Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5144 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Someone is about to tell me "hey, the forum has a search feature."

I'm debating whether to cut my driver and 3-wood, and maybe my hybrid as well, 1/2" to 1".

For starters, I recently (within the last 5 months) switched to "modern" woods.  I had been playing Titleist 983E 9.5-deg and 980F 15-deg, both with TTDG steel stiff shafts.  Heavy to say the least, but straight and workable.  Not long, but long enough.  The driver was 43.5" and the 3-wood was probably 41.5" or 42".

I switched to Titleist 910 D3 (9.5, adjusted to 8.75) and 910F 13.5.  Both have the Mitsubishi ahina (whiteboard) 73 gram in X-flex.  Stock lengths with the driver at 45" and the 3-wood at 42.5".

They feel too long.  I am always choking down on both driver and 3-wood, sometimes as much as 2 or 3 inches.

I get good distance with both, averaging about 290 with the D and 255-260 with the 3.  I'm comfortable with the weight.  I'm not hitting the ball in the center of the face as often as I'd like, but when I do the distance numbers really jump.

I'm wondering if I cut down (max of 1") off of both clubs if I'd see an improvement in consistency and center contact.  As I said, the clubs just feel long, and I'm usually choking down at least 1".  I don't want to cut the shaft if it's going to significantly change the way the shaft feels, though--I generally like my launch angle and spin (when I swing on plane, anyway).  Logic tells me that a shorter shaft will be easier to get on plane and release at the right moment more consistently.

I'm aware that Titleist sells a weight kit that can fix swingweight if that could become an issue by cutting.

I'm also just generally concerned with the length gaps in shafts.  My 3-iron is 39", hybrid is 41", 3-wood is 42.5", and D is 45".  I'm thinking about cutting all of them to create a more natural progression through the bag, with 3-iron at 39", hybrid at 40.5", 3-wood at 42", and driver at 44".

Thoughts?

Kevin

Titleist 910 D3 9.5* with ahina 72 X flex
Titleist 910F 13.5* with ahina 72 X flex
Adams Idea A12 Pro hybrid 18*; 23* with RIP S flex
Titleist 712 AP2 4-9 iron with KBS C-Taper, S+ flex
Titleist Vokey SM wedges 48*, 52*, 58*
Odyssey White Hot 2-ball mallet, center shaft, 34"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I have same clubs with PX shafts and asked here about cutting them down an inch or so. Everyone scared me off cutting because of change to swing-weight (hotly debated if it matters with a butt cut vs. choking up) and because of the potential of messing up the bend profile of the shaft -- also debated a bit. So, I am just a choke up an inch or so guy. I decided the risk of messing up my expensive shafts was too great.

http://thesandtrap.com/t/41703/cutting-shaft-at-grip-end-question

Russ - Student of the Moe Norman swing as taught by the pros at - http://moenormangolf.com

Titleist 910 D3 8.5* w/ Project X shaft/ Titleist 910F 15* w/ Project X shaft

Cobra Baffler 20* & 23* hybrids with Accra hybrid shafts

Mizuno MP-53 irons 5Iron-PW AeroTech i95 shafts stiff and soft stepped once/Mizuno MP T-11 50.6/56.10/MP T10 60*

Seemore PCB putter with SuperStroke 3.0

Srixon 2012 Z-Star yellow balls/ Iomic Sticky 2.3, X-Evolution grips/Titleist Lightweight Cart Bag---

extra/alternate clubs: Mizunos JPX-800 Pro 5-GW with Project X 5.0 soft-stepped shafts


Posted

Personally, I wouldn't. It changes the dynamics of the shaft and the club. That shaft was designed for the club and vice versa. I cut down my Taylor Made Burner 09 and it was never the same. :-(

 

  Hi Bore XL 10.5*

  Launcher DST 3W 15*

  Rescue 09 Hybrid 19*

   MX-23 Irons 4-PW

   Wedges 51*,56*, 60*

   Classic II Putter

   B330-RX


Posted

I cut my Cally down 1/2" with no problem. I lost 2 swingweights but picked 1 back up with a grip change.  I still choke down 1/2" to 1" and have no loss in distance.

