Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4301 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Here's an interesting thought however - if you look at the ubiquitous Trackman optimal numbers, then not one of them has an optimal smash factor of 1.50. Which begs the question, are they really as optimal as they could be? Anyone who knows anything about fitting knows that hitting the middle of the club face yields the best ball speed. And ball speed is everything.

Actually hitting the clubface slightly higher than center and slighting towards the toe yields the best ball speed. I am talking about maybe at most a quarter of an inch up and over. so center of the clubface isn't the best location to strike the golf ball.

Also, if you miss hit the ball then you are going to get lower ball speed, but higher spin rates. So even if optimal is the perfect strike, getting the right launch angle and matching spin values. Getting close to that is best, because mishitting the ball takes you away from those values. So it still stands that you want to strive for optimal numbers. Mishitting is not part of the equation when talking theoretical.

Ball speed isn't anything. If you have 170 mph ball speed, but launch it at 9 degrees with 3300 rpm, you will only get 285 yards carry.

Lets say you are able to get that launch higher, lets say 13 degrees with 800 less spin, so 2500 rpm, you will get 295 yards of carry. You will also get more roll because the ball will descend at a shallower angle. So the ground will not take out as much energy from when the ball strikes the ground.

So ball speed isn't everything, though it is important.

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Here's an interesting thought however - if you look at the ubiquitous Trackman optimal numbers, then not one of them has an optimal smash factor of 1.50. Which begs the question, are they really as optimal as they could be? Anyone who knows anything about fitting knows that hitting the middle of the club face yields the best ball speed. And ball speed is everything.

Getting to 1.50 is tough to reach on Trackman with a conforming club, since other monitors tend to measure things differently. Many don't measure both clubhead and ball speed and just use an estimate, or they measure things differently such as tracking different spots on the club. Finally, the CG or true sweet spot of the club or even the toe may produce the highest ball speed but the best launch conditions are usually a bit higher on the face where the spin numbers will be lowest.

Ball speed isn't everything unless you can get freakishly good launch conditions every time, Even the guys on tour with the best smash factor and driving efficiency numbers are under 1.49 most of the time. And they still get outdriven by the guys who have higher swing speeds.

In My Bag:

Adams Super LS 9.5˚ driver, Aldila Phenom NL 65TX
Adams Super LS 15˚ fairway, Kusala black 72x
Adams Super LS 18˚ fairway, Aldila Rip'd NV 75TX
Adams Idea pro VST hybrid, 21˚, RIP Alpha 105x
Adams DHY 24˚, RIP Alpha 89x
5-PW Maltby TE irons, KBS C taper X, soft stepped once 130g
Mizuno T4, 54.9 KBS Wedge X
Mizuno R12 60.5, black nickel, KBS Wedge X
Odyssey Metal X #1 putter 
Bridgestone E5, Adidas samba bag, True Linkswear Stealth
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

When I went to get fitted for a new driver, I was shown my data with a 1.47 smash factor.    My swing speed was only 88 mph.    That was an average of  7 shots.   Two of the shots had a smash factor of 1.49.   I don't put a whole lot of stock in these numbers because the average total distance was 231 yards.   This was using Trackman at Carl's Golfland in Michigan.

From the land of perpetual cloudiness.   I'm Denny

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
When I went to get fitted for a new driver, I was shown my data with a 1.47 smash factor.    My swing speed was only 88 mph.    That was an average of  7 shots.   Two of the shots had a smash factor of 1.49.   I don't put a whole lot of stock in these numbers because the average total distance was 231 yards.   This was using Trackman at Carl's Golfland in Michigan.

If that's true then that's remarkable, especially for someone of your handicap. Your slower swing speed may have something to do with how solidly you hit the ball.

Colin P.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Ball speed: 128.9

Launch angle 15.1

spin rate 2315

Smash factor 1.47

Carry: 201.2

Total: 231.4

Landing angle: 30.9

Launch dir: -6.6

Spin axis: -2.8

Attack angle: -0.1

Club path: -5.8

Face angle: -6.7

Fact to path: -0.9

Club speed: 88.0

Height: 66.0

Side: 73.8L

Dyn Loft: 16.9

Spin Loft: 17.1

These were my number December 16, 2012.    This is why it was suggested I take lessons instead of buying new clubs.

From the land of perpetual cloudiness.   I'm Denny

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Ball speed: 128.9

Launch angle 15.1

spin rate 2315

Smash factor 1.47

Carry: 201.2

Total: 231.4

Landing angle: 30.9

Launch dir: -6.6

Spin axis: -2.8

Attack angle: -0.1

Club path: -5.8

Face angle: -6.7

Fact to path: -0.9

Club speed: 88.0

Height: 66.0

Side: 73.8L

Dyn Loft: 16.9

Spin Loft: 17.1

These were my number December 16, 2012.    This is why it was suggested I take lessons instead of buying new clubs.

pull cut?  fix your path, the rest will follow.  get your weight forward, get your AoA a little higher, youll see more distance.

Colin P.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

pull cut?  fix your path, the rest will follow.  get your weight forward, get your AoA a little higher, youll see more distance.

