Jump to content
IGNORED

Lifting the Flagstick


pgawest
Note: This thread is 4304 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Originally Posted by Fourputt

All that said, if I'm playing in a competition, I'm not playing my stroke until you move away from the hole.  If you don't do it on your own, I will ask you to do so.  If I'm standing near the hole and am instructed to leave the flagstick in, I will immediately move away from it, both to satisfy the rule and as a point of etiquette.

I agree with this paragraph 100%.

Kevin

Link to comment
Share on other sites


In my opinion, there wouldn't be a penalty to the player hitting the ball, nor the person attending the flagstick.  It's already explained and clear the person hitting the ball wouldn't incur a penalty.  And rule 17-2 says" if someone attends the flagstick without the players authority or prior knowledge".  In this case, the player had prior knowledge.  She saw her partner standing close to the flagstick, within an arms length.  Anyone standing within an arms length of the flagstick is said to be attending it, no matter anything else.  The person would have only incurred the penalty if they had walked away more than an arms length of the flagstick, and then hurried back to it and pulled it while or after the stroke was being played and the ball was still moving and might be influenced by it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by Rudyprimo

In my opinion, there wouldn't be a penalty to the player hitting the ball, nor the person attending the flagstick.  It's already explained and clear the person hitting the ball wouldn't incur a penalty.  And rule 17-2 says" if someone attends the flagstick without the players authority or prior knowledge".  In this case, the player had prior knowledge.  She saw her partner standing close to the flagstick, within an arms length.  Anyone standing within an arms length of the flagstick is said to be attending it, no matter anything else.  The person would have only incurred the penalty if they had walked away more than an arms length of the flagstick, and then hurried back to it and pulled it while or after the stroke was being played and the ball was still moving and might be influenced by it.

So do you mean that I have to go and physically remove the person standing next to the flag if they do not obey my exact orders of "not lifting the flag" and at the same time move away from the flag?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by Rudyprimo

In my opinion, there wouldn't be a penalty to the player hitting the ball, nor the person attending the flagstick.  It's already explained and clear the person hitting the ball wouldn't incur a penalty.  And rule 17-2 says" if someone attends the flagstick without the players authority or prior knowledge".  In this case, the player had prior knowledge.  She saw her partner standing close to the flagstick, within an arms length.  Anyone standing within an arms length of the flagstick is said to be attending it, no matter anything else.  The person would have only incurred the penalty if they had walked away more than an arms length of the flagstick, and then hurried back to it and pulled it while or after the stroke was being played and the ball was still moving and might be influenced by it.

You have ignored the key words in 17-2 which affect this case.

'If ...., without the player's authority ..... removes .... the flagstick ....'

This flagstick was removed without the player's authority. 17-2 applies, not 17-1.

Attending is not the issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by Rulesman

You have ignored the key words in 17-2 which affect this case.

'If ...., without the player's authority ..... removes .... the flagstick ....'

This flagstick was removed without the player's authority. 17-2 applies, not 17-1.

Attending is not the issue.

Good call.  I was right in my assumption that once permission to remove it was denied, he could no longer be deemed to be attending the flagstick, regardless of where he was standing.  He did not have the player's authority, tacit or otherwise.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by Dormie1360

On another note, if you tell someone to not attend the flag and they still stand by it, you're saying Note 1 still applies?  Never really thought about that.  If that's the case I agree it would be the player's responsibility to make sure the other player moved away from the flag.

Originally Posted by Rulesman

You have ignored the key words in 17-2 which affect this case.

'If ...., without the player's authority ..... removes .... the flagstick ....'

This flagstick was removed without the player's authority. 17-2 applies, not 17-1.

Attending is not the issue.

Looked into this further.  Rulesman is correct.  The player did not have authority, standing close to the flag does not change that.

Regards,

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4304 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • More actual thoughts on the articles: Oh boy. I taught 5SK, and before that, I was S&T certified. Those experiences, for many good instructors, are additive. They're not "all" that they are. If I were to go through Scott Cowx's certification, or Dr. Kwon's, or James Ridyard's, or whomever's… I wouldn't be a "method" teacher any more than I am now. I'd be adding tools to the toolbox. He says there are "system" teachers, "non-system" teachers, and method teachers. Which one am I? A "non-system teacher"? So, I don't have any systems or structure? Or am I a "system" teacher with a bunch of branches and if/then/else statements? I don't know. The physics thing as it relates to S&T… yeah, that's already been discussed. Huh? Brendan, sorry, that part is bogus AF. Of course the arms go "around" somewhat. It's back, up, and in. Down, out, and forward. Plus, again, "energy can either be created or destroyed" isn't even right, as many of you have said. It's "neither" and it can be transformed, too. Plus, as others noted, that's typically a closed system: in our bodies we transform sugars and other things to create movement, energy. I'm going to move off this before I get totally annoyed… "These are the pontifications of a method" — no, the specific example he cited is the way everyone who has ever played good golf moves their hands - back, up, and in. The clubhead moves that way, too. I've seen this happen. This part might be the most accurate part of the article (it's no longer clear whether he's talking about this fellow or just talking in general here.) "Now here’s the sinister thing: The overwhelming information is by design." — If the instructor is as incompetent as he says, he's likely not doing any of this "by design." He doesn't sound bright enough to do so. WTF does that have to do with anything? Probably happens to some extent sometimes, but is that the instructor's fault? Or the student for not recognizing it? Also, again, this instructor doesn't seem to be bright (not that this article even really talks about the instructor anymore), so… I doubt he's doing all of this intentionally. People are found out eventually. I'm at a point where I get a lot of referrals from people who have noticed their friends playing better golf, and ask. Or people want to brag about their improvements, and that sells their friends. "As a result, these players couldn’t play golf." — Huh? I think he just observed when he was there. Not that he went out of his way to watch. 😄 
    • I am dying..🤣 Can one of yall come and pick me up from the floor? 
    • If you can’t, attack it. That’s the new age ideology. 
    • Is it possible that he writer is full of shit himself? "After months of listening and watching...". Yeah right, cuz that's so normal for writers do that just to get a single article out of the massive endeavor. I mean unless you are angling for a Rant-Pulitzer (Yup, it is a thing.. like, totally). 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...