Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Tom Watson playing The Greenbriar not the Senior US Open


Note: This thread is 5246 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Strange decision, especially as its a 'major' he's never won. I always thought Tom was a man of integrity and showed a healthy respect for history and the significance of winning particular championships.

I imagine it's to do with his sponsors, but a real shame for the Senior US Open. I bet the USGA are furious.


Posted

As I understand it he made a commitment to a friend some time back to be somewhere else at the time of the Senior Open.  I would think honoring that commitment is a show of integrity.

Butch


Posted

according to the article i read, he's pro-emeritus at the greenbrier, and had wanted to play it last year but couldn't make it, so he promised that he would play this year instead.  he said several times in the article when asked why he wasn't playing the open "I made a promise, here i am, and that's that."

edit:  here's the article:  http://sports.yahoo.com/golf/pga/news?slug=ap-golfnotes


Posted


You find it strange that a man is keeping his word?

Originally Posted by Journeyman

That's a good point.

I still find it a strange decision.




Posted

I believe he finds it strange that Tom Watson gave his word in the first place.

Originally Posted by shades9323

You find it strange that a man is keeping his word?




Posted

I see.  It is the U.S. Senior Open.  It doesn't mean anywhere close to the regular U.S. Open, IMO. I don't find it as a big deal at all.  I doubt the USGA is furious like Journyman said.

Originally Posted by deasy55

I believe he finds it strange that Tom Watson gave his word in the first place.




Posted


Originally Posted by mirv

according to the article i read, he's pro-emeritus at the greenbrier, and had wanted to play it last year but couldn't make it, so he promised that he would play this year instead.  he said several times in the article when asked why he wasn't playing the open "I made a promise, here i am, and that's that."

edit:  here's the article:  http://sports.yahoo.com/golf/pga/news?slug=ap-golfnotes


Just what I would expect from Watson and exactly the reason I have great respect for the man.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

If the reason is in fact that he made a commitment,this my hat is off to Tom,it's the right thing to do.I would like to see him win a Senior Open,but he made the right choice in my opinion!


Note: This thread is 5246 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 12: stole about 10 minutes in the garage, doing my drill with foam balls. 
    • Day 116 12-6 Still working on getting to lead side. Tonight I also tried some skill work with clubface awareness.  Hit foam balls. 
    • To flog this subject even further, if that's even possible, this article from Golf Monthly just appeared today in one of my news feeds. Written by a golf writer in the UK who I never heard of, he's basically saying that there should be only 3-5 rounds from the most recent 20 that should count towards the average and only competitive rounds should count. He claims the erratic scorers would have less of an advantage than they do now. He makes a lot of references to "club golfers" in the UK being the ones who are mostly dissatisfied. https://share.google/qmZZBEoJvOxHxJGil  In my experience with my league where we have golfers with indexes ranging from 5 to 40, looking at the weekly results from the past two years, I can detect no pattern that would substantiate the claim that the current system gives an unfair advantage to either erratic golfers (aren't we all?) or higher handicappers. Apparently though, at least in the UK, this seems to be "a thing."
    • Day 26 (6 Dec 25) - Another day of rainy weather - got in some mirror work rehearsing forward weight shift as finishing back swing. 
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6* 🟨⬜🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟩🟩⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 no eagle -  but a birdie is a nice follow-up
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.