Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4665 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Originally Posted by ApocG10

Oh, and I should have added this earlier, but its too late to edit now.

If you are playing off of an 11hc, what the hell are you doing with blades, let alone undersized blades. Get some cavity backs and watch your iron game progress.

i have blades with a 10 hc.. putting kills me, what makes u think u can tell someone to not get blades just cause their handicap?? for all u know he's a way better ball striker than u. too easy to judge people behind a computer apoc. he wants blades, let him spend his money how he wants


  • Administrator
Posted
Originally Posted by Mr. Desmond

Miura doesn't make a secret of its steel.

The art is in the design of the club and is a melding of math, knowledge, experience, imagination, and science.

Forging is a process.

Huh?

You heat metal to soften it and you smash it with some progressively more precise molds. There's really not that much to it.

Someone could build a cast club in the same exact shape, weight, with the same metal as a Miura forged iron and it would be indistinguishable from a Miura iron.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by iacas

Huh?

You heat metal to soften it and you smash it with some progressively more precise molds. There's really not that much to it.

Someone could build a cast club in the same exact shape, weight, with the same metal as a Miura forged iron and it would be indistinguishable from a Miura iron.

HUH?

I said forging was a process - nothing special in that, as the poster stated. But he said Miura was not art.

I disagree.

Miura is more than a forging process, as is ANY other golf club.

There is an art to designing a golf club other than the manufacturing process, which is my point.

Perspective....

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
Originally Posted by Mr. Desmond

HUH?

I said forging was a process - nothing special in that, as the poster stated. But he said Miura was not art.

I disagree.

Miura is more than a forging process, as is ANY other golf club.

There is an art to designing a golf club other than the manufacturing process, which is my point.

Perspective....

I think you believe there's an art to it.

Miura isn't art - it's a mass produced (albeit smaller masses than others) club.

I've played 'em. Owned a few sets. They're just irons. I see them more as tools than anything else. What's artistic about them? The design? They look like virtually every other player's iron out there.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by iacas

I think you believe there's an art to it.

Miura isn't art - it's a mass produced (albeit smaller masses than others) club.

I've played 'em. Owned a few sets. They're just irons. I see them more as tools than anything else. What's artistic about them? The design? They look like virtually every other player's iron out there.

I think all golf clubs have elements of artistic value in them.

Why do people have a hard-on for Miura or want to downplay them?

I don't know.

Miura is a golf club.

Their designs are neither high tech or special - they are functional and pleasing to my eye, and that's what counts to me as an owner.

To a clubmaker, they are special because they are made to spec with tight tolerances.

My opinion is - there is an element of art to any golf club, to some degree - putting it all together where a club is appealing to the golfer in terms of function and still pleasing to the eye is an art.

Miura designs are simple yet pleasing to me, as are other irons, and I've owned many sets of irons (I'm sorry to say). Others look similar. Miura is forged steel with hand finishing - no tungsten, titaniums, rods, and rubber anywhere. Others have that simplicity in some of their designs, too.

It's a golf club. I enjoy it for what it is - no more, no less.

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by GaijinGolfer

Nice press release.  Did you quote that from the Miura brochure?

Why do people insist on being a-holes when it comes to MIura?

I stated the Q&A; came from the Miura site.


And this discussion is not about Endo - I've owned Epon and TourStage - and am familiar with the product.

You can believe the tourspec stuff - I don't - they have an agenda.

See the video of the Miura tour - email Adam Barr if you like, I don't care. But don't drivel around here without facts. Give us something from Miura that says they don't do their own forgings. Until then, STFU.

Thank you.

:-)

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
Originally Posted by Mr. Desmond

My opinion is - there is an element of art to any golf club, to some degree - putting it all together where a club is appealing to the golfer in terms of function and still pleasing to the eye is an art.

Miura designs are simple yet pleasing to me, as are other irons, and I've owned many sets of irons (I'm sorry to say). Others look similar. Miura is forged steel with hand finishing - no tungsten, titaniums, rods, and rubber anywhere. Others have that simplicity in some of their designs, too.

I'll admit to playing devil's advocate a little bit. I'm a fan of "austerity" and the Miura blades do look nice. I think (in my opinion) calling it "artistry" is going a bit too far. But there's something to be said for pleasing esthetics. :)

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by Mr. Desmond

Quote:

Originally Posted by iacas

I think you believe there's an art to it.

