Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5404 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

0  

  1. 1. Victory Red or R11?

    • Victory Red from Nike
      2
    • R11 from Taylormade
      0


Recommended Posts

Posted

ok so it seems it can cost up to $100 or more to test hit a bunch of driver at GolfGalaxy and im not paying all that. I have tested the R11 on the course but not the Victory Red yet. Im going to see how much it costs to test those 2 and decide on one of those so the question is if you were given the choice between the two which one would you pick?


Posted

Just to add on because I dont know how to edit your decision will not be what I choose I will choose what feels best during my fitting but just wondering on your opinions. Control is the big issue for me so I can give up 20 or so yards if it means im in the fairway more. And yes I know there are a bunch of drivers out there but these are the two that have peaked my intrest and dont want to spend the money to hit a bunch of them Wednesday.


Posted

Check out another golf shop - I am not familiar with paying to test different drivers (unless it is some kind of professional fitting)

Follow me on twitter

Chris, although my friends call me Mr.L

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted


Originally Posted by meenman

Check out another golf shop - I am not familiar with paying to test different drivers (unless it is some kind of professional fitting)



From what im to understand the simulator is free but the launch tester starts at $30 for one club then goes up from there for how many you test. From what ive read their simulator is pretty useless it just gives base information. There are not to many golf shops around there to really choose from.


Posted

Check out another golf shop - I am not familiar with paying to test different drivers (unless it is some kind of professional fitting)

Agreed. There are plenty of golf shops that let you hit drivers (or any clubs) for free, and have a machine (possibly juiced, but meaningful in comparisons) that tells you about each shot. GolfSmith and Roger Dunn shops around me both do this for free.

-- Michael | My swing! 

"You think you're Jim Furyk. That's why your phone is never charged." - message from my mother

Driver:  Titleist 915D2.  4-wood:  Titleist 917F2.  Titleist TS2 19 degree hybrid.  Tour Edge Exotics C723 21 degree hybrid.  Irons 5-U, Ping G400.  Wedges negotiable (currently 54 degree Cleveland, 58 degree Titleist) Edel putter. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Golf Galaxy charges (about) $50 for a driver fitting, but waives the fee if you buy a new driver from them.

I got a fitting in 2008 - hit my old driver for baseline data, and then tested six new drivers from Callaway, Ping and Cleveland. Took over an hour on the launch monitor, and I ended up selecting my HyperX Tour driver. Also, the pro gave me the data printout comparing the seven drivers, and I keep it for future reference and fittings.

Plus, you can test-hit clubs for free.

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha B16 OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:  image.png.0d90925b4c768ce7c125b16f98313e0d.png Inertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  :srixon: QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

As others have said, hitting drivers on the simulator is free.  Golf Galaxy will not charge you a dime to hit any new driver on the simulator.  If you feel the need to have a professional 'fitting' then you can proceed with the club(s) you like best.

'Getting fit' for a driver, is an overused term that is becoming increasing gray as golf shops try and make money here.  A real fitting should involve fine-tuning a narrow set of clubheads using a variety of shaft flexes, weights and lofts.  Fitting should evaluate drivers based on launch angle, ball speed, ball spin, carry, overall distance, dispersion.  A real fitting should also use a launch monitor, not a simulator.  Furthermore, if you struggle to keep it in the fairway, paying $50 for a 'fitting' is a waste of money beyond what can be learned from most modern simulators.

Also, the VR is likely a poor choice if control is not your strong suit.

In the Bag: TaylorMade R11 TP - TaylorMade R7 TP TS - Cleveland Halo - TM TP 2009 3-PW - Vokey SM 52 - Vokey SM 60 - Rife Barbados CS - ProV1x 


On the Computer:  Analyzr Pro 
 


Note: This thread is 5404 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I work with a lot of golfers who want more shaft lean at impact, who currently have AoAs that range from +2° to -2°, and who love to see the handle lower and more "in front of their trail thigh" from face-on at P6. And a lot of these golfers try to solve the issue by working on the downswing. They do something to drag the handle forward. Or they just leave their right thigh farther back so the same handle location "looks" farther forward. Or they move the ball back in their stance. Or they push themselves down into the ground to get the handle lower and increase (decrease?) their AoA (to be more negative). The real fix is often to get wider in the backswing. To do LESS in the backswing. To hinge less, fold the trail arm less, abduct the trail arm less. I had a case of this over the weekend. Before, the player had 110° of trail elbow bend, "lifted" his trail humerus only a few degrees, etc. The club traveled quite a bit around him, and he tended to "pick" the ball from the fairways. In the "after" swings below (which are mild exaggerations — this golfer does not need to end up at < 70° of elbow bend. These were slower backswings with "hit it as hard as you normally would" intent downswings), you can see that he bent his elbow about 70° instead of 110° and lifted his right arm an extra ~15° or more. You can't see how much less this moved his hands across his chest (right arm abduction), but it was also decreased. His hands stayed more "in front of" his right shoulder rather than traveling "beside" them so much. The two swings look like this: The change at P6, without talking about the downswing one little bit (outside of him telling me that he tends to pick the ball), is remarkable: Without 110° of elbow bend to get out (which he gets to 80°, a loss of 30°), the golfer actually loses slightly less elbow bend (70 - 50 = 20), but delivers 30° less elbow bend, lowering the handle and letting the elbow get "in front of" the rib cage… because it never got "behind" or "beside" the rib cage. If you look at this video showing the before/afters of P6, you'll note the handle location (both vertically and horizontally) and the shoulders (the ball is in the same place in these frames). This golfer's path was largely unaffected (still pretty straight into the ball, < 3° path and often < 1.5°), but his AoA jumped to -5° ± 2°. I've always said, and in talking with other instructors they agree and feel similarly, that we spend a lot of time working on the backswing. This is another example of why.
    • We had a member of our senior club who developed a mental block on pulling the trigger. I played with him to see what the membership was talking about. I timed him a few times when he would get over the ball. 45 seconds. He knew he had a mental block and would chide himself, “Just hit it!” Once on the green he was okay and chipping was a bit better. It was painful to watch him struggle. Our “bandaid” was to put him in the last tournament  tee time with two understanding players. We should have suggested to him to take a break from our tournaments. I agree with the idea that when a player realizes they have a problem, the answer is to go fix it and not return until they are able to play at an acceptable pace.
    • Day 56 (4 May 26) - Worked on some ball-then-ground drills - going from P3 thru impact - with a slowed tempo, working to keep all parts in sync.   
    • Wordle 1,780 3/6 🟩⬜🟨🟨🟨 ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,780 4/6 🟨⬜⬜⬜🟨 ⬜🟨🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟨🟩🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.