Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4977 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Played the other day and had a bad round. Cold and wind had a lot to do with it,

I found  about 8 Pro V1 balls in the thick stuff. I'm begining to wonder if they don't spin too much off the driver for the average golfer.

Would the average golfer be better off with a lower spin ball... like the Callaway HEX Black or new Nike balls?


Posted

Yes!

They are preferred by better players because they are soft and receptive to shot shaping - i.e. turning the ball left or right. The average weekend golfer is going to struggle to hit any straight shots with this ball as they will accentuate the sidespin.Someone who slices the ball with his driver will be better served with a ball that is less likely to spin as much.

Titleist 910D2 10.5* Stiff / Taylormade 3 Wood - Superfast 2.0 15*  3 Superfast 2.0 Rescue 18* Stiff Shafts


Posted

The quick answer is, "yes".  All of that lovely backspin is going to turn into sidespin if you dont strike the ball solidly.  Lets not to forget to that while they may feel softer, they are actually firmer compression than a distance ball and most people dont swing hard enough to properly compress the ball.  Yet another instance of feel isnt real.

Whats in my :sunmountain: C-130 cart bag?

Woods: :mizuno: JPX 850 9.5*, :mizuno: JPX 850 15*, :mizuno: JPX-850 19*, :mizuno: JPX Fli-Hi #4, :mizuno: JPX 800 Pro 5-PW, :mizuno: MP T-4 50-06, 54-09 58-10, :cleveland: Smart Square Blade and :bridgestone: B330-S


Posted
Originally Posted by jakester

Played the other day and had a bad round. Cold and wind had a lot to do with it,

I found  about 8 Pro V1 balls in the thick stuff. I'm begining to wonder if they don't spin too much off the driver for the average golfer.

Would the average golfer be better off with a lower spin ball... like the Callaway HEX Black or new Nike balls?

With a Driver - you don't want spin.  The more spin you impart on the ball - the more the ball is likely to go off its intended target line.  In addition, the more spin you create on the shot, the less distance it is likely to travel as the ball will lift - and gravity will pull it out of the sky.

Pro V1 golf balls are lower compression than Pro V1x ( following data was taken from the Titleist FAQ site)

Pro V1.... 84 to 96 Compression

Pro V1x... 95 to 105

Meaning the Pro V1 will spin less than the Pro V1x... The Pro V1x is a tour ball - for high club speed (100+mph swing speed with a driver).

The Callaway HEX Black is a tour ball, again for high club speed (100+mph swing speed)... For a slower swing speed - or a ball with more spin, Callaway HEX Chrome is offerred.

The new Nike balls - I'm guessing your are talking about the new resin 20XI-X (100+mph swing speed) or 20XI-S (slower speed, more spin)?

So all things being equal - if you are talking about the Pro V1 - then compare it to the Callaway HEX Chrome and or the Nike 20XI-S.  Those would be a better comparison.

But all in all - every golfer is different.  Check this link out to learn more about golf ball fitting.

http://www.titleist.com/golf-ball-fitting/

.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

Beachcomber,

Your post doesn't seem to agree with the Titleist site you linked.  Suggest the OP read the fitting article at the Titleist site.  It is very informative and well written.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by Beachcomber

With a Driver - you don't want spin.  The more spin you impart on the ball - the more the ball is likely to go off its intended target line.  In addition, the more spin you create on the shot, the less distance it is likely to travel as the ball will lift - and gravity will pull it out of the sky.

Pro V1 golf balls are lower compression than Pro V1x ( following data was taken from the Titleist FAQ site)

Pro V1.... 84 to 96 Compression

Pro V1x... 95 to 105

Meaning the Pro V1 will spin less than the Pro V1x... The Pro V1x is a tour ball - for high club speed (100+mph swing speed with a driver).

The Callaway HEX Black is a tour ball, again for high club speed (100+mph swing speed)... For a slower swing speed - or a ball with more spin, Callaway HEX Chrome is offerred.

The new Nike balls - I'm guessing your are talking about the new resin 20XI-X (100+mph swing speed) or 20XI-S (slower speed, more spin)?

