Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5392 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Can someone link me to, or explain a concise explanation of how to read greens and fairways?

Meaning:

What does it mean when a green is fast,

What does it mean when a green is slow,

What does it mean when a fairway is hard,

etc.

I know fast, means the balls roll faster, but how do you account for that in a swing? Lower the power?

Any info / posts are appreciated.


Posted
The ball will obviously roll faster on a fast green, but it will also break more and roll faster downhill. On a slow green, the ball might stop in the middle of a downslope, on a fast one, it might never. Hitting the ball harder is of course the solution on a slower green, and maybe taking a little less break. A hard fairway means pretty much that it's hard. The ball will bounce more, might give you more roll, but might also bounce or roll off the fairway.
  • Upvote 1

Ogio Grom | Callaway X Hot Pro | Callaway X-Utility 3i | Mizuno MX-700 23º | Titleist Vokey SM 52.08, 58.12 | Mizuno MX-700 15º | Titleist 910 D2 9,5º | Scotty Cameron Newport 2 | Titleist Pro V1x and Taylormade Penta | Leupold GX-1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted


Originally Posted by Zeph

The ball will obviously roll faster on a fast green, but it will also break more and roll faster downhill. On a slow green, the ball might stop in the middle of a downslope, on a fast one, it might never. Hitting the ball harder is of course the solution on a slower green, and maybe taking a little less break.

A hard fairway means pretty much that it's hard. The ball will bounce more, might give you more roll, but might also bounce or roll off the fairway.


Actually, although it seems counter-intuitive, I find that I have to play less break on a faster green, unless I play the ball to die at the hole (I'm not counting playing on dead slow greens that roll only 5 or 6 on the stimp - that's something that I only see on one course I know of, and most putts there can be played almost straight).  If I play my normal stroke for the ball to run past a couple of feet, I play less break because the ball doesn't lose speed as quickly, and thus it doesn't break as sharply until it's past the hole.  It's easier to hit right through the break.

I find this to be very true on my home course.  I've been playing this course for more than 25 years, and as the greens have been made faster over the years, the amount of break I play for a typical putt is less.  This doesn't entirely hold true on an extreme break, but with the many subtle breaks which I encounter there, I have to play less borrow than I once did or I miss every putt on the high side.  That doesn't mean that they are all straight putts, just that what was once an 8 inch break might now be only 6 inches, then will fall off another 4 inches once past the hole.

I have rarely found any hard and fast rules for green reading.  It's really as much art as science, and only experience will train your eye to spot many of the slight slopes which seem to cause more misses than the obvious breaks.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

Originally Posted by Fourputt

Actually, although it seems counter-intuitive, I find that I have to play less break on a faster green, unless I play the ball to die at the hole (I'm not counting playing on dead slow greens that roll only 5 or 6 on the stimp - that's something that I only see on one course I know of, and most putts there can be played almost straight).

It's not only counter-intuitive, it's flat out wrong from a physics standpoint. Faces with a hole and a ball on the same location and on the same green, and a putt which travels the same distance past the hole, the faster the greens, then:

  • the longer the ball will take to get to the hole
  • the slower the ball will be rolling at any point
  • the more break

The same breaking putt always breaks more on faster greens. Always. I like you a lot FourPutt, but the laws of physics don't cease to exist at your course.

Originally Posted by Fourputt

I have rarely found any hard and fast rules for green reading.  It's really as much art as science, and only experience will train your eye to spot many of the slight slopes which seem to cause more misses than the obvious breaks.


Take an AimPoint seminar. Screw experience. Good green readers become great green readers. Bad ones become very good ones. We say "experience" because, prior to AimPoint, we didn't have any real way to teach green reading.

We do now.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 5392 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I would think of it in terms of time. The time it takes to get the arm angle into a good position to deliver the club with proper shaft lean. Another component is rotation, but that is also a matter of timing. It relates to how the body stalls to give the golfer time to hit the ball. If you have to get 80+ degrees out of that right elbow in one third of a second versus 50 degrees in the same time then you have to steal time from somewhere. It is usually body rotation. That does not help with shaft lean.  I agree in that amateurs tend to make the swing more complicated than pro golfers. 
    • I haven't been able to practice like I wanted and won't for the next week.  1. The weather sucks in Ohio this year. I have been mostly inside hitting foam balls. Just kind of my basic stuff.  2. I woke up last Saturday with a left side rib muscle on fire. If I turned or leaned a certain way it would spasm that almost buckled my knees. I have been taking a break to let that settle. I don't want to get a long term injury. I think I pinched a nerve or just aggravated a muscles.   3. I am going on a mini-vacation to Florida (screw you Ohio weather) with a friend, and rolling that into a work conference I have next week. I will be with out my clubs for a week.  I will be back next in two Fridays to hit the ground running with some warmer temps and better weather in Ohio, hopefully. I would really like to get more out on the course and the range.     
    • Day 580 - 2026-05-04 Played eight holes. Sometimes golf kicks you in the nuts. 😉 
    • I work with a lot of golfers who want more shaft lean at impact, who currently have AoAs that range from +2° to -2°, and who love to see the handle lower and more "in front of their trail thigh" from face-on at P6. And a lot of these golfers try to solve the issue by working on the downswing. They do something to drag the handle forward. Or they just leave their right thigh farther back so the same handle location "looks" farther forward. Or they move the ball back in their stance. Or they push themselves down into the ground to get the handle lower and increase (decrease?) their AoA (to be more negative). The real fix is often to get wider in the backswing. To do LESS in the backswing. To hinge less, fold the trail arm less, abduct the trail arm less. I had a case of this over the weekend. Before, the player had 110° of trail elbow bend, "lifted" his trail humerus only a few degrees, etc. The club traveled quite a bit around him, and he tended to "pick" the ball from the fairways. In the "after" swings below (which are mild exaggerations — this golfer does not need to end up at < 70° of elbow bend. These were slower backswings with "hit it as hard as you normally would" intent downswings), you can see that he bent his elbow about 70° instead of 110° and lifted his right arm an extra ~15° or more. You can't see how much less this moved his hands across his chest (right arm abduction), but it was also decreased. His hands stayed more "in front of" his right shoulder rather than traveling "beside" them so much. The two swings look like this: The change at P6, without talking about the downswing one little bit (outside of him telling me that he tends to pick the ball), is remarkable: Without 110° of elbow bend to get out (which he gets to 80°, a loss of 30°), the golfer actually loses slightly less elbow bend (70 - 50 = 20), but delivers 30° less elbow bend, lowering the handle and letting the elbow get "in front of" the rib cage… because it never got "behind" or "beside" the rib cage. If you look at this video showing the before/afters of P6, you'll note the handle location (both vertically and horizontally) and the shoulders (the ball is in the same place in these frames). This golfer's path was largely unaffected (still pretty straight into the ball, < 3° path and often < 1.5°), but his AoA jumped to -5° ± 2°. I've always said, and in talking with other instructors they agree and feel similarly, that we spend a lot of time working on the backswing. This is another example of why.
    • We had a member of our senior club who developed a mental block on pulling the trigger. I played with him to see what the membership was talking about. I timed him a few times when he would get over the ball. 45 seconds. He knew he had a mental block and would chide himself, “Just hit it!” Once on the green he was okay and chipping was a bit better. It was painful to watch him struggle. Our “bandaid” was to put him in the last tournament  tee time with two understanding players. We should have suggested to him to take a break from our tournaments. I agree with the idea that when a player realizes they have a problem, the answer is to go fix it and not return until they are able to play at an acceptable pace.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.