Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5088 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I think a lot of people forget, there are game improving clubs and tour clubs.  Game improving clubs are normally cast clubs while tour clubs are forged.  I see higher handicappers using forged irons (MB) shooting in the 80s where a game improving club could shave 5-10 strokes off there game.  So the big question when comparing clubs, what type of player I'm I; being honest or accepting your game skill level.   I would say somewhere around 10 handicap or above you need a game improving club, unless your short game stinks which runs up your index.  Butt.... I want to play what the Pros play is the biggest mistake most golfers make.  I do recommend for a little better players to use forged wedges including your PW.  So... my handicap is around a 2 but normally moves up during the winter a bit.  I do like the combo sets for the single handicap digit guys.  OK... back to the R11.  I tried this set out, I found they were easy to control, long, and little vibration but they are also about 2 degrees strong. (Example: I normally hit a 6 iron about 175-180 yards but the r-11s were about 190-195. straight out. fades took off about 15 yards and no noticeable difference with draws except maybe a few yards with roll out.Wow inverted cone technology works) I like the looks and feel; the KBS reg shaft worked fine even though I normally use a stiff shaft. However KBS tips are a bit stiffer.  R11 top line and face is a bit larger then the CBs but it is a game improving club for more surface area and worked well for off center hits.  I heard some pros degrading the club at testing, but they are pros, and of course they are not going to like the feel and playability of cast as compared to their prefer forged.  So bash away pros.  I recommend the r11 irons.


  • Administrator
Posted

Originally Posted by jburns2627

I see higher handicappers using forged irons (MB) shooting in the 80s where a game improving club could shave 5-10 strokes off there game.


Uhm, in a word, "no."

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted


Originally Posted by jburns2627

I think a lot of people forget, there are game improving clubs and tour clubs.  Game improving clubs are normally cast clubs while tour clubs are forged.  I see higher handicappers using forged irons (MB) shooting in the 80s where a game improving club could shave 5-10 strokes off there game.  So the big question when comparing clubs, what type of player I'm I; being honest or accepting your game skill level.   I would say somewhere around 10 handicap or above you need a game improving club, unless your short game stinks which runs up your index.  Butt.... I want to play what the Pros play is the biggest mistake most golfers make.  I do recommend for a little better players to use forged wedges including your PW.  So... my handicap is around a 2 but normally moves up during the winter a bit.  I do like the combo sets for the single handicap digit guys.  OK... back to the R11.  I tried this set out, I found they were easy to control, long, and little vibration but they are also about 2 degrees strong. (Example: I normally hit a 6 iron about 175-180 yards but the r-11s were about 190-195. straight out. fades took off about 15 yards and no noticeable difference with draws except maybe a few yards with roll out.Wow inverted cone technology works) I like the looks and feel; the KBS reg shaft worked fine even though I normally use a stiff shaft. However KBS tips are a bit stiffer.  R11 top line and face is a bit larger then the CBs but it is a game improving club for more surface area and worked well for off center hits.  I heard some pros degrading the club at testing, but they are pros, and of course they are not going to like the feel and playability of cast as compared to their prefer forged.  So bash away pros.  I recommend the r11 irons.


How many strokes would clubs made out of Starmetal shave off your game? Do you know what kind of distance increase I would get out of a shaft made of spiders silk and the hair of a bedoin tribes woman that has been grown since she was born?

My Bag: Nike Vapor X
Driver: Diablo Octane Tour Project 7.0  X-Stiff
Woods: Callaway RAZR 3 wood Adilla NVS 65 g X-Stiff
Hybrids: Taylor Made Burner Superlaunch 3-18*, 4-21*, UST Mamiya Proforce V2 75
Irons: Maltby TE Forged 5-PW TrueTemper X-300
Wedges: Maltby Tricept 52*/6, 56*/10; 60*/6 TrueTemper S-400
Putter: Yes! Emma 37" Belly Putter 
Ball: NXT Tour


Posted

Paragraphs are always nice. Were you looking to actually talk about R11 irons vs CB irons or did you just want to rant and continue spreading misinformation?


Posted

so.. what would you like to know?  Maybe I can help you, or not.  Objective opinion mostly not misinformation.  Been teaching, playing, and testing golf equipment for 30 years.


Posted

Welcome to the forum.  Come on in and pretend that you own the place, the game of golf, and all knowledge associated with it.  Just don't pretend that you own a third-grader's grasp of the English language.  I may have been born at night....