Pull draw, his face angle is more closed than his swing path. Somebody needs to review the flight laws again :-D

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Pull draw, his face angle is more closed than his swing path. Somebody needs to review the flight laws again :-D

:8) :8) :8)

Colin P.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4301 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 1: 2025.12.26 Worked on LH position on grip, trying to keep fingers closer to perpendicular to the club. Feels awkward but change is meant to.
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • When you've been teaching golf as long as I have, you're going to find that you can teach some things better than you previously had, and you're probably going to find some things that you taught incorrectly. I don't see that as a bad thing — what would be worse is refusing to adapt and grow given new information. I've always said that my goal with my instruction isn't to be right, but it's to get things right. To that end, I'm about five years late in issuing a public proclamation on something… When I first got my GEARS system, I immediately looked at the golf swings of the dozens and dozens of Tour players for which I suddenly had full 3D data. I created a huge spreadsheet showing how their bodies moved, how the club moved, at various points in the swing. I mapped knee and elbow angles, hand speeds, shoulder turns and pelvis turns… etc. I re-considered what I thought I knew about the golf swing as performed by the best players. One of those things dated back to the earliest days: that you extend (I never taught "straighten" and would avoid using that word unless in the context of saying "don't fully straighten") the trail knee/leg in the backswing. I was mislead by 2D photos from less-than-ideal camera angles — the trail leg rotates a bit during the backswing, and so when observing trail knee flex should also use a camera that moves to stay perpendicular to the plane of the ankle/knee/hip joint. We have at least two topics here on this (here and here; both of which I'll be updating after publishing this) where @mvmac and I advise golfers to extend the trail knee. Learning that this was not right is one of the reasons I'm glad to have a 3D system, as most golfers generally preserve the trail knee flex throughout the backswing. Data Here's a video showing an iron and a driver of someone who has won the career slam: Here's what the graph of his right knee flex looks like. The solid lines I've positioned at the top of the backswing (GEARS aligns both swings at impact, the dashed line). Address is to the right, of course, and the graph shows knee flex from the two swings above. The data (17.56° and 23.20°) shows where this player is in both swings (orange being the yellow iron swing, pink the blue driver swing). You can see that this golfer extends his trail knee 2-3°… before bending it even more than that through the late backswing and early downswing. Months ago I created a quick Instagram video showing the trail knee flex in the backswing of several players (see the top for the larger number): Erik J. Barzeski (@iacas) • Instagram reel GEARS shares expert advice on golf swing technique, focusing on the critical backswing phase. Tour winners and major champions reveal the key to a precise and powerful swing, highlighting the importance of... Here are a few more graphs. Two LIV players and major champions: Two PGA Tour winners: Two women's #1 ranked players: Two more PGA Tour winners (one a major champ): Two former #1s, the left one being a woman, the right a man, with a driver: Two more PGA Tour players: You'll notice a trend: they almost all maintain roughly the same flex throughout their backswing and downswing. The Issues with Extending the Trail Knee You can play good golf extending (again, not "straightening") the trail knee. Some Tour players do. But, as with many things, if 95 out of 100 Tour players do it, you're most likely better off doing similarly to what they do. So, what are the issues with extending the trail knee in the backswing? To list a few: Pelvic Depth and Rotation Quality Suffers When the trail knee extends, the trail leg often acts like an axle on the backswing, with the pelvis rotating around the leg and the trail hip joint. This prevents the trail side from gaining depth, as is needed to keep the pelvis center from thrusting toward the ball. Most of the "early extension" (thrust) that I see occurs during the backswing. Encourages Early Extension (Thrust) Patterns When you've thrust and turned around the trail hip joint in the backswing, you often thrust a bit more in the downswing as the direction your pelvis is oriented is forward and "out" (to the right for a righty). Your trail leg can abduct to push you forward, but "forward" when your pelvis is turned like that is in the "thrust" direction. Additionally, the trail knee "breaking" again at the start of the downswing often jumps the trail hip out toward the ball a bit too much or too quickly. While the trail hip does move in that direction, if it's too fast or too much, it can prevent the lead side hip from getting "back" at the right rate, or at a rate commensurate with the trail hip to keep the pelvis center from thrusting. Disrupts the Pressure Shift/Transition When the trail leg extends too much, it often can't "push" forward normally. The forward push begins much earlier than forward motion begins — pushing forward begins as early as about P1.5 to P2 in the swings of most good golfers. It can push forward by abducting, again, but that's a weaker movement that shoves the pelvis forward (toward the target) and turns it more than it generally should (see the next point). Limits Internal Rotation of the Trail Hip Internal rotation of the trail hip is a sort of "limiter" on the backswing. I have seen many golfers on GEARS whose trail knee extends, whose pelvis shifts forward (toward the target), and who turn over 50°, 60°, and rarely but not never, over 70° in the backswing. If you turn 60° in the backswing, it's going to be almost impossible to get "open enough" in the downswing to arrive at a good impact position. Swaying/Lateral Motion Occasionally a golfer who extends the trail knee too much will shift back too far, but more often the issue is that the golfer will shift forward too early in the backswing (sometimes even immediately to begin the backswing), leaving them "stuck forward" to begin the downswing. They'll push forward, stop, and have to restart around P4, disrupting the smooth sequence often seen in the game's best players. Other Bits… Reduces ground reaction force potential, compromises spine inclination and posture, makes transition sequencing harder, increases stress on the trail knee and lower back… In short… It's not athletic. We don't do many athletic things with "straight" or very extended legs (unless it's the end of the action, like a jump or a big push off like a step in a running motion).
    • Day 135 12-25 Wide backswing to wide downswing drill. Recorder and used mirror. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.