Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Top Flite practice Range ball distance?


Note: This thread is 5175 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

The range I usually go to has closed for the season, so I drove all the way across town to check out this indoor/outdoor range.

Its a lot better and even has a pro shop.

At the old range the balls were real golf balls of all brands, but at this place they were ALL TopFlite Range Practice balls.

The old ones seemed to hit just like any old golfball, same distance as the balls I carry in my bag, but these TF Range balls were weird as hell. No matter how good a shot, even with a driver, they wouldnt fly out any further than about 200 yards then theyd drop like a sack of bricks.

I even tried my 7 wood which on the old range when Id hit off a tee the ball would go up and out and then you could see the trajectory raise a little when what I believe was backspin slowing down. I generally can get a hell of a lot of distance out of my 7 wood. Its been VERY consistent with normal balls.

But these TF range balls, while flying very straight, didnt seem to carry nearly as far as Im used to with regular balls.

I did notice that this particular range is VERY Short compared to what Im used to. A 300 yard hit would actually be over and across the back fence and onto another property, so I wondered if they intentionally bought balls that wouldnt fly that far.

Its no huge deal to me, Im less interested in hitting them a mile and more interested in controlling the ball, but I was beginning to feel a bit inadequate until I saw that no one with a driver was hitting as far as even the 275 mark.

Thoughts about the TF range practice balls?


Posted


Originally Posted by raygrinberg

Those TF balls were most likely "Restricted Flight" balls specifically made for smaller spaces.



so they do make balls for shorter flight like that?

It was driving me crazy until I got almost home and thought maybe that was the case.

The seemed 'lighter' than normal balls, not quite the same heavy feel as a normal ball.

Would being lighter make them not fly as far?

It was weird when I was out there because I caught hold of a few balls that I just knew were going to fly well.

You know that 'feel' when the swing is just right and you can feel how the club caught the ball and that distinct sound you get.

So Im looking for at least a 240-250 minimum.....and plunk. Out to about 175 or so and dropped out of the sky like a giant turd.

Its like once the ball slowed down even slightly it would then lose ALL its forward energy and just drop.


Posted

Yea limited flight balls are worthless for practice.  There is a range up the road that has them due to limited space and you can get some really weird shot shapes.  Balls that will fly out 200 yards then hook or nose dive into the ground.

Driver: Titleist 915 D3
3 wood: 15 Callaway X Hot pro
Hybrids:  18 Callaway X Hot Pro
Irons: 4-GW Callaway Apex
project x 6.0
Wedges: 54 , 58 Callaway
Putter: 2 ball
Ball: Callaway Chrome

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted


Originally Posted by poser

Yea limited flight balls are worthless for practice.  There is a range up the road that has them due to limited space and you can get some really weird shot shapes.  Balls that will fly out 200 yards then hook or nose dive into the ground.


Its really good to know all this. I was really getting a bit down there

They have an indoor range and you can sneeze and hit the end of it. Maybe 160 yards tops.

It is sort of cool to hit inside because it was really windy today and once your ball gets into the sky its not so easy to see.

This indoor range is a nice color that your ball really highlights against so you can see it good enough. But driver shots end up hitting against the end, not really a huge problem since I usually know if Ive hit a bad one by that distance.

Thats why I went outside to see how far my balls were actually going because I had some really nice shots, but outside they didnt go a whole lot further and Im thinking what the hell


Posted

Do they not tell you this before you purchase the balls? I'd ask for my money back.

"Success is going from failure to failure without loss of enthusiasm." – Winston Churchill


Posted

I found this other thread on the topic;

http://thesandtrap.com/t/16079/limited-flight-range-balls

I was trying to draw the ball and I have to say that altho the distance was shorter on these range balls I was able to aim right of the flag and pull the ball back to pretty much where the green would be.

They seemed to handle well enough as far as that goes.


Posted

I've used ranges with restricted distance balls and didn't have issues as I could discern the initial ball flight and curvature.

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 5175 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.