Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3337 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

If the sand is like wet concrete from rain then high bounce can be a problem.  Zero bounce like on my 1963 Hogans IPT would be great because I could lay the club open and slide so wonderfully along right under the ball. High bounce may not get under and produce a bit of a flier effect especially if the club is not opened. The zero bounce in soft fluffy sand would be like a butter knife in butter - not good.


Posted

we don't get a lot of rain in our area.  sand is usually fluffy.  I bought a Cleveland 60 degree with high bounce. did I make a good choice?


  • Administrator
Posted
Originally Posted by cajuntexan00

we don't get a lot of rain in our area.  sand is usually fluffy.  I bought a Cleveland 60 degree with high bounce. did I make a good choice?

I love having a lot of "glide" (I'm renaming bounce to "glide") on wedges.

http://thesandtrap.com/t/57874/my-edel-wedges-or-super-bounce-and-why-its-good-for-you-or-the-sweet-spot-is-finally-in-the-right-place/

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by cajuntexan00

we don't get a lot of rain in our area.  sand is usually fluffy.  I bought a Cleveland 60 degree with high bounce. did I make a good choice?

Most likely a good choice but be aware that a poor swing on hard fairway and the bounce may cause a "flier"  so keep the hands ahead of the club head and don't flip the head under the ball like trying to scoop it up.  I love Cleveland wedges.


  • Administrator
Posted
Originally Posted by Jon Robert

Most likely a good choice but be aware that a poor swing on hard fairway and the bounce may cause a "flier"  so keep the hands ahead of the club head and don't flip the head under the ball like trying to scoop it up.

A wedge's bounce cannot cause a "flier." A "flier" is when grass gets between the clubface and the ball out of light rough and the ball is shot upwards more with less spin and an unpredictable (but longer) distance.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by iacas

A wedge's bounce cannot cause a "flier." A "flier" is when grass gets between the clubface and the ball out of light rough and the ball is shot upwards more with less spin and an unpredictable (but longer) distance.

Good point,  technically quite correct but  a poster can likely visualize a "flier" better than a "thin"  And I GUARANTEE that if you hit a 60 degree wedge thin due to bounce on hard fairway the ball will be flying to far and distant lands that you never intended to visit.  Result is the same. thin or flier.   "less spin and an unpredictable (but longer) distance."


  • Administrator
Posted
Originally Posted by Jon Robert

Good point,  technically quite correct but  a poster can likely visualize a "flier" better than a "thin"  And I GUARANTEE that if you hit a 60 degree wedge thin due to bounce on hard fairway the ball will be flying to far and distant lands that you never intended to visit.  Result is the same. thin or flier.   "less spin and an unpredictable (but longer) distance."

Thin shots can actually have more spin.

You goofed up and now you're trying to cover it up by saying someone can "visualize" a flier better than "thin"? Thin and fat are common terms. I greatly prefer everyone on the site simply use the terms properly .

And I disagree that a lot of bounce is going to lead to hitting the ball thin. The opposite is more often true because of how it'll change the person's technique. With more bounce, a player doesn't need to try to force a really shallow divot - it happens for them. So they can swing aggressively and take nice shallow divots out of the sand. With too little bounce players will have to hit too close to the ball.

Almost nobody thins the ball by taking a divot behind it and having the club come up and out of the sand. Most thins from greenside bunkers take place because the guy doesn't get into the sand early enough (or never touches the sand at all - i.e. same way they don't take divots from the fairway).

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I have 10* of bounce on my 60* wedge (which most people would consider on the higher side, I believe).  With the higher bounce, I feel like I can hit down on the ball a little bit out of the sand (similar to a regular iron shot) without it taking a huge divot.  I will say that if the sand is hard (or if I'm using it to hit off a tight lie on a well-manicured fairway), I have had a bad swing which hit behind the ball slightly, and I can feel the club bounce off the ground and cause me to hit the ball thin.  I don't have enough knowledge/experience to say whether this is exaggerated by the higher bounce of my lob, or if it is just something that happens with wedges.  My understanding is that a wedge with less bounce in that situation would dig into the ground and cause a big divot before the ball (a fat shot).

