Jump to content
IGNORED

"Players" Irons vs "game impovement" Irons to a beginner


Bradbar
Note: This thread is 4248 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Hello,

I revently got into golf around a month or so ago and before really knowing anything about clubs I purchased a set of used Ping I-10's.  Since than I have had multiplule people tell me that my skill level is not good enough for the clubs I am using and I would get more out of "game inprovement" irons.  I know I am just beginning but feel I am progressing rather quickly and find it hard to believe that there can be that big a different between I-10's and something like a G-15 (which someone suggested to me).  Is this true and would it be worth it for me to look at trying to switch to a more "game improvement" iron?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


IMHO, the Ping I-10 is a game improvement iron.  While it might not be as forgiving as the G-15, it is a long way from a Mizuno MP69 or any other forged blade.  I think you will be just fine using that set.

Craig 

Yeah, wanna make 14 dollars the hard way?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Agree with lumpuckeroo.  I never could get below about a 15 handicap with true game improvement irons, and my best guess is that it was because i didn't get the feedback from bad contact and inconsistent swings that i get with mid-level to player's irons.  I switched to Ping I5's and over about a 2 month (frustrating at first) period I dropped to about an 11 handicap, and then dropped to about 7.5 over a few months when I switched to Mizuno MP-32's a year later.  Granted, a lot of it is confidence and head games, but the I-10's are a nice blend of forgiving while still providing the feedback to help you know when you don't make good contact and need to make adjustments.  Switching to the mid to player's irons forced me to pay closer attention to the details of my swing which in turn made me a better golfer.  Of course, all that assumes you can put in the time to work with them on the range.  I recently re-gripped and switched back to my I5's because I wasn't playing enough to hit my MP-32's and 710 MB's consistently well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by lumpuckeroo

IMHO, the Ping I-10 is a game improvement iron.  While it might not be as forgiving as the G-15, it is a long way from a Mizuno MP69 or any other forged blade.  I think you will be just fine using that set.

Agree.  I played forever with Titleist cavity backs that were, I assume, in the "players iron" category, but I assumed that they had decent forgiveness because they were cavity backs.  I just got some i20's and now I can tell you that the forgiveness of the Titleist (speaking primarily of toe-hits here) was virtually non existent in comparison.

I don't know i10's but will assume that they are just an earlier version of i20's, in which case I think you have some fine clubs there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Thanks for the feedback guys.  I recently had them extended +1" (i'm 6'-4" and my local golf pro said that it will help me maintain my spine angle) and since took them to the range once and hit them better than I ever have but it did not translate into the course very well.  I ended up chunking alot that round but I beleive its mostly due to the fact I have not had enough time with the clubs after having them extended.  Either way hearing what you gys have to say make me feel better about buying a set of clubs blind lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Do yourself a favor and don't worry about what category your clubs fall into......whether they are SGI, GI or Players clubs, the main thing is that you need to feel comfortable hitting them. I am a 20 Handicap and just recently went to get custom fitted for a set of Ping  i20's. After hitting them and the Ping G 20's, I decided to purchase the G20's because they felt more comfortable. I didn't care that they were GI irons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


The I10 carries a Maltby Playability Factor (MPF) of 560 and falls into the Game Improvement category. As tall as you are, you should be able to generate good leverage and clubhead speed.

If a beginner is having trouble hitting the I10 irons, then he might want to move into SGI or UGI category. But if you're hitting them and improving along the way, keep and enjoy!

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4248 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • So here’s the thing, you’ve treated the bunker as if it were GUR, which would actually be the appropriate course of action except you and your playing partners are not authorized to determine that for yourselves. The Committee in this case would be the golf course and in an ideal world, they would have handled their responsibilities and told you at the beginning of the round that X bunkers are under water, treat them as GUR. I’m actually ok with how you handled the situation in a casual round TBH but this is the rules forum and you asked about a rules clarification so there’s a specific procedure for that. As for your proposed rule, I don’t agree with the logic at all for the reason I outlined in my previous post. You are trading a bunker lie for a lie in grass for no penalty. And also, there are already rules in place that address the exact situation you found yourself in, including relief options for if the bunker was appropriately marked as GUR or not.
    • Someone asked would pros accept someone else keeping score. It’s done in every other sport. That’s what scorekeepers are for. It’s an antiquated rule. It’s fine for non-professionals.  I feel like there is a lot of resistance to rule in golf, as if these rules were brought down on stone tablets by Moses.
    • Y'all can appoint a few good men from your own league that have proper understanding of the rules or at least access the USGA rules (book, online, etc.) when necessary. They don't have to have some kind of official certification or blessings from any outside org/entity to my knowledge.  Yes, y'all could have collectively declared it GUR under F-16 as @DaveP043 posted as the self appointed committee and you would have been fine to drop outside of this particular bunker. Remember to not declare all bunkers as GUR on a wholesale basis. It is case by case only.  Now you might say 'who's got time for all that' (going around which bunkers should be declared GUR) then I can somewhat understand  your pain but at the same time you cannot fault the tedium of rules  enforcement as a general reason to declare them 'lacking in common sense'.  
    • Its simple, YOU are responsible for reporting YOUR score correctly, at every level of golf.  Do you imagine a top pro would really trust anyone else with his score? Without getting too far from the original post, the Rules have been revised every 4 years for decades.  They're continually evaluated, and most changes are in response to changes within the game.  BTW, if wind blows your ball off the green before you've lifted and replaced it, you play from wherever it ends up.  The TV call ins weren't a rule of golf issue, they were a PGA Tour issue, all in an effort to get the call right.  
    • Someone asked what I propose. I think if the bunker is full of rainwater, you get to drop it with no penalty directly in back of the bunker, so you still have a tricky shot of chipping over the bunker. People are talking about local committees and such which we just don’t have at our level. My league and playing partners gave the free drop with no issue. My original purpose of this post was just to understand what the “real” rule is, and I now know. But now I also want to encourage people to see that many long time golf rules are outdated and illogical, and hopefully encourage people to push for change. They made some changes in the last few years, so I’m hopeful the game I love will improve if enough people speak out. A lot to hope for posting in a little forum I know, but you have to start somewhere.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...