Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Tom Watson on Modern Amateurs - In Name Only


Note: This thread is 5321 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Colleges are spending big money on sports to run their almost major league programs.  The competition makes players train every day all year rather than focusing on school.  But I know a lot of the players are going to school specifically to get the course time, practice and instruction and see if they can be good enough to make the tour.

I also don't see the utility of the word "amateur".  If we're discussing the amateurs that participate in pro tournaments, but retain amateur status, then I completely agree with Tom Watson - they're basically pros.  Meanwhile, we're never going to see a "weekend warrior" on television in a PGA event.  Good enough to play means enough money to support yourself and play or train daily year-round.  If you don't have the big money support or don't put in the time on expensive courses you aren't going to be good enough to make it into an event obviously.

This reminds me of the US Open at Bethpage when announcers and officials made a huge deal that they were on a municipal course.  Even though it is absolutely nothing like the average course, it is not affordable or accessible or badly maintained.


Posted

They don't get paid so they are not pro's.

And to the above post, bethpage is only like $65 for state residents...thats not that bad.  And its not accessible b/c its such a great deal.


Note: This thread is 5321 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Pretty accurate.  Another way you can look at it is how many years was Jack top 10 on the money list. It used to be the list that mattered, nothing else came close. Jack was top 10 from 1962-1978 and then once more in 1983 making 18 years total. He had another 4 inside the top 20. He was #1 8 times.  Tiger was top 10 from 1997-2009, 2012-2013, and 2018 which is 16 times total. His next best were 24th and 38th in 2019-2020. He was #1 10 times.  Honestly, they're both pretty long but Jack has quite a few more seasons in the upper ranks. Makes sense when Tiger barely played in 2010-2011 and then again from 2015-2017, and pretty much 2020 onwards. 
    • Bangers and mash. In keeping with the golf theme.🫢
    • Played three and a half rounds in England last week. I will not be playing more than maybe 4 rounds on any one course. Probably only about 20 rounds all year and between 4 and 8 of those will be alternate shot, so don't really count. Off to a pretty good start though. Three and a half rounds gave me 5 birdies and an eagle (with two of those birdies being on the same hole number). 
    • First round of 2026. No birdies and a very pedestrian 86. Maybe I should have hit a few balls over the past 100 days. Next year!
    • Domino's. 🙂 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.