Kevin

Titleist 910 D3 9.5* with ahina 72 X flex
Titleist 910F 13.5* with ahina 72 X flex
Adams Idea A12 Pro hybrid 18*; 23* with RIP S flex
Titleist 712 AP2 4-9 iron with KBS C-Taper, S+ flex
Titleist Vokey SM wedges 48*, 52*, 58*
Odyssey White Hot 2-ball mallet, center shaft, 34"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

speaking in generalities,  most higher handicap players could easily shave strokes by getting a club fitted to their game but too many pros influence the average golfer to purchase outside their skill level.  So instead of missing greens long or short because of inconsistently hitting the ball all over the club face with forged irons; cavity backs allow for some forgiveness on those shots.  This builds confidence which co insides with better shots and lower scores.  The R11 was fantastic replacement for the CBs and a great match for mid to higher handicappers, just looking over the club  builds confidence for a great shot.  We still have TM tour clubs, but using forged blades is part of the old era and technology has moved forward.  GET  OVER IT..The modified forged, single digit handicap guys ex: titleist AP2 or CBs are great clubs but very pricey.  Explain that one to your wife.   Take the R11 for what it is mid price game improving club without this huge oversize & thick line head.


Posted

So is it your contention that the material of the iron (cast versus forged) and not the design (CB vs MC vs Blade) is the deciding factor for whether a high handicapper should play a particular iron?

Originally Posted by jburns2627

speaking in generalities,  most higher handicap players could easily shave strokes by getting a club fitted to their game but too many pros influence the average golfer to purchase outside their skill level.  So instead of missing greens long or short because of inconsistently hitting the ball all over the club face with forged irons; cavity backs allow for some forgiveness on those shots.  This builds confidence which co insides with better shots and lower scores.  The R11 was fantastic replacement for the CBs and a great match for mid to higher handicappers, just looking over the club  builds confidence for a great shot.  We still have TM tour clubs, but using forged blades is part of the old era and technology has moved forward.  GET  OVER IT..The modified forged, single digit handicap guys ex: titleist AP2 or CBs are great clubs but very pricey.  Explain that one to your wife.   Take the R11 for what it is mid price game improving club without this huge oversize & thick line head.



Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

My irons are both cavity back and forged.........but how can that be?

Also, I don't have to explain anything to my wife......I just do a lot of apologizing after the fact


Posted

If you've been teaching, playing and testing golf equipment for 30 years then why is it that you're saying a specific club will help everybody in a certain handicap bracket? Surely you understand that the shaft is the main driving point of the swing, not the head and certainly not 'any R11' (to paraphrase)

I don't think the golf swing can be generalised, whether it's based on handicap or not. I'm a high handicap golfer but that handicap is born of the fact that I spent more time working on my swing or playing with family than playing handicap-contributing rounds and my short game is appalling because I don't practice it. My swing though is generally pretty good.

I currently play cavity backs because people (like you) told me I should. "It will help you". "It will save you strokes". "You will thank me in the long run" etc.

I tried a set of Mizzy MP59's a few weeks back and instantly was hitting the ball straighter, cleaner and longer than normal. My dispersion tightened and my distances became more regular than with my CB's. I even managed to easily shape the ball with lovely soft draws and soft fades that dropped out of the sky dead straight to the target. The feeling off the face was amazing and the look at address was confidence-inspiring. Since then I've gone for a fitting with Mizuno where the two "good" options were MP53's and MP-59's with S300 shaft and I'm ready to pull the trigger on a set to replace my 8-month-old Yonex VMS irons.

Listening to other people's opinions on what I should or shouldn't play costs money. My personal recommendation to others is to go and get fit for irons, not to listen to some random on the internet telling you that a specific make and model of club will turn you into your club champion. To some cast may be the best option, to others forged. To some blades may be the best option, to others muscle or cavity backs. There is no universal one-size-fits all in this game. You should know that after 30 years.

SWING DNA
Speed [77] Tempo [5] ToeDown [5] KickAngle [6] Release [5] Mizuno JPX EZ 10.5° - Fujikura Orochi Black Eye (with Harrison ShotMaker) Mizuno JPX EZ 3W/3H - Fujikura Orochi Black Eye Mizuno JPX 850 Forged 4i-PW - True Temper XP 115 S300 Mizuno MP R-12 50.06/54.09/58.10 - Dynamic Gold Wedge Flex Mizuno MP A305 [:-P]


Posted

That sounds great, glad you found the right club for you.  In college I had a friend that loved his.  That is why we have alot of choices and brands.  Generally speaking higher handicappers do better with cavity backs but in rare cases like you, blades did work fine.  Normally the smash number is higher with cavity backs for higher handicaps but for purer swings the forge irons outdo cavity backs.  Some swings generate alot of ball spin which can hurt distance, so cavity backs seem to generate more, which gives you a better launch angle or gets the ball up.  So by not putting you on a machine couldn't tell you why.  Normally, I've seen more guys balloon golf balls with cavity backs then forged.  But in other words irons are fitted personally and I agree.  Sometimes its just a ball adjustment.  PGA tour shops gives you a large variety of clubs and fittings.    I stick to my statement higher handicappers do better with cavity backs with you being an exception.  Now The r11 cavity back is a great club but generates alot of spin this would not be a club for you.  So no need to try them. The MB would be a better fit.  sorry for your misfortune


Posted

Your opinions might be a little more credible if you stop associating forged with non-cavity backed clubs.  Forged is the process in which the club head is formed.  A forged club is hammered though dies to get it's initial form, it doesn't matter if it's a blade or a cavity back .  A cast club (poured into a mold) can also be a blade or cavity back.


