Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5318 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I consider myself an above average player when it comes to length. My drive is 285-300, my 150 club is 9 iron. I have a 54 and 60 degree wedge (14 and 12 bounce which I know makes no sense but I received them as a gift). For some odd reason I am not getting the distance I want on either of my wedges. Most course I hit my drive and have myself between 85-115 yards which I think should be a nice easy 54 wedge. I find myself hitting these baby fades or hitting them way to high. My 60 degree wedge is even worse, I max out at around 50-60 yards when I feel that most people with my distance should be 75. I tend to have a strong grip but maybe I am using a weak grip with these wedges. Please feel free to give me any advice.


Posted

Just my opinion but wedges are not distance clubs, they are scoring clubs. Who cares how far you hit them its how much control and consitency you have with them. I never take over a 3/4 swing with my 58 and its my club inside 80 yards.

Driver- Titleist 910 D3 9.5

3 Wood- Burner 15 degree
Irons- Slingshot 4I-AW
Hybrid- CPR 3 22 degree
Putter- White Hot XG 8


Posted

Boy, that is weird. You average about 290 with a driver (above the PGA average) and only hit your lob wedge 50 yds.? By my calculation you should be going about 140 with that baby. ;-}

In the Bag:
Driver: Cleveland Launcher Ultralight XL 270

FW: Taylor Made 300 17 degree 
3-PW: Mizuno MX-23

AW: Mizuno TP-T11 52/07 (Bent to 50)
SW: Mizuno TP-T11 56/10

LW: Mizuno TP-T11 60/05

Putter: Original Ping Zing

Ball: Wilson Staff FG Tour


Posted

I think the answer is simple.   You don't average 285 to 300.    You probably think you do because you haven't measured it accurately.    You've probably hit a few bombs that roll out to 270ish or maybe even 300 and you translate that rarity into a "I average 300".  I once hit a drive 320 but I average about 260.

The real question is, who cares how far you hit your wedges?  The important question is "how close to the flag do your hit your wedges".   If I hit my lob wedge 65 yards and it lands 2 feet from the flag and you hit yours 120 and it lands 30 feet from the flag I'm clearly going to score better.

There are no strokes deducted for distance.

  • Upvote 1

Driver: VRS 9.5 degrees

Fairway Wood: 13 degrees
Hybrid: A3 19 degrees

Irons: i20's  Yellow dot

Wedges: Vokey's 52, 56 & 60

Putter: 2 ball

Ball: Penta; ProV


Posted


Originally Posted by alexander19

I consider myself an above average player when it comes to length. My drive is 285-300, my 150 club is 9 iron. I have a 54 and 60 degree wedge (14 and 12 bounce which I know makes no sense but I received them as a gift). For some odd reason I am not getting the distance I want on either of my wedges. Most course I hit my drive and have myself between 85-115 yards which I think should be a nice easy 54 wedge. I find myself hitting these baby fades or hitting them way to high. My 60 degree wedge is even worse, I max out at around 50-60 yards when I feel that most people with my distance should be 75. I tend to have a strong grip but maybe I am using a weak grip with these wedges. Please feel free to give me any advice.


I used to hit my LW 90 yards on a full swing. Years later another 60 degree wedge was my 70 yard club. I was consistently hitting it off the toe - really nice tiny wear spot 1/2 way from the toe and the sweet spot. Once I reprogrammed myself to hit the sweet spot, my LW became my 90 yard club again. Just a thought.

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted


Originally Posted by alexander19

Please feel free to give me any advice.



I used to have the same problem until I realised I was seriously flipping. The shorter the club, the more loft you add at impact when flipping and hence the more distance you lose. You can get away with it to a degree with shots off of a tee. I know immediately when I start flipping as I immediately start hitting my irons too high and losing a good 10-20% distance.