Callaway AI Smoke TD Max 10.5* | Cobra Big Tour 15.5* | Rad Tour 18.5* | Titleist U500 4i | T100 5-P | Vokey 50/8* F, 54/10* S,  58/10* S | Scotty Cameron Squareback 1


Posted

I cut my drivers down - I don't approach the driver for ultimate length, but controllability.      With an inch and a quarter off, I am exponentially more consistent & don't bottom out.     Worked wonders for me & I have actually gained yardage, due to consistently hitting the sweet spot.     To me, whatever distance lost (if any), is insignificant.

John

Fav LT Quote ... "you can talk to a fade, but a hook won't listen"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I also choke down as I really like my swing weight right now but will be picking up a new driver next year and will probably have it cut. I choke down about an inch on my current driver and the loss of distance is minimal but the gain in accuracy makes it all worth it. The main thing with choking down is sometimes I forget to do it so having it already cut to the length I woudl like will take that issue away.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I had my R11 re-shafted and cut down by a professional club maker, I am now much more consistent and have gained considerable distance. My advise would be to see a professional club maker and tell them what the problem is and what you are looking for and let them work their magic.

Taylormade R11 Driver

Taylormade Superfast 5W

Taylormade Superfast 2.0 #4 21* hybrid

Callaway Razr X #5 24* hybrid

Titleist CB 712 irons

Titleist Vokey 54* & 58* Wedges

Scotty Cameron California Sea Mist Del Mar

 

 

 


Posted
I'm still tryin' to figure out why folks dwell on swing weight. It's a number that means nothing really.

:tmade: R15 14* Matrix Black Tie 7m3

:adams: Speedline Super S 3w & 5w Matrix Radix HD S VI

:callaway: X-12 4-PW Memphis 10

IONNOVEX  Type S GDT 50*, 54* & 62* Mitsubishi Rayon Kuro Kage Black 80ir

:odyssey: Tri-Ball SRT

-Landon


Posted

I did it.  Cut 3/4" off the driver (down to 44.25), 1/2" off of the 3-wood (down to 42"), and 1/2" off the hybrid (down to 40").  Can really see the difference on the driver and hybrid, as I'm holding the grip in a more natural spot (with 1/4" to 1" of the grip sticking out), with the length of the club looking and feeling more comfortable/natural at address.  The 3-wood still feels a little long when I address a ball on the turf, but that's probably just a personal issue I have.

No noticeable difference in the feel or weight of any club.  Hit a few balls on the monitor in the shop, and everything felt fine.  Haven't tested on the course yet, so we'll see--but so far it doesn't seem that I have completely ruined the finely-tuned machine that is the golf shaft.

Kevin

Titleist 910 D3 9.5* with ahina 72 X flex
Titleist 910F 13.5* with ahina 72 X flex
Adams Idea A12 Pro hybrid 18*; 23* with RIP S flex
Titleist 712 AP2 4-9 iron with KBS C-Taper, S+ flex
Titleist Vokey SM wedges 48*, 52*, 58*
Odyssey White Hot 2-ball mallet, center shaft, 34"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted


Originally Posted by k-troop

I did it.  Cut 3/4" off the driver (down to 44.25), 1/2" off of the 3-wood (down to 42"), and 1/2" off the hybrid (down to 40").  Can really see the difference on the driver and hybrid, as I'm holding the grip in a more natural spot (with 1/4" to 1" of the grip sticking out), with the length of the club looking and feeling more comfortable/natural at address.  The 3-wood still feels a little long when I address a ball on the turf, but that's probably just a personal issue I have.

No noticeable difference in the feel or weight of any club.  Hit a few balls on the monitor in the shop, and everything felt fine.  Haven't tested on the course yet, so we'll see--but so far it doesn't seem that I have completely ruined the finely-tuned machine that is the golf shaft.



Glad your experiment seems to be working.

Just a couple of thoughts for others considering the same. Lets say your choking down on the club and you measure that the distance from the tip of your right thumb to the top of the hosel is 36 inches and there's 2 inches of club butt sticking out from the back of your left hand. Lets say you really like the feel of that length and what it does for your ball flight

You cut 1 inch off of the butt of the club and re-install the grip. Now if you address the ball with the tip of your right thumb positioned still 36 inches above the hosel you will see only 1 inch of butt sticking out behind your left hand. Your hands have not changed in relation to the club head. The club will have exactly the same “effective swing weight”, (what you feel) as before even though on a swing weight scale the club will measure 6 points lighter. You will have lost ~1.5 grams of overall weight, but no normal human could feel that. The flex will be exactly the same, (it will be flexing from where your hands are, not from a clamp on the “new” end of your club on a freq analyzer).