Posted

The golf shaft lots to talk about but generally speaking its the kick point for your golf swing. Sure you can pure shafts use steel graphic or bimetal. This mostly depends on launch angle.  High kick point sends the ball low, mid is middle, low sends the ball high. Some shafts have more snap then others.  Tip of the shaft stiff, firm, soft.  normally the firmer the tip the less torque. So you might hear butt trim or tip trim.  Normally most clubs are but trim to fit but tips can be cut to firm them up.  The big trick in shafts is a good release with your swing speed that carries with consistancy.


Posted

This is all pretty irrellevant if you don't have the Holy Golf Spirit at your side....

http://thesandtrap.com/t/55537/swing-coach-calling-out-haney-and-leadbetter/18#post_677676

Yours in earnest, Jason.
Call me Ernest, or EJ or Ernie.

PSA - "If you find yourself in a hole, STOP DIGGING!"

My Whackin' Sticks: :cleveland: 330cc 2003 Launcher 10.5*  :tmade: RBZ HL 3w  :nickent: 3DX DC 3H, 3DX RC 4H  :callaway: X-22 5-AW  :nike:SV tour 56* SW :mizuno: MP-T11 60* LW :bridgestone: customized TD-03 putter :tmade:Penta TP3   :aimpoint:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Most CB irons are forged but there are some that are like an hybrid.  In other words the frame of the club is forged with a face insert.  or the cub is forged with a box cavity back alittle pricey but great clubs.  Cast put Ping on the map.  Cast is more forgiving not only for mishits but the sting in the hands is less.  Well the older I get the worse the sting gets. I hate mis hits.


Note: This thread is 5088 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 470 - 2026-01-13 Got some work in while some players were using the sim, so I had to stick around. 🙂 Good thing too, since… I hadn't yet practiced today until about 6:45 tonight. 😛 
    • That's not quite the same thing as what some people messaged me today.
    • Day 152 1-12 More reps bowing wrists in downswing. Still pausing at the top. Making sure to get to lead side and getting the ball to go left. Slow progress is better than no progress.  
    • Yea, if I were to make a post arguing against the heat map concept, citing some recent robot testing would be my first point. The heat map concept is what I find interesting, more on that below. The robot testing I have looked at, including the one you linked, do discreet point testing then provide that discrete data in various forms. Which as you said is old as the hills, if you know of any other heat map concept type testing, I would be interested in links to that though! No, and I did say in my first post "if this heat map data is valid and reliable" meaning I have my reservations as well. Heck beyond reservations. I have some fairly strong suspicions there are flaws. But all I have are hunches and guesses, if anyone has data to share, I would be interested to see it.  My background is I quit golfing about 9 years ago and have been toying with the idea of returning. So far that has been limited to a dozen range sessions in late Summer through Fall when the range closed. Then primarily hitting foam balls indoors using a swing speed monitor as feedback. Between the range closing and the snow flying I did buy an R10 and hit a few balls into a backyard net. The heat map concept is a graphical representation of efficiency (smash factor) loss mapped onto the face of the club. As I understand it to make the representation agnostic to swing speed or other golfer specific swing characteristics. It is more a graphical tool not a data tool. The areas are labeled numerically in discrete 1% increments while the raw data is changing at ~0.0017%/mm and these changes are represented as subtle changes in color across those discrete areas. The only data we care about in terms of the heat map is the 1.3 to 1.24 SF loss and where was the strike location on the face - 16mm heal and 5mm low. From the video the SF loss is 4.6% looking up 16mm heal and 5mm low on the heat map it is on the edge of where the map changes from 3% loss to 4%. For that data point in the video, 16mm heal, 5mm low, 71.3 mph swing speed (reference was 71.4 mph), the distance loss was 7.2% or 9 yards, 125 reference distance down to 116. However, distance loss is not part of a heat map discussion. Distance loss will be specific to the golfers swing characteristics not the club. What I was trying to convey was that I do not have enough information to determine good or bad. Are the two systems referencing strike location the same? How accurate are the two systems in measuring even if they are referencing from the same location? What variation might have been introduced by the club delivery on the shot I picked vs the reference set of shots? However, based on the data I do have and making some assumptions and guesses the results seem ok, within reason, a good place to start from and possibly refine. I do not see what is wrong with 70mph 7 iron, although that is one of my other areas of questioning. The title of the video has slow swing speed in all caps, and it seems like the videos I watch define 7i slow, medium, and fast as 70, 80, and 90. The whole question of mid iron swing speed and the implications for a players game and equipment choices is of interest to me as (according to my swing speed meter) over my ~decade break I lost 30mph swing speed on mine.
    • Maxfli, Maltby, Golfworks, all under the Dicks/Golf Galaxy umbrella... it's all a bit confounding. Looking at the pictures, they all look very, very similar in their design. I suspect they're the same club, manufactured in the same factory in China, just with different badging.  The whacky pricing structure has soured me, so I'll just cool my heels a bit. The new Mizuno's will be available to test very soon. I'm in no rush.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.