So all things being equal - if you are talking about the Pro V1 - then compare it to the Callaway HEX Chrome and or the Nike 20XI-S.  Those would be a better comparison.

But all in all - every golfer is different.  Check this link out to learn more about golf ball fitting.

http://www.titleist.com/golf-ball-fitting/


Ummm, actually the Pro V1x spins LESS.  Youve got this one backwards.

Whats in my :sunmountain: C-130 cart bag?

Woods: :mizuno: JPX 850 9.5*, :mizuno: JPX 850 15*, :mizuno: JPX-850 19*, :mizuno: JPX Fli-Hi #4, :mizuno: JPX 800 Pro 5-PW, :mizuno: MP T-4 50-06, 54-09 58-10, :cleveland: Smart Square Blade and :bridgestone: B330-S


Posted

I play a draw on most shots. I've been playing ProV1;s for years. I like to shape shots too in saome cases.This year I bought the Callaway Razr Fit, it comes with some HEX Black balls. I also bought a sleeve of HEX chrome and the two Nike balls 2010X-X 2010X-S I think they are...

My siwng speed is down a little from 10 years ago when it was 119 with the driver, it's now 105.So I may be able to play almost any ball.

The HEX Black and Nike 2010X-X and really long off the drive and have a decent softer feel. I've been spoiled rotten by the ProV1 feel.

I shot 75 Saturday, 4 over... I've been averaging 38-39 in tow leagues this year. I'm really impressed with these new balls, but if they costs about the same as ProV's I've got to convince myself I should be playing them, I'm impressed wit the new technology. In 10 years and with a little less swing speed

I haven't loss very much. in yardage. I do think the Prov V1's feel beeter off my irons, especially longer irons, 2-3-4.

It's hard to get my head around the thought that several layers all do different things? Really? I played TM Penta's last year too decent balls, I thought.

I haven't tried the new TP Penta offering has anyone?


Posted

IMO...most average golfers would benefit more by playing the Titleist Velocity or NXT, over the ProV1 or ProV1x.  Heck, there are single digit handicappers that would benefit more from the mid-line balls.  And the ProV1 is a tour ball.  There are dozens of guys on the PGA tour playing the ProV1.

Driver:  Callaway Diablo Octane 9.5*
3W:  Callaway GBB II 12.5*, 5W:  Callaway Diablo 18* Neutral
3H:  Callaway Razr X, 4H:  Callaway Razr X
5-PW:  Callaway X Tour
GW:  Callaway X Tour 54*, SW:  Callaway X Tour 58*
Putter:  Callaway ITrax, Scotty Cameron Studio Design 2, Ping Anser 4


Posted
Originally Posted by jakester

I play a draw on most shots. I've been playing ProV1;s for years. I like to shape shots too in saome cases.This year I bought the Callaway Razr Fit, it comes with some HEX Black balls. I also bought a sleeve of HEX chrome and the two Nike balls 2010X-X 2010X-S I think they are...

My siwng speed is down a little from 10 years ago when it was 119 with the driver, it's now 105.So I may be able to play almost any ball.

The HEX Black and Nike 2010X-X and really long off the drive and have a decent softer feel. I've been spoiled rotten by the ProV1 feel.

I shot 75 Saturday, 4 over... I've been averaging 38-39 in tow leagues this year. I'm really impressed with these new balls, but if they costs about the same as ProV's I've got to convince myself I should be playing them, I'm impressed wit the new technology. In 10 years and with a little less swing speed

I haven't loss very much. in yardage. I do think the Prov V1's feel beeter off my irons, especially longer irons, 2-3-4.

It's hard to get my head around the thought that several layers all do different things? Really? I played TM Penta's last year too decent balls, I thought.

I haven't tried the new TP Penta offering has anyone?

You can buy the proV1 practice balls.  That's what I do and they're only $30 dzn.  From my understanding, they're sanctioned for USGA tournament play (because the ID is listed on the ball itself).  So, they appear on the conforming list.  The only caveat is that they put half regular and half x balls in the box and they have the word "PRACTICE" stamped on the side of it.  When I buy mine, I go to the local store and swap out the regular ones to make a box of all Xs.  I spoke to the manager about this and he was fine with it.

