Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5165 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I read that Dick's has two different kinds of monitor.  One is a camera and one is a radar.  To help you get the idea of what I hit on.  It was in it's own room with a white screen and you would have to go back to look at the computer to see your scores etc.

Reason I am bringing this up is that my buddy and I went in to try out the new RBZ 3 wood.  He is a 6 handicap and you can see what I am.  His swings were in the 106-108 range and the monitor was saying that he was hitting his 3 wood in the 280-290 range.

I went in to it and I got anywhere from a 100mph swing to a 108 mph swing however it said I was getting from 250-275 because of the spin.  His was 2800 and mine was like 3300 or so.

I'm wondering if this thing is accurate?  I mean I usually hit my 3 wood anywhere from 230 to 245 with roll added in and I think my buddy is probably in the 250 range or so. Do we really have 108 mph swing speeds?  It just seems to me to be a little to fast.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

It is different on every machine you step on, you could be close to that, but the distance may be a little false. For example, I went into one Golf Galaxy machine, it said I hit my drives on avg. 335 yds. Longest one being 340 yds. However this isn't true, I would pay attention to ball mph. not your swing speed. I have been tested on a lot of machines, my distance for my clubs avg on the machine like 320 yds. However on the course it is more like 300- 305 yds.

Driver Taylormade r9 supertri *9.5
Hybrid Taylormade rescue burner 19 degree
Irons 2008 taylormade TP
Wedges Taylormade rac TP 52, 56, 60
Putter Scotty Cameron Newport 2.0 Studio StyleBall Bridgestone e6

Posted

It is hard to get a real number on a launch monitor if you dont hit the ball on the sweet spot or near the sweet spot on every swing. The reason for this is that the swing speeds are based on 1 MPH of swing speed = 2.5 yards of distance. So if your swing speed is 100 MPH and you hit the ball on the sweet spot or close to it you could hit the ball 250 yards and a ball speed of 143 on average. This will change when you hit the ball closer to the toe or heel. Even if your swing speed is 100 MPH the ball speed will not be 143 it could drop to 120 and now the ball will only go about 210 yards.

This is just an example the club and other things can effect the outcome.

5 Simple Keys® Associate

"Golf is not a game of great shots. It's a game of the most accurate misses.

The people who win make the smallest mistakes." - Gene Littler

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Guys I'm just wondering if the Swing Speed itself is accurate.  I take the distance with a grain of salt, but I'm wondering if it can accurately read swing speeds?

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted


Originally Posted by MattM

Guys I'm just wondering if the Swing Speed itself is accurate.  I take the distance with a grain of salt, but I'm wondering if it can accurately read swing speeds?



Hard to tell it could still be off also.  If you really want to know for sure I would look for a flightscope or trackman.

Driver: Titleist 915 D3
3 wood: 15 Callaway X Hot pro
Hybrids:  18 Callaway X Hot Pro
Irons: 4-GW Callaway Apex
project x 6.0
Wedges: 54 , 58 Callaway
Putter: 2 ball
Ball: Callaway Chrome

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

You should go hit on a doppler radar rather than using a camera based system.

Trackman's are pretty accurate with regard to club speed and ball speed in my testing.

.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I wouldn't rely on the yardage, just the swing speed, and launch angle. The machine will try to interpolate a golf ball distance from a defined equation, but there inaccurate. I had launch monitor say i hit the ball 350-370 yards before, while another one had me at 285, while another had me at 310. Yet my ball speed, 160-170 hasn't changed at all.

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Interesting, Anyone know who makes the launch monitors for Dicks? Seems like they use two different companies a radar, and a camera based.? Or maybe one company makes both?


Posted

I believe this is what they use.

Zelocity Pure Launch

Zelocity-Pure-Launch.jpg

5 Simple Keys® Associate

"Golf is not a game of great shots. It's a game of the most accurate misses.

The people who win make the smallest mistakes." - Gene Littler

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Thats exactly what they used. Any info on it? Is it any good at measuring swing speed?
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I hate that machine, because it uses doplar radar. The issue is, that the golf club can put off such a loud noise from the clubface to ball interaction that you can get NaN results. I spent a good half an hour, using that, only getting a handful of results to get some data points.

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

The radar “sees” the club and golf ball before, during, and after the moment of impact, and follows the ball as it flies down range. This allows Zelocity to collect a stream of actual data points from the Doppler radar signal. It is then processed through patented mathematical algorithms, to produce vital statistics about the shot.  It is suppose to be accurate.

I think all of them will be off some.


Posted
hmm.. Well if it is even within 5 miles an hour accurate that explanes some things for me. Its probably the reason why im way more accurate with my r11 with a stiff shaft than I was with the 09 burner with the reax stiff. I always felt like I had to take alot of speed off the 09 to hit it right.
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 5165 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Better late than never.  I got The Stack System over 2 years ago.  Problems with ruptured tendon and bone-on-bone knee stopped me from using it.  Foot was a year to full recovery.  Had the knee done in January.  This weekend was first full swings in quite a while, With spring here (at least according to the calendar) I’m finally going to do the program.  It’s 32 degrees with flurries tonight so I’m not sure exactly when I will start but should be soon.  
    • Day 29  (6 Apr 26) - Snuck  a few balls with the 6i while waiting for the local school tournament golf match to start.  Worked on tempo - starting with 1/2 swings working to full while working the ball slightly from side to side. 
    • Day 230 4-6 worked on wrist arching in downswing and hips. Going slooow today. Hit foam balls. 
    • Nor Phil. Full TV schedule including the times on Prime. 2026 Masters: How to watch, scores, tee times, TV times - PGA TOUR The first major championship of the season tees off from Augusta National Golf Club on Thursday, and this year, there are more streaming and viewing options thr  
    • Erik J. Barzeski (@iacas) • Instagram reel 1 likes, 0 comments - iacas on April 6, 2026: "The LM1 from @shot_scope is a $200 launch monitor with a great display and extreme portability. Since 98% of a ball's distance inside of about 150 yards is determined... The ShotScope LM1 is a $200 launch monitor that made waves last fall and at the PGA Show in January. Think of it like the PRGR or the Stack radar, but in a different form factor and with a better display. It's also got a rechargeable battery (no messing around with AA or AAA batteries), and a bigger, brighter, multi-color screen over the greyscale LCD on those units. I believe it still uses the same algorithms to "guess" at the distance given the club you've chosen, assuming a relatively moderate launch angle. I do not believe it measures your "VLA" (vertical launch angle). As we know from Dr. Sasho MacKenzie, ball speed for shots 150 yards and shorter accounts for about 98% of the distance the ball travels, assuming you didn't blade the bejeezus out of it, so the LM1 can, like other simple launch monitors, really help you dial in your distance wedges. I don't think ShotScope is honoring discount codes yet (you're free to try clicking the link and using the codes in the sidebar here at TST), and it's sold out for now anyway. But, you can sign up to be notified when it's back in stock. I'll update this thread as I continue to test the unit, but so far I really like: Ease of setup and use. The quality, brightness, and colors of the display. Battery life seems adequate. I'm not sure about five hours, but… it'll last well over a full session. The battery charges quickly and with a standard USB-C cable. I had some difficulties inside when players were hitting drivers into a net 13 or 14 feet away. Many swings reported 35 MPH, or 38, or 32. My hunch was that it was seeing the speed the screen moved, perhaps, as we tried a number of configurations. It was a solid screen, not a net, and later testing to an archery net that was 35 feet away yielded consistent and reasonable numbers every time.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.