Miura isn't art - it's a mass produced (albeit smaller masses than others) club.

I've played 'em. Owned a few sets. They're just irons. I see them more as tools than anything else. What's artistic about them? The design? They look like virtually every other player's iron out there.

Miura is a golf club.

Their designs are neither high tech or special - they are functional and pleasing to my eye, and that's what counts to me as an owner.

They remind me of Titleists, Clevelands, Scratch, MacGregor MTs and several other irons I really really like. I love blades. Miura rocks and like most things worth liking there will be haters and fanatics.

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted
Originally Posted by iacas

I'll admit to playing devil's advocate a little bit. I'm a fan of "austerity" and the Miura blades do look nice. I think (in my opinion) calling it "artistry" is going a bit too far. But there's something to be said for pleasing esthetics. :)

Yes, I appreciate minimalist, too.

:-)

Minimalism -

I don't like to use wikipedia, but here goes - funny in a way. " The term minimalism is also used to describe a trend in design and architecture where in the subject is reduced to its necessary elements. Minimalist design has been highly influenced by Japanese traditional design and architecture."

Do you think it coincidental that a Japanese Domestic line of Miura is called "Miuraism."

Truth is stranger than fiction.

:-)

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by Mr. Desmond

Miura doesn't make a secret of its steel.

The art is in the design of the club and is a melding of math, knowledge, experience, imagination, and science.

Forging is a process.

Forging is a simple process. Its not an art. Its hammering steel down to a shape that can then be finished. And it is pretty damn easy, at that. build a mould, put it in the press, and let it hammer **** the steel until it is in the desired shape. I have been around forged materials, as well as presses, dies, and metals to know exactly what im talking about. Forging is forging, and your foolish if you think that a forging from Miura is different than a forging from Mizuno or anyone else. Its pretty goddamn simple, and given the same steel, the exact same forging can be made by anyone with the equipment to do so. The only thing Miura has over other people, is that fools believe that one forging is somehow different from another, when they all use the exact same principle. Cult personalies. Thats what fans of Miura fit into. If you believe otherwise, then i've got some beachfront land in Siberia to sell you, because you are truly gullible.

Hand finishing is the only thing that sets Miura apart. But guess what? Anybody can hand finish an iron. Its really quite easy.

Again, anything Miura can forge, my father could match. That is not because my father is some forging genius, its because forging is so simple that anybody with the tools and knowledge can create a forging to match Miura.

In the Ogio Kingpin bag:

Titleist 913 D2 9.5* w/ UST Mamiya ATTAS 3 80 w/ Harrison Shotmaker & Billy Bobs afternarket Hosel Adaptor (get this if you don't have it for your 913)
Wilson Staff Ci-11 4-GW (4I is out of the bag for a hybrid, PW and up were replaced by Edel Wedges)
TaylorMade RBZ 5 & 3 Fairway Woods

Cobra Baffler T-Rail 3 & 4 Hybrids

Edel Forged 48, 52, 56, 60, and 64* wedges (different wedges for different courses)

Seemore Si-4 Black Nickel Putter


Posted
Originally Posted by ApocG10

Forging is a simple process. Its not an art. Its hammering steel down to a shape that can then be finished. And it is pretty damn easy, at that. build a mould, put it in the press, and let it hammer **** the steel until it is in the desired shape. I have been around forged materials, as well as presses, dies, and metals to know exactly what im talking about. Forging is forging, and your foolish if you think that a forging from Miura is different than a forging from Mizuno or anyone else. Its pretty goddamn simple, and given the same steel, the exact same forging can be made by anyone with the equipment to do so. The only thing Miura has over other people, is that fools believe that one forging is somehow different from another, when they all use the exact same principle. Cult personalies. Thats what fans of Miura fit into. If you believe otherwise, then i've got some beachfront land in Siberia to sell you, because you are truly gullible.

Hand finishing is the only thing that sets Miura apart. But guess what? Anybody can hand finish an iron. Its really quite easy.

Again, anything Miura can forge, my father could match. That is not because my father is some forging genius, its because forging is so simple that anybody with the tools and knowledge can create a forging to match Miura.

You may know metallurgy, but need to work on reading comprehension.

You have a bone to pick, apparently, and seem to get worked up about this.

