Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5217 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Most everyone for years now has been Brand Name conscious for everything from clothing to perfume, to jewelry, you name it. In these hard economic times Brand Names maybe a thing of the past. Keeping money in your pocket is what on everyone’s mind right now.

Let’s talk in the apparel industry about cotton. It’s hard for the consumer to understand that even though the soaring prices of cotton are slowly coming down, they may not see the decrease for 8 months to a year. This is so because in this industry like a lot others the key component (cotton) is bought by factories far in advance and manufacturers have placed orders far in advance at these higher prices. The manufacturers won’t still get the goods for 3 months (production time) and so the price stays high. It may take 2-3 orders before they will see the decrease and in turn pass it on to the consumer. Some manufacturers didn’t increase the goods when cotton prices sky rocketed and they worked on very very low margins and in some cases not very profitable ones to keep the consumer buying and they now may take even longer to reduce the price so they can recoup some of the past losses.

What can consumers and apparel buyers do in the mean time to promote sales and increase their margins. One idea is to go for the Not so Brand Name Company’s. For instance Heritage Cross Apparel is a Manufacturer of Quality Men’s and Ladies Golf and Corporate apparel and has been in business for 10 years. They use trendy fabrics such as “Cross” Dry which consists of a blend of Cotton and Polyester, a “Cross” Cool which consist of 100% Polyester. Both types of fabrics are Moisture Wicking with Antimicrobial finishes. These shirts also come individually bagged with tissue …great for retailing. Take a look at them at www.heritagecross.com.

Take a Brand Name shirt hang it in your Pro Shop or Retail store for lets say $60.00-$90.00 then take that similar shirt from the Not so Brand Name and hang next to it for $40.00-$60.00. Remember the quality of the Not so Brand Name is just as superior as the Name Brand because believe it or not they are both most likely made in the same factories. I can bet the consumer will go with the lower price garment. Quality + Low Price =Sales

In the end I think we have figured out that in these trying times where cash is king the NOT so Brand Name can be a better sell to your customers and will make you more money.


Posted

Not so Brand Name is different from No Brand Name.  Rather than buy the less expensive No Brand Name shirts, consumers will shop discount stores and look for sales where they can purchase brand names for less.  For example, I picked up a new Callaway tech fabric shirt at Marshalls for $14.99 that sells list for $60 and 2 Adidas tech golf shirts at Sports Authority for $35 reduced from $65.

Your shirts quality might be just as good as these, but I've never heard of your company and your prices are still higher than the name brand shirts I purchased.

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted


Originally Posted by newtogolf

Not so Brand Name is different from No Brand Name.  Rather than buy the less expensive No Brand Name shirts, consumers will shop discount stores and look for sales where they can purchase brand names for less.  For example, I picked up a new Callaway tech fabric shirt at Marshalls for $14.99 that sells list for $60 and 2 Adidas tech golf shirts at Sports Authority for $35 reduced from $65.

Your shirts quality might be just as good as these, but I've never heard of your company and your prices are still higher than the name brand shirts I purchased.

+1, I buy most of my golf shirts at Marshalls. Name brand, at low prices.


Note: This thread is 5217 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 11: did mirror work for a while. Worked on the same stuff. 
    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.