Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5500 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Can someone explain with maybe pictures exactly what he means by this?  Is this cocking the wrist (hinging it) at the top of the back swing forming a relatively cupped left wrist instead of flat?  How does this help fight a hook vs a flat left wrist at the top?  I noticed my left wrist is pretty flat at the top of my backswing and this could be a big help to my problems striking the ball.  I'm looking for a little more clarity on this secret move though.

Thanks

Driver: adams.gif Speedline 9032LS RIP Shaft (Stiff)

3 Wood: adams.gif Oviation 3Wood

Hybrids: taylormade.gif Rescue 18* 3H - 22* 4H

Irons: callaway.gif X-24 Hot Irons 5-PW

Wedges: cleveland.gif CG15 52, 56

 

Putter: odyssey.gif PT 82

Ball:  e6


Posted

I don't have pics, but I use it.

Basically, if you are looking down at your left hand on the grip, rotate it to the right, so you can see more of the back of your left hand.


Posted

I'm paraphrasing from memory, but in five lessons he states at just prior to impact the wrist should supinate rather pronate so that the palm is facing more up than down to maximize swing power at impact.

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I was under the impression that the 'anti-hook' move was the one described on page 101:

Quote:

Every good golfer has his left wrist in this supinating position at impact. Every poor golfer does the exact reverse.

Five Lessons: Left Wrist Supination

The reason this is an anti-hook move is simple:

A hook is caused by having an in-to-out swing path combined with a club face that is square to the target. This generates a mass of left-ward spin on the ball. By increasing the angle of the club face or opening it, we generate less leftward spin which in turn shapes the shot as a draw rather than hook.

By supinating the left wrist, the club face is opened more at impact; an anti-hook move.

SWING DNA
Speed [77] Tempo [5] ToeDown [5] KickAngle [6] Release [5] Mizuno JPX EZ 10.5° - Fujikura Orochi Black Eye (with Harrison ShotMaker) Mizuno JPX EZ 3W/3H - Fujikura Orochi Black Eye Mizuno JPX 850 Forged 4i-PW - True Temper XP 115 S300 Mizuno MP R-12 50.06/54.09/58.10 - Dynamic Gold Wedge Flex Mizuno MP A305 [:-P]


Posted



Originally Posted by bkoguy07

Can someone explain with maybe pictures exactly what he means by this?  Is this cocking the wrist (hinging it) at the top of the back swing forming a relatively cupped left wrist instead of flat?  How does this help fight a hook vs a flat left wrist at the top?  I noticed my left wrist is pretty flat at the top of my backswing and this could be a big help to my problems striking the ball.  I'm looking for a little more clarity on this secret move though.

Thanks


There is nothing secret about it.  You should experiment with the amount of rotation in your backswing, to see what works for you.  This is also affected by your grip.  A strong grip restricts rotation, while a weak grip allows for more rotation.

Hogan found that a full rotation (cupped lead wrist at the top) kept him from closing the clubface through impact.  However, it is just the opposite for me.  It keeps me from leaving the clubface open, and I have found this to be true with some other players.  That's why I say experiment .


  • Administrator
Posted

Originally Posted by MiniBlueDragon

The reason this is an anti-hook move is simple:

A hook is caused by having an in-to-out swing path combined with a club face that is square to the target. This generates a mass of left-ward spin on the ball. By increasing the angle of the club face or opening it, we generate less leftward spin which in turn shapes the shot as a draw rather than hook.

By supinating the left wrist, the club face is opened more at impact; an anti-hook move.


Completely the opposite. The supination is turning the palm upwards, which points the clubface more to the left (for a righty).

http://www.davidlnelson.md/anatomy12.htm (demonstrated with the right hand - make the same move while holding a golf club with only your left hand and you'll see that it turns the face DOWN and left).

Here's the full image. Palm faces upward. Clubface rolls a bit. Overdone, low-pull-hook city.

Hogan-left-wrist-action.jpg

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted


Originally Posted by MiniBlueDragon

By supinating the left wrist, the club face is opened more at impact; an anti-hook move.