I suggest counseling.

Or you can rant on...

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I just got back from a PGA course and I used the entire set of the 1957 baby Miura Blades with PXi 6.0 .

Played from the black tees total about 7500+ yds.  Shot 8 over . I think I could have done a little better since I missed my 4 and 5 iron shots 3 times.

ALbeit the small head, they are definitely more solid than my MP68, but less soft.

Going back to the course tomorrow and use my Wilson FG Tour V2 and see how I score.

I do like that solid / stout feel without having to get a stiffer shaft, so most likely I'll sell my brand new MP68 to help cover the cost.


Posted
Originally Posted by Sai-Jin

I just got back from a PGA course and I used the entire set of the 1957 baby Miura Blades with PXi 6.0 .

Played from the black tees total about 7500+ yds.  Shot 8 over . I think I could have done a little better since I missed my 4 and 5 iron shots 3 times.

ALbeit the small head, they are definitely more solid than my MP68, but less soft.

Going back to the course tomorrow and use my Wilson FG Tour V2 and see how I score.

I do like that solid / stout feel without having to get a stiffer shaft, so most likely I'll sell my brand new MP68 to help cover the cost.

Some people wince when I say this, but certain Miura head-shaft combos seem to generate a more dense, solid, precise, surgical "feel" when compared to Mizuno, which will "feel" softer.

Feel is subjective and different to everyone...

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by Mr. Desmond

You may know metallurgy, but need to work on reading comprehension.

You have a bone to pick, apparently, and seem to get worked up about this.

I suggest counseling.

Or you can rant on...


no bone to pick, and not worked up. Just sick of people pretending that Miura makes some magical irons that are somehow better than Mizuno or any other forged club. Forged is forged. The only difference is the finishing technique, which is done by hand. No way Mizuno or Titleist or any large club maker could finish clubs by hand, because they make far too many. Miura's irons are expensive because of the low quantity made, and the hand finishing. But they dont feel or work any better than any other forged club.

In the Ogio Kingpin bag:

Titleist 913 D2 9.5* w/ UST Mamiya ATTAS 3 80 w/ Harrison Shotmaker & Billy Bobs afternarket Hosel Adaptor (get this if you don't have it for your 913)
Wilson Staff Ci-11 4-GW (4I is out of the bag for a hybrid, PW and up were replaced by Edel Wedges)
TaylorMade RBZ 5 & 3 Fairway Woods

Cobra Baffler T-Rail 3 & 4 Hybrids

Edel Forged 48, 52, 56, 60, and 64* wedges (different wedges for different courses)

Seemore Si-4 Black Nickel Putter


Posted

I think you've been drinking too much of the Miura Kool-Aid.  I'm glad you're happy with your clubs but let's not get carried away.

Originally Posted by Mr. Desmond

HUH?

I said forging was a process - nothing special in that, as the poster stated. But he said Miura was not art.

I disagree.

Miura is more than a forging process, as is ANY other golf club.

There is an art to designing a golf club other than the manufacturing process, which is my point.

Perspective....

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by ApocG10

no bone to pick, and not worked up. Just sick of people pretending that Miura makes some magical irons that are somehow better than Mizuno or any other forged club. Forged is forged. The only difference is the finishing technique, which is done by hand. No way Mizuno or Titleist or any large club maker could finish clubs by hand, because they make far too many. Miura's irons are expensive because of the low quantity made, and the hand finishing. But they dont feel or work any better than any other forged club.


For someone who is supposedly such a expert, you clearly dont understand the finer details of forging.  Forged isnt forged because you can tailor the feel of the iron based upon the blend of metals that you use and the temperature that you forge the metals at.

Forging is a fairly simple process but it does take skill and knowhow to get it right.  I suggest you drop the ego, open your mind and do some more reading on forging because you still have something to learn on the subject.

About Miuras, theyre great irons and you cant deny the quality and attention to detail with them.

Whats in my :sunmountain: C-130 cart bag?