Either way, I have been using my 60.10 as my go-to club for greenside bunkers and it has been working pretty well.  I usually get a nice gentle plop out that gets a little bit of roll towards the hole.  Mishits are almost always thinned shots, but, as long as there isn't a huge wall to jump over, I tend to favor a thin over a fat bunker shot (because at least you get out).  Granted, you don't want to sail one over the green into the trees/water.

Driver:  :adams: super S

Fairway Woods: :tmade: RBZ 15* 3 wood

Hybrids:  :tmade: Burner 2.0 18* 3H, :adams: A7OS 22* 4H, :adams: A7OS 25* 5H

Irons: :adams: A7OS 6-PW

Wedges:  :cleve: 588 RTX 50* GW, :cleve: 588 BeCu 56* SW

Putter:  :odyssey: White Hot XG #7 2.0


Posted

Thin and or wet sand: low bounce

Thick and or fluffy sand: high bounce

Just think about it for a while and you will figure it out. Bounce is confusing to some because they don't stop to figure out what is happening.

R11s driver

R11 3 wood

Glide sole design 5 wood

Cleveland CG16 irons

Vokey SM4 48*, Vokey SM4 52*, Vokey SM4 56* wedges

Yes! Eleanor putter


  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Ideal bounce? I'd say depends on you/your swing to some extent. Generally, more bounce out of deep/fluffy sand but try some different bounce angles out. I have a 56° SW w/ 10° bounce which seems to work well for me and I trust implicitly to get the job done well. I've always tended to slide under the ball rather than dig, both out of sand and off turf. I also tend to lay my SW open to varying degrees as well, depending on the shot, so most times I probably have >10° bounce.

Home Course: Wollaton Park GC, Nottingham, U.K.

Ping G400, 9°, Alta CB 55S | Ping G400, 14°, Alta CB 65S | Adams Pro Dhy 18°, 21°, 24°, KBS Hybrid S | Ping S55 5-PW, TT DGS300 | Vokey 252-08, DGS200 | Vokey 256-10 (bent to 58°), DGS200 | Ping Sigma G Anser, 34" | Vice Pro Plus

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I carry two "sand wedges".

1) 54 degree Cleveland with very low bounce. Great in wet/thin sand and from a fairway.

2) 56 degree Odyssey with 10* bounce. Great in fluffy grass and fluffy sand.

If you carry two utility wedges, I'd consider one with low bounce and one with medium to high bounce.

R11s driver

R11 3 wood

Glide sole design 5 wood

Cleveland CG16 irons

Vokey SM4 48*, Vokey SM4 52*, Vokey SM4 56* wedges

Yes! Eleanor putter


Posted

You should be fine with your selection given the conditions that you describe. If you do encounter some hard packed sand, just don't crank it wide open exposing max bounce. By squaring it up a bit you can reduce the exposure and cheat a little with a shot that will come out lower.

Callaway AI Smoke TD Max 10.5* | Cobra Big Tour 15.5* | Rad Tour 18.5* | Titleist U500 4i | T100 5-P | Vokey 50/8* F, 54/10* S,  58/10* S | Scotty Cameron Squareback 1


Posted

I guess I'll be the lone dissenting voice.  IMHO the "best" wedge depends a lot on you.  I like a low bounce 54 or 55 degree sand wedge.  Why? I don't like a lot of bounce on most pitches from tight lies.  Too easy for me to skull one.  Low bounce in line with the rest of my irons works best for me.  Then in the sand or a different lie I can create 'bounce' by opening my stance and the clubface.  I can't really take bounce off a wedge, but I can add "bounce".  That said, learning to play a fanned clubface with an open stance takes a lot of practice to nail your aim and various swing lengths for varying distances.  If you don't have the time or inclination to practice, maybe two wedges is better.