Incorrect. Hogan is incorrectly using the term "supination" here. This is much of where his so-called "secret" comes from, I think. What he's actually referring to here is palmar flexion -- the bending back of the left wrist through the downswing and hitting area. It is defined as "the decreasing of the angle between the palm and the forearm."

The correct definition of supination in the forearm is "when the palm faces anteriorly, or faces up (when the arms are unbent and at the sides)." So supination here for Hogan means both supination and palmar flexion. The supination occurs when the lead arm rotates. But he forgot to add the palmar flexion part.

Palmar flexion (what he's actually referring to) shuts the face of the clubhead -- it doesn't open it -- it allows the hands to be ahead at impact. Its one of the moves that contributes to creating draw or hook spin. It increases ball compression...I could go on and on here over the good things it does for you.

Example 1: Dustin Johnson at the top of his backswing with extreme palmar flexion. His clubface is dead shut.

Picture 1.png

Picture Two here is an example of a golfer doing the opposite -- dorsiflexion of the lead wrist -- or "cupping" in golf terms -- is defined by modern medicine as "when the angle between the back (dorsum) of hand and the forearm is reduced." This opens the club face. Its extremely useful if you're hitting an explosion shot of some kind.

Picture 2.png

The clubface here is wide open. If these wrist angles are maintained through impact, the golfer will be flipping at the ball with a severely open face. This produces a push or push fade with minimal compression.

This mistake is just another example why Hogan's book is an out-dated teaching tool for many.

IMO

Constantine

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Damn Erik beat me to the punch. I could have edited my post better. I wasn't clear enough in some sentences. If you hit a hook you probably have too much bowing of the wrist already. If you hit a weak push or push slice though with no distance it will help though.

Constantine

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Ah see my interpretation of supination from Five Lessons was the bending of the hand toward the forearm which seems to open the face more in a stationary impact position pose. That to me turns a hook into a draw. My bad! :( Thanks for clarifying though. The "weak push" comment may be handy for me personally. :)

SWING DNA
Speed [77] Tempo [5] ToeDown [5] KickAngle [6] Release [5] Mizuno JPX EZ 10.5° - Fujikura Orochi Black Eye (with Harrison ShotMaker) Mizuno JPX EZ 3W/3H - Fujikura Orochi Black Eye Mizuno JPX 850 Forged 4i-PW - True Temper XP 115 S300 Mizuno MP R-12 50.06/54.09/58.10 - Dynamic Gold Wedge Flex Mizuno MP A305 [:-P]


Posted


Originally Posted by JetFan1983

What he's actually referring to here is palmar flexion -- the bending back of the left wrist through the downswing and hitting area.



This is one of those unclear parts, my bad. This is what Dustin Johnson does (probably why his driver face is custom built to be a few degrees open). Palmar flexion specifically just refers to a way the wrist can bend.

Constantine

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted


Originally Posted by JetFan1983

Incorrect. Hogan is incorrectly using the term "supination" here. This is much of where his so-called "secret" comes from, I think. What he's actually referring to here is palmar flexion -- the bending back of the left wrist through the downswing and hitting area. It is defined as "the decreasing of the angle between the palm and the forearm."

The correct definition of supination in the forearm is "when the palm faces anteriorly, or faces up (when the arms are unbent and at the sides)." So supination here for Hogan means both supination and palmar flexion. The supination occurs when the lead arm rotates. But he forgot to add the palmar flexion part.

Palmar flexion (what he's actually referring to) shuts the face of the clubhead -- it doesn't open it -- it allows the hands to be ahead at impact. Its one of the moves that contributes to creating draw or hook spin. It increases ball compression...I could go on and on here over the good things it does for you.

Example 1: Dustin Johnson at the top of his backswing with extreme palmar flexion. His clubface is dead shut.

Picture Two here is an example of a golfer doing the opposite -- dorsiflexion of the lead wrist -- or "cupping" in golf terms -- is defined by modern medicine as "when the angle between the back (dorsum) of hand and the forearm is reduced." This opens the club face. Its extremely useful if you're hitting an explosion shot of some kind.

The clubface here is wide open. If these wrist angles are maintained through impact, the golfer will be flipping at the ball with a severely open face. This produces a push or push fade with minimal compression.

