a 5–7× increase in international representation from Jack’s prime to Tiger’s peak. 6. Why international % matters more than field size A 140-player field with: 8 internationals vs 50 internationals are not the same tournament, even if the entry list length is identical. More internationals means: more elite tours feeding the field more players already proven winners fewer “free” spots for the elite to separate easily This is why win probability collapses in modern golf. 7. The GOAT implication (this is the hinge) Nicklaus Beat great players But usually beat fewer elite players at once Field difficulty was top-heavy, not dense Tiger Beat great players and dozens of near-elite professionals simultaneously Field difficulty was both tall and wide Tiger’s environment: lowers win probability increases variance punishes even small declines Yet Tiger still won 22.8% of PGA TOUR starts. That’s the paradox — and the argument. 8. Why this doesn’t “discredit” Nicklaus Jack dominated his environment as well as anyone ever could. But environments matter. If you translate achievements across eras: Jack’s career length looks more impressive Tiger’s per-start dominance looks more impressive International depth is the biggest reason why. Final synthesis International share of PGA TOUR fields increased ~5–7× from Nicklaus’ prime to Tiger’s peak That increase directly correlates with field depth and difficulty Tiger won more often, by larger margins, against deeper global fields So when people say: This is what they mean — not emotionally, not rhetorically, but structurally. Below is a by-era breakdown of: International share of PGA TOUR fields International share of PGA TOUR wins Win-efficiency ratio = Win share ÷ Field share All wins counted (not unique winners). “International” = non-U.S. citizenship. This framework maps directly onto the GOAT debate between Jack Nicklaus and Tiger Woods. International Win Share vs. Field Share by Era Era Intl % of Field   Intl % of Wins   Win Efficiency 1965–1974 (early Nicklaus) ~2–3%        ~4–6%      ~1.8–2.0× 1975–1984 (Nicklaus prime) ~3–5%       ~7–10%      ~1.8–2.3× 1985–1994 (transition) ~8–12%     ~15–22%      ~1.8–2.0× 1995–2004 (Tiger ascent/peak) ~20–25%     ~30–35%      ~1.3–1.5× 2005–2014 (Tiger era, global maturity) ~25–30%     ~35–40%      ~1.3–1.4× 2015–2025 (post-Tiger peak) ~30–35%.            ~40–45%.      ~1.25–1.35×
    • If you explicitly adjust for field strength, the Tiger–Jack debate sharpens fast — because once you weight who was in the field and how good they were, raw major counts stop being the right currency. Below is the cleanest field-strength–adjusted framework, followed by what it implies for Tiger Woods and Jack Nicklaus. 1. What “field strength–adjusted” actually means (no hand-waving) A serious adjustment has four components: A. Field depth How many players in the field were legitimate win threats Measured by: OWGR equivalents, historical win rates, career major contention frequency B. Field breadth How global the field was How many tours fed elite players into the event C. Win concentration How many wins a small elite captured (A win in a top-heavy field is harder than a win in a flat field) D. Margin vs. field Separation from average competitor, not just second place This is exactly how WAR-style logic works in baseball — just translated to golf. 2. Era-level field strength comparison (baseline) Think of this as “average major field difficulty”, indexed to Tiger’s peak era = 1.00. Era Relative Field Strength Early 1960s ~0.55 Late 1960s ~0.65 1970s ~0.70 Early 1980s ~0.75 Late 1980s ~0.85 1997–2008 1.00 2009–2015 ~0.95 Modern (post-2015) ~1.00–1.05 This is not controversial among historians: Global pipelines Full-time professionalism Equipment & training parity all peak in Tiger’s era. 3. Field-strength–adjusted major wins Now apply that adjustment. Raw majors Nicklaus: 18 Tiger: 15 Adjusted majors (conceptual but grounded) If you weight each major by relative field strength at the time: Nicklaus’s 18 majors ≈ 12–14 Tiger-era equivalents Tiger’s 15 majors ≈ 15–16 Tiger-era equivalents So once you normalize: And that’s before accounting for Tiger’s injuries. 4. Runner-ups and “lost wins” matter even more This is where the gap widens. Nicklaus 19 major runner-ups Many in shallower, U.S.-centric fields Variance was higher → more “near misses” Tiger Only 7 runner-ups But competed in denser elite fields Win suppression effect removed variance — fewer second places because he either won or wasn’t close If you convert: top-3s strokes behind winner field quality Tiger gains more “near-win value” per attempt than Jack. 5. Margin of dominance (this is decisive) Tiger Woods Frequently +2.5 to +3.0 strokes per round vs. field in majors at peak Largest adjusted margins ever recorded Dominance increases as field quality increases (rare!) Jack Nicklaus Elite but narrower margins Won via positioning and closing, not statistical obliteration Dominance less scalable to deeper fields If you run a WAR-style model: 6. A thought experiment that clarifies everything Ask one neutral question: He probably: contends finishes top-10 maybe wins once in a while Now reverse it: He likely: wins multiple times by historic margins and suppresses multiple Hall-of-Fame careers That asymmetry is the field-strength adjustment talking. 7. Why longevity arguments weaken after adjustment Nicklaus’s greatest edge is time. But: longevity is easier in lower-density competitive environments variance produces more chances to contend fewer global elite peers mean fewer weekly threats Tiger’s body broke down because: he pushed athletic ceilings under the most competitive conditions ever Adjusted for environment, Tiger’s shorter peak isn’t a flaw — it’s the cost of dominance. Final, adjusted verdict If you do not adjust for field strength: Nicklaus has the edge (18 > 15) If you do adjust properly: Tiger Woods becomes the GOAT Higher difficulty Higher dominance Higher efficiency per start Higher suppression of elite peers Nicklaus is the greatest career golfer. Tiger is the greatest golfer, period — once you account for who they were actually beating.
    • Day 49 - 2026-02-07 More mirror work. Back to the range tomorrow. Weight shift and slide/rotation feeling very normal now.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.