Posted

I use a 60* with 10* of bounce and a 56* with only 5. That way I'm covered for both types of sand and rough, but I use the 60* more around the green due to it's versatility and the fact that I never try to hit a flop off a tight lie, so the bounce is fine. (Been burned too many times trying it)

 

 

My bag:

Driver: G10 10.5* w/ Pro Launch Red Reg 

3 Wood: G10 w/ Pro Launch Red Reg 

18* and 21* hybrids: G10 with Pro Launch Red Stiff 

4-PW: Ping Eye 2 Irons w/ Reg GS 95 

56* and 60*: Tour-S Rustique Wedges w/ Stiff KBS Tour 

Putter: Scotty Cameron Pro Platinum Newport 

 

 

 


Posted

the whole thing of "hard packed/wet sand = low bounce" is not very accurate.  I can take a 10* bounce wedge into soaking wet sand and hit great bunker shots with no problem with the clubface wide open....I actually like MORE bounce in wet sand because you don't have to worry about digging in and the club head getting stuck due to the heavy sand.

My philosophy on golf "We're not doing rocket science, here."


  • 4 years later...
Posted

So if I were to get one "all purpose" wedge for hitting out of green side bunkers, what degree and bounce  (and even manufacturer) would anyone recommend.  Thanks.


Note: This thread is 3337 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 470 - 2026-01-13 Got some work in while some players were using the sim, so I had to stick around. 🙂 Good thing too, since… I hadn't yet practiced today until about 6:45 tonight. 😛 
    • That's not quite the same thing as what some people messaged me today.
    • Day 152 1-12 More reps bowing wrists in downswing. Still pausing at the top. Making sure to get to lead side and getting the ball to go left. Slow progress is better than no progress.  
    • Yea, if I were to make a post arguing against the heat map concept, citing some recent robot testing would be my first point. The heat map concept is what I find interesting, more on that below. The robot testing I have looked at, including the one you linked, do discreet point testing then provide that discrete data in various forms. Which as you said is old as the hills, if you know of any other heat map concept type testing, I would be interested in links to that though! No, and I did say in my first post "if this heat map data is valid and reliable" meaning I have my reservations as well. Heck beyond reservations. I have some fairly strong suspicions there are flaws. But all I have are hunches and guesses, if anyone has data to share, I would be interested to see it.  My background is I quit golfing about 9 years ago and have been toying with the idea of returning. So far that has been limited to a dozen range sessions in late Summer through Fall when the range closed. Then primarily hitting foam balls indoors using a swing speed monitor as feedback. Between the range closing and the snow flying I did buy an R10 and hit a few balls into a backyard net. The heat map concept is a graphical representation of efficiency (smash factor) loss mapped onto the face of the club. As I understand it to make the representation agnostic to swing speed or other golfer specific swing characteristics. It is more a graphical tool not a data tool. The areas are labeled numerically in discrete 1% increments while the raw data is changing at ~0.0017%/mm and these changes are represented as subtle changes in color across those discrete areas. The only data we care about in terms of the heat map is the 1.3 to 1.24 SF loss and where was the strike location on the face - 16mm heal and 5mm low. From the video the SF loss is 4.6% looking up 16mm heal and 5mm low on the heat map it is on the edge of where the map changes from 3% loss to 4%. For that data point in the video, 16mm heal, 5mm low, 71.3 mph swing speed (reference was 71.4 mph), the distance loss was 7.2% or 9 yards, 125 reference distance down to 116. However, distance loss is not part of a heat map discussion. Distance loss will be specific to the golfers swing characteristics not the club. What I was trying to convey was that I do not have enough information to determine good or bad. Are the two systems referencing strike location the same? How accurate are the two systems in measuring even if they are referencing from the same location? What variation might have been introduced by the club delivery on the shot I picked vs the reference set of shots? However, based on the data I do have and making some assumptions and guesses the results seem ok, within reason, a good place to start from and possibly refine. I do not see what is wrong with 70mph 7 iron, although that is one of my other areas of questioning. The title of the video has slow swing speed in all caps, and it seems like the videos I watch define 7i slow, medium, and fast as 70, 80, and 90. The whole question of mid iron swing speed and the implications for a players game and equipment choices is of interest to me as (according to my swing speed meter) over my ~decade break I lost 30mph swing speed on mine.
    • Maxfli, Maltby, Golfworks, all under the Dicks/Golf Galaxy umbrella... it's all a bit confounding. Looking at the pictures, they all look very, very similar in their design. I suspect they're the same club, manufactured in the same factory in China, just with different badging.  The whacky pricing structure has soured me, so I'll just cool my heels a bit. The new Mizuno's will be available to test very soon. I'm in no rush.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.