All that you'll feel will be the slightly larger section of grip that your now holding onto, it will be a larger contact area with your fingers so that could make it feel slightly different. You won't have changed any physical qualities of the club for the worse or better, you simply will have gotten rid of 1 inch of un-used club.

If you cut 1 inch off and then move your hands 1 inch closer to the club head then you have changed things for the lighter.

I am NOT a professional club builder, or club fitter. I'm a hobbyist club maker and skilled tradesman with a keen interest in all things mechanical and technical.


Posted

Butt-trimming the club by 1" will have extremely little to no affect on shaft flex. As for the swing-weight, your driver, #3 wood, and hybrid are not swing weighted in respect to any other club in your bag so this is not a consideration. What you will experience, however, is much more consistency in your ball striking and center face contact.

David Lake, President

1 Iron Golf, Inc.

  • Upvote 2

David Lake


Note: This thread is 5144 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 470 - 2026-01-13 Got some work in while some players were using the sim, so I had to stick around. 🙂 Good thing too, since… I hadn't yet practiced today until about 6:45 tonight. 😛 
    • That's not quite the same thing as what some people messaged me today.
    • Day 152 1-12 More reps bowing wrists in downswing. Still pausing at the top. Making sure to get to lead side and getting the ball to go left. Slow progress is better than no progress.  
    • Yea, if I were to make a post arguing against the heat map concept, citing some recent robot testing would be my first point. The heat map concept is what I find interesting, more on that below. The robot testing I have looked at, including the one you linked, do discreet point testing then provide that discrete data in various forms. Which as you said is old as the hills, if you know of any other heat map concept type testing, I would be interested in links to that though! No, and I did say in my first post "if this heat map data is valid and reliable" meaning I have my reservations as well. Heck beyond reservations. I have some fairly strong suspicions there are flaws. But all I have are hunches and guesses, if anyone has data to share, I would be interested to see it.  My background is I quit golfing about 9 years ago and have been toying with the idea of returning. So far that has been limited to a dozen range sessions in late Summer through Fall when the range closed. Then primarily hitting foam balls indoors using a swing speed monitor as feedback. Between the range closing and the snow flying I did buy an R10 and hit a few balls into a backyard net. The heat map concept is a graphical representation of efficiency (smash factor) loss mapped onto the face of the club. As I understand it to make the representation agnostic to swing speed or other golfer specific swing characteristics. It is more a graphical tool not a data tool. The areas are labeled numerically in discrete 1% increments while the raw data is changing at ~0.0017%/mm and these changes are represented as subtle changes in color across those discrete areas. The only data we care about in terms of the heat map is the 1.3 to 1.24 SF loss and where was the strike location on the face - 16mm heal and 5mm low. From the video the SF loss is 4.6% looking up 16mm heal and 5mm low on the heat map it is on the edge of where the map changes from 3% loss to 4%. For that data point in the video, 16mm heal, 5mm low, 71.3 mph swing speed (reference was 71.4 mph), the distance loss was 7.2% or 9 yards, 125 reference distance down to 116. However, distance loss is not part of a heat map discussion. Distance loss will be specific to the golfers swing characteristics not the club. What I was trying to convey was that I do not have enough information to determine good or bad. Are the two systems referencing strike location the same? How accurate are the two systems in measuring even if they are referencing from the same location? What variation might have been introduced by the club delivery on the shot I picked vs the reference set of shots? However, based on the data I do have and making some assumptions and guesses the results seem ok, within reason, a good place to start from and possibly refine. I do not see what is wrong with 70mph 7 iron, although that is one of my other areas of questioning. The title of the video has slow swing speed in all caps, and it seems like the videos I watch define 7i slow, medium, and fast as 70, 80, and 90. The whole question of mid iron swing speed and the implications for a players game and equipment choices is of interest to me as (according to my swing speed meter) over my ~decade break I lost 30mph swing speed on mine.
    • Maxfli, Maltby, Golfworks, all under the Dicks/Golf Galaxy umbrella... it's all a bit confounding. Looking at the pictures, they all look very, very similar in their design. I suspect they're the same club, manufactured in the same factory in China, just with different badging.  The whacky pricing structure has soured me, so I'll just cool my heels a bit. The new Mizuno's will be available to test very soon. I'm in no rush.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.