This mistake is just another example why Hogan's book is an out-dated teaching tool for many.

IMO

OK I'm officially confused.

Palmar Flexion is when your wrist bends forward, decreasing the angle between palm and forearm.

Dorsiflexion is the opposite; it's your hand bending backward, decreasing the angle between the back of your hand and forearm.

Standing at address and applying Palmar Flexion to the left wrist pushes the club head backward toward the rear foot (hands end up more ahead of the club head), increases the right wrist flying wedge angle and opens the face.

Standing at address and applying Dorsiflexion to the left wrist pushes the club head forward toward the front foot (hands end up further back from the clubhead), decreases the right wrist flying wedge and closes the face. It resembles the "scooping" a lot of amateurs do when they start out.

That's the complete opposite to your description above.

SWING DNA
Speed [77] Tempo [5] ToeDown [5] KickAngle [6] Release [5] Mizuno JPX EZ 10.5° - Fujikura Orochi Black Eye (with Harrison ShotMaker) Mizuno JPX EZ 3W/3H - Fujikura Orochi Black Eye Mizuno JPX 850 Forged 4i-PW - True Temper XP 115 S300 Mizuno MP R-12 50.06/54.09/58.10 - Dynamic Gold Wedge Flex Mizuno MP A305 [:-P]


Posted


Originally Posted by MiniBlueDragon

Standing at address and applying Palmar Flexion to the left wrist pushes the club head backward toward the rear foot (hands end up more ahead of the club head), increases the right wrist flying wedge angle and opens the face.


Hands ahead good, increased flying wedge yes, but the face should be delofting. Do it so the face delofts.

Constantine

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted


Originally Posted by JetFan1983

Hands ahead good, increased flying wedge yes, but the face should be delofting. Do it so the face delofts.


Ah right so I was actually slightly rotating my forearm there even though it looked like a straight bend. It looked like a perfectly straight bend from my own view looking down at address but when done holding the club in just the left hand, vertically (thumbs-up) it's clear as day that it closes majorly.

I think I may have to add a little Palmar Flexion to my swing to fight this baby push I've been playing with.

Many thanks indeed!

SWING DNA
Speed [77] Tempo [5] ToeDown [5] KickAngle [6] Release [5] Mizuno JPX EZ 10.5° - Fujikura Orochi Black Eye (with Harrison ShotMaker) Mizuno JPX EZ 3W/3H - Fujikura Orochi Black Eye Mizuno JPX 850 Forged 4i-PW - True Temper XP 115 S300 Mizuno MP R-12 50.06/54.09/58.10 - Dynamic Gold Wedge Flex Mizuno MP A305 [:-P]


Posted

Well I hope it works out for you . Hopefully you need more of this in your swing. If you already fight a hook, feeling more palmar flexion is bad.

You could do some of this drill -- adding the exaggerated palmar flexion to it throughout the backswing and downswing. You know you are doing it right if you're hitting very well compressed baby draws that feel great off the clubface. If you're hooking it you are overdoing it (but at least you're doing it). If you are slicing, pushing, or push slicing, you are probably not palmar flexing enough, and/or your hands aren't inward enough.

In the end, the ideal here is perfect baby draws.

Good luck. Keep in mind, I'm but a humble Sandtrap member such as yourself -- and not an instructor . Hopefully, this is something you need in your swing. It might not be who knows. I tried viewing your swing but it was hard to in the thread you started. You need to post better clips (better angles, etc.) Correctly filmed swing threads always will have a higher reply rate.

Constantine

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

Originally Posted by MiniBlueDragon

Standing at address and applying Palmar Flexion to the left wrist pushes the club head backward toward the rear foot (hands end up more ahead of the club head), increases the right wrist flying wedge angle and opens the face.

You figured out that you were rotating your forearm a little when doing this, so that's good.

Ulnar deviation and palmar flexion both will effectively raise the handle, pushing the path farther to the right while maintaining a clubface that's relatively more closed to the path than before.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I tried cupping my wrist last year when having snap hook issues.  I didn't read too much into it, just made sure it was cupped at the top.  It felt a lot easier to get a lot of clubhead speed, and I hit amazing iron shots.  I shot my first round under par doing this, but a week later my game went down the tube, and I went back to my natural swing.