Woods: :mizuno: JPX 850 9.5*, :mizuno: JPX 850 15*, :mizuno: JPX-850 19*, :mizuno: JPX Fli-Hi #4, :mizuno: JPX 800 Pro 5-PW, :mizuno: MP T-4 50-06, 54-09 58-10, :cleveland: Smart Square Blade and :bridgestone: B330-S


Posted

Miura draws upon the Japanese cultural traditions of metallurgy, craftsmanship, artistry, etc.  It's no coincidence that this approach has been successful for them in the Japanese market and beyond.  This multidisciplinary approach has always been a fundamental component of Japanese culture and the Miura company functions under this philosophy.  I've always admired this mindset.  The Samurai prized the ability to arrange flowers and write poetry as much as skill with arms or military tactics.  At the core of this belief is the assumption that better design is to be found through such a multidisciplinary approach.

Nike Vapor Speed driver 12* stock regular shaft
Nike Machspeed 4W 17*, 7W 21* stock stiff shafts
Ping i10 irons 4-9, PW, UW, SW, LW AWT stiff flex
Titleist SC Kombi 35"; Srixon Z Star XV tour yellow

Clicgear 3.0; Sun Mountain Four 5


Posted
Originally Posted by newtogolf

I think you've been drinking too much of the Miura Kool-Aid.  I'm glad you're happy with your clubs but let's not get carried away.

No, I think you're carried away and did not read my posts.

It's a golf club, nothing more, nothing less is what I said.

I have perspective because I've looked back and learned from mistakes. Like others here, I've owned many different brands of golf clubs and was happy with them. I could choose another set and be happy with them.

I have no attachments to golf clubs, but I do have opinions about them.

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4665 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Never practiced golf when I was young and the only lesson ever taken was a driver lesson. I feel like I'm improving every year. However, the numbers don't support my feeling about improving. I usually drop to 12-13 during the summer while playing the familiar courses around home and then go on golf trips in the fall to new courses and increase to end the year between 15-17. Been a similar story for a number of years now but hey, it's the best thing there is in life so not too bothered but reaching 9.9 is the objective every year. Maybe a few lessons and practice could help me achieve it since I pretty much have no idea what I'm doing, just playing and never practice.
    • I am semi-loyal. Usually buy four dozen of one ball and only play that until out and then determine whether to continue or try another one. Since starting my semi-loyal path to success, I've been playing the below, not in order: ProV1 ProV1x ProV1x left dash AVX Bridgestone BXS Srixon Z-star XV I am not sure if it has helped anything, but it gives a bit of confidence knowing that it at least is not the ball (while using the same one) that gives different results so one thing less to mind about I guess. On the level that I am, not sure whether it makes much difference but will continue since I have to play something so might as well go with the same ball for a number of rounds. Edit: favorite is probably the BXS followed by ProV1/Srixon Z-star XV. Haven't got any numbers to back it up but just by feel.  
    • Will not do it by myself, going to the pro shop I usually use after Cristmas for input and actually doing the changes, if any, but wanted to get some thoughts on whether this was worthwhile out of curiosity. 
    • In terms of ball striking, not really. Ball striking being how good you are at hitting the center of the clubface with the swing path you want and the loft you want to present at impact.  In terms of getting better launch conditions for the current swing you have, it is debatable.  It depends on how you swing and what your current launch conditions are at. These are fine tuning mechanisms not significant changes. They might not even be the correct fine tuning you need. I would go spend the $100 to $150 dollars in getting a club fitting over potentially wasting money on changes that ChatGPT gave you.  New grips are important. Yes, it can affect swing weight, but it is personal preference. Swing weight is just one component.  Overall weight effects the feel. The type of golf shaft effects the feel of the club in the swing. Swing weight effects the feel. You can add so much extra weight to get the swing weight correct and it will feel completely different because the total weight went up. Imagine swinging a 5lb stick versus a 15lb stick. They could be balanced the same (swing weight), but one will take substantially more effort to move.  I would almost say swing weight is an old school way of fitting clubs. Now, with launch monitors, you could just fit the golfer. You could have two golfers with the same swing speed that want completely different swing weight. It is just personal preference. You can only tell that by swinging a golf club.     
    • Thanks for the comments. I fully understand that these changes won't make any big difference compared to getting a flawless swing but looking to give myself the best chance of success at where I am and hopefully lessons will improve the swing along the way. Can these changes make minor improvements to ball striking and misses then that's fine. From what I understood about changing the grips, which is to avoid them slipping in warm and humid conditions, is that it will affect the swing weight since midsize are heavier than regular and so therefore adding weight to the club head would be required to avoid a change of feel in the club compared to before? 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.