:titleist: :scotty_cameron:
915D3 / 712 AP2 / SC Mont 1.5


Posted

Yep, everybody at the country club I work at uses them. So I pretty much have more Pro V's than I know what to do with and I don't really even like them b/c I always lose them


Posted

It's not the point of cost that I'm concerned about at this point. About the only time I lose one is hitting the cart path and ruining the ball, The point was the extra amount of spin...


Posted

Well the HEX Black and the Nike XI 20 are both tour balls and produce a lot of spin, and for the average weekend golfer they would all probably have too much driver spin. They might want spin on the greens, but in order for them to have that benefit, the average golfer would need to learn how to control his longer shots so he won't slice or hook. As long as they learn to hit the ball consistently, they would be fine. Still, the tour balls might not be good for average golfers with a slow swing speed and a lot of people don't realize that. I play the HEX Chrome instead of the HEX Black because I know my swing speed isn't in the tour zone (about 105mph or so)


Posted
I'd guess that the average golfer has a driver swing speed of about 90mph, tends to lose golf balls to water/woods, scores around 100, hits low slices, and leaves most approach shots short. So, I'd say the average golfer should choose something cheaper with low spin/high launch instead of a $4 ball with a penetrating ball flight that spins a lot off wedges. Of the cheaper balls, I like the ones that feel softer off the putter Srixon soft feel, Taylormade Burner LDP, and Top Flite D2 feel would be good choices.

HiBore XLS Tour 9.5*
Adams Fast10 15* 3W
A2OS 3H-7iron 60* LW
8iron Precept Tour Premium cb
9iron and 45* PW 50* GW 56* SW m565 and 455 VfoilPutter Anser Belly Putter Ball in order of preference TPblack e5 V2  AD333


Posted

uttexas....you are right on!  Today I observed EXACTLY what you describe.

I played a round with brother-in-law and two of my cousins today.  One insists on using a Pro V1x because it's the "best" ball.  He has a horrible slice and his driving distance is average.  He was busting my chops for using a Top Flite ball (Gamer V2).  When I suggested he try one of mine, he basically laughed his a$$ off and indicated that he wouldn't be caught with a Top Flite in his bag.

He missed almost every fairway on his way to a 112.  Ironically, I shot one of my better rounds with a 93 that included 12 of 14 on the fairway or a good miss (first cut of rough with clean second shot).  My score included some lousy putting and the two missed fairways were hooks resulting in lost balls on holes that I could otherwise have parred or bogied.

I firmly believe that matching equipment to the golfer is critical and that golfing dogma like tour balls can help everyone and that stiff shafts are better than regular shafts are hurting people's games.  I'm well on my way to my goal of breaking 90 consistently and the Top Flite Gamer V2 (and similar balls) is an important part of it....along with more lessons.

Driver:  Callaway Diablo Octane iMix 11.5*
Fairway: Cobra Baffler Rail F 3W & 7W
Irons:  Wilson Ci
Wedges:  Acer XB (52* & 56*)
Putter:  Cleveland Classic #10 with Winn Jumbo Pistol Grip


Posted
Originally Posted by Beachcomber

With a Driver - you don't want spin.  The more spin you impart on the ball - the more the ball is likely to go off its intended target line.  In addition, the more spin you create on the shot, the less distance it is likely to travel as the ball will lift - and gravity will pull it out of the sky.

False.  Spin will keep the ball airborne longer, backspin to be exact, and carry more.  Top/back spin will help keep the ball on it's intended target line as opposed to side spin.   What you don't want to impart on the ball is side spin.  You can still slice the hell out of a low spin distance ball by putting side spin on it.


Posted
Originally Posted by TitleistWI

The quick answer is, "yes".  All of that lovely backspin is going to turn into sidespin if you dont strike the ball solidly.

One of the tour pros proclaims this on weekend tournament TV ads.

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4977 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.