Posted

Cool.  Another Hogan's secret thread.  I've got a secret too.  It was the last thing that I worked on that made be a better ballstriker.  That was the 'final' missing piece to improvement....by definition because I don't know what to work on next.  Get good enough, and it will be a long time before you find something new to improve on.  Become world class and you may actually convince yourself that you've discovered the secret to golf.

The cupping issue is really a simple one and I'm not sure why people are so confused about it:  your wrists hinge more with a cup.  Why do you want more hinge?  More power.  That's why the long-drive guys use strong grips.  They can hinge the club more and that grip keeps the clubface square.  If you want to cup with a weak grip, that's fine too, but you need to flatten it somehow by impact.  Maybe better said, "It needs to flatten by impact".  Hogan did this naturally in two ways, combining the power of the hinge with the accuracy of a clubface that's not manipulated.  One, he had soft wrists so that the Hogan hands through impact image was automatic.  That is, he released late, so with the club pointing up in the air, the cup wants to flatten out since the arms are being driven forward with the club back.  Two, he ever-so-slightly let the club sneak behind him for extra leverage on the backswing.  Then, on the transition, he pulled his right elbow into his side a little to get it back in front of him.  When you tuck your right elbow in at the TOB, the left wrist wants to flatten just a little.  The former much more extreme than the latter, but they both worked to flatten the left wrist.

Also, not sure if this was mentioned, but turning the hands down (left hand palm-up) like in the Hogan photo at impact causes the ball to go low and left if the clubface wasn't open at address.  You can just hold a club and do this to prove it to yourself.  Hogan's was open 5 degrees or so, so he could get away with this move.

[ Equipment ]
R11 9° (Lowered to 8.5°) UST Proforce VTS 7x tipped 1" | 906F2 15° and 18° | 585H 21° | Mizuno MP-67 +1 length TT DG X100 | Vokey 52° Oil Can, Cleveland CG10 2-dot 56° and 60° | TM Rossa Corza Ghost 35.5" | Srixon Z Star XV | Size 14 Footjoy Green Joys | Tour Striker Pro 5, 7, 56 | Swingwing