"Success is going from failure to failure without loss of enthusiasm." – Winston Churchill


Posted


Re: Flipping -- I feel like I suffer from the same thing. I hit really high shots (usually with a draw). While I love the high shots, it creates distance problems within the bag, especially at longer yardages (180+). Are there any good explanations/instructions/videos on how to correct flipping? Thanks!

Originally Posted by The_Pharaoh

I used to have the same problem until I realised I was seriously flipping. The shorter the club, the more loft you add at impact when flipping and hence the more distance you lose. You can get away with it to a degree with shots off of a tee. I know immediately when I start flipping as I immediately start hitting my irons too high and losing a good 10-20% distance.




Posted


Originally Posted by Gopher1000

Re: Flipping -- I feel like I suffer from the same thing. I hit really high shots (usually with a draw). While I love the high shots, it creates distance problems within the bag, especially at longer yardages (180+). Are there any good explanations/instructions/videos on how to correct flipping? Thanks!



Check out the Casting and How to Create Lag video by Herman Williams on Youtube. Practicing the drills in the video helped me stop flipping from one day to the next. And it helped me with all the shots and clubs in my bag. Good luck!

"Success is going from failure to failure without loss of enthusiasm." – Winston Churchill


Posted

I too have length problems when it is only 54-60 degrees. Brrrrrrrr

:whistle:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Sean is on to something...

My 54 is my 105 club and my 60 is my 85 club. This is for a 85% full swing with good contact through the ball. I average about 265 off the tee when I am on. With the wedge swing try putting more weight on your front foot with a narrow but open stance. A good drill is to set up with more weight than you need (exaggerated) and hit shots to minimize the weight shift. Pulling off the ball with a big turn is not the swing you want from 100 yards in. Since the wedges are precision clubs you can't afford to swing like you are hitting a longer club because where you hit it on the club face is so important. Slow your tempo down, shorten and feel the club head through the ball making the best contact you can. From there start to increase until you find your zone. Sometimes on the course when I feel a little off, I just feel  a little more weight staying on the front side. Good luck.

Callaway AI Smoke TD Max 10.5* | Cobra Big Tour 15.5* | Rad Tour 18.5* | Titleist U500 4i | T100 5-P | Vokey 50/8* F, 54/10* S,  58/10* S | Scotty Cameron Squareback 1


Posted


Originally Posted by TourSpoon

Sean is on to something...

My 54 is my 105 club and my 60 is my 85 club. This is for a 85% full swing with good contact through the ball. I average about 265 off the tee when I am on. With the wedge swing try putting more weight on your front foot with a narrow but open stance. A good drill is to set up with more weight than you need (exaggerated) and hit shots to minimize the weight shift. Pulling off the ball with a big turn is not the swing you want from 100 yards in. Since the wedges are precision clubs you can't afford to swing like you are hitting a longer club because where you hit it on the club face is so important. Slow your tempo down, shorten and feel the club head through the ball making the best contact you can. From there start to increase until you find your zone. Sometimes on the course when I feel a little off, I just feel  a little more weight staying on the front side. Good luck.



With each set of wedges, finding a swing speed that provides the most consistent ball then turf contact is tricky. Whatever that distance ends up being for each wedge it fine for me, as long as it's consistent and comfortable under pressure.

For example, with my Hogan wedges, a comfortable full swing with my 60 degree LW seems to be about 85 yards (like you said - not 100%, but a full "wedge swing" nonetheless) and yet on one teeny tiny par 3 at my course (just 88 yards with a tiny green - really strange), I have my 54 degree dialed in to land on the front 1/3 of the green and release to dead centre. I see much shorter hitters (with longer clubs) than me taking full cuts with their LW and their results are either perfect or all wet (there's a pond in front).

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted


Great video--thanks!!

Originally Posted by The_Pharaoh

Check out the Casting and How to Create Lag video by Herman Williams on Youtube. Practicing the drills in the video helped me stop flipping from one day to the next. And it helped me with all the shots and clubs in my bag. Good luck!




Note: This thread is 5318 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.