Note: This thread is 5500 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • In the 1970s and 1980s, Dean Knuth, who became known as the "Pope of Slope," created the handicap system as well as the course rating system. He consulted with the USGA through 2002, but hasn't really had a hand in the handicapping since then, and was not involved in the WHS. Suffice to say, he does not like the WHS, and he wrote an article expressing why:  https://www.popeofslope.com/world-handicap-system.html. The problem? His article… well, it's bad. Here is a brief (for me!) exploration of that article. Part 1 includes the bulk of his point, right up until the section labeled "The Par Pitfall," here: The handicapping system has seen almost no changes in the U.S. It's the rest of the world where they've seen the biggest changes. In the U.S., ESC was replaced by NDB, we have soft and hard caps, and we use 8/20 instead of 10/20 at 96%. Those are the only real changes. Dean will spend most of the rest of the time talking about par, but — and this cannot be stressed enough — the par is irrelevant. Its role in determining your playing or course handicap does three things only: It makes the score you have to shoot to "play to your handicap" make a lot more sense. It "bakes in" the changes players should have made but rarely did when playing from different tees. Through NDB, it defines the holes on which you can take a triple (or which you can take a gross bogey if you're on the + side of scratch). The calculation of your differential at the end is completely unaffected and does not involve par. Dean will spend a good amount of the time in this article talking about how par is "less precise" than the rating and slope, but he seems to miss the two points here: Par is an integer. If it helps him to think of it as 72.000000 or something, by all means, Dean… Par is used only to adjust another whole number: the strokes a player gets on the course. We don't give 10.4 strokes — a 10.4 index player might get 13, 10, 8, or whatever number of whole-number strokes.   The problem with this type of statement is that the "par handicap" could be "7" or "13" or "88" and except for affecting NDB, players competing against each other would have the same difference (except they'd still need to adjust for playing from different tees). Let's say a 10.4 and a 14.7 are playing a 71.5/127 course. Par is 72. (10.4 * 127/113) + 71.5 - 72 = 11.2 -> 11 strokes (14.7 * 127/113) + 71.5 - 72 = 16.0 -> 16 strokes -> this player gets 5 strokes Instead of 72, plug in 23 because it's your favorite number: (10.4 * 127/113) + 71.5 - 23 = 60.2 -> 60 strokes (14.7 * 127/113) + 71.5 - 23 = 65.0 -> 65 strokes -> this player gets 5 strokes They still get the strokes they deserve (5), but we've lost the meaning as players now get 60 strokes off a 10 handicap. Remove the course rating and… you're back at the same problem as we've had where players weren't doing the calculation properly, and we lose the first benefit of "playing to your handicap". An example of that, with a 12.3 index player playing on a 68.7/123 rated par 72 course. Properly: (12.3 * 123/113) + 68.7 - 72 = 10.1 -> 10 strokes Improperly: 12.3 * 123/113 = 13.4 -> 13 strokes If the player plays a "net even par" round of golf, he'll shoot 82 and 85. Here's why this makes sense: WHS: (82 - 68.7) * 113 / 123 = 12.2 differential Prior: (85 - 68.7) * 113 / 123 = 14.97 -> 15.0 differential The player "played to his handicap" with a net even par round in shooting the 82, which aligns with getting ten strokes, not 13. This makes way more sense and is in fact an improvement over the prior system for two of the three reasons listed above: It more closely aligns the index and the score you have to shoot to "shoot your handicap" It bakes in players playing from different tees.   Par is not a factor in determining the differential in the WHS system, only the playing handicap. The only way it affects the differential is that it can award a triple bogey on a few more holes (or a gross bogey max to a few + handicappers playing shorter tees) in determining NDB. You can completely ignore the WHS system of calculating your playing handicap and your differentials — the calculation of which does not use par - is going to be almost exactly the same (again, differing only when you tripled a hole on which you wouldn't have gotten NDB but now do because you didn't do the subtraction part of the WHS course/playing handicap calculation). Or maybe it was because of the other three reasons listed above. Which were the reasons given to me back in 2017 and 2018 when I talked with some of the people responsible for helping to create the WHS. If the ease of adoption by other countries and regions, then that's a fourth reason. But, I didn't really hear much about it prior to the WHS being instituted. A similar step was also required when players played from different tees, yet this was frequently forgotten. Players used to playing the blue tees would move up to the whites and expect to keep their 13 strokes, and be dismayed and sometimes even angered and argumentative that they would only get 10. This literally makes no sense. There's no more or less rounding than in previous versions. The output of "HI * Slope/113" typically produced a decimal number, the output of "HI * Slope/113 + CR - Par" also produces a decimal number, and the output of "Score * 113/Slope" (which is unchanged) also produces a decimal number. Each are rounded just as they were before. No, Dean is way off base here. Even if you accept that "par is an approximation" (of course difficulty), it's not used as he suggests. A player playing a par-72 that's rated 75 will get more COURSE handicap strokes than a player playing a par-72 that's rated 67, but that makes sense. At the end of the round, their score is processed using the same old formula to get their differential as always. This is about where I start to wonder and worry about Dean's mental faculties at his nearly 80 years of age. It hasn't "gone away" - it's been built-in as he says, and I think it's fairly obvious that this is true. No it is not. It is what I've said above, which is what the USGA and R&A have said it is. I agree that the course rating is the "most accurate measure of the relative difficulty for the scratch golfer" (I mean, it's almost exactly the defeinition), and slope determines the relative difficulty between two levels of player. So, which of these formulas incorporates BOTH the CR and the Slope in determining a player's course handicap: a. (HI * Slope/113) + CR - Par b. (HI * Slope/113) Clearly A incorporates "the most accurate measure of the relative difficulty" (as well as the measure of the relative difficulty). Dean's favored formula did NOT include "the most accurate measure of the relative difficulty for the scratch golfer". A scratch golfer under Dean's preferred method could shoot an even par round of 72 and see a differential that ranged from +2.7 (75.4/140) to 5.5 (66.3/118) or something. Under the WHS, if they shoot net par, they're going to end up with about a 0.0 differential. No. Again, you could subtract any integer from the Course Rating (which again the WHS ADDS to the calculation in course/playing handicap that the older system did not) and get the same relative course handicaps for all players. Using par just helps it make the most sense to actual golfers. It's an integer… as are the scores we shoot and the pars of the holes we play. The addition of the "CR - Par" has almost no effect on a player's differential. Again, the only affect it would have is when NDB is applied, because there may be a few holes where they'd get a stroke that they do not. And even then, it requires the player to card a triple on that specific hole, and be among their 8 out of 20 counting scores, AND even then if it happens once a round in ALL of the eight rounds, it's about 1 stroke on their index (probably a bit less given that most slopes are > 113). This has nothing to do with "jumping in" and everything to do with the foundational reasons for adding (CR - Par). Dean sees it as "adding par" when he would more accurately see it as adding the Course Rating! Small point of order: this was not shown to be accurate. The 96% applied to all 10 scores almost perfectly offset the dropping of two middle scores. Some players indexes went up a little. Some went down a little. The net change was almost exactly 0. Yes, that's how math works. The change makes MORE sense, again, as a player shooting net par under the WHS has basically "shot their handicap". Shoot below net par and your handicap will likely go down. Shoot above it and it may go up a little (less chance of this than shooting under lowering it, though, of course). So? Half of the players who play a 72.5/72-par course will see their Course Handicap one higher than they had before the system and half will not! Also and again, players who play a course rated 68.7 par-72 will all see their course handicaps drop several strokes. That's just math, and the boundaries of rounding. Dean chose a 0.5 marker, but the same math is true at any level, because the HI already has a decimal, and the Slope/113 multiplier also tends to produce decimals. So, someone who previously had a 10.5 to 10.9 index will still be an 11, while the 10.0s to 10.4s will go up to 11s. But on another course where the decimals work out to 0.3 and 0.2… the same math applies. And on a course where the decimals work out to 0.8… players half of the players will get an "extra" stroke and half will not. This is just rounding. It's always been a part of the WHS. The point at which rounding occurs might move slightly (depending on the course and index in question) for half of the situations, but if you have a 10.0 and an 11.5… or a 10.5 and an 12.0… half of the time the higher handicapper will get the "extra" stroke, and half the time the lower handicapper will get the "extra" stroke. This is just how rounding works. Handicaps in match play are almost entirely unaffected. A 13 playing a 10 might now be a 10 playing a 7, but the difference is still the same size. You're subtracting out a constant (CR - Par) from both players. The (HI * Slope/113) remains the same. This makes no sense and Dean has absolutely failed to provide any basis for this "less accurate" while ignoring that the WHS ADDS the CR to the course handicap calculation. It is easier. Shoot net par and you've "played to your handicap." Yes, and what they say is both accurate and makes sense. The WHS method bakes in the "playing from different tees" and makes it easier to know what it takes to "play to your handicap." Those are my notes right up until "The Par Pitfall." Dean has yet to make a valid point in any of this blog post thus far. When I have the time, and feel like procrastinating a bit more like today, I'll continue with my response to this blog post. I respect what Dean did in creating the original handicap system and the course ratinga system. The course rating system is one of the most elegant solutions to a very complex problem that I have ever seen. Nothing done by the WHS changes that. The course rating system is relatively unchanged, and its application in the WHS is, again, MORE accurate by the inclusion of the Course Rating than the previous system, in addition to the other benefits. Dean deserves (and has been given) much credit for that. But, if this is how he thinks these days, Dean can remain Pope Emeritus but the Cardinals need to elect a new Pope.
    • Wordle 1,810 4/6* ⬛⬛⬛⬛🟦 ⬛🟦⬛⬛⬛ ⬛🟧⬛🟦🟧 🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧
    • Wordle 1,810 4/6* ⬜⬜⬜🟨⬜ ⬜🟩🟨🟨🟩 🟩🟩⬜🟨🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,810 4/6 ⬜⬜⬜🟨⬜ ⬜⬜⬜🟨🟨 🟨⬜🟨⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,810 3/6 ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ 🟨